Reaching out to the youth

13 posts / 0 new
Last post
Ally_S's picture
Ally_S
Offline
Joined: 14-07-13
Jul 28 2013 09:06
Reaching out to the youth

I'm 19 years old, and I've been an anarcho-communist for at least two years. There are many reasons for my espousal of anarcho-communism, but one notable motivation for becoming an anarchist comes from my contempt for the way I've been treated by some family members, particularly my father. Ever since I've known him, he has completely controlled almost every aspect of my life via physical abuse, economic coercion, and verbal threats of abandonment, violence, eviction, etc. Worst of all, when he finds out that I am transgender and non-Muslim, he'll likely resort to even worse behavior e.g. trying to "cure" me of my transness and/or physically abusing me more than ever (I hate to say it, but even murder can't be ruled out - knowing the way he is).

I don't want any more kids and teenagers to go through what I have been going through. There are children who have it worse than me, such as those who are being sexually abused by their parents and/or relatives. And children whose atypical gender identity and/or non-straight sexual orientation is known to their parents, who abuse them for not being "normal." Such children deserve to get out of their abusive situation and start to rebuild their lives, recover, and thrive. They need someone to talk to, a chance to recover and thrive, and an escape from circumstances that no one deserves to face.

There are already organizations dedicated to serving youth in need of help. But they are all statist organizations, which I cannot work with for reasons that are probably clear to everyone. Like many others here, I wish for anarchist solutions to social problems, not authoritarian solutions.

So here is my question: how can anarchists go about helping the youth and reaching out to them via anarchist means? Perhaps it can be done through anarchist youth organizations, consisting of both youth anarchists and non-youth anarchists? I am very interested in suggestions you folks may have to offer, considering that I don't hear this topic brought up very often among fellow anarchists. I apologize if I'm coming off as navel-gazing or self-righteous - I just mentioned my personal experience to provide some added perspective (for lack of a better term) to the topic.

Mike S.
Offline
Joined: 28-07-13
Jul 28 2013 09:52

All I can say is, as far as unsolicited advice goes, if you think your father will murder you for being tans try your hardest to become economically independent ASAP and then put some safe barriers between you two. I'm not sure about how anarchists OR Marxists can help people through socialistic means under advanced capitalism- these immediate issues, such as the one you're facing, can probably be navigated within more liberal social justice means (rather than revolutionary communist theory/action) depending on where you live. If in America in a large city on either the far east or far west coast you may be able to find a shelter or free housing programs so as to escape any immediate threat an abuser may pose.

Some resources for people in Northern CA:

http://tgsf.org/2013/03/03/284951/

I'm sure you can find, in the US, rural farming "collectives" but this isn't necessarily anarchism in action or anything but a utopian sort of Owenite thing- that environment would probably be safer for people facing daily abuse. My experience is we've never had the funds to do any sort of large scale meaningful community work. It's rough when most of us are on the hamster wheel grinding out an existence. I'm not sure how much anarchists could do in so far as material/financial support, the focus has been on, as far as issues such as this, changing the way people think but I agree that's not enough. This is what capitalism does, it dispossesses us of the ability to even form viable community based alternatives to the nuclear family and capitalist relations. It's fucked.

Ally_S's picture
Ally_S
Offline
Joined: 14-07-13
Jul 28 2013 10:08

@Mike S.

Thanks for the resource! =] And yeah, I'm currently in the process of becoming economically independent - I'm currently working as a web developer in order to help start supporting myself. I also know people who are willing to let me couch-surf at their places temporarily (which means up to several months) if things get dangerous for me. So, fortunately, some things are moving in the right direction.

