libcom.org keeping a UK focus?

99 replies [Last post]
revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04

Admin - split from here:

http://libcom.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=9435

rkn wrote:
I dont think the UK influence of the site should change... the forums... im ok with the international bit. But i think it should stay UK based.

why?

Surely this site is a perfect example of how human relations exceed territorial limits, how our shared experiances make farces of national boundaries?

I think you'd be overlooking one of the most positive things about this site, and I've been really impressed with the new batch of aussies/kiwis, and their experiances are very relevant.

Also the best thing Libcom did was the French anti CPE stuff.

rkn
rkn's picture
User offline. Last seen 11 weeks 5 days ago. Offline
Joined: 17-07-06
revol68 wrote:
why?

because we have to set limits on the stuff we can manage to do. And geographicaly is one way to do that. I'd rather focus it on something i know a little more about than stuff i dont know about. Also different things i.e. organise/listings/thought apply in different places.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
rkn wrote:
revol68 wrote:
why?

because we have to set limits on the stuff we can manage to do. And geographicaly is one way to do that. I'd rather focus it on something i know a little more about than stuff i dont know about. Also different things i.e. organise/listings/thought apply in different places.

yeah but it's not like you need to do the work?

i mean there are plenty of people from around the world who are welll capable of harvesting the info and spreading it. I mean the newswire is international as fuck.

I don't understand your last point. I mean I can see why u'd need different listings, but i'd imagine organising in New Zealand Starbucks is pretty much the same as organising in one in the Uk, and as for "thought" well i'm just baffled by that.

Steven.'s picture
User offline. Last seen 6 hours 45 min ago. Offline
Joined: 27-06-06

i don't think we should always have a UK focus. There's no political point to it, as we're internationalists. I think we should base everything on practicalities. Practically we who do it are all in the UK so it should focus here. However as discussed on some other thread I'd ideally like to hook up with similar groups across the world to tailor some content to their area: us.libcom.org / nz.libcom.org / ireland.libcom.org or whatever.

Re thought being UK-based revol, the evryday manifesto is. but still with people in other countries it'd be easy enough to split stuff up i think.

hmm but then i spose uk pages would still be uk ones, so maybe having UK in somewhere wouldn't be so bad...

Rob Ray's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 17 min ago. Offline
Joined: 6-11-03

Nah rkn's right, it's far better to do what's being done atm, ie. letting the international community do stuff if they want to, than aiming to properly cover the globe with nine people based in the UK (mostly Southeast indeed).

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Saii wrote:
Nah rkn's right, it's far better to do what's being done atm, ie. letting the international community do stuff if they want to, than aiming to properly cover the globe with nine people based in the UK (mostly Southeast indeed).

fuck yeah, i wasn't suggesting the current collective take it all on, rather that they just provide a space for internationals to do their own thing, and that this should be encouraged.

Steven.'s picture
User offline. Last seen 6 hours 45 min ago. Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
Saii wrote:
Nah rkn's right, it's far better to do what's being done atm, ie. letting the international community do stuff if they want to, than aiming to properly cover the globe with nine people based in the UK (mostly Southeast indeed).

while we are 9 people based in the UK there will never be an issue of us trying to cover the whole world, don't worry!

rkn
rkn's picture
User offline. Last seen 11 weeks 5 days ago. Offline
Joined: 17-07-06
Quote:
yeah but it's not like you need to do the work?

Uhh... no... but someone has to. And i dont see them very often. in theory there are lots of people, in practice there arent.

Quote:
I mean the newswire is international as fuck.

Yeah but most of that news isnt submitted by people outside of libcom, certain people spend a hell of a lot of time doing that.

Quote:
but i'd imagine organising in New Zealand Starbucks is pretty much the same as organising in one in the Uk, and as for "thought" well i'm just baffled by that.

Cos u cant take things out of cultural context, different ways of doing stuff exist in differnet places. There are different laws in different places, different traditions and structures to work in. A Starbucks here isnt always going to be the same as a starcbucks there. Again with thought the same ideas dont apply everywhere, obviously there are the underlying themes, but they need to be applied differently in different contexts.

