Bauhaus Exibition comments

6 posts / 0 new
Last post
Spikymike
Offline
Joined: 6-01-07
Aug 1 2012 13:35
Bauhaus Exibition comments

I don't think I will be able to see this exibition at the Barbican in London but noticed two short reviews as follows:

www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/socialist-standard/2010s/2012/no-1296-august-2012/culture-reviews-bauhaus-attila

and;

http://en.internationalism.org/icconline/201207/5066/success-and-failure-bauhaus

It also go a brief plug in the usually skeptical 'Jackdaw' art review journal.

Has anyone else been along to this or seen any other useful material recently on the Bauhaus from an anarchist or communist perspective.

Steven.'s picture
Steven.
Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
Aug 1 2012 13:57

I wanted to go to this, but it was pretty pricey and exhibitions are usually really boring. But I will have a look at those reviews shortly…

Cooked's picture
Cooked
Offline
Joined: 6-04-10
Aug 1 2012 16:18
Steven. wrote:
I wanted to go to this, but it was pretty pricey and exhibitions are usually really boring. But I will have a look at those reviews shortly…

yep this type of exhibition is usually pretty shit. I used to be able to go for free through work so I've seen far to many.

What might be interesting in this case though is to see how the school developed. Many don't know about the early Weimar stuff and how it was more experimental and had broader scope politically, socially and artistically. Not quite as geared towards capitalist production.

The text at internationalism muddles a few things. The International Style is a very specific "manufactured" concept with specific rules created by Philip Johnson who was a mediocre and unprincipled architect with political/pr skills. He coined the term in something like 1935 so using it as a synonym to modernism or bauhaus is not very accurate.

The ideas of honesty to construction and materials is also overstated in the icc article. For instance concrete was a bit expensive and advanced so brick was rendered to look like concrete much like the russian constructivists mentioned in the article that made timber look like steel. Modern architecture was full of fakery and ornament (if industrial ornament). In fact early postmodernism was a critique of this lack of rationality. VSBA used the example of the Duck and the Decorated Shed to critique how in much modern architecture form didn't follow function. But form was representing the function in a expensive and irrational manner much better resolved by building simple buildings with huge signs och stuck on ornament. The logic is sound but the results are terrifying...

It looks like I'll be jailing minds the coming year so I had to practice wink

bastarx
Offline
Joined: 9-03-06
Aug 1 2012 21:09

Philip Johnson was something of a fascist IIRC.

Arbeiten's picture
Arbeiten
Offline
Joined: 28-01-11
Aug 1 2012 23:09

I went. Didn't like a lot of it, but came out with a new appreciation for Paul Klee. I don't know much about art, but it seemed to me that he was pretty different from the rest of the group.

Also there was some architectural drawings at the end with some hellish writings underneath about workers having finely tuned and measured apartments so they could enjoy rations of work and pleasure in equal measure.

Spikymike
Offline
Joined: 6-01-07
Aug 6 2012 15:24

In my continueing effort to link various discussions thought I'd mention the short text by A.Liies and M.Vishmidt that is Chapter 6 in the book 'Communization and its Discontents' which I've just got to reading, since it mentions the Russian Constructivists in reviewing various marxist analysis of the relationship between 'art' and 'work', 'exchange value and use value', 'production and consumption' etc and various critical artistic movements (not all radical in intention).

Had a few big words I've not come accross (and been too lazy to check so far) but was still useful in making various connections including one referencing the famous Lucas Aerospace alternative plan.

Also seemed relevant to the issue of whether communism is the abolition of 'work' or just 'wage labour' mentioned elswhere and perhaps even some enlightenment of certain Nihilist Communist critiques of the more traditiional self-management ideologies still around in our milieu.

I will need to give it another read sometime but others more familiar with some of the cross references in this text may be able to add comments here?

I might add some more comments to the other thread about this book when I've finnished reading it - and it's certainly not the easiest of reads.