Pick of the anarchist movement
Right, well there's a lot of great stuff in the anarchist press, from news of struggles in faraway places to cutting analysis of current events.
This is not the thread for them. This is for the shite, this is for the stuff that makes you begin to despair for what anarchism has become.
However this is not just for bitching, I reckon we can embarrass-out all the crap anarchist propaganda, so that in future, people will think twice before putting some random picture of a guy with an AK in a local newsletter.
All in a constructive fashion of course
Firstly, it looks like our comrade gangster reveals a little too much about his bizarre anatomy in The Blast, Northeast Class War Newsheet
The northeast looks to be getting it in the neck as further job losses kick the region in the balls
Then, in Wildfire, An anti-civilisation bulletin, which claims to be "a pan-european bulletin" (read: one Womble in his mum's house). It reports on the mutiny growing "inside civilisation's borders".
But what format does this mutiny take? Well see page 2
UKNovember 5th, nine chickens liberated
And later
November 13th, Oxford Lab employee's [note singular, note no mention of actual job] tires [sic] slashed
Finally, in a strange mix which manages to appear both vaguely homophobic and misogynist (but mainly is just a bit lame), a poor effort from our friends in CWF:

So come on, can anyone better that?
Would you please not post stuff like that? My boss is now wondering why I burst out laughing while "working" on my computer.
Finally, in a strange mix which manages to both both vaguely homophobic and misogynist (but mainly is just a bit lame), a poor effort from our friends in CWF:
So come on, can anyone better that?
Makes you wonder how we shift so many, there must be a lot of misogynist homophobes in the anarchist movement.............
Makes you wonder how we shift so many, there must be a lot of misogynist homophobes in the anarchist movement.............
I meant to add obviously it is neither of those things, but I think it is ill thought-out and easily misinterpreted...
I thought it was just one of the oldest and cliche'd type images around?
Explain what's homophobic about that. IMO it depicts the relationship between Bushit and Bliar perfectly
Freedom is my favourite anarchist newspaper, because it contains intellegent debate, and isn't stuck up it's own arse,
I have no real opinion on AF or indeed their paper, but the issue which had as a leading story how more people were pulling sickies and nicking stationery from work and then trying to claim this was revolutionary made me wonder whether I should have just collected beermats instead.
I have no real opinion on AF or indeed their paper,
Is this the most unintentionally hilarious quote of the month?
I have no real opinion on AF or indeed their paper, but the issue which had as a leading story how more people were pulling sickies and nicking stationery from work and then trying to claim this was revolutionary made me wonder whether I should have just collected beermats instead.
Alan, IIRC that article, "going underground" or something in resistance a few months ago, was not saying that was revolutionary but was that it was an expression of class struggle, albeit in a time where the collective organs of struggle (like the unions) have been largely smashed.
i don't think alan and subtle nuanced reading of texts go very well.
abit like cantdo and marxism.
I have no real opinion on AF or indeed their paper, but the issue which had as a leading story how more people were pulling sickies and nicking stationery from work and then trying to claim this was revolutionary made me wonder whether I should have just collected beermats instead.
Fuck off counter-revolutionary CAG scum- I wrote that.
I claimed quite specifically that it wasn't revcolutionary, but was symptomatic of the atomisation of resistance- as such it isn't capable of going further.
It sounds like an interesting article. I realise this is totally unacceptable behaviour for enrager, but I wouldn't mind reading it before I comment. Is it available electronically?
i actaully liked the articel pingtao, an attempt to understand the forms and limits of current workers struggles is much better than another shitey article going on about anarchism being an amazing utopian blueprint and then a wee bit on Spain 1936, followed by some dribble about how we need to smash both the state and capital.
Here is the original.
What has happened to resistance?According to the Office for National Statistics, the number of strikes fell last last year to an all-time low, with workers striking for only 500,000 working days. The unions themselves, once bastions of working-class resistance, have shrunk to cover only around 29% of the UK workforce. Increased casualisation of work means that 14% of us are temporary employees – with much fewer rights and no union representation. UK workers work the longest hours in Europe, and we get the least number of days off. It is not as if there is workplace peace- a poll by HR Gateway showed that two-thirds of workers don’t trust their immediate superiors, while 80% distrust their directors.
So, where is the resistance?
Resistance is all around us, but is less organised and more atomised than it once was. It is less immediately visible as political resistance, but not all political action waves a banner and marches around.
Last month, the Economist warned UK bosses that they were operating in the worst climate in Europe for theft (what they euphemistically call “shrinkage”). Britain has the honour of having the highest rate of shoplifting in Europe, and it is heartening to know that “shrinkage is increasing alarmingly in some countries and is generally on the rise” throughout the continent.
Despite the decline in union activity, resistance carries on at the point if production itself: the workplace. UK workers manage to take back £1.2bn a year from their employers though theft. Interestingly, employee theft also shows a pattern of targeting larger capitalists: 19% of firms with fewer than 15 employees have experienced staff fraud, with the figure being more than doubled (48%) for businesses with over 36 staff. This desire to take back what the bosses have stolen from us was highlighted in a survey by Leicester University, which showed that 70% of the 2,000 people questioned admitted they would steal from their employer if they felt that could get away with it.
It is not only the money and goods that our labour produces that we take back, it is also our time. What the bosses call “absenteeism”, and we call “sickies” is up to an all-time high of around 30% of total time taken off work. A recent poll indicated that a third of UK employees pull a sickie if they don’t want to go to work. Figures released by the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) showed that sickies cost businesses around £11.6bn a year.
The real figures for all these acts of resistance are likely to be much higher, as most of it goes unnoticed. How many don’t use company phones to speak to their families, use the internet while at work or knock off early when the boss is out for the day?
Capitalism is based on a contradiction that cannot be solved- bosses want to pay us as little as possible for the most amount of work, whereas we want to work the least amount possible for the most amount of money. It tries to reduce all human interaction to monetary exchange: to live we must sell our bodies and minds in return for a wage, which we then have to give back by buying a small proportion of what we produced. In reasserting our dignity as human beings, it is natural that we resist this exploitation.
These are all acts of resistance because they seek to go beyond this commodification of life, and meet human needs directly. Any action that tries to sever the link between capitalist work and life contains within it the seed of revolutionary activity.We must not forget that behind the world of offices of grey-faced workers, factories humming to the sound of repetitive drudgery and commodities kept separate from us by pricetags, there is a world of enforced slavery.
We do manage to go beyond this, every day. A world where work and life blend together, where human needs are met and exploitation ends is possible- we glimpse it in every act of resistance. The task before us is to link up with each other, and make our resistance as organised as possible.
Reading it again, it would have been better if i'd gone into the limits of that sort of activity more- but then Resistance isn't the place for that.
Thanks for that.
Oh Jeez. Sorry Pingtaio. I still felt the article was clutching at straws, but I guess that was kinda the idea. My memory's a bit hazy....it was like a year back or something wasn't it??
Well I see what you mean, but I think that it is important to examine the forms that w/c resistance has taken after the decomposition of union power. The dissatisfaction and alienation has resulted in a growth in certain forms of activity harmful to capital, and I maintain that these must be regarded as such. I don't think that they can lead to anything greater though, as they are isolated and atomised acts- gestures of futility I supose.
But they are still there.
What is your opinion?
I'm slightly wary of the phrase "working class resistance to capital", cos at the end of the day, it's just people nicking rulers from work and calling in sick cos they're hungover. Yeah OK it proves people don't like their jobs very much, but we already knew that right??
alan it's very important to look at those forms tho, the class struggle goes on everyday not just when there is a strike on. It's important to look at those forms of resistance and capitals response to them.
...for instance increased surveillance at work (next time you are in a supermarket, just check out where exactly the CCTV cameras are pointing), the recent decisions by ASDA (was it?) to stop paying the first three days when you are off sick, the Carphone Warehouse CEO decreeing that email was nolonger to be used by staff etc...
I think it was Tesco with the three days, but ASDA may have joined in.
aye, Tescos it was, cheers.
A ballad againt work is well worth reading on this subject.
Found this on resistg8.org.uk