John -

I agree with you it is down to practicalties. Practialy the 9 people who run libcom now, shouldnt run an international site. We all live in the UK, this is what we know about, we should do that. I would have no problem with oceania.libcom.org but that needs different people who are based in/ have experience of that area to get involved in some sort of fixed way and help out.

For example in the listings part of the site - i would rather have locally based people submitting content for their own region instead of people in london managing all of it. Again thats just practical.

User offline. Last seen 1 year 18 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 1-04-06

You guys really should consider branching out as far as possible. If you haven’t noticed this site is becoming a real focal point for class struggle anarchists in the anglophone world. Especially for America it’s important to have a central resource for class struggle anarchism. Otherwise we’ll get run over by crimethinc and the infoshop halfwits.

Practically speaking this could be a strain on resources, but all that’s required is an expansion in your collective. Create those subsections for Ireland, USA, Australia, NZ etc. I’m sure there are people here (myself included) willing to contribute content.

User offline. Last seen 22 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 16-10-03

It should keep a uk focus, it should be resource which is relevant to workers in the uk.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
WeTheYouth wrote:
It should keep a uk focus, it should be resource which is relevant to workers in the uk.

why?

whats special about UK workers?

What is this mythical thing that makes it relevant to UK workers?

I'd say that this site has shown just how irrelevant national differences are. Sure there are differences, but these differences are really as great within national territories as they are between them.

User offline. Last seen 22 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 16-10-03
revol68 wrote:
WeTheYouth wrote:
It should keep a uk focus, it should be resource which is relevant to workers in the uk.

why?

whats special about UK workers?

What is this mythical thing that makes it relevant to UK workers?

I'd say that this site has shown just how irrelevant national differences are. Sure there are differences, but these differences are really as great within national territories as they are between them.

Maybe becasue taking up loads of resources time and effort in global struggles is not as important as building a place for workers to organise in our own backyard.

Joseph Kay's picture
User offline. Last seen 47 min 1 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 14-03-06
WeTheYouth wrote:
Anarquistas Occidentales de Región Central

hmm grin wink

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04

except we have to to link our struggles internationally on order to effectively change shit in our own backyard.

Don't u think that the anti cpe protests have a great relevance to us in the UK, they have put the breaks on noe liberal reform in one of the largest EU members and that has repurcussions across the EU and the world.

Steven.'s picture
User offline. Last seen 6 hours 45 min ago. Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
WeTheYouth wrote:
Maybe becasue taking up loads of resources time and effort in global struggles is not as important as building a place for workers to organise in our own backyard.

But if workers in other countries developed their own bit of the site that would be "their own backyard".

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04

aye but I but they would just steal your jobs! the feckers!

I heard your a racist now father. Do we all have to be racists now? I fecking hate the greeks, they invented gayness!

User offline. Last seen 22 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 16-10-03
John. wrote:
WeTheYouth wrote:
Maybe becasue taking up loads of resources time and effort in global struggles is not as important as building a place for workers to organise in our own backyard.

But if workers in other countries developed their own bit of the site that would be "their own backyard".

true. but the main focus of enrager should be to build a resource for workers here, as anarchism in the uk desperately needs a voice in the labour movement.

Admin - branding correction angry ....so what

User offline. Last seen 22 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 16-10-03
Joseph K. wrote:
WeTheYouth wrote:
Anarquistas Occidentales de Región Central

hmm grin ;)

tis cool? no?

Steven.'s picture
User offline. Last seen 6 hours 45 min ago. Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
WeTheYouth wrote:
true. but the main focus of libcom should be to build a resource for workers here, as anarchism in the uk desperately needs a voice in the labour movement.

TBH I think it's more re-building a "labour movement" - one without the illusions of its predecessors.

And workers here are no more or less important than workers elsewhere.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04

what does that even mean??

why do we need a voice in the current labour movement?

It's fucking dead!

Social Democracy can't be fucked by to life by the terminal phallus of the present labour movement.

the labour movement I want to see, is an international one, a linking of struggles, something that our comrades in New Zealand and France can teach us alot about. The labour movement should be us!

