Favorite Anarcho-Videos

Submitted by thugarchist on 31 January, 2007 - 09:47.

The Flint Jones Story
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gGdoE5SjNM

Dancing With NicArchy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qe9UTSZ8AU

Schizowegian Wood (This Mathias Can Fly)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAbU-iBNuGw

The Wrong Br*dy To F*ck With
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3eG4WZ1Ghc

Teh McAnarBree Rulzz!!!11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOlTCm6gou4

Chuck Hendricks: The Movie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aScnsNrhEcQ

Crybaby Anarcho censorers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvNWtbtmpWM

Chuck H
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8slqkmbSz4

CHUCKO LOVE-O
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mo4m3nWWoU4

31 January, 2007 - 10:08

Bree for Moderator
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDiWM-QKWH8

31 January, 2007 - 10:54

wtf is this? You have pulled a bunch of pics of people and made apparently defamatory videos about them?

wtf is this kind of thing acceptable practice in the US?

I think you need a nice cup of tea and a lie down mate, jesus.

31 January, 2007 - 12:00

the one thugarchist posted is a piss-take that spilled out of the armpits of myspace

31 January, 2007 - 12:49

Why are they your favourites? They're all shit.

31 January, 2007 - 13:03

These are all hilarious, tacks don't be such a dry shite all your life.

31 January, 2007 - 13:11

For reference, which of these (apart from the 2 Chucks) relate to people we'd know of?

31 January, 2007 - 13:31
Jack wrote:
For reference, which of these (apart from the 2 Chucks) relate to people we'd know of?

At least 3 of the others post or have posted on Libcom but it would be unethical to put names to videos

31 January, 2007 - 13:32

These videos are more or less all Joeblack talks about in the pub.

31 January, 2007 - 13:34

Just realised there's a Flint, who I assume is Flint on libcom.

Ooooh, and the crybaby I assume I know who that is.

Are the pictures real? Fuck me, I hope so, Chuck is just as ugly as I'd hoped. Both of them, actually. grin

31 January, 2007 - 13:50

I should add that I don't really approve, apart from anything else if you search on youtube for NEFAC all you find is three of them.

Mind you searching for WSM also returns some odd results

31 January, 2007 - 16:48
guydebordisdead wrote:
These are all hilarious, tacks don't be such a dry shite all your life.

yeah sorry total sense of humour failure there.

Dunno how i managed to miss the hilarity of these videos - i mean photo's set to music with random bits of text? Pure gold. Definitely time well spent.

31 January, 2007 - 18:52
thugarchist wrote:
The Flint Jones StoryNEFAC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gGdoE5SjNM

Dancing With NicArchyNEFAC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qe9UTSZ8AU

Schizowegian Wood (This Mathias Can Fly) ABCF
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAbU-iBNuGw

The Wrong Br*dy To F*ck WithA-Word
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3eG4WZ1Ghc

Teh McAnarBree Rulzz!!!11 Baltimore Anarchist Union and that nw fed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOlTCm6gou4

throwhen: The Movie ex-nefac ex-iww
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aScnsNrhEcQ

Crybaby Anarcho censorersNEFAC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvNWtbtmpWM

Chuck HEx-nefac ex-iww
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8slqkmbSz4

CHUCKO LOVE-Oinfoshop
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mo4m3nWWoU4

Note affiliation and/or anarchist publication

1 February, 2007 - 21:57

did anyone's feelings get hurt by these videos though?

2 February, 2007 - 01:06
hirono wrote:
did anyone's feelings get hurt by these videos though?

Is that a joke?

2 February, 2007 - 02:34

I feel like you should explain the significance of the bear suit.

2 February, 2007 - 05:31
hirono wrote:
did anyone's feelings get hurt by these videos though?

Nah, I know my video stems from that time a few years back when I hurt Thugarchist's feelings, pushed him out of NEFAC, and later called him a crybaby. I don't pretend to know much about psychology, but I gather that by depicting me as a crybaby he has given himself an important coping mechanism. I just go along with it.

2 February, 2007 - 07:22
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
hirono wrote:
did anyone's feelings get hurt by these videos though?

Nah, I know my video stems from that time a few years back when I hurt Thugarchist's feelings, pushed him out of NEFAC, and later called him a crybaby. I don't pretend to know much about psychology, but I gather that by depicting me as a crybaby he has given himself an important coping mechanism. I just go along with it.

Wrooooooong. Mathias made your video. I'm perfectly happy acknowledging that I'm a whiney crybaby.

2 February, 2007 - 07:23
revolutionrugger wrote:
I feel like you should explain the significance of the bear suit.

Heh. I believe that NEFAC is putting out a Bear Suit Position Paper soon.

2 February, 2007 - 23:52
thugarchist wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
hirono wrote:
did anyone's feelings get hurt by these videos though?

