Batman: the Dark Knight

Submitted by xConorx on 25 July, 2008 - 17:13.

saw this the other day
it is very good

25 July, 2008 - 17:17

Yes.

25 July, 2008 - 17:32

Yes.

25 July, 2008 - 17:45

You were all hating on Heath when i started his death thread.. do you think he should be awarded the posthumous Oscar or not now you have seen his swansong??

25 July, 2008 - 18:01

He definitely deserves the oscar, hype or no hype.

25 July, 2008 - 18:08

off to see it saturday around midnight in the pepsi imax (daft huge 3D cinema attempt) and can't wait. So good to see Batman being done justice after these years of pain.

oh shi - 'done justice' heh heh. Like batman, the character, does justice and... Um. Yeah.

25 July, 2008 - 18:09

oh, a little worried they have chucked in 2 face/harvey dent this early on. If its the jokers film its the jokers film. 2 Face is a different and equally disturbing premise, hope he isn't wasted.

25 July, 2008 - 18:52

Apparently all the actors ('ceptin Ledger, obviously) had to sign a three film contract, so there will probably be a space for Twofaces's development. Have faith in Chris Nolan - his narratives are fairly tight, so it should be OK. I'm waiting till my mates are back from Amsterdam before I go, so no spoilers plz.

25 July, 2008 - 22:02

LW what the fuck has this got to do with hating on Ledger?
It's a good film and he is very good in it.

26 July, 2008 - 00:13

There was fancy dress showing at the independent arts cinema at the bottom of my road (lol brighton) but I couldn't get tickets. I hear its a very good film. I don't know whats so good about it, its only a superhero film? I will get back to once I've seen it.

PS Wall-e is amazing.

26 July, 2008 - 00:30
xConorx wrote:
LW what the fuck has this got to do with hating on Ledger?
It's a good film and he is very good in it.

Cos you were all really mean about his death and now you are all praising his work -seems a tad contradictory that is all. neutral

Jess

I bet Wall-E is amazing - only reason i haven't seen it yet is because i know it is part inspired by awesome 1971 film "Silent Running" which i found really moving as it is and i thought the cuteness of Wall-E might just finish me off. (embarrassing tears in cinema alert)

26 July, 2008 - 00:53

I started getting teary during the opening credits embarrassed its such a beautiful film.

26 July, 2008 - 00:54

*possible spoilers*

So...who's the villain in Batman 3?

For obvious reasons it can't be the Joker. The ending doesn't leave any loose ends that could pertain to Two-Face's possible return which is a disappointment since I wanted to see Nolan adapt the Long Halloween story arc in the same way he used Batman: Year One for Batman Begins.

The Scarecrow is still alive but while potentially formidable and frightening, he's kind of been shown to be a pushover for Batman in the last two movies. This makes me think that he'll only be used as a crony...perhaps in an Arkham related story arc. But even this seems unlikely since Arkham is best used to present Batman with a rogue's gallery of opponents and the last two movies haven't really given us much to work with (Scarecrow being the only one, really). A very unlikely but very cool possibility would be the portrayal of Scarecrow in the recently released Gotham Night animated short in which he is raising an army of street people in the sewers of Gotham.

In this particular short, Batman also encounters Killer Croc and it makes for a great fight scene...which is about all that Croc is good for. Bane would also fill this role but could be used as an actual character too.

Mr. Freeze would be a stretch but the level of technology seen in Nolan's vision may allow people to suspend disbelief. It would be wonderful to see the character redeemed from Arnold Schw(impossible to spell)egger's abomination. Perhaps he could be portrayed as a rogue weapons developer who had been working for Wayne Enterprises and managed to steal tons of freeze-related weaponry in order to lay a siege on Gotham. Keep in mind that anything short of apocalypse falls short compared to the first two movies!

This is an exceedingly short list considering the huge amount of DC villians one could choose from...but Batman villains are a unique bunch, generally devoid of any power apart from their own cunning and ambition. Nolan's vision of Batman's world makes the list even shorter: someone like the Penguin or the Riddler would seem boring after the degree of mayhem wrought by Joker in Dark Knight! Furthermore, their getups (that's Texan for outfits) would just look ridiculous. Perhaps the Riddler could be cast as a crony of the real bad guy...possibly as a computer hacker played by the guy from Doctor Who.

The only other realistic villain I can come up with would be the serial killer Zsaasz who is pretty scary...but not really capable of bringing Gotham to its knees.

26 July, 2008 - 01:08
Jess wrote:
I started getting teary during the opening credits embarrassed its such a beautiful film.

I'd be the same. Just looking at the stills is bad enough!! embarrassed

26 July, 2008 - 03:53

yeah it's sick, I reckon they will recast the Joker, what's he just going to sit in jail for Batman 3?

26 July, 2008 - 03:54
Quote:
yeah it's sick, I reckon they will recast the Joker, what's he just going to sit in jail for Batman 3?

Yes...even if not originally, they are going to do that now. You can't touch Ledger's performance. You just can't.

26 July, 2008 - 03:57

*spoiler*

I thought Batman was going to drop the fucker, that would have been better I think. That was awesome when he was falling to his death and just laughing 'ha ha ha'

26 July, 2008 - 04:13

It was awesome. However, remember what the Joker was saying about Batman completing him and how they were destined to chase one another forever? Straight out of Batman: The Killing Joke. Once again, Nolan is really staying true to the source material.