Anyway, you have a valid point about the hurdles anarchists must overcome in order to start providing such social aid in the first place. I understand that, just like an anarchist revolution, anarchist solutions to social problems can't simply be implemented with the flip of a switch. I still think that the kind of organization I speak of is possible, though, and I definitely think it's worth trying. At this time, it seems that how feasible an anarchist youth organization can be depends entirely on what specific purposes (as opposed to the very vaguely defined ones I mentioned) that organization has. And that perhaps implies that the burden of financial/material support can vary depending on what purposes such an organization may have. Maybe I'm overthinking/not seeing things straight here, but that's how I see it currently.

ultraviolet's picture
ultraviolet
Offline
Joined: 14-04-11
Jul 28 2013 18:35

i think it would be great if anarchists could do something like this. the various forms of abuse and oppression that so many children and teens face from their parents and other authorities in their life is such an important issue (life long wounds and warping can and do take place), and although there are services available, most kids don't receive the help they need, or the help they do receive is inadequate. if anarchists could help fill in some of the gaps, it would be good for the youth and also an opportunity to introduce them to anarchism.

but i'm struggling to think of what could be done, for basically the same reasons mike s. brought up in his post. effective programs require a lot of labor and resources, and in capitalism that means they require a lot of money. providing help for abused children and teens is something i've thought a lot about, but always in the context of "imagine all the great programs we could implement, or already existing programs we could spread/increase, after revolution."

the only things i can think of that we can do now are...
> collective houses subsidizing a room for teen runaways (this would bring everyone's rent up higher, but having a couch available wouldn't raise the rent, and even this is better than nothing).
> opening an alternative school for troubled kids (although obviously this is still connected to the state, since that's where the funding comes from, but it seems alternative schools tend to operate with a degree of autonomy)

ally, i think that it would be really great if you could do something around this issue... i'm not sure what that could be, but with persistence you'll come up with something. and if what you do is successful, other anarchists will notice and duplicate similar programs in their cities. it could really catch on.

bozemananarchy's picture
bozemananarchy
Offline
Joined: 28-12-06
Jul 28 2013 20:56

Ally_s,

A few things come to mind when reading this thread.

First it seems that folks have in their frame of mind very expensive service oriented type orgs. I understand, yes, actual stable housing is important, but its already been covered about how capitalism fucks that shit up pretty bad. Anyways, to take a quote from you. . .

Quote:
And children whose atypical gender identity and/or non-straight sexual orientation is known to their parents, who abuse them for not being "normal." Such children deserve to get out of their abusive situation and start to rebuild their lives, recover, and thrive. They need someone to talk to, a chance to recover and thrive, and an escape from circumstances that no one deserves to face.

That very important point can be something fully self-organized and supported by affected individuals and allies. I've heard of some support groups that were run by people basically fully outside of the communities they were meant to support. This isn't saying that they were bad, or bad things happened in them, it is saying though, that there was a good opportunity for self-organization missed. In such a self-organized support-group atmosphere, responsibilities and empowering roles can be rotated.

Further, I feel that any group of working-class people who need services from state/faith/ngo groups can use a combative organization to protect and further their interests within it. I really like the idea of benefit claimants unions and feel that some of these models can be exported to different areas, even to groups that receive services from NGO/faith groups. This could be really broad or really narrow too. On the broad side, a solidarity network type model for the solidarity and defence of transgender youth in everything from abusive relationships, hate/street violence, cops, exploiters, employers and landlords. On the narrow side, a union of transgender youth who are all participants in the same state-run/funded program that happens to always be underfunded/staffed or maybe has some problem within it that negatively affects the people who its supposed to be helping. A union that fights for more control and autonomy for the people that need its services. This could also be a way, when lacking montetary means to build alternatives, to fight to expand services (emergency housing is the example we seem to talk about on this thread). I think this kind of organizing sounds really tough, like all organizing really, but also something that could be started with little to no cash and a few energetic spirits. Meeting spaces can be found by inquiring to sympathetic orgs, rotating apartments or coffeeshops with quiet corners.

And finally, all the best in your struggle Ally_s! Solidarity!

-b

ultraviolet's picture
ultraviolet
Offline
Joined: 14-04-11
Jul 29 2013 01:49

love it.

bozemananarchy wrote:
Ally_s,

A few things come to mind when reading this thread.

