UK "Winter of Discontent"

Submitted by syndicalist on 16 September, 2007 - 11:25.

Saw this BBC report. Is this more bark than bite? Is there more to it than simply wages?

"Unions back 'co-ordinated' action
Unions are warning of a 'winter of discontent' over pay
Unions have voted to take "co-ordinated industrial action" against the government over its below-inflation pay settlement for public sector workers."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics

16 September, 2007 - 12:18

I think it's unlikely there'll be any real co-ordinated action by the unions - at the very, very most a single 24-hour strike. Unison, the CWU, Unite - all their leadership have very close relationships with the Labour Party and will go out of their way to avoid too much embarrassment for Brown.

People are very, very pissed off though and it's more likely than it has been in the UK at any point in the past ten years or so I reckon. There's still a chance (although increasingly small unless there's a revolt by the CWU membership) that we'll see significant strikes in the post office, the civil service (PCS union) has been increasingly militant the past few years as well.

It is more than about just pay - postal service is facing major, major casualisation - 20-ish "strings" attached to the pay (cut) offer that would see the job changed beyond recognition.

http://libcom.org/forums/organise/uk-public-sector-pay-dispute-nurses-local-gov-civil-service-post-office-etc

16 September, 2007 - 12:29

There was no coordinated action by unions in the 'Winter of discontent' in 1979.
The unions opposed it, as they had made an agreement with the Labour government to keep down workers' pay.
Devrim

16 September, 2007 - 13:09
Devrim wrote:
There was no coordinated action by unions in the 'Winter of discontent' in 1979.
The unions opposed it, as they had made an agreement with the Labour government to keep down workers' pay.
Devrim

You know this thread is about Winter 2007 right? Although that statement may well be just as applicable this time 'round.

I don't think co-ordinated action by the unions even matters at all - it'll be a 24 hour strike at most, might even simply provide a pressure valve which prevents more efffective action spilling over in its absence.

Either way I need to read up on the 78/79 in the UK, there's not much out there to read though sad

17 September, 2007 - 09:51

If - and I think it is a big IF - unions do decide to ballot local government, civil service, postal and prison staff, then actually there will, following last week's TUC Congress be an attempt to coordinate action via the TUC's public services committee. Any dispute though will be nothing like 1978/79 as it is unlikely that the ballots will be for more than a series of one day strikes.

Following Unisons, Unite, GMB ballots and the RCN council meeting Saturday there won't be any action in the NHS this year. The point about union leaders being close to the Labour Party is spot on. Karen Jennings, Unisons head of health has just been elected a Labour PPC.

It is good to see an increase in militancy. It is depressing though that the unions are dragging their feet so much. The common issue is this year's pay offer and in most public service areas that was made in April - 6 months ago! I do think Brown would like a show down with the unions as it plays well with the Mail.

17 September, 2007 - 12:32

There's no doubt of a growing militantcy in the class on the back of the growing need of the bourgeoisie to press home its attacks. The unions are already gearing up their various divisive practices in order to confront this. As part of the ICC's involvement in the strikes of 79, I was in the Midlands where about 20,000 steel workers from Scotland and the North came on a massive flying picket. The coordinated action of the steel union, like the coordinated actions of the other unions were to attempt to stop the struggles united, isolate and divert their "own" workers away from any sort of solidarity. The steel unions actually favoured the setting up of "rank and file" committees in order to impose the union's will on the strikers. Once the union posters appeared everywhere, with the slogan "Solidarity!", the strike had been effectively isolated and beaten.

18 September, 2007 - 08:27
RPG wrote:
If - and I think it is a big IF - unions do decide to ballot local government, civil service, postal and prison staff, then actually there will, following last week's TUC Congress be an attempt to coordinate action via the TUC's public services committee. Any dispute though will be nothing like 1978/79 as it is unlikely that the ballots will be for more than a series of one day strikes.

Like I've said above, Unison will be balloting local govt. Any action will be for 2 days - members are very disillusioned with 1 day strikes, especially in London after the failed London weighting 4k campaign.

Quote:
It is good to see an increase in militancy. It is depressing though that the unions are dragging their feet so much.

It is depressing, but we can't expect any better, as they are our enemy.

19 September, 2007 - 11:10

BM Blob's account