"I too have a bloodust(sic"
"You can't tell I'm authoritarian because I don't have a pointy beard or moustache"
(nearly) all them SE anti-G8 posters and stuff are fuckin cool and dead proffessional and a bit arty too. good work whoever did em
(nearly) all them SE anti-G8 posters and stuff are fuckin cool and dead proffessional and a bit arty too. good work whoever did em
Please please pleeeease tell me you're joking - I've just taken a look through them, and I am just totally gobsmacked at their shiteness. I mean I know the Wombles are good at graphic design, but the content is so so so bad it's worse than cringeworthy. They're all aimed at a small clique within a tiny subculture, with no relevance to anyone outside of this clique (which contains maybe, what a maximum of 500 people in the UK).
Like this one for instance:

What the fuck does that mean
I mean even the text is awful. Here's the introductory G8 text on the sample site
In a world increasingly dominated by the commodification of images and the omnipresence of hierarchies, leaders and celebrities, the G8 summit becomes the re-enforcement of the powers that be, which dictate and order our lives. It becomes no more than a media circus, a convenient photo shoot dominating our view and reproducing our powerlessness.
Firstly, what the fuck does that even mean? And secondly, "celebrities"? Jesus help us...
Lol and just seen this, which is pretty ironic if they're trying to say Bush is stupid:


And finally, wow well not even Jack could spoof it:
That last one made me choke on my apple.
That last one made me choke on my apple.









