Box at start of article intrudes in to photo of Kafka.
Bit on his involvement with anarchist movement is a bit skimpy. There's far more than that written about it!!
Mar 19 2007 09:26
Mar 19 2007 10:01
Thanks, Joseph, I was just about to paste that Lowy website myself. Good if it could be incorporated.
Notice the comments about how "polite" the Czech anarchists were. Perhaps a couple of the posters on libcom could take a leaf out of their book.
Mar 19 2007 10:04
fuck off 
[/predictable schoolboy humour]
Mar 19 2007 10:06
Nice!
Mar 19 2007 10:08
Battlescarred wrote:
Perhaps a couple of the posters on libcom could take a leaf out of their book.
I hope you will be even handed and include yourself in that Mr Scarred!
Mar 19 2007 10:26
XXX@@@@*****youWWWZZZ****take a&&**^^%%$$££ to yourself!!
Mar 19 2007 10:27
John. wrote:
Battlescarred wrote:
Perhaps a couple of the posters on libcom could take a leaf out of their book.I hope you will be even handed and include yourself in that Mr Scarred!
no Battlescarred is big into Baudrillard, in hyper reality manners are more important on the internet than in real life.....
Mar 19 2007 10:28
In hyper reality you are Mister Potty Mouth Big Shot . In real life you are a cowering country mouse.
Mar 19 2007 10:32
Battlescarred wrote:
In hyper reality you are Mister Potty Mouth Big Shot . In real life you are a cowering country mouse.
yes because whilst you were acting like a n embarrassing uncle I wasn't actually having a political debate with Alf.
of course people are more abrasive on the internet, it's perfectly normal behaviour, definately less strange than being an uptight tube online but turning into Steptoe over dinner.
Mar 19 2007 10:36
No, don't excuse yourself, your behaviour on the Internet to people who you should regard as comrades is appalling. It's not perfectly normal behaviour, and your assumption that it is is astounding.
Also , don't make excuses that I stopped you having a debate with Alf. I hardly tripped you up when you were on the way to his table, did I?
Mar 19 2007 10:45
Battlescarred wrote:
No, don't excuse yourself, your behaviour on the Internet to people who you should regard as comrades is appalling. It's not perfectly normal behaviour, and your assumption that it is is astounding.
Also , don't make excuses that I stopped you having a debate with Alf. I hardly tripped you up when you were on the way to his table, did I?
You'd have had a hard time considering I was sitting at the same table as him.....
and whether my behaviour on the internet is rude or not is really of little import, especially as you are just as capable of being rude down right sectarian online. The diferrance is that I don't take this shit seriously and is why i'm happy enough to sit down and talk to almost anyone in real life.
Mar 19 2007 10:50
No, sorry, your behaviour online is appalling and actually does you no favours at all, especially as now and again in amongst the sectarian gibes and swearing, you sometimes make some interesting points.
And how does anything I have said compared to your over the top sectarian comments about practically every libertarian organisation or group on the planet?
Mar 19 2007 11:22
Battlescarred wrote:
No, sorry, your behaviour online is appalling and actually does you no favours at all, especially as now and again in amongst the sectarian gibes and swearing, you sometimes make some interesting points.
And how does anything I have said compared to your over the top sectarian comments about practically every libertarian organisation or group on the planet?
Sectarianism? I don't engage in sectarianism, i criticise things i think are shit no matter where they come from, whether it's the IWA, CGT, SAC, IWW, AF, WSM and even that coming from members of Organise! Sectarianism is an allegiance to a sect and the rabid denouncement of everyone not in it. Any criticisms i make of groups are based on what I see as fundamental principles of libertarian communism and working class self organisation, as such i'm as likely to criticise various groups in the IWA as I am the CGT, the IWW as much as the WSM. I will happily criticise the AF's analysis of anarcho syndicalism whilst at the same time defend youse from bullshit attacks and slanders. You might think the manner in which i do it is bombastic and over the top, but that's just me fucking about on the internet and if anything I think it's better than alot of the low level passive aggressive sniping and sectarianism that goes on.
My online behaviour is my online behaviour, it's meant to be somewhat ridiculous, i like to think that most people understand the joke.
Can comment on articles and discussions
not in the books i had to hand! i've just found this which i might try and incorporate some stuff from. yeah the box i'm not sure how to fix, catch/rkn?