What do you think is the worst section of libcom.org?

31 replies [Last post]
Steven.'s picture
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 48 min ago. Offline
Joined: 27-06-06

Poll here:
http://libcom.org/polls/what-do-you-think-worst-section-libcom-org

Please vote and say why/give comments - cheers!

arf
User offline. Last seen 1 year 2 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 25-11-06

can i say which i think is the best? i like the libcommunity bit in the forums the best.

the shittest bit is the thought bit with all the articles, not because its all crap or anything, but just because i cant work out how to search by subject rather than by author or title. its a bit annoying.

Steven.'s picture
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 48 min ago. Offline
Joined: 27-06-06

you can vote for the best bit here!
http://libcom.org/polls/what-your-favourite-section-libcom

cheers arf, will comment later

arf
User offline. Last seen 1 year 2 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 25-11-06

i voted for thought as the best bit cos it is really even if i cant work out the searches. i come here mainly for the forums but the thought bit is well handy when i dont understand or am trying to make sense of something.

arf
User offline. Last seen 1 year 2 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 25-11-06

oh yeh and i voted for none for worst bit cos its all useful. if you want suggestions for improvements, then i reckon the only thing missing is a comic strip. cant any of you draw? that would be great grin

sorry for multiple posts.

thugarchist's picture
User offline. Last seen 18 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 26-11-06

Whichever section has anything about John Bowden in it.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 3 days 32 min ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
thugarchist wrote:
Whichever section has anything about John Bowden in it.

Maybe you need to chill out abit! eh?

thugarchist's picture
User offline. Last seen 18 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
revol68 wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Whichever section has anything about John Bowden in it.

Maybe you need to chill out abit! eh?

Well there's a hilarious comment of pot vs kettle-ism if there ever was one.

thugarchist's picture
User offline. Last seen 18 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
revol68 wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Whichever section has anything about John Bowden in it.

Maybe you need to chill out abit! eh?

Well there's a hilarious comment of pot vs kettle-ism if there ever was one.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 3 days 32 min ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
thugarchist wrote:
revol68 wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Whichever section has anything about John Bowden in it.

Maybe you need to chill out abit! eh?

Well there's a hilarious comment of pot vs kettle-ism if there ever was one.

I think something just flew over your head.

Steven.'s picture
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 48 min ago. Offline
Joined: 27-06-06

he's a bit of a hot head is that one.

thugarchist's picture
User offline. Last seen 18 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
revol68 wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
revol68 wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Whichever section has anything about John Bowden in it.

Maybe you need to chill out abit! eh?

Well there's a hilarious comment of pot vs kettle-ism if there ever was one.

I think something just flew over your head.

Ooops. Sorry. Usually I have a good head on my shoulders about such things.

Steven.'s picture
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 48 min ago. Offline
Joined: 27-06-06

Not usually so quick to lose your head.

MJ
MJ's picture
User offline. Last seen 5 weeks 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 5-01-06

Why isn't "The British one" an answer?

User offline. Last seen 3 days 1 hour ago. Offline
Joined: 11-05-06
John. wrote:
Not usually so quick to lose your head.

thugarchist's picture
User offline. Last seen 18 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 26-11-06

This whole conversation is making my blood boil.

User offline. Last seen 35 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 13-02-04

I wouldn't say it was the worst part of the site, but I reckon the history section has grown considerably worse over the years, mainly because now it's a bit more difficult to navigate around than it used to be when you had all the articles arranged in different catergories and they were all linked to on the same page, as opposed to now where the section is split up into about fifty pages with links to only about ten or so articles on each one. The search function is great if you're looking for something specific, but I used to like spending time just browsing through the articles.

arf
User offline. Last seen 1 year 2 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 25-11-06

yeh, i want to be able to browse categories too. i keep thinking that there is a way and its probably right there in front of me, but i just cant find it..

catch's picture
User offline. Last seen 13 hours 13 min ago. Offline
Joined: 7-02-06

If you make urls like this:

http://libcom.org/history/tags/strikes

http://libcom.org/history/tags/uk

then you can view history articles by category, hope that helps!

User offline. Last seen 1 year 35 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 1-04-06

Yeah history section is hard to navigate and hasn't been kept up like library. A lot of the history articles have awkward/grammatically incorrect phrasing and structure. I think a group effort to update and clean up the history section would be a good idea. Perhaps have certain portal pages for various major subjects like the "revolutionary wave" that's in progress now, 1936, the 60s, syndicalism, etc. Though that could be history as well as library/factsheet territory.

I'd also like to see "the everyday manifesto" get finished. I think that would be a pretty useful propaganda tool. A nice little booklet we can hand out at events, marches, pickets etc.

Lone Wolf's picture
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 29 min ago. Offline
Joined: 1-03-06

I voted none.

S'all good John. All the site sections are useful and helpful etc etc.

tongue circle A cool

User offline. Last seen 2 years 3 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 16-12-05

The section where the threads are mostly namecalling.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 3 days 32 min ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Nate wrote:
The section where the threads are mostly namecalling.

Look at my tears. I mean just fucking look them. There's one over there, another one there - i think there's one rolled under the fridge as well.

User offline. Last seen 2 years 3 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 16-12-05

You gotta post a photo Reevey darling, otherwise I can't see them. Not the one under the fridge, though. Don't photograph that one, at least not if under your fridge looks anything like under mine. Actually, do. Do post the under the fridge one, then I'll post a picture of mine. There's a name for that game but it slips my mind just now.

madashell's picture
User offline. Last seen 6 hours 15 min ago. Offline
Joined: 19-06-06

Depends on what you mean by the worst. Least useful? Least entertaining? Most NEFAC?

I probably use the history and thought sections the least, but I find the bits I do bother to read pretty interesting. The organise section is a bit boring, but it has some great advice. I enjoy the forums (and every so often something good does come out of them, but you have to admit it's rare), but they're not all that useful. So yeah, it depends on what you're after.

User offline. Last seen 10 hours 3 min ago. Offline
Joined: 30-04-06

I reckon the forums, easily.

Refused's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 19 min ago. Offline
Joined: 28-09-04

Refused is worst thing about LibCom.

arf
User offline. Last seen 1 year 2 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 25-11-06

cheer up emo kid smile

Fall Back's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 22-09-03

I think thought, probably. Just a little pointless, really. I guess it might be better as just an organised set of links to relevant articles in the library, altho that's just off the top of my head.

User offline. Last seen 2 years 3 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 16-12-05

Refused is fucking dead.

Lone Wolf's picture
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 29 min ago. Offline
Joined: 1-03-06
Jack wrote:
I think thought, probably. Just a little pointless, really. I guess it might be better as just an organised set of links to relevant articles in the library, altho that's just off the top of my head.

I don't think you should be offering up the top of your head tbh. eek