OK so if we reorganise history, thought and library content types into one "article" content type, and rework history and thought indexes to be more portal-style - linking to other portals and generally being a bit more comprehensive for browsing through, then we won't have a library any more as such - since the library content that's about historical events will be in /history and the theoretical content will be in /thought. Anything that's not directly linked will fall through the cracks and only be available via an /articles or /latest list of everything, or going via tags - but that happens with nearly everything now.
So, I reckon we should replace the library index with a navigation guide to the site, basically a catalogue. Basically a completely reworked version of: http://libcom.org/explore
This will have - links to search/advanced search/google site search/firefox plugin - maybe technorati as well.
Links to tag lists (I reckon we can re-work the tag clouds to use tabs so you can get different ones on different pages, also it should be possible to make views that work like tag clouds so we can make more useful ones).
Then a decent-working alphabetical directory.
And a working google maps as well.
Stuff like that. Main thing is to try to get the respective elements looking decent, then make a panel which draws them together so they're easily accessible from one page - then we can probably remove the /library link from the top menu, and stick this new panel under the explore link.
How's that sound?



Can comment on articles and discussions
Yeah, I like the idea of the library as a general catalogue of stuff on the site and the history section being a series of portals on different events/topics. I'm slightly worried about the idea of making /thought just a list of links to other articles though. I know that at the moment the thought section is pretty shite but the idea behind it (providing introductory texts on different theories we like or don't like as well as simple libertarian communist ideas on everyday issues) is essential to the site in my opinion.
I mean, if I was a young Leninist struggling with the contradictions within it and you pointed me to an online version of 'The Bolsheviks and Workers Control' and some other stuff by Bakunin I might find it a bit much, read my nice and easy Chris Harman pamphlet on why anarchism is rubbish and leave it at that. I think we'd need to keep the easy intros very accessible on the site somewhere.
That said though, each portal could have an introductory text/s to get people started so I guess that might be alright. My main issue is that I don't want to lose the element of libcom which staggers the level of political development you need to have to use the site.