what is anarchism
i have always been the individual in groups to stand up and question everything. i believe heavily in buddhism, but also seek refuge in other religions. i think i would call that religious freedom.. i believe what i want, i believe in who i want.. and i am free to do so.
i view society similarly. i dont understand, though, how as "free" as this country is, how we really are not free. i believe that everyone deserves equality, everyone deserves the right to live according to their own beliefs and value systems without the interference of the state. i dont believe in laws.. or the set of constraints put on us in this free country.. which leads me to believe that is the reason i have always rejected the "norm". i live freely and spontaneously according to what my heart tells me is a genuine act of LIFE. that to me is living to the fullest extent..
i am finishing my first year of a creative adverising program. i went into the program loving the industry and as i learnt more about our consumer culture, i began to hate it. i am finishing this year and dropping out. this consumer culture disgusts me. the materialistic drones that walk around all day wanting more and more and more. why is it not enough? why is simplicity not enough?
i think i need an answer. this appealing alternative to the general view of the country pulls me in and excites me and i want to learn more. how do my views on life and religion and culture and simplicity correlate with anarchism?? how does someone BECOME an anarchist?? i really think its beautiful.. even though the majority of people hear "anarchist" and immediately think negatively.. i think its beautiful. i dont want anyone to get the impression i believe in a world with absolutely no rule.. thats chaotic. i dont believe in passing judgement on anyone (who are we to do so).. and i think everyone deserves their own right to speech and thought and action.. to an extent where it is not harmful toward the rest of a society.. its a little hard for me to get out all of my thoughts on this subject right now (im not stoned)... but if there are any thoughts/suggestions/anything that anyone can offer up to help me to better understand anarchism, it would be greatly appreciated.
get a mohawk. okay. im just wondering how people realize that this is what they believe.
get a mohawk. okay. im just wondering how people realize that this is what they believe.
I was being glib. Do you think an ideology is something that exists inside you or something you internalise? Are you having a calling to anarchism or do you want me to annoint you?
yeah anoint me. i feel drawn towards this ideology and i want to understand better how people understood and developed the same "calling". there are obviously certain things i dont and will not understand, which is what this thread is about.. understanding anarchism better.
how does someone BECOME an anarchist?? i really think its beautiful..
Throw your's (or much better a stolen one from Argos) TV at Gordon Brown, two birds one stone sorta thing. Also doing it naked with some big slogan across your stomach makes it all the more effective.
yeah anoint me. i feel drawn towards this ideology and i want to understand better how people understood and developed the same "calling". there are obviously certain things i dont and will not understand, which is what this thread is about.. understanding anarchism better.
What do you want to understand? Questions might help. We are for the most part ordinary workers (with a collective terrible sense of humour) who organise to different degrees in our workplaces and communities. Most people here are members of anarchist organisations like AF, Solfed and WSM. WSM is the best one though.
i thought i asked questions in my first post? i hope terrible sense of humour is not a trademark of an anarchist.. what is the basic belief? how does it correlate to what i had said about life? this is what im trying to understand.. whether i am misunderstanding anarchism or not, or whether it corresponds to my current beliefs?
The basic idea of anarchism is that society should not have any kind of hierarchy. No one should have any control over anyone else.
Anarchists are generally idiots that fail to understand this and prefer to do thing things like:
have some form of shit haircut, often dreads
smell bad
get ethnic tattoos
set up myspace pages supporting convicted killers
be completely disconected from the working class and treat anyone from it with contempt
try to fight the police at demos
play bongos
try to fight the police at demos
This isn't the worst so long as you are good at it and don't get too obsessed with it. Why introduce someone to anarchism via a list of negatives? Can you only define yourself in relation to what you are not? Is this some sort of lacanian thing?
OP; Anarchism is about creating a society where workers control the means of production without a need for the state. We stand for non-hierarchical society but I wouldnt necessarily agree with Jef's ideas that
1. "No one should have any control over anyone else."
2. "society should not have any kind of hierarchy"
There are definitely situations where hierarchy is functional, an operating theatre for example.
is there a difference between controlling someone and passing judgment on them?? i think if youre able to live harmoniously with others without judgment then there is no need for a system of CONTROL.. but rather a system of communal support and togetherness?.. this is where i begin to wonder whether or not my ideas correlate with those of anarchism?
is there a difference between controlling someone and passing judgment on them?? i think if youre able to live harmoniously with others without judgment then there is no need for a system of CONTROL.. but rather a system of communal support and togetherness?.. this is where i begin to wonder whether or not my ideas correlate with those of anarchism?
Communal support sounds about right, not sure what you mean by judging people though. I reserve my right to judge most of the people on here after the revolution. Some socially, others at the end of a gun.
Question; do you think anarchism is a set of personal beliefs that you should apply to your lifestyle similar to buddhism etc?
so far, from my introduction to anarchism, i think its something that you should live your life by yes. i think that anything you believe in should govern how you live your life, or else.. what is the point in a belief system? it comes across to me as a philosophy.. similar to Buddhism. a set of guidelines by which to live your life.
I've found the official guidelines for you equalfights
have some form of shit haircut, often dreads
smell bad
get ethnic tattoos
set up myspace pages supporting convicted killers
be completely disconected from the working class and treat anyone from it with contempt
try to fight the police at demos
play bongos
good luck!