Nah, I know my video stems from that time a few years back when I hurt Thugarchist's feelings, pushed him out of NEFAC, and later called him a crybaby. I don't pretend to know much about psychology, but I gather that by depicting me as a crybaby he has given himself an important coping mechanism. I just go along with it.

Wrooooooong. Mathias made your video. I'm perfectly happy acknowledging that I'm a whiney crybaby.

Really? Ah well, same applies. I scrapped some of his creepy porn posts (and a few that bordered on anti-semetic) in a MySpace group and he threw a hissy fit and denounced me as a crybaby bad man censor. I can live with that.

3 February, 2007 - 01:35

anti-semetic?

whats that?

Illustrate with the relevant examples please smile

3 February, 2007 - 01:41
Tacks wrote:
anti-semetic?

whats that?

Illustrate with the relevant examples please :)

Nothing serious. Just bad attempts at trying to be provocative and wind people up, which in the company of people who know enough to not take it serious its not a big deal but in a public group for anyone to stumble across... well, I wasnt real comfortable being associated with that sorta thing.

3 February, 2007 - 02:38
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Tacks wrote:
anti-semetic?

whats that?

Illustrate with the relevant examples please :)

Nothing serious. Just bad attempts at trying to be provocative and wind people up, which in the company of people who know enough to not take it serious its not a big deal but in a public group for anyone to stumble across... well, I wasnt real comfortable being associated with that sorta thing.

No no, please tell me about this anti-semitism. I am intrigued.

3 February, 2007 - 02:46
Tacks wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Tacks wrote:
anti-semetic?

whats that?

Illustrate with the relevant examples please :)

Nothing serious. Just bad attempts at trying to be provocative and wind people up, which in the company of people who know enough to not take it serious its not a big deal but in a public group for anyone to stumble across... well, I wasnt real comfortable being associated with that sorta thing.

No no, please tell me about this anti-semitism. I am intrigued.

Uh, I dunno, think Borat without the funny. I shit-canned the entire group so I don't have any examples off hand.

3 February, 2007 - 06:08
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Tacks wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Tacks wrote:
anti-semetic?

whats that?

Illustrate with the relevant examples please :)

Nothing serious. Just bad attempts at trying to be provocative and wind people up, which in the company of people who know enough to not take it serious its not a big deal but in a public group for anyone to stumble across... well, I wasnt real comfortable being associated with that sorta thing.

No no, please tell me about this anti-semitism. I am intrigued.

Uh, I dunno, think Borat without the funny. I shit-canned the entire group so I don't have any examples off hand.

Mathias is very offensive as a method of being provocative and then he crosses the line too much. But his views on judaism aren't anti-semetic. He's just more comfortable with the concept of religion than most anarchists so he can make those jokes comfortably. I love elders of zion jokes and khazar jokes and I'm jewish.

3 February, 2007 - 17:08
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
hirono wrote:
did anyone's feelings get hurt by these videos though?

Nah, I know my video stems from that time a few years back when I hurt Thugarchist's feelings, pushed him out of NEFAC, and later called him a crybaby. I don't pretend to know much about psychology, but I gather that by depicting me as a crybaby he has given himself an important coping mechanism. I just go along with it.

Wrooooooong. Mathias made your video. I'm perfectly happy acknowledging that I'm a whiney crybaby.

Really? Ah well, same applies. I scrapped some of his creepy porn posts (and a few that bordered on anti-semetic) in a MySpace group and he threw a hissy fit and denounced me as a crybaby bad man censor. I can live with that.

LOL what are you smoking. creepy anti-semitic porn posts?

3 February, 2007 - 17:17
Tacks wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Tacks wrote:
anti-semetic?

whats that?

Illustrate with the relevant examples please :)

Nothing serious. Just bad attempts at trying to be provocative and wind people up, which in the company of people who know enough to not take it serious its not a big deal but in a public group for anyone to stumble across... well, I wasnt real comfortable being associated with that sorta thing.

No no, please tell me about this anti-semitism. I am intrigued.

I hold the belief that the original Jews of the bible were a black African race and that white european Jews, just like European Christians, Catholics and Muslims are converts not original.

Religously this is not provocative for most people. Some Christians that are racist get upset because they don't like the idea of a Black Jesus, but in terms of religion there is nothing wrong with being a convert, in fact the Prophet Muhammad praised converts and declared himself the first convert.

However, for those who are Zionists, the idea that Europeans are converts causes a problem because they are trying to claim land on the basis of it being the land of their ancestors. Again, for those who are religous Jews and zionists it doesn't matter because their claim is that God promised that land to the Jews (converts or not). But many, or most I have met, are Athiest and hold on to the concept that the land they are taking from the Palestinians is just because it was originally their to begin with.

Therefore some anarcho-zionists have labelled be anti-semitic because I point out passaged in the Talmud, New Testament, Linguistics and anthropology that show the original Jews and Christians were black Africans and that Europeans are converts.

3 February, 2007 - 19:58
Mathias wrote:
Tacks wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Tacks wrote:
anti-semetic?

whats that?

Illustrate with the relevant examples please :)

Nothing serious. Just bad attempts at trying to be provocative and wind people up, which in the company of people who know enough to not take it serious its not a big deal but in a public group for anyone to stumble across... well, I wasnt real comfortable being associated with that sorta thing.

No no, please tell me about this anti-semitism. I am intrigued.

I hold the belief that the original Jews of the bible were a black African race and that white european Jews, just like European Christians, Catholics and Muslims are converts not original.

Religously this is not provocative for most people. Some Christians that are racist get upset because they don't like the idea of a Black Jesus, but in terms of religion there is nothing wrong with being a convert, in fact the Prophet Muhammad praised converts and declared himself the first convert.

However, for those who are Zionists, the idea that Europeans are converts causes a problem because they are trying to claim land on the basis of it being the land of their ancestors. Again, for those who are religous Jews and zionists it doesn't matter because their claim is that God promised that land to the Jews (converts or not). But many, or most I have met, are Athiest and hold on to the concept that the land they are taking from the Palestinians is just because it was originally their to begin with.

Therefore some anarcho-zionists have labelled be anti-semitic because I point out passaged in the Talmud, New Testament, Linguistics and anthropology that show the original Jews and Christians were black Africans and that Europeans are converts.

Didn't say you were anti-semitic. I said that sometimes you post dumb shit that could easily be interpreted as anti-semitic when your trying to be oh-so-shocking and provocative. Uh, and who are these "anarcho-zionists" you're talking about?

3 February, 2007 - 20:28
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Mathias wrote:
Tacks wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Tacks wrote:
anti-semetic?

whats that?

Illustrate with the relevant examples please :)

Nothing serious. Just bad attempts at trying to be provocative and wind people up, which in the company of people who know enough to not take it serious its not a big deal but in a public group for anyone to stumble across... well, I wasnt real comfortable being associated with that sorta thing.

No no, please tell me about this anti-semitism. I am intrigued.

I hold the belief that the original Jews of the bible were a black African race and that white european Jews, just like European Christians, Catholics and Muslims are converts not original.

Religously this is not provocative for most people. Some Christians that are racist get upset because they don't like the idea of a Black Jesus, but in terms of religion there is nothing wrong with being a convert, in fact the Prophet Muhammad praised converts and declared himself the first convert.

However, for those who are Zionists, the idea that Europeans are converts causes a problem because they are trying to claim land on the basis of it being the land of their ancestors. Again, for those who are religous Jews and zionists it doesn't matter because their claim is that God promised that land to the Jews (converts or not). But many, or most I have met, are Athiest and hold on to the concept that the land they are taking from the Palestinians is just because it was originally their to begin with.

Therefore some anarcho-zionists have labelled be anti-semitic because I point out passaged in the Talmud, New Testament, Linguistics and anthropology that show the original Jews and Christians were black Africans and that Europeans are converts.

Didn't say you were anti-semitic. I said that sometimes you post dumb shit that could easily be interpreted as anti-semitic when your trying to be oh-so-shocking and provocative. Uh, and who are these "anarcho-zionists" you're talking about?

There are anarcho-zionists everywhere. Sam Dolgoff was one.

I don't agree with the existence of Israel, to me its just another form of European colonialism, but I am neither Jewish or Arab so it is not easy to grasp all that is happening over there.

Having worked closely with Zionists over the last few years however I have gained acquired an admiration of them, especially Duke.

3 February, 2007 - 20:40
Quote:
There are anarcho-zionists everywhere. Sam Dolgoff was one.

Dude's real dead though. Don't think he can do much for Israel now. I've only ever met one genuine anarcho-zionist, but he's dead now too. Pretty sure it was a generational thing among some Jewish anarchists back in the day.

3 February, 2007 - 20:44
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Quote:
There are anarcho-zionists everywhere. Sam Dolgoff was one.

Dude's real dead though. Don't think he can do much for Israel now. I've only ever met one genuine anarcho-zionist, but he's dead now too. Pretty sure it was a generational thing among some Jewish anarchists back in the day.

We had an ABCF member in LA who was a hardcore anarcho-zionist. That guy Mobius who was a young protege of the first anarchist group I cofounded (Paterson Anarchist COllective) is also an anarcho-zionist. I know a few other ardent supporters of Israel who are also anarchist and or leftist but I don't know how public they are, many choose to keep it personal.

I'm not sure how confined it is to a generation. I think the Jewish people have done a better job than others of keeping the wrong done to them front and center in the worlds consciousness.