wsm or "chinks"
Nov 8 2009 12:32
Which is funnier? I think wsm links are funny, but oisleep getting b& over on ABC for using "racial slurs" made my sunday.
Nov 8 2009 12:41
#2
The worst thing is he actually apologised, to ABC, how fucking embarrassing.
Nov 8 2009 15:17
#3
The worst kind!
Nov 8 2009 15:21
#4
Btw you got a link for this shit? I'm surfing ABC for the first time in ages...god they're pious, self-important fucks.
Nov 8 2009 15:31
#5
Oh man, Dundee is actually a fucking mentalist right-winger. Even the rest of ABC can't take his fucking hilariously awful shit on Venezuela: http://anarchistblackcat.org/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=5330
Turns out the ABC secret society decided to unban me though. So much for transparent, consistent decision-making...
Nov 8 2009 16:19
#6
Quote:
Venezuala is a very large country. A unitary country of that nature requires to be ruled by fear to some degree in times of government cutbacks, otherwise it would collapse into anarchy (in the bad sense) and lawlessness. You can also bet Colombia would march right on in there (with two or three US carrier battlegroups off the coast).If you were in Chavez' government position right now, what would you do?
Nov 8 2009 16:20
#7
Quote:
The reality is were we in Chavez' position we'd have to adopt an iron rule kind policy. That's not a "justification"; it's me saying that in that position we'd already have lost, and some appreciation for how nations are governed I would have thought at the very least, kind of entry level theory for socialists serious about winning, no?End of, Chavez has to crack heads to stay in power. I'd rather have Chavez than some mafia boss. And those are the 'options' given the socialist movement is in no position to launch a geo-regional revolution across the Americas.
Nov 8 2009 16:50
#8
Caiman del Barrio wrote:
Btw you got a link for this shit? I'm surfing ABC for the first time in ages...god they're pious, self-important fucks.
if you're registered you can put his name in the search box, that's how i found it all.
Nov 8 2009 17:14
#9
Man so I tried to post in the thread about my banning, in which Akai had very kindly mounted something of a defense for me (more in passing concerning her own ideas about forum moderation though). I'm still not allowed to state my case!! Hahah...ABC. I'll put the post here though cos I'm confrontational liek that.
Quote:
Not meaning to kick a dead horse, but I've only just been granted the right that (most) bourgeois courts grant their defendants, that of stating my case...georgestapleton wrote:
On your fifth warning the moderators will discuss a permanent ban (this hasn't happened yet.) [Caiman del Barrio] got four warnings.Really? You clearly have a greater commitment to the minutiae of my actions than I do. I do know that I'd only made 5 posts before my banning. 4 warnings in 5 posts is quite an achievement.
Quote:
Secondly, the 'apology' is not published on the site it is purely so that people understand why they've been banned and agree to try to change their behaviour on the forum. (This has been mentioned on libcom, which is why I mention it here.)Will I get another warning if I state that I think this policy is somewhere between Maoist self-denunciation and the indignities that a boss might force upon a worker? I know you're all fluffy and back-breakingly nice in a middle class academic fashion here, but my knee jerk reaction to this is tell you all to fuck off. I'm resolute that posting in light-hearted, chatty Christmas thread that you spent your holidays worrying about the lack of an organised anarchist international to intervene in the global socialist revolution that's apparently only 24 months away (now it's more like 13 months btw, where's that revolution then Dundee?) is worrying from a political - not to mention psycological - POV. Not that i care that much, I think it's more dangerous and damaging that ABC is seen to tolerate