User offline. Last seen 22 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 16-10-03
revol68 wrote:
what does that even mean??

why do we need a voice in the current labour movement?

It's fucking dead!

Social Democracy can't be fucked by to life by the terminal phallus of the present labour movement.

the labour movement I want to see, is an international one, a linking of struggles, something that our comrades in New Zealand and France can teach us alot about. The labour movement should be us!

All very nice. Would be wonderful for us to be the labour movement, but is that realistic right now? i dont think it is, we have to subvert the current labour movement and intervene as much as possible and at the same time build unions which can carry forward the struggle.

Joseph Kay's picture
User offline. Last seen 47 min 1 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 14-03-06
WeTheYouth wrote:
Joseph K. wrote:
WeTheYouth wrote:
Anarquistas Occidentales de Región Central

hmm grin ;)

tis cool? no?

si, es esta muy bueno senor wink sounds like an exotic foreign struggle - how do i get involved? wink

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04

seriously the current labour movement is unrecoverable, all we can do is try and organise our own networks of struggle, and intervene in actual existing struggles to try and win as well as pointing to an empasse away from the inertia of trade unionism.

and our networks are by necessity international.

Devrim's picture
User is online Online
Joined: 15-07-06

As much as I stressed before the responsibility of English speaking comrades, I am not sure if you know the effect your website has in other countries. Just two examples, I think will suffice. last week ı was arranging over the e-mail to go, and visit AKİ( Anarchist Communist Initiative) in Istanbul, and one of them said that it he had been following my arguments on this thread on the unions. Tonight, I met with people from my group, and one of them said that he had been following the argument on national liberation. Libcom is important internationally. Keep up the good work.

Also, five of us are coming over to the anarchist bookfare in London in the Autumn. When we are there I will peronally donate €100 to Libcom. I know that it isn't a lot, but our wages are a lot lowerer here than in England. I don't agree with everything you say, but you do provide a really useful service.

In solidarity,

Devrim Valerian

User offline. Last seen 22 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 16-10-03
Joseph K. wrote:
WeTheYouth wrote:
Joseph K. wrote:
WeTheYouth wrote:
Anarquistas Occidentales de Región Central

hmm grin ;)

tis cool? no?

si, es esta muy bueno senor wink sounds like an exotic foreign struggle - how do i get involved? ;)

come down pub on friday night.

Quote:
seriously the current labour movement is unrecoverable, all we can do is try and organise our own networks of struggle, and intervene in actual existing struggles to try and win as well as pointing to an empasse away from the inertia of trade unionism.

and our networks are by necessity international.

all we can do is abandon the current unions to piss all over the workers and build small organisations away from the ongoing struggle??? wtf. you need to be realistic, we are not in a situation to just leave the unions and build things ourselves we need to be as active inside the current unions as possible otherwise we will remain insignificant groups and unseen by the majority of workers.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04

only active in the current unions as much as we have to be, I mean yes, if there is a union in your place, join it for the basic cover, but in terms of organising and circulating struggle it will have be by passed 99% of the time. Infact the only way you can pressure unions into doing fuck all is if you force their hand by going ahead and making them follow.

User offline. Last seen 22 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 16-10-03
revol68 wrote:
only active in the current unions as much as we have to be, I mean yes, if there is a union in your place, join it for the basic cover, but in terms of organising and circulating struggle it will have be by passed 99% of the time. Infact the only way you can pressure unions into doing fuck all is if you force their hand by going ahead and making them follow.

And how do you do that by acting outside of the unions? anarchists need to have a presence in the current unions, we need to have as much influence on the shop floor and in the branches as possible, whilst at the same time building our own networks.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
WeTheYouth wrote:
revol68 wrote:
only active in the current unions as much as we have to be, I mean yes, if there is a union in your place, join it for the basic cover, but in terms of organising and circulating struggle it will have be by passed 99% of the time. Infact the only way you can pressure unions into doing fuck all is if you force their hand by going ahead and making them follow.

