Button, Steve + Gentle Revolutionary split
Mar 27 2006 18:48
Steve wrote:
JOKE!
Will you stop using long words that Joe doesn't understand? 
Mar 27 2006 17:42
#2
Actually it's far easier to take the piss out of you and your little whistle.
Mar 27 2006 18:45
#3
Steve wrote:
Actually it's far easier to take the piss out of you and your little whistle.
I really scared the **** out of you Steve, didn't I? 
"Don't ask, don't tell" sort of libertarian eh?
What a petty little bullying aparatchik you are...
Mar 27 2006 18:50
#4
gentle revolutionary wrote:
Steve wrote:
Actually it's far easier to take the piss out of you and your little whistle.I really scared the **** out of you Steve, didn't I?
What a petty little bullying aparatchik you are...
Why do you think you scared the shit out of him by joining solfed, then talking shit about it on the internet?
Do you think you doing this is a good thing?
Mar 27 2006 22:06
#5
Steve wrote:
Actually it's far easier to take the piss out of you and your little whistle.
what whistle?
Mar 27 2006 22:14
#6
the one he blew
Mar 27 2006 22:18
#7
It was truly deafening. 
Mar 27 2006 23:11
#8
pingtiao wrote:
Steve wrote:
Actually it's far easier to take the piss out of you and your little whistle.what whistle?
He claims that I don't like him because he was a whistle-blower who infiltrated SolFed and "the activist movement" to blow the lid on... something 
(He is a bizarre student fantasist)
Mar 27 2006 23:53
#9
John. wrote:
pingtiao wrote:
Steve wrote:
Actually it's far easier to take the piss out of you and your little whistle.what whistle?
He claims that I don't like him because he was a whistle-blower who infiltrated SolFed and "the activist movement" to blow the lid on... something
That's a lie. I never "infiltrated" anything. I did tell the truth about some things, but a few people here are babies who couldn't handle it.
Mar 28 2006 00:16
#10
gentle revolutionary wrote:
That's a lie. I never "infiltrated" anything. I did tell the truth about some things, but a few people here are babies who couldn't handle it.
But you've never said anything interesting or useful at all. You said the everyone in SF wasn't revolutionary enough, cos they didn't DO enough, even though the SF people I know have years of industrial struggle behind them, whereas you have a couple of terms of Uni, and it would seem a minor personality disorder.
Mar 29 2006 21:42
#11
Why no John in the title of this thread. 
Mar 29 2006 22:10
#12
Jason Cortez wrote:
Why no John in the title of this thread.
He split it?
Abuse of power I say.
Mar 29 2006 23:01
#13
Jef Costello wrote:
Jason Cortez wrote:
Why no John in the title of this thread.He split it?
Abuse of power I say.
John's not the only one who can abuse his power
Mar 29 2006 23:09
#14
Jason Cortez wrote:
Why no John in the title of this thread.
I split it before posting. Ha.
Mar 30 2006 11:48
#15
Catch wrote:
Jef Costello wrote:
Jason Cortez wrote:
Why no John in the title of this thread.He split it?
Abuse of power I say.
John's not the only one who can abuse his power ;)
Hey! You changed it! I only commented in the appropriate forum, i.e. I was uninvolved in the split. So I'm changing it back 
People seem more likely to make these kinds of jokes when CGT is concerned, personally I find it much easier to make fun of the CNT.