First it seems that folks have in their frame of mind very expensive service oriented type orgs. I understand, yes, actual stable housing is important, but its already been covered about how capitalism fucks that shit up pretty bad. Anyways, to take a quote from you. . .

Quote:
And children whose atypical gender identity and/or non-straight sexual orientation is known to their parents, who abuse them for not being "normal." Such children deserve to get out of their abusive situation and start to rebuild their lives, recover, and thrive. They need someone to talk to, a chance to recover and thrive, and an escape from circumstances that no one deserves to face.

That very important point can be something fully self-organized and supported by affected individuals and allies. I've heard of some support groups that were run by people basically fully outside of the communities they were meant to support. This isn't saying that they were bad, or bad things happened in them, it is saying though, that there was a good opportunity for self-organization missed. In such a self-organized support-group atmosphere, responsibilities and empowering roles can be rotated.

Further, I feel that any group of working-class people who need services from state/faith/ngo groups can use a combative organization to protect and further their interests within it. I really like the idea of benefit claimants unions and feel that some of these models can be exported to different areas, even to groups that receive services from NGO/faith groups. This could be really broad or really narrow too. On the broad side, a solidarity network type model for the solidarity and defence of transgender youth in everything from abusive relationships, hate/street violence, cops, exploiters, employers and landlords. On the narrow side, a union of transgender youth who are all participants in the same state-run/funded program that happens to always be underfunded/staffed or maybe has some problem within it that negatively affects the people who its supposed to be helping. A union that fights for more control and autonomy for the people that need its services. This could also be a way, when lacking montetary means to build alternatives, to fight to expand services (emergency housing is the example we seem to talk about on this thread). I think this kind of organizing sounds really tough, like all organizing really, but also something that could be started with little to no cash and a few energetic spirits. Meeting spaces can be found by inquiring to sympathetic orgs, rotating apartments or coffeeshops with quiet corners.

And finally, all the best in your struggle Ally_s! Solidarity!

-b

Ally_S's picture
Ally_S
Offline
Joined: 14-07-13
Jul 29 2013 05:51

@bozemananarchy

To clarify, the kind of organization I'm thinking about shouldn't be limited to only transgender folks. Although it goes without saying that I'm all for an organization that is transgender-friendly, teenagers of all genders, races, sexual orientations etc. should be welcome.

I really like your ideas, though. From your perspective, I can see how at least starting such an anarchist youth organization is more feasible than some may think. Your suggestions for meeting places are also appealing, especially if they're more public (e.g. as you said, coffee shops with quiet corners). I'm glad your response is so descriptive and your suggestions realistic. ^_^

bozemananarchy's picture
bozemananarchy
Offline
Joined: 28-12-06
Jul 29 2013 13:43

Sorry about that Ally_s. Rereading I see you didn't really spell your vision out like that. You asked a pretty specific question!

Quote:
So here is my question: how can anarchists go about helping the youth and reaching out to them via anarchist means? Perhaps it can be done through anarchist youth organizations, consisting of both youth anarchists and non-youth anarchists?

My thoughts,

I think the best bet for reaching out to youth is actually for anarchist youth to organize around issues that affect working-class youth directly. My thoughts on organizational form would be either a specifically "youth" anarchist group, independent activity of a "youth caucus" within a larger anarchist organization or an economic/community organization (like the ones I described in my other post). I don't see any of these as mutually exclusive and would think that a political anarchist youth group / caucus would probably work to build those economic/community orgs.

Ally_S's picture
Ally_S
Offline
Joined: 14-07-13
Jul 30 2013 12:05
bozemananarchy wrote:
Sorry about that Ally_s. Rereading I see you didn't really spell your vision out like that. You asked a pretty specific question!
Quote:
So here is my question: how can anarchists go about helping the youth and reaching out to them via anarchist means? Perhaps it can be done through anarchist youth organizations, consisting of both youth anarchists and non-youth anarchists?

