I'm going to keep a log while I read. After reading I will type a little about what I read, and post it hear. Please comment. First post:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pY6CDiK49-hMPNdFLR4pezJmpGd6ddN1464LIRzBRv8/edit
Also my schedule:
introduction:
wage labor and capital
ABC's of anarchism
theory:
black flame
Cartography
The Idea of the State
Conquest of bread



Can comment on articles and discussions
Only if you have no idea how much work is involved. The difference between a 1000 page novel and a 1000 page history text is that once the novellist has finished writing, checked for language, style and any obvious plot howlers, the job is done. A history text can have one or more historical facts per paragraph. Each one needs referencing and checking. Where you are covering historical periods that lots of different historians have already written about, you can refer to their work and, to a certain extent, lean on their fact-checking work. When you are writing about history that most everybody else has ignored or not written about before, that verification job is orders of magnitude more laborious. Particularly when you are preparing a text that, for political reasons, is going to be read by a wider audience than the normal academic one, including a substantial section whose primary reading aim will be finding mistakes and factual errors in order to ground their attack on the text. That's without dealing with the bigger problem of having to continually review and adjust interpretations of the facts.
We're talking thousands, if not tens of thousands, of hours labour.