...srsly, how do you think being an anarchist would effect the way you live your life?
so far, from my introduction to anarchism, i think its something that you should live your life by yes. i think that anything you believe in should govern how you live your life, or else.. what is the point in a belief system? it comes across to me as a philosophy.. similar to Buddhism. a set of guidelines by which to live your life.
Sorry, no, its not. Its a set of ideas for how to organise collectively to change the world and smash the class system. Nothing to do with being a hippy.
i didnt say anything about being a hippie?.. and if individuals are coming together to change the world, and are doing so through a set of the same ideas.. then how is that not living your life by your beliefs? im having a hard time differentiating i suppose
There are definitely situations where hierarchy is functional, an operating theatre for example.
Depends on your definition of hierachy I suppose. In an anarchist society operating theatres and the like could be designated Temporary Authoritarian Zones if that would make things easier.
yeah I don't see such leadership as anything bad. same with football, i don't want some sort of anarchist-football team where everyone's the captain and there's no coach. fuck that noise.
Depends what we are talking about. Are you talking about putting your ideas into action by working to create an anarchist society through the overthrow of capitalism - or are you talking about being nice to your nieghbours and growing your own veg as an anarchist ends? Its your reference to buddhism that threw me.
but to answer the original question, anarchism's working class control of society with no rulers and no rich parasites left alive. basically. everything else is just academic.
guydebordisdead wrote:
There are definitely situations where hierarchy is functional, an operating theatre for example.Depends on your definition of hierachy I suppose. In an anarchist society operating theatres and the like could be designated Temporary Authoritarian Zones if that would make things easier.
Delegated accountable authority is ok by me.
no.. my religious beliefs lie in buddhism.. and i live my life according to them. im not talking about growing veggies and loving everyone.. changing the state of society is where my beliefs concerning anarchism would come into play, yes.. but obviously these ideas and actions would govern my other ideas, behaviours and actions.. right?
even though this is in the community board, i dont see any reason to get so snippy with equalfights - especially since s/he's new to all this. would it kill us to make a good first impression?
equalfights: on the most basic level, a few people have answered what Anarchism is, when mentioning working class control of society (etc etc). the problem is, though... if you dont understand much about the class system, a bunch of the at least basic ideas behind socialist thought and all that, it's kinda hard to see where Anarchists (or other types of socialists) are coming from. not that i'm saying you're necessarily like that or anything, but it's difficult for many people - it certainly was for me.
some of the flak you've been getting in the latter messages, like guy making the hippie crack and the talk of Anarchism as a philosophy and all this sort of stuff, there's a little bit of Anarchist baggage behind this - which is strongly tied to hippies and punks. a problem which pisses off many Anarchists today (at least, most of the people who frequent these forums) is the confusion of Anarchism - which is not just a social philosophy of sorts but also, i suppose you could say, a *method* of struggle with a fairly clear end-vision - with a sort of... personal philosophy. like treating Anarchism as if it simply meant living by an unusual personal code of ethics, eating a particular diet, dressing a particular way, or withdrawing from society-at-large to live in a wee little community of people who act like this (which many people here would argue is not a form of actual social struggle, not a way to genuinely change the world, but rather a *withdrawal* from the world... a form of escapism). there's more into it than that, it's hard to explain really quickly, but... maybe you get the idea? anyway, most of the people on this board are *quite* against this sort of thing, and want Anarchism to move out of a sort of subcultural ghetto to become a genuinely relevant, effective social *movement*, as it once was in a number of places some decades ago (in a large way). so some Anarchists can get a bit sensitive over this, please excuse us for the difficulties!
beside this, most Anarchists are pretty solid atheists, and philosophical materialists (ie: basically against mystical sorts of explanations of the world), so get a bit wary when someone comes around professing a belief in this or that religion. beside that, the sort of way that various religions view and explain the world is usually much different than how Anarchists, or other socialists, will do it. and there's the whole thing about most (if not all) religions being guided by a religious elite, an upper class of its own, which usually molds the doctrine to their interests of keeping and possibly expanding on their position of privilege. although it's a bit more difficult to make such an argument when it comes to someone who believes in a religion without adhering to any religious organization.
anyway, it's kind of difficult to explain things *well* off the bat... i find that most socialists (including Anarchists) will often use expressions and such that mean nothing to a newcomer, or will mean SOMETHING, but not the thing that the socialist is talking about. considering that there's a lot of information to possibly give, it *might* help if you had any slightly more... specific? sorts of questions to ask, based on what you've heard here so far (particularly on the main point(s) of Anarchism, which was mentioned by Bob Savage and Guy and Jef kinda too).
if you're interested in something to read on your own, to get a bit of a better idea, a good starting place is this, the Anarchist FAQ:
but it's quite large, and nobody would expect you to read the whole thing in any short time (or possibly ever, i'm not sure if i've read all of it or not, and they occasionally add things after some time too). but it's a good source, which covers a lot of the basics, goes into some of the more advanced stuff, and talks a bit about history too. i'm sure people here would be happy to provide you with other things they view as essential (or just realy good) reading - i have something else in mind, but it's a bit difficult as starting material i think.
anyway, which ever way you find yourself in the end, take care equalfights





I have fuck all as it is. I'm an anarchist because I want more, leave the asceticism at the door - we have a world of pleasures to win.
I suppose you could always get a mohawk?