26 July, 2008 - 04:51

*spoiler*

Since Ra's al Ghul, Joker, and Two-Face are all dead/done (there'd be rioting in the streets if they recast Joker after that performance), some thoughts on villains.

Out:
Mr Freeze
Poison Ivy
Riddler
Penguin
Clayface
Killer Croc

Possible:
Scarecrow
Harley Quinn
Catwoman
Anarky

Top Picks:
Ventriloquist/Scarface
Bane

26 July, 2008 - 05:40

I still maintain that Mr Freeze would could be cool if he was just a renegade weapons scientist using ice-based weapons to hold Gotham under siege. The contrast of dark shadows on white snow would create some interesting cinematography.

Poison Ivy could be an eco-terrorist but they already did that one...and having a super-powered character stripped of their super-powers is pretty stupid.

The Riddler would be a cool supporting villain...he wouldn't really even have to wear green or anything. He could be really creepy and cryptic. Still, he doesn't have the oomph to bring Gotham to its knees the way film 3 will need.

Penguin is stupid.

Clayface is stupid.

Killer Croc is probably a bit far-fetched, true.

Yep, Scarecrow's still alive and may play a supporting role similar to film 2.

Harley Quinn? I seriously doubt it. Would they cast Fran Drescher?

Catwoman would really just waste time with an over-the-top love interest. She isn't a mass-murderer. I think she's pretty much just a jewel thief.

Anarky...like Robin but even lamer? Why did DC's 'anarchist' super-hero have to be a pre-teen dressed like a gay wizard wearing a non-Guy Fawkes mask?! Nice staff, loser.

Ventriloquist/Scarface? Nah. The current mob-bosses are so realistic that they really had to create some really nutso shit in order for them to even consider getting involved with someone like the Joker. I have to admit, though, the split personality thing could really be used to create a great performance. Still, the next film will be the third film of a trilogy. It has to be bigger and crazier than the previous two...and a mild-mannered dude with a deranged puppet probably won't cut it.

Bane...is a cool character but he doesn't really have any good storylines attached to him (even though he does break Batman's spine). I also can't see Nolan's vision including a steroid freak in bondage gear with tubes sticking out of the back of his head!

26 July, 2008 - 08:35

Hmm dunno because Nolan seems to be doing the names and personalities or the raw villains, but stripping out the gimmicks - eg. Joker doesn't use joker venom - which means for example that a poison ivy could be done without her needing to have toxic blood. So given that level of re-imagining, it could be various - though yeah penguin would be shit, as would catwoman and clayface. Tbh Mr Freeze wouldn't work either I think, not as a lead character.

It's not going to be scarecrow btw, because he's used on the side of the vigilantes in the opening fight scene and is clearly too pathetic a character now to be capable of running the third movie. Bane couldn't be used in isolation because he's not smart enough, they need smarts or they'll just get rolled over by batman's superior technology.

Black mask?

Quote:
a mild-mannered dude with a deranged puppet probably won't cut it

You can get some really deranged psychological stuff out of the master/puppet concept, I wouldn't rule it out.

There's also the possibility that several of the smaller/more realistic characters will surface at once, to continue the theme of escalation - that kind of diffuse chaos could be just as effective as the Joker's one-man band.

26 July, 2008 - 10:00
Saii wrote:
It's not going to be scarecrow btw, because he's used on the side of the vigilantes in the opening fight scene.

Hey? you are saying he is on the side of the vigilantes now?

26 July, 2008 - 10:53

I reckon they could do a reimagined Bane pretty cool if they did it based on Knightfall, surely? Maybe even combining elements from Venom (the book not the spiderman villain) into it...

It'd make a nice change - both the Joker and Ra's did things 'intellectually' (despite Ra's ninja skills, the film concentrated on him as a mastermind in the shadows type), whereas Bane would just be hard as fuck.

26 July, 2008 - 11:13
Tacks wrote:
off to see it saturday around midnight

A social life, you need one.

26 July, 2008 - 15:41

What the fuck are you on about Weeler?
Going out to the cinema is socialising. Weeler 2.0 is fail again.

26 July, 2008 - 16:09

I agree with Conor. Unless Tacks is going on his own.

26 July, 2008 - 16:10
Lone Wolf wrote:
I bet Wall-E is amazing - only reason i haven't seen it yet is because i know it is part inspired by awesome 1971 film "Silent Running" which i found really moving as it is and i thought the cuteness of Wall-E might just finish me off. (embarrassing tears in cinema alert)

Wall-E is really good.

26 July, 2008 - 17:51
Refused wrote:
I agree with Conor. Unless Tacks is going on his own.

Yeah but Weeler's idea of socialising is going out with 'the lads' and touching up 'some birds'.

26 July, 2008 - 17:57
Weeler wrote:
Tacks wrote:
off to see it saturday around midnight

A social life, you need one.

Everyone on this thread with opinions about the villain in the next film is a nerd and needs a life.

I went to see Wall-e on my own embarrassed

26 July, 2008 - 18:22

Who do you think the next villain will be in Wall-e 2? I reckon the massage machine will run amok...

26 July, 2008 - 18:24

Nothing wrong with going to cinema by yourself.
It's only bad if you crave constant acceptance and validation and can't stand to be alone with your depressive.
Personally I find the voices in my head fascinating and dead funny, their commentary during films is excellent.