And how do you do that by acting outside of the unions? anarchists need to have a presence in the current unions, we need to have as much influence on the shop floor and in the branches as possible, whilst at the same time building our own networks.

i'm not saying outside and againstas a fucking principle, i'm saying that the only way you will win a struggle and actually show the relevance of your praxis is by actually extending the struggle beyond the limits of trade unionism. Thats what will be influencial on the shop floor, not passing meaningless motions at empty branch meetings, nor getting elected to long ineffectual husks of power.

catch's picture
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 27 min ago. Offline
Joined: 7-02-06

My views on this - I don't think we gain anything by staying UK focused, apart from maybe a higher concentration of UK users but we already have that.

We stand to lose a lot if we overstretch ourselves though, and an easy way to overstretch ourselves would be to lose our focus. I don't think our focus necessarily needs to be on the UK though, it should be on the type of politics and information that's here - and that's likely to stay focused by having people who're like-minded (to some extent) from elsewhere, rather than just more people from the UK.

The only thing I think it'd be impractical to expand into is other languages to any significant extent - if that ever became a possibility the best thing would be to help people set up another site closely linked to this one (like hosted), or a completely new section, because multi-language sites are usually very confusing.

I want to see people posting and reading news that's from their own situations or close to them from as many places as possible. I'd also like to see us as the main repository of contemporary social anarchist/anti-state communist theory and history internationally - we may be close to that, but there's a lot to go anyway.

What we don't want is people writing stuff about international struggles, or worse liberal geopolitics type stuff when they're completely divorced from it themselves, have nothing new to offer, and ignore what's going on down the road from them - this is the problem with nearly all anarchist/left sites at the moment and one we've been trying to avoid as much as possible by keeping a UK focus.

There are real practical limits to how much the present admin team can expand the site and keep up with what's already here, so any international expansion would require a lot of input from other people - it'd be impossible for us to cover it to any significant extent ourselves.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Catch wrote:
My views on this - I don't think we gain anything by staying UK focused, apart from maybe a higher concentration of UK users but we already have that.

We stand to lose a lot if we overstretch ourselves though, and an easy way to overstretch ourselves would be to lose our focus. I don't think our focus necessarily needs to be on the UK though, it should be on the type of politics and information that's here - and that's likely to stay focused by having people who're like-minded (to some extent) from elsewhere, rather than just more people from the UK.

The only thing I think it'd be impractical to expand into is other languages to any significant extent - if that ever became a possibility the best thing would be to help people set up another site closely linked to this one (like hosted), or a completely new section, because multi-language sites are usually very confusing.

I want to see people posting and reading news that's from their own situations or close to them from as many places as possible. I'd also like to see us as the main repository of contemporary social anarchist/anti-state communist theory and history internationally - we may be close to that, but there's a lot to go anyway.

What we don't want is people writing stuff about international struggles, or worse liberal geopolitics type stuff when they're completely divorced from it themselves, have nothing new to offer, and ignore what's going on down the road from them - this is the problem with nearly all anarchist/left sites at the moment and one we've been trying to avoid as much as possible by keeping a UK focus.

There are real practical limits to how much the present admin team can expand the site and keep up with what's already here, so any international expansion would require a lot of input from other people - it'd be impossible for us to cover it to any significant extent ourselves.

excellent points, catch! especially about the actual relevance of struggles. An international focus shoudn't mean every other page being about some awful nasty thing in a fucking papua new guinea, which we have no real power to effect. but an international focus like "supersize my pay" "MWR" or struggles against neo liberal reforms in which we can have some input and has a relevance to our own struggles is exactly what we need.

catch's picture
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 27 min ago. Offline
Joined: 7-02-06
Devrim wrote:

Also, five of us are coming over to the anarchist bookfare in London in the Autumn. When we are there I will peronally donate €100 to Libcom. I know that it isn't a lot

Er, that is a lot - just about pays for a year's hosting (although we need to get more expensive hosting so we don't disappear all the time). Hope we get to meet up properly when you're over and refund some of that donation in beer.