Yank bun fight

37 replies
Joined: 14 Mar 06
User offline. Last seen 1 hour 25 min ago.
Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
madashell wrote:
Tacks wrote:
the world outside of Libcom

LIES!!!11

Seriously though, this looks potentially pretty interesting, any chance chuck and friends could have the twenty-seventh repeat of the "You're a middle-class union leader parasite!" "No, you're a middle-class dilletante who's just waiting for his trust fund to kick in" bun fight elsewhere? Illuminating and politically useful as it is.

What's a "bun fight?"

Joined: 10 Apr 06
User offline. Last seen 7 weeks 4 days ago.
Quote:
What's a "bun fight?"

It's when some argument ceases to be about ideas and is just about flinging insults or restating positions at each other, ie when it ceases to be a discussion.

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
Dundee_United wrote:
Quote:
What's a "bun fight?"

It's when some argument ceases to be about ideas and is just about flinging insults or restating positions at each other, ie when it ceases to be a discussion.

Oh good. I thought it was some sort of homophobic crap.

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online

Bun-fight, bunfight, bun fight:

If it sounds to you like a Victorian children’s nursery at teatime, that surely must be the original allusion behind it. Imagine children having tea, inevitably squabbling over the buns, teacakes, muffins and — this being a British expression — crumpets. Two similar expressions are known from the middle of the nineteenth century: crumpet-scramble and muffin-worry; these haven’t survived.

Interestingly, some of the early uses of bun-fight (these days, also often bunfight) borrowed the idea of afternoon tea in the nursery but left out the fighting: it could refer to the most decorous of engagements, such as those one was invited to by elderly aunts of the Wodehousian persuasion, at which squabbling over food was inconceivable. Then, as now, a bun-fight could more generally be any occasion at which food was served, it often being a sarcastic term describing rather formal ones for which guests had to dress up. In 1994, a newspaper report told of a British MP who turned up improperly dressed (in a lounge suit) at an engagement that was described as the “annual bunfight of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, at which black tie and decorations are de rigueur”.

Another sense of bun-fight, also still with us, borrowed the fight sense but left out the food. Often this refers to a heated altercation, but one that the describing observer feels is of no importance, rather like the nursery squabble that started the expression off.

Joined: 1 Mar 06
User offline. Last seen 5 hours 52 min ago.

Great post! cool i have always liked that saying - don't like it when the food aspect is left out of the equation.. wink

Joined: 15 Apr 06
User is online

Another wasted thread. Started off good, intersting and went down hill. This is why there's no more nefac-friends list in the US.

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
Lone Wolf wrote:
Great post! cool i have always liked that saying - don't like it when the food aspect is left out of the equation.. wink

I'm going to use the old version of crumpet-scramble.

If you've never been to vegas you'll have to trust me when I tell you how funny it'll be for me to start saying "crumpet-scramble" in actual conversation.

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
syndicalist wrote:
Another wasted thread. Started off good, intersting and went down hill. This is why there's no more nefac-friends list in the US.

Fucking crybaby. Remember when people from Jersey were tough?

Joined: 15 Apr 06
User is online

Duke, if you want to blather at the mouth, just do it as PM's to people.

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
syndicalist wrote:
Duke, if you want to blather at the mouth, just do it as PM's to people.

Mitch, if you want to whine like a tired old woman do it to someone else.

Joined: 14 Jan 07
User offline. Last seen 36 weeks 1 hour ago.

leave mitch alone. its sunday and his team isnt in the playoffs

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
Mathias wrote:
leave mitch alone. its sunday and his team isnt in the playoffs

The Pats are kicking ass right now. 21 to 3.

Joined: 25 Mar 06
User offline. Last seen 5 days 7 hours ago.
Quote:
Another wasted thread. Started off good, intersting and went down hill. This is why there's no more nefac-friends list in the US.

I agree entirely. This is exactly what happened to the NEFAC friends list and its really disappointing seeing this board declining the same way.

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
EdmontonWobbly wrote:
Quote:
Another wasted thread. Started off good, intersting and went down hill. This is why there's no more nefac-friends list in the US.

I agree entirely. This is exactly what happened to the NEFAC friends list and its really disappointing seeing this board declining the same way.

Totally. I can't understand why anarchism puts up with these clowns.

Joined: 14 Jan 07
User offline. Last seen 36 weeks 1 hour ago.

Yeah but who cares what you potheads think

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
Mathias wrote:
Yeah but who cares what you potheads think

That's uncalled for. Lets not turn this into a crumpet-scramble.

