The middle class don't exist

116 replies
Joined: 14 Nov 04
User offline. Last seen 1 hour 27 min ago.

Well, maybe they do in a real and meanigful sense. First health and housing, now education. Ah well, some knew this already.

http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,,1718920,00.html

Joined: 27 Jun 06
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 13 min ago.

a: that article doesn't define "middle class"

b: if it did it wouldn't be the same even as "anarchist" definitions of it

c: it's obvious that better-off people do better in school, healthcare and just about everything else

d: other factors like nationality will have massively more effect than these small differences here. The working class - even in the bollocks sociological terms you're talking about - is international, and kinds in Sierra Leone or Sudan would do far far worse on all factors then British w/c kids compared to m/c ones.

Does this mean that "nationality" exists as an inherent quality of people? Or does this mean that "some workers are better off than others"? Which is just stating the obvious...

Joined: 23 Feb 04
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 12 min ago.

i think the term middle class is only useful for a) taking the piss b) understood as a tendency amongst the proletariat that is dependent on a number of factors c) a historical hangover from early capitalism and one which is increasingly being eroded in concrete terms yet continues to hold great ideological weight.

Joined: 27 Jun 06
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 13 min ago.
revol68 wrote:
i think the term middle class is only useful for a) taking the piss b) understood as a tendency amongst the proletariat that is dependent on a number of factors c) a historical hangover from early capitalism and one which is increasingly being eroded in concrete terms yet continues to hold great ideological weight.

And the idea of it is very useful for dividing the working class of course, and for the Blair/Thatcherites who say "the working class is dead, we're all middle class now". Using it as an insult if you don't believe in it - like you do - is stupid and counter-productive.

Joined: 6 May 05
User offline. Last seen 40 weeks 19 hours ago.

Hi

Quote:
other factors like nationality will have massively more effect than these small differences here

That would explain why all those middle class foreigners in fee paying schools do so astonishingly badly.

Love

LR

Joined: 27 Jun 06
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 13 min ago.
Lazy Riser wrote:
Hi
Quote:
other factors like nationality will have massively more effect than these small differences here

That would explain why all those middle class foreigners in fee paying schools do so astonishingly badly.

So you think british citizens do worse academically then most of the rest of the world's population do you?

Joined: 6 May 05
User offline. Last seen 40 weeks 19 hours ago.

Hi

I have no idea. The middle class exist as tenable reality. It might not be relevant to communists, but it is to me.

Love

LR

Joined: 28 Sep 04
User offline. Last seen 8 hours 40 min ago.
revol68 wrote:
c) a historical hangover from early capitalism and one which is increasingly being eroded in concrete terms yet continues to hold great ideological weight.

I was always led to believe that the middle class is a product of capitalism - a minority of the working class who are socially mobile. But I get the feeling I'm about to be told why I'm wrong. smile

Joined: 6 May 05
User offline. Last seen 40 weeks 19 hours ago.

Hi

What's Ben then...

Part of "the minority of the working class" or perhaps he's a "member of the ruling elite"?

He's middle class. He's probably a communist too.

www.faststream.gov.uk

Love

LR

Joined: 9 Feb 06
User is online

I've taken the faststream tests and got paid for it black bloc

Although judging from how easy they were I do wonder if they pick the people that fail them smile

Keep the pictures coming LR

Joined: 17 Jun 04
User offline. Last seen 11 weeks 4 days ago.

But what is the middle class? Who is the middle class? is it a cultural thing, or economic?

Joined: 28 Sep 04
User offline. Last seen 8 hours 40 min ago.

Well it's a sociological term if you ask me. They maybe materially more affluent than the "working class", but there's no difference in terms of their relation to capital.

Joined: 6 May 05
User offline. Last seen 40 weeks 19 hours ago.

Hi

Do you think company directors of 50-person firms share the same relationship to capital as their employees? Or are they "ruling class"?

Love

LR

Joined: 1 May 05
User offline. Last seen 19 weeks 5 days ago.
Alan_is_Fucking_Dead wrote:
Well it's a sociological term if you ask me. They maybe materially more affluent than the "working class", but there's no difference in terms of their relation to capital.

I thought they worked to promote capital on behalf of the ruling class. The equivalent of a vampire's Igor.

Joined: 6 May 05
User offline. Last seen 40 weeks 19 hours ago.

Hi

Some do. But two people can both be middle class and have different relationships towards capital. Someone can be middle class for lots of separate reasons.

The cost of enumerating the middle class is more than its benefit. Seeing as I'm not middle class then who is, and who is not, is irrelevant to me. Although, the fact that there is such a thing as the middle class, is relevant.

Love

LR

(Sorry for rapid edit)

Joined: 27 Jun 06
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 13 min ago.
Lazy Riser wrote:
Hi

Do you think company directors of 50-person firms share the same relationship to capital as their employees? Or are they "ruling class"?

