I for one, find this to be offensive.
[...waits for gratitude/sexual favors]
Conor: "we've already had my guide to male sexuality with insights into personality"When? i missed that one. was it cunningly concealed in a full stop somewhere?
It was fucking epic and had amazing graphs, it was during the previous golden age of libcom last January.
dee wrote:
Conor: "we've already had my guide to male sexuality with insights into personality"When? i missed that one. was it cunningly concealed in a full stop somewhere?
It was fucking epic and had amazing graphs, it was during the previous golden age of libcom last January.
Does it still exist? can I has a link please?
Original male feminism thread, again
has bits about male types, and is pretty retarded
Because it follows a process of observation and reasoning. the outcome may be irrational, but the initial process - watching, listening, considering, is not. Its just when other emotions/considerations kick in that the outcome gets screwed up to fit whatever it is you are uncertain/ insecure about.
Unfortunately, I have no facility for graphs, so can we just draw the following basic distinctions:
1; xconorx is not a male feminist. definitely.
2: the basic difference between men and women is genital. Everything else is either socially constructed or a complete myth.
2.1: this includes the concept of women as the gentler sex, and men as incapable of listening.
3. xconorx is definitely not a male feminist.
4. The application of the term male feminist is herewith a slang term for one who attempts to ingratiate themselves with members of the opposite sex for 'tapping' access.
5. Definitely, xconor is not a male feminist. But he can call other people that for the purposes of comedy/wind-up.
The same rule applies to everyone else though, so we'd better think of another term that will need clarification after a while, by which time somebody will supply graphs or a lolcat. Either one, I'm not fussy. Now please can we get back to tarp and fritzl jokes?
(AP) A college student who branded a former lover's body with a scalding piece of metal as payback for never calling her after they had sex was sentenced to five years in prison Friday.Kristina Caban, 23, had no comment as state Supreme Court Justice Michael Obus sentenced her for what he called a crime that was "not remotely justifiable."
...
Caban enlisted new boyfriend Robert Testagrossa to help brand a four-inch-high "R" on Sara's abdomen in October 2006, the prosecutor said. She said Caban lured the former lover to a hotel room, where Testagrossa and another man grabbed him.
Blumberg said the men used a Taser to immobilize Sara in a room at the Chelsea Inn while Caban laughed at his distress and kicked him while he was down.
...
Testagrossa is the son of two prosecutors. His father Charles is the executive assistant district attorney in Queens who prosecuted the Sean Bell police shooting case. His mother is a lawyer in the Nassau County district attorney's office.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/14/national/main4181411.shtml
so the "conspiracy plotting" at least is confirmed
dee, why did you have to do that? this is libcommunity, take that 'truth' and 'facts' bullshit to the theory forum or something.
women are bad drivers and complain a lot!
and do you know why women are supposedly bad drivers? cause we get told this:
[ ]
is six inches.
oh god i'd forgotten about that."o hai mr judge i cant go to jail, i have a job"
"ok"
"oh, I can't go to jail, I'm wearing the old school tie and am fabulously important. Besides, the stupid cow married me so she knew i was prone to a bit of a temper" . scum sucking syphilitic son of a whore.
juozokas wrote:
dee, why did you have to do that? this is libcommunity, take that 'truth' and 'facts' bullshit to the theory forum or something.
women are bad drivers and complain a lot!and do you know why women are supposedly bad drivers? cause we get told this:
[ ]
is six inches.
OH SHI-
we've already had my guide to male sexuality with insights into personality
what about women - I'd rather hear the persepective of the lying whorish coquettes themselves, but to start the discussion, which should remain serious, here is this illustration by a BRAIN SCIENTIST