Glossary *Read before you post*

26 posts / 0 new
Last post
Jacques Roux's picture
Jacques Roux
Offline
Joined: 17-07-06
Aug 17 2005 19:38
Glossary *Read before you post*

The question you are about to ask or definition you might be looking for might have already been defined on our Glossary which you can find at:

http://www.libcom.org/notes/glossary.php

Please check there before starting a thread we have probably had before.

Help us update the glossary

You can help us add new definitions, refine current ones, by collecting information from threads here or other sources and writing a short definition. Please use this thread to submit definitions to see if we want to stick them on the glossary page.

Rocinante
Offline
Joined: 12-12-05
Dec 12 2005 16:41

Hmmm. I am new round here, so forgive me, but I do have a comment about your glossary. You seem to put communists into two camps - Libertarian and statist.

I think it may be useful to subdivide the statist approach - you state that statist communists want to see the state wither away after a while. That may be true of many people. But what about those "communists" who believe that the state is the ultimate vehicle for communism, supreme and should remain (i.e. Stalinists)??

Just a thought.

Volin's picture
Volin
Offline
Joined: 24-01-05
Dec 12 2005 18:19

'Stalinism's a moot term, from their own point view there is no such thing -they're just Leninists. It was a definition given to them by their enemies, 'Trotskyists' especially (who often prefer being called Leninist) and although there are a few small, boring differences between the two groupings the concept of the withering state wasn't one of them...All State Socialists take the (absurd) view that, yeah sure a stateless society is lovely and that's what communism's about, but the capturing of Political State power by the 'working-class' is necessry in the mean-time. What they're associated with in practice may seem confusing but I asure you they told themselves they were heading for communism.

This cross-eyed self-delusion goes all the way back to Marx.

Steven.'s picture
Steven.
Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
Dec 13 2005 07:38
Rocinante wrote:
Hmmm. I am new round here, so forgive me, but I do have a comment about your glossary. You seem to put communists into two camps - Libertarian and statist.

I think it may be useful to subdivide the statist approach - you state that statist communists want to see the state wither away after a while. That may be true of many people. But what about those "communists" who believe that the state is the ultimate vehicle for communism, supreme and should remain (i.e. Stalinists)??

Just a thought.

Whether they want the state to wither away or not is largely irrelevant, since it never can. But didn't Stalin claim to want the state to wither away too?

dom
Offline
Joined: 27-10-05
Dec 14 2005 12:29
Quote:
You seem to put communists into two camps - Libertarian and statist.

Of course that is the distinction. Good communist ie Libertarian and Bad ones ie stateist.

What would be the point in spliting the bad communists into two groups.

Also were stalists really communist anyway. (wrong place to post that last bit)

Steven.'s picture
Steven.
Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
Dec 14 2005 13:16
dom wrote:
Also were stalists really communist anyway. (wrong place to post that last bit)

I think they were in that that's what most of them really wanted, just that can't be the outcome of their ideas...

Lazy Riser's picture
Lazy Riser
Offline
Joined: 6-05-05
Dec 14 2005 14:43

Hi

Quote:
I think they were in that that's what most of them really wanted

But is what they wanted worth having? Sell me one benefit of communism, libertarian or otherwise.

Love

LR

Steven.'s picture
Steven.
Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
Dec 14 2005 15:33
Tommy Ascaso wrote:
Equality, abolition of poverty...

That won't work on Lazy Riser.

How bout loads of these?

Lazy Riser's picture
Lazy Riser
Offline
Joined: 6-05-05
Dec 14 2005 15:55

Hi

Quote:
abolition of poverty...

Actually, I'm quite poor at the moment, so you may be onto a winner there. What especially communist thing do you recommend I do as way of increasing my level of luxury?

Love

LR

Lazlo_Woodbine
Offline
Joined: 26-09-03
Dec 14 2005 16:36

join a credit union, and generally share more

Lazy Riser's picture
Lazy Riser
Offline
Joined: 6-05-05
Dec 14 2005 16:53

Hi

Hardly "communist", I know Tories and Christians who'd recommend the same course of action.

Love

LR

Lazlo_Woodbine
Offline
Joined: 26-09-03
Dec 14 2005 17:22
Lazy Riser wrote:
Hardly "communist", I know Tories and Christians who'd recommend the same course of action

Yes, communism already exists in our everyday life and benefits everyone. That's what's so great about it 8)

Lazy Riser's picture
Lazy Riser
Offline
Joined: 6-05-05
Dec 14 2005 19:02

Hi

Quote:
Yes, communism already exists in our everyday life and benefits everyone.

Christians and Tories? And I thought I was sailing close the wind recruiting currency speculators.

Seriously, Credit Unions are in the tradition of Victorian Philanthropy not working class autonomy.

Love

LR

jef costello's picture
jef costello
Offline
Joined: 9-02-06
Dec 14 2005 19:17
Lazy Riser wrote:
Hi
Quote:
abolition of poverty...

Actually, I'm quite poor at the moment, so you may be onto a winner there. What especially communist thing do you recommend I do as way of increasing my level of luxury?

Love

LR

Sorry but unless you abandon capitalist notions of wealth and luxury then you will be poorer as a result of communism as this country is subsidised by the former empire.

Christianity, following from christ's teachings (which few christians do), is actually fairly redistributive and egalitarian.

Lazlo_Woodbine
Offline
Joined: 26-09-03
Dec 15 2005 12:16
Lazy Riser wrote:
Seriously, Credit Unions are in the tradition of Victorian Philanthropy not working class autonomy.

No, you're muddling up a series of developments that happened at the same time, including paternalism and working class mutual aid. Who is the 'philanthropist' that is needed for us to form a credit union?

As for recruiting, that's because you're seeing communism as a political movement, rather than an ever-present tendency in human society. Sucker tongue

Rob Ray's picture
Rob Ray
Offline
Joined: 6-11-03
Dec 15 2005 12:46

On the whole, as I get marginally better interest from a credit union and can loan at better rates, while simultaneously enabling others with poor credit ratings to circumvent banks/loan sharks, it seems a good idea to me...

Lazy Riser's picture
Lazy Riser
Offline
Joined: 6-05-05
Dec 15 2005 13:26

Hi

Yes, yes comrades, please cut me a little slack. I’m more than familiar with the operation of Credit Unions…

Quote:
Who is the 'philanthropist' that is needed for us to form a credit union?

The FSA.

http://www.abcul.org/page/about/settingup.cfm

Quote:
Discuss your plans with the regulators - The Financial Services Authority will need to approve your common bond and satisfy itself that your business plan and policies and procedures meet its standards

Talk about self management of your own exploitation. Now off my case, if you please.

Love

LR

Lazlo_Woodbine
Offline
Joined: 26-09-03
Dec 15 2005 13:30
Lazy Riser wrote:
Talk about self management of your own exploitation. Now off my case, if you please.

Stop point out when you're wrong? No thanks, it's too much fun.

How on earth is the FSA a 'victorian philpanthropist'. Because being registered with a statutory body is like getting a hand out from THE MAN!!!???///???1111!!!!!

confused

Lazy Riser's picture
Lazy Riser
Offline
Joined: 6-05-05
Dec 15 2005 13:31

Hi

Whilst I'm at it...

Quote:
Sorry but unless you abandon capitalist notions of wealth and luxury then you will be poorer as a result of communism as this country is subsidised by the former empire.

Christianity, following from christ's teachings (which few christians do), is actually fairly redistributive and egalitarian.

I seem to have found myself on the wrong side of the barricade. Honestly, this is so appalling I’m totally lost for words. Christianity and Thirdworldism. I've lost the will to live.

Love

LR

Lazy Riser's picture
Lazy Riser
Offline
Joined: 6-05-05
Dec 15 2005 13:34

Hi

Quote:
How on earth is the FSA a 'victorian philpanthropist'

Poetic license, comrade. You're not an ideas man, you're just a pedant. Not really.

Love

LR

Lazlo_Woodbine
Offline
Joined: 26-09-03
Dec 15 2005 13:35
Lazy Riser wrote:
Poetic license, comrade.

Ah. Was it a metaphor, as well?

Bluffer Mr. T

Not really wink

jef costello's picture
jef costello
Offline
Joined: 9-02-06
Dec 15 2005 23:47
Lazy Riser wrote:
Hi

Whilst I'm at it...

Quote:
Sorry but unless you abandon capitalist notions of wealth and luxury then you will be poorer as a result of communism as this country is subsidised by the former empire.

Christianity, following from christ's teachings (which few christians do), is actually fairly redistributive and egalitarian.

I seem to have found myself on the wrong side of the barricade. Honestly, this is so appalling I’m totally lost for words. Christianity and Thirdworldism. I've lost the will to live.

Love

LR

What?

Its true that this country is subsidised by others.

Its true that christianity is fairly tolerant if you ignore virtually all christians and the way they act. And of course the concept that he was the son of God.

Anarchoneilist
Offline
Joined: 10-12-04
Dec 22 2005 20:37
Rocinante wrote:
Hmmm. I am new round here, so forgive me, but I do have a comment about your glossary. You seem to put communists into two camps - Libertarian and statist.

I think it may be useful to subdivide the statist approach - you state that statist communists want to see the state wither away after a while. That may be true of many people. But what about those "communists" who believe that the state is the ultimate vehicle for communism, supreme and should remain (i.e. Stalinists)??

Just a thought.

I suppose you could divide commies into State Communists and State Capitalists?I can't imagine the state "socialising" the working classes without introducing a greta deal of sexism and xenophoboia. I tend to have a problem with society being strictly divided

so I tend to avoid the term "commiunist/sm" except to refer to primitive communism.

Libertarian tends to mean both a lack of state intervention in the economy and in people's private lives, though not necessarily a lack of government/state (but then you go into "American Anarchism i.e ancappery/Robert Novic etc )

Anarchoneilist
Offline
Joined: 10-12-04
Dec 22 2005 20:38

Er, just wondering , but why has it been saying 184 posts for the last 20 at least in my profile?

magnifico
Offline
Joined: 29-11-05
Jan 2 2006 21:40
Anarchoneilist wrote:

I suppose you could divide commies into State Communists and State Capitalists?I can't imagine the state "socialising" the working classes without introducing a greta deal of sexism and xenophoboia. I tend to have a problem with society being strictly divided

so I tend to avoid the term "commiunist/sm" except to refer to primitive communism.

Don't worry Rocinante, no-one else understands what he means either. Anarchoneilist, if you're going to talk gibberish please could you at least not do it on introductory thought? New people could get very confused.