What's the relevance of individual classifications of people? None. Institutional structures are relevant since they're the things that shape the world.

Lazy Riser wrote:
Seeing as I'm not middle class then who is, and who is not, is irrelevant to me. Although, the fact that there is such a thing as the middle class, is relevant.

You claimed that you were working class but a Sierra Leonian doctor was middle class. I think that shows up your analysis as pretty ridiculous.

Joined: 6 May 05
User offline. Last seen 40 weeks 19 hours ago.

Hi

Quote:
You claimed that you were working class but a Sierra Leonian doctor was middle class. I think that shows up your analysis as pretty ridiculous.

I think it is your "analysis" that is pretty ridiculous. The Sierra Leonian doctor is middle class, the UK forklift driver is working class. Don't take my word for it, ask either of them.

Honestly, I expect more for my frequent donations than your petty insults, John..

Love

LR

Joined: 28 Sep 04
User offline. Last seen 8 hours 40 min ago.
John. wrote:
Lazy Riser wrote:
Seeing as I'm not middle class then who is, and who is not, is irrelevant to me. Although, the fact that there is such a thing as the middle class, is relevant.

You claimed that you were working class but a Sierra Leonian doctor was middle class. I think that shows up your analysis as pretty ridiculous.

Well seeing as how Lazy Riser's more or less correct in sociological terms, surely it is sociology that's ridiculous??

Joined: 27 Jun 06
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 13 min ago.
Lazy Riser wrote:
Hi
Quote:
You claimed that you were working class but a Sierra Leonian doctor was middle class. I think that shows up your analysis as pretty ridiculous.

I think it is your "analysis" that is pretty ridiculous. The Sierra Leonian doctor is middle class, the UK forklift driver is working class. Don't take my word for it, ask either of them.

Honestly, I expect more for my frequent donations than your petty insults, John..

grin Sorry you can't buy me, LR

If you can explain to me how it would benefit me, or the majority of the population, to think of the middle class as an economic class rather and a cultural group please do.

Joined: 23 Feb 04
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 12 min ago.
John. wrote:
Lazy Riser wrote:
Hi
Quote:
You claimed that you were working class but a Sierra Leonian doctor was middle class. I think that shows up your analysis as pretty ridiculous.

I think it is your "analysis" that is pretty ridiculous. The Sierra Leonian doctor is middle class, the UK forklift driver is working class. Don't take my word for it, ask either of them.

Honestly, I expect more for my frequent donations than your petty insults, John..

grin Sorry you can't buy me, LR

If you can explain to me how it would benefit me, or the majority of the population, to think of the middle class as an economic class rather and a cultural group please do.

so are you seriously suggesting that ther is no economic correspondance between certain occupations and certain cultural aspects that are labelled middle class?

Joined: 27 Jun 06
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 13 min ago.
revol68 wrote:
so are you seriously suggesting that ther is no economic correspondance between certain occupations and certain cultural aspects that are labelled middle class?

Relevance? I'm a communist, I have a shared interest with all workers - those who have to sell their labour power.

Joined: 23 Feb 04
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 12 min ago.
John. wrote:
revol68 wrote:
so are you seriously suggesting that ther is no economic correspondance between certain occupations and certain cultural aspects that are labelled middle class?

Relevance? I'm a communist, I have a shared interest with all workers - those who have to sell their labour power.

the relevance is in understanding the contradictions and divisions within the proletariat, remember we aren't dealing with a homogenous working class, unity has to be created by the actual concrete unification of struggles, and surely trying to find points of division and deal with them is important. For example the tensions between teachers and pupils, the rioters in France and how some of their actions effected the wider organised working class.

Joined: 27 Jun 06
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 13 min ago.
revol68 wrote:
the relevance is in understanding the contradictions and divisions within the proletariat

There you go. Everything else you said is stating the obvious. And you know isn't related to LR's position.

Joined: 23 Feb 04
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 12 min ago.
John. wrote:
revol68 wrote:
the relevance is in understanding the contradictions and divisions within the proletariat

There you go. Everything else you said is stating the obvious. And you know isn't related to LR's position.

yes but the boundaries between the proletariat and other classes aren't solid they are fluid, and i would say there is a space where middle class is useful in describing these contradictary positions, for example proles who buy small amounts of property, small business owners, self employed people, lawyers, many consultants, pyschiatirists, doctors etc etc

Joined: 9 Feb 06
User is online
John. wrote:
If you can explain to me how it would benefit me, or the majority of the population, to think of the middle class as an economic class rather and a cultural group please do.

Do you mean "rather than" or "rather than a cultural and economic group"

The first one is obviously wrong and the second doesn't contradict LR at all.

Joined: 6 May 05
User offline. Last seen 40 weeks 19 hours ago.