Joined: 19 Dec 06
User offline. Last seen 1 year 36 weeks ago.

fuck nefac.
fuck leftists.
fuck tom, mitch and even that canadian fucker mick.

They haven't organized workers and wouldn't know how to if they had to.

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
throwhen wrote:
fuck nefac.
fuck leftists.
fuck tom, mitch and even that canadian fucker mick.

They haven't organized workers and wouldn't know how to if they had to.

The Pats just got intercepted. Colts are going to the superbowl.

Joined: 19 Dec 06
User offline. Last seen 1 year 36 weeks ago.
thugarchist wrote:
throwhen wrote:
fuck nefac.
fuck leftists.
fuck tom, mitch and even that canadian fucker mick.

They haven't organized workers and wouldn't know how to if they had to.

The Pats just got intercepted. Colts are going to the superbowl.

colts vs. chicago...

midwest all the mother fucking way

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
throwhen wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
throwhen wrote:
fuck nefac.
fuck leftists.
fuck tom, mitch and even that canadian fucker mick.

They haven't organized workers and wouldn't know how to if they had to.

The Pats just got intercepted. Colts are going to the superbowl.

colts vs. chicago...

midwest all the mother fucking way

1st superbowl with two black coaches ever.

Joined: 14 Jan 07
User offline. Last seen 36 weeks 1 hour ago.

The working class rejoices

Joined: 19 Dec 06
User offline. Last seen 1 year 36 weeks ago.
Mathias wrote:
The working class rejoices

do you even watch football.
does buddha allow that or is it too much violence for your krishna ass?

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
throwhen wrote:
Mathias wrote:
The working class rejoices

do you even watch football.
does buddha allow that or is it too much violence for your krishna ass?

Mathias is a Hare Krishna? And a trade unionist? And an anarchist? Bizarre.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAbU-iBNuGw

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online

This is more of a muffin-worry than a bun-fight.

Joined: 13 Oct 05
User offline. Last seen 4 hours 51 min ago.
thugarchist wrote:
Remember when people from Jersey were tough?

no. no i don't. smile)

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
newyawka wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Remember when people from Jersey were tough?

no. no i don't. smile)

Having grown up in Boston I do not recognize the existence of your so-called "New York" in any way, shape or form.

Joined: 2 Jan 07
User offline. Last seen 37 weeks 3 days ago.

ah, libcom falls prey to the anarcho-labor no it alls of Duke, Mathias, and Chuck. not to dismiss their experiences, because there is much to learn, but these guys seem intenet on just making a joke out of @ist forums. they think their participation challenges and provokes, but in honesty it just becomes a bore. their answers are "look im in a million strong union, what does your little 10 person anarchist group have?". perhaps their insight could be usefull but they are not interessted in trying to build revolutionary anarchist organizations or movements or help devise strategy. a discussion that may start some anarchists talking about their labor organizing and approaches gets turned into a joke. come on guys, why even waste peoples time here, it's not like yall are actually interessted in revolutionary libertarian politics anymore, if you ever really were...

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
blackstarbhoy wrote:
ah, libcom falls prey to the anarcho-labor no it alls of Duke, Mathias, and Chuck. not to dismiss their experiences, because there is much to learn, but these guys seem intenet on just making a joke out of @ist forums. they think their participation challenges and provokes, but in honesty it just becomes a bore. their answers are "look im in a million strong union, what does your little 10 person anarchist group have?". perhaps their insight could be usefull but they are not interessted in trying to build revolutionary anarchist organizations or movements or help devise strategy. a discussion that may start some anarchists talking about their labor organizing and approaches gets turned into a joke. come on guys, why even waste peoples time here, it's not like yall are actually interessted in revolutionary libertarian politics anymore, if you ever really were...

Who are you?

Joined: 14 Jan 07
User offline. Last seen 36 weeks 1 hour ago.

As a life long jersey boy (Paterson NJ) my experience with NY'ers has been that it is usually transplants who live outside NYC, move there and then try fitting in by attempting to take on the accent (like writing new yawka) and talking shit about jersey as if this makes their kansas transplanted ass a real new yorker.

New York has become nothing but a playground for the bourgoise and their offspring.

Joined: 26 Nov 06
User is online
Mathias wrote:

New York has become nothing but a playground for the bourgoise and their offspring.

As opposed to when you were young and Chris Day was chief anarcho-rev?