My thoughts,

I think the best bet for reaching out to youth is actually for anarchist youth to organize around issues that affect working-class youth directly. My thoughts on organizational form would be either a specifically "youth" anarchist group, independent activity of a "youth caucus" within a larger anarchist organization or an economic/community organization (like the ones I described in my other post). I don't see any of these as mutually exclusive and would think that a political anarchist youth group / caucus would probably work to build those economic/community orgs.

No problem! I can be long-winded sometimes, so it's no surprise that some people miss a few ideas I try to convey. I need to work on that.

In terms of effectiveness, do you think the more independence from other organizations, the better - in other words, do you think an independent anarchist youth organization dedicated specifically to community support would probably be more capable of serving the needs of young folks? Granted, as you say, the organizations you suggest aren't mutually exclusive - and I definitely think they are all feasible on some level - but at this time I feel that some would be more effective than others. What are your thoughts on that?

In any case, I think all of your suggestions are great so far, hence why I can't say much in response. You've given me a lot of good ideas, and I really appreciate that. Thanks! =]

bozemananarchy's picture
bozemananarchy
Offline
Joined: 28-12-06
Aug 1 2013 00:35

Well, All I've really got to offer is thoughts based my own limited experience (with little to no success in mass organizing) so hopefully some others will pipe in.

Hmmmm. .. A specifically youth oriented organization may have its appeal to young folk in that its all youth and they may feel more comfortable in an org without an adult/youth dynamic. So yea, if there is any advantage, it is that. However, being connected to larger organizations can be helpful in terms of resources (social and fiscal) and also being right there to plug into other work you find interesting as well. In terms of your specific question, the more or less independence = more effective thing is going to depend entirely on what larger organizations are around that you can see yourself as a member of. As in, some may be more conducive towards those ends and others may even be inhibiting to those ends.

Some more thoughts and a concrete suggestion or two, drawing from my experience;

I think that I have a better chance at being involved in organizing effective, goods-getting mass organizations by working towards those ends in a group with tight political unity. We know what we want, have enough folks to spread work around and now we struggle with how to get there I feel this is a good place and is my best hope at effectiveness.

I think that in your specific case, it would be plenty worth your while to get in touch with any already existing organizations that you think are worth your time (sorry, I've just assumed you haven't already done this). Maybe, just maybe, there is a group engaged in work that really excites you and may already be plugging away at something you would like to get involved in. If that is the case, I think that this would be the best bet at effectiveness. I'm sorry if this seems overstepping, but I would really caution you away from mainstream NGO type situations. Chances are, one of these groups is doing something you can get behind, but most anarchists coming from this background seem to talk of deep disappointments both in political content and end results.

Perhaps this won't be the case and you need to start from scratch. If you've already got your mass organizing idea or plan fleshed out, I would try to get at least two other folks whom you are tight with politically to toss in with you to try to get something started. Perhaps from this nucleus grows a specific @ org and/or a fighting mass organization.

However you go about it, all the best!

-b

iexist
Offline
Joined: 16-05-12
Aug 10 2013 01:49

If your dad mite kill you RUN. Get some where safe and get a restraining order, it's not a time for political theory.

Ally_S's picture
Ally_S
Offline
Joined: 14-07-13
Aug 11 2013 06:58
iexist wrote:
If your dad mite kill you RUN. Get some where safe and get a restraining order, it's not a time for political theory.

All right, I think I gave everyone the wrong impression. It's not that my life is at risk right now, or that there's a high likelihood that he'll try to hunt me down any day. It's just that, given his personality, I can't rule out the possibility of him being murderous once I come out to him. Right now I'm safe, though, and I have plenty of things I can do in the worst case scenario. In fact, at this time, things are going the way I want them to because I'm going to move away within the next two months. That gives me the luxury to think about larger life aspirations, particularly political ones. If I had my own well-being and safety at risk right now I probably wouldn't even bother writing this response.

iexist
Offline
Joined: 16-05-12
Aug 11 2013 13:26

Ah that makes sense.

Hope every thing works out. As a youth myself your post rings true.