Hi

John. wrote:
If you can explain to me how it would benefit me, or the majority of the population, to think of the middle class as an economic class rather and a cultural group please do.

This is an excellent challenge, and it will take significant investment to do it justice. Whilst I’m thinking about it though, imagine you had a wheelbarrow full of stuffed olives. I’m pretty sure that knowing that the people in the middle class part of town are hardly short of a few bob would come in very handy.

Where does middle class wealth come from? Middle class decision makers. Where does working class wealth come from? Middle class decision makers.

Ben: Middle class.

Love

LR

Joined: 17 Jun 04
User offline. Last seen 11 weeks 4 days ago.

The button said I'm too middle class to join SolFed cry

Joined: 9 Feb 06
User is online

but you exist so you obviously aren't too middle class.

Either that or someone's wrong

Joined: 26 Sep 03
User offline. Last seen 12 weeks 1 day ago.
John. wrote:
If you can explain to me how it would benefit me, or the majority of the population, to think of the middle class as an economic class rather and a cultural group please do.

You really want to drive a hard and fast distinction between culture and economy? I've heard of 'relative' autonomy but this is ridiculous wink

Catch and LR can tell you: it's all in CastrOl-idadis. Structures and patterns of management, or summat.

Joined: 12 Sep 04
User offline. Last seen 39 years 2 weeks ago.
Quote:
Well it's a sociological term if you ask me. They maybe materially more affluent than the "working class", but there's no difference in terms of their relation to capital.

Is a plumber who earns 80k a year drives a flash 50-60k car (probably a truck actually), lives in a big house and talks in a socially frowned upon dialect middle class? What if he takes his family on four foreign holidays a year?

What about a teacher, who earns less than the average UK worker's wage, can't afford to live where her workplace is in London and is applying for one of Johno's key housing thingmies? What if she spends her money on things like Bruscetta (sp?) and sun dried tomatos and only ever shops in Waitrose, Sainsbury's or M&S, but still can't afford to run a car and keep up her rental payments?

Working class/middle class is culturally relative. Money and actual status in the workplace are obviously important and (as people are mutable) much of the cultural things those two ridiculous examples I gave would be subject to change over time to take as people 'adjust' culturally to their actual financial situation (e.g. Eric the plumber, or more probably his wife, will probably decide it behoves them to start shopping at Sainbury's instead of Asda's) but you get the point, it's really more a question of attitude, deportment, culture, accent and educational experience.

In our community council we have people coming along every meeting about things which are affecting their own neighbourhoods which they'd like the community council to try and tackle. There are two groups. They go about things very differently.

One group of people comes along and moans about anti-social behaviour. This is a very real issue for these people. Cars are being burnt out in their street, numpties are running about having wild parties in the scheme late at night, arseholes are chucking furniture and TVs and so-on from the deckaccess flats at passing cars and people are being assaulted and mugged and having their houses tanned, their close doors kicked in, the windaes panned in etc. The way they approach it has been to moan at the community council that somebody should do something about it; the ones that come to the meetings have been angry about it but they've also been pretty passive and by and large people in the scheme as a whole are totally demotivated to do anything about it themselves (even tho it affects them day-in, day-out). By and large with a few exceptions they get ignored.

Quite another group from an area of posh tenemental flats and owner-occupied low to medium income flats come along and talk about the parking issues that their area is facing. Now these are a problem and the council has been utter dicks about how they're implementing the scheme. They didn't consult anyone sufficiently and they've put it into place partially in order to cause parking chaos and people are being charged large sums to park their cars in this area. These people have themselves an organised group which has been holding public meetings, doing petitions, firing emails, writing to MPs/MSPs/Councillors and all the rest. They've staged protests. They've gotten exceedingly angry about the issue. Not to be a tad harsh but it almost seems like it's been a wee experience for the people concerned. They seem to have been slightly shocked that the council didn't listen to them, that the various agencies walked all over them, and that nobody in authority had ears for their views. They've had to campaign to even be heard and it's meant they've thought quite deeply about what is to be done. When these people come to the community council meetings they tend to be listened to and their concerns taken on board. The council might not be listening to them but they've made damn sure everyone else is. Whether or not they'll succeed or not I don't know - they are very liberal.

Which of these two groups has a worse problem? Why is it that the folk from the scheme have been persistently ignored? I don't think it has anything to do with wealth directly.

Joined: 27 Jun 06
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 13 min ago.
Lazlo_Woodbine wrote:
Catch and LR can tell you: it's all in CastrOl-idadis. Structures and patterns of management, or summat.

Nah Castoriadis is a muppet. It's not as simple as order-givers and order-takers, cos everyone's a bit one and a bit the other. The structures we fit into, shaped by capital, are the things that force us to be one or the other wherever we happen to be...