Fascist Boneheads in Train Accident
Jan 15 2005 17:13
From enrager.net newswire:
http://www.enrager.net/newswire/stories.php?story=05/01/15/9012545
After a lot of confusion and last minute date changing (no doubt to keep anti-fascists off the scent), the National Front (NF) finally decided to have their march in Woolwich today. The march was held to stir up racial tensions following the horrible murder of white teenager Terry Gregory last year. His family have repeatedly said they want nothing to do with the NF or their politics. This was the one-year anniversary of Terry’s death, with the NF also holding a march last year.
One group of anti-fascists spotted two particularly ugly and badly dressed boneheads and followed them onto a train heading towards their meet up point. At the next stop, the boneheads were made to feel extremely ‘uncomfortable’ on the train and one fascist would later turn up to the march looking more than a little worse for wear. One anti-fascist sustained an injury, from the fascists attacking his fists with their faces!
The NF later held their march, bringing out thirty members (almost half last year’s total) and the Unite Against Fascism picket had around a hundred, with similar numbers of police. No arrests were made.
For more information about fighting fascism, contact Antifa www.antifa.org.uk
Jan 15 2005 20:33
#2
it doesnt beat the strangeness of this extract from a russian antifa action:
Quote:
At least 5 nazis got bottled on the head. And one nazi got hit with a computer keyboard (apparently as a protest against symbolic thinking in general
from here:
http://www.enrager.net/newswire/stories.php?story=04/12/15/1622243
Jan 15 2005 20:55
#3
Next they’ll be using the oldest one in the book:
‘the fascist was then promptly introduced to the pavement’
Jan 15 2005 20:57
#4
Well it beats fighting park police...
Jan 17 2005 16:32
#5
it's interesting to see the fascist with the dangerous face being described as a 16 year old on the NF website, i mean what are they feeding them steroids along with ugly pills in the NF youth section now?
Jan 17 2005 16:48
#6
In the days of Martin Webster there were lots of 16 year old lads in the NF...........
Jan 17 2005 18:30
#7
Looking at far-right message boards they're shitting their pants about this. Demanding better polics protection, more secrecy, saying how people aren't turning up to events, and how they need to arrange their own transport. Excellent stuff!
Jan 18 2005 15:49
#8
PaulMarsh wrote:
In the days of Martin Webster there were lots of 16 year old lads in the NF...........
i think you meant
"in the days of the NF martin webster was in lots of 16 year old lads"
Jan 18 2005 17:42
#9
kalabine wrote:
PaulMarsh wrote:
In the days of Martin Webster there were lots of 16 year old lads in the NF...........i think you meant
"in the days of the NF martin webster was in lots of 16 year old lads"
I think it's got something to do with the name martin?
Jan 18 2005 20:42
#10
Brighton Bomber wrote:
I think it's got something to do with the name martin?
Explain.
Jan 18 2005 23:51
#11
Scrapping with the fascists is the easy option.
Refuse to defend democracy.
It’s better to spend you energy terrorising Bolsheviks and give them a hiding,
The role of the Left is to attempt to direct proletarians into supporting the state.
Jan 19 2005 14:52
#12
vacant wrote:
Scrapping with the fascists is the easy option.Refuse to defend democracy.
It’s better to spend you energy terrorising Bolsheviks and give them a hiding,
The role of the Left is to attempt to direct proletarians into supporting the state.
what the fuck are you on about? 
Jan 19 2005 18:53
#13
kalabine wrote:
vacant wrote:
Scrapping with the fascists is the easy option.Refuse to defend democracy.
It’s better to spend you energy terrorising Bolsheviks and give them a hiding,
The role of the Left is to attempt to direct proletarians into supporting the state.
what the fuck are you on about?
I think he's one of those fascist-appeasing, individualist "the-left-is-just-as-bad-as-the-right-but-I'm-beyond-left-and-right-can-I-suck-your-balls-please?" type fuckers.
I give him about three days.
Jan 22 2005 01:33
#14
Three days of what, detention for not towing the line?
Or is this Enrager lark just an endurance test for teens?...sort of 'I'm an anarchist get me out of here!'
:red:
Jan 22 2005 10:57
#15
vacant wrote:
Three days of what, detention for not towing the line?
Three days until you get bored and start spouting incoherent bollocks somewhere else. Guess that was wishful thinking 
Jan 23 2005 00:13
#16
You bet!
Now give us some incoherent bollocks about Anti-Fascism.
I wanna learn all about it, and why not attack the Left?
:red:
Jan 23 2005 12:24
#17
Cos we are the left... duh.
Jan 23 2005 13:40
#18
Quote:
Scrapping with the fascists is the easy option.Refuse to defend democracy.
It’s better to spend you energy terrorising Bolsheviks and give them a hiding,
The role of the Left is to attempt to direct proletarians into supporting the state.
why is scrapping with fascists the easy option?
are you trying to say attacking fascists is somehow defending democracy?
where do you get the evidence that the role of the Left is to direct proletarians into supporting the state? You actually read any BNP literature? What do you think they are trying to achieve?
why am i trying to make sense of this?
Jan 23 2005 15:37
#19
You are the Left?
What, Left-Wing anarchists?
:red:
Jan 23 2005 15:49
#20
vacant wrote:
You are the Left?What, Left-Wing anarchists?
look pal, no matter how simplistic the left-right classification is, its pretty obvious that anarchists are on the left.
Jan 23 2005 16:08
#21
dammit vacant, you sussed us. your powers of perception have cut to the heart of enrager. you, and you alone, have finally perceived that the whole anarchist/libertarian thing is a front, to hide our true intentions. we are really a posse of city councillors (the real left).... onward you proles, we herd you into the arms of the beast. death is too good for us.
i think your trolling. now how about http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/enfantprovocateur.htm
unless you want to say a bit more about why you think what you think, put the red star down and back away slowly. beware of the bolsheviks.
Jan 23 2005 23:56
#22
Thank you for your cooperation.
Your positions are now made clear.
No further questions.
You can go now.
:red:
Jan 24 2005 00:02
#23
vacant wrote:
Thank you for your cooperation.Your positions are now made clear.
No further questions.
You can go now.
:red:
i cant pretend that i understand what your position is on all this is, but i have to admire the contribution you have made to this thread
:red:
Jan 24 2005 00:05
#24
He's a state asset. Much like CAG in fact.
Jan 24 2005 13:54
#25
I don't really see anarchists as part of the left. 
Also, can someone please remind me what the point of anti-fash actions like this is? I know there IS a point and a good one but I've lost sight of it. Surely these people will not change their politics beause they got beaten up will they?? Does it really effect numbers going to facist demos? I would have thought the far right thrive on this sort of physical confontation...
I spose its all good tho.
Jan 24 2005 14:05
#26
3rdseason wrote:
Also, can someone please remind me what the point of anti-fash actions like this is?
well this for a start:
John. wrote:
Looking at far-right message boards they're shitting their pants about this. Demanding better polics protection, more secrecy, saying how people aren't turning up to events, and how they need to arrange their own transport. Excellent stuff!
3rdseason wrote:
I don't really see anarchists as part of the left.
let me guess, because every grouping on the left-right classification is statist, and anarchists are anti-statist?
Jan 24 2005 14:12
#27
Yes I knew there was a point behind it.
and yes, thats why I don't see anarchists as part of the left. On the political spectrum anarchism isnt left or right its upwards (well maybe upwards and left )
Jan 24 2005 14:27
#28
3rdseason wrote:
and yes, thats why I don't see anarchists as part of the left. On the political spectrum anarchism isnt left or right its upwards (well maybe upwards and left
well communists believe in the abolition of the state (albeit after they have used it to crush the counter revolutionaries) so are they no longer left wing?
Jan 24 2005 14:32
#29
No they're just confidence tricksters. I think anyone who really believes the state can wither away without being attacked is talking crap.
The absolutely crucial difference is that anarchists are against hierarchy, not just capitalism. Communism is mainly about eonomics IMO.
Jan 24 2005 15:16
#30
Well if you take left vs right as in general being progressive versus reactionary. To crudely pigeonhole every political stance from far right to far left, you have fascists/nazis who want the dictatorship of capital, conservatives (with a small "c") who support the standard, smooth running of free market capitalism, liberals (including parliamentary socialists) who can see flaws in capitalism but hope to reform them away or keep them in check, and finally you have communist revolutionaries who want to see the overthrow of capitalism and its replacement with a system of mutual aid. So do you see how that's like a sliding scale from left to right?
Of course then there are individualists and that, but they're just rubbish.
Nice one.
But fuck me, the euphemisms are scraping the barrel here: "One anti-fascist sustained an injury, from the fascists attacking his fists with their faces!"