Government to use scab drivers and the police to break fuel strike

Tanker drivers in the UK have voted in favour of strike action over health and safety standards. The strikes are expected to take place over the Easter Holiday period to cause maximum disruption. The government has trained 300 soldiers to take over the duties of striking drivers and has vowed to use the police to prevent any 'irresponsible' picketing.

Submitted by working class … on March 28, 2012

This week, tanker drivers in the UK have voted in favour of strike action over health and safety concerns. The 2,000 drivers balloted are responsible for around 90% of the fuel delivered to petrol stations in the UK.

Strikes are expected to take place over the Easter Holidays in order to cause maximum disruption. It is expected to cause the biggest disruption to fuel supplies since 2001.

The government have responded in typical fashion by accusing drivers of putting people’s lives at risk, as Ambulances and Fire Engines would not be able to run. They have forgotten to mention that the Union have stated that emergency services would have access to fuel.

The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, Edward Davey, has said:

“The Unite ballot result is disappointing. The Government is strongly of the view that strike action is wrong and unnecessary. The union should be getting round the negotiating table, not planning to disrupt the lives of millions of people across Britain.”

“Our economy is just getting back on its feet and any action that makes that harder is totally unjustified”.

“With the London 2012 Olympics approaching, it is unacceptable and selfish to behave in this manner and jeopardise our international reputation.”

How selfish of the drivers to want industry standard minimum health and safety regulations?

The government has been planning for the strike action and has trained 300 scab drivers from the armed forces to take over the delivery of fuel. They have also stated that they will be using the police to prevent pickets from blocking depots or interfering with scab drivers.

It’s a shame that there has not been a move to link up the strikes with a fuel price campaign, but there is time yet.

[youtube]olxgJkayLr4[/youtube]
[youtube]AZidpiFbnTI[/youtube]

Comments

Chilli Sauce

12 years ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Chilli Sauce on March 28, 2012

I think we need to organise to support this. Are there set dates for the strikes yet?

801

12 years ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by 801 on March 28, 2012

Francis Maude being a complete cunt again:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2012/mar/28/fuel-tanker-drivers-strike-cameron

Kronstadt_Kid

12 years ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Kronstadt_Kid on March 28, 2012

Not sure if it has been mentioned on here but Wincanton fuel drivers were on strike in Jan and Feb over pay. The latest news I can find from it is from Feb 4, the strikes were suspended for further talks.

http://www.itn.co.uk/business/38379/Wincanton+fuel+drivers+strike+halted

http://union-news.co.uk/2012/02/wincanton-fuel-strike-back-on-over-two-little-words/

Wincanton warehouse workers in Swindon also held a 24 hour strike in response to the creation of a 2 tier workforce.

http://libcom.org/news/uk-workplace-struggles-roundup-december-2011-01012012

working class …

12 years ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by working class … on March 28, 2012

not seen any actual official dates yet

Steven.

12 years ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Steven. on March 30, 2012

Unite calls off Easter strikes:
http://www.scotsman.com/news/fuel-crisis-unite-calls-off-petrol-tanker-strike-1-2206347

baboon

12 years ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by baboon on March 31, 2012

The government have increased the driving hours of tankers from 9 a day, 56 hours a week, to 11 a day, 77 hours a week. I think that Unite must have agreed to this. If not, they don't look like opposing it at all. Restricting rather than increasing driving hours would have strengthened the drivers' hand in the short term.

And increased driving hours can't be good news for drivers. Apart from a bit of overtime the 77 hour week driving time (like the 56 hour) means working many more hours than this. It doesn't include breaks, tipping, loading, cleaning the tanker (essential if different types of petroleum are being transported) and other safety maintenance. At no time can the driver be out of sight of the rig and one of the main complaints of the workers is the onerous and awkward working hours which destroys family life. So the pittance in overtime is nothing but the further misery of longer hours.

Much has been made of the forty-odd grand pay of the drivers. This is the top rate and is bonus-related. Some shifts start at two and four in the morning. The tendency (which has been going on for 15 years under the auspices of Unite) is for sub-contracting to third-party hauliers on increasingly short-term contracts. "A race to the bottom" as one driver put it.

I agree with Len McClusky though (today's Scotsman). I think that the government tried to set the drivers up for a defeat (McClusky himself uses the example of the miners). But this incompentent bunch in government doesn't, at the moment, have the intelligence of the Thatcher regime.

baboon

11 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by baboon on April 19, 2012

The delegates have rejected the proposal and more talks are on. Because of ballot irregularities it doesn't look as if there will be any strike earlier than mid-May (unless there's a wildcat, which is looking increasingly unlikely).
The bosses have offered nothing on pay and pensions: "aspirations" for the first and "examination" for the second, according to today's BBC.
What has been agreed by the bosses and the unions - and this should come as no surprise - are equal opportunities, disciplinary procedures and trade union facilities.