Anarchopedia is expanding, and needs to expand more
Dec 6 2007 11:49
Anarchopedia is an internet open knowledge portal, similar to Wikipedia, but one geared towards working through
anarchist principles and providing information for revolutionaries.
The first article for English-language Anarchopedia has been written on 2004 November 29, and since then a lot
of development has happened on that open knowledge portal. It now contains more than 3000 articles on the whole
range of topics which can be useful to radicals, revolutionaries, or just information that is commonly censored
in today's society.
We are always looking for people who have dedication enough to help us improve the portal, come and join us on
Anarchopedia.org
English Language Anarchopedia: http://eng.anarchopedia.org/
Dec 6 2007 11:58
#2
ethical_anarhist, don't you have some very dodgy views on "child love"?
Dec 6 2007 12:03
#3
Ugh, the majority of articles on there look pretty dodge to say the least
Dec 6 2007 12:14
#4
guydebordisdead wrote:
Anarchopedia? sounds like a Hakim Bey project.
Funny you should mention that...
Dec 6 2007 12:16
#5
What is the purpose of a seperate anarchist wiki? Surely having our information in the main wikipedia site would be much smarter.
Dec 6 2007 12:20
#6
apparently wikipedia doesn't allow stuff on certain topics.
Dec 6 2007 12:24
#7
Looks good to me - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workers_Solidarity_Movement
Dec 6 2007 12:34
#8
who are they?
Dec 6 2007 12:35
#9
Jack wrote:
apparently wikipedia doesn't allow stuff on certain topics.
Man-Boy Love?
Dec 6 2007 12:35
#10
Jack wrote:
apparently wikipedia doesn't allow stuff on certain topics.
Man-Boy Love?
Dec 6 2007 12:36
#11
Oh no, they do
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nambla
Dec 6 2007 13:17
#12
Dosen't look to bad.
Dec 6 2007 13:25
#13
A NAMBLA logo. The capital M and lowercase b symbolize a man and a boy
Dec 6 2007 13:28
#14
Several articles fixed.
Dec 6 2007 13:29
#15
Dec 6 2007 13:48
#16
"Girl moment
Girl moment, or "GM" for short, is a term used by some childlovers to define any sort of interaction between an adult (who has a sexual orientation favouring female children) and one or more female children. The interactions are not necessarily illegal (although the definition of "girl moment" as used, could be reasonably applied to the commission of illegal activities), and can involve anything from merely an encounter at a bus stop, to a good deed (helping a lost child find her parents, etc), a birthday party, babysitting occasion, and others.
The contents of a girl moment usually focuses on non-sexually describing the events that went on in the day, and is applicable more as a descriptive narrative of an occasion, which someone who has a sexual orientation favouring female children could read and enjoy. Such moments are rarely sexually explicit, and their purpose is not (generally) to arouse the sexual appetites of its readers."
I think this picture needs to be added to the entry, for greater clarity on what we could be dealing with here.
Dec 6 2007 13:51
#17
Worth a thousand words
Dec 6 2007 13:55
#18
MJ wrote:
http://eng.anarchopedia.org/childlover
eh, it's fixed now.
Dec 6 2007 13:59
#19
Dec 6 2007 14:00
#20
Haha brilliant
Dec 6 2007 14:00
#21
Not a bad idea on the face of it, especially if it can avoid the controversie and edit-wars of the anarchist portal in wikipedia.
BTW, I completely replaced the text of the article on WSA, which was a stub at best and included a couple of gross over-simplifications.
Dec 6 2007 14:10
#22
interesting that this...
Quote:
Pedophilia, in no way, and under no variety of name, has anything to do with Anarchism.
...got reverted
Dec 6 2007 14:18
#23
Quote:
Not a bad idea on the face of it, especially if it can avoid the controversie and edit-wars of the anarchist portal in wikipedia.
Given that page is number one on google for anarchism - I'd suggest the time might be better spent on the edit war.
Dec 6 2007 14:18
#24
Between the child-lover entry getting 'fixed' within about 20 minutes and the animal liberation stuff on the front page I think I'll give that place a miss.
Dec 6 2007 14:20
#25
What the fuck? What kind of cunt would change that back???
Dec 6 2007 14:36
#26
well given as they left this link at the bottom....
Quote:
* naphtala's freesite "Freesite of self confessed pedophile."
i'd imagine the paedo-apologist kind
Dec 6 2007 14:41
#27
* Christian Sexuality "Pro-child-love, pro-polygamy, Christian opinion page....no pornography".
Dec 6 2007 15:12
#28
Anarchopedia has loads of articles on that have been nicked off libcom. If it's a pro paedophile site then we would definitely not allow any of our content on it. I didn't know the original poster here had anything to do with it - you still haven't owned up if you're the person who posts in places as "Volodya" and is a supporter of child rape.
I mean I know that you are, but you could still have the decency to admit it.
Dec 6 2007 15:28
#29
Wow. That's fucked up, who would of thought my simple pun would unearth a paedo. No platform his ass.
Dec 6 2007 15:39
#30
guydebordisdead wrote:
Wow. That's fucked up, who would of thought my simple pun would unearth a paedo. No platform his ass.
I laughed a lot when I saw that because I wrote my first post before you made yours! But yeah it's a bit of a giveaway.
Anarchopedia? sounds like a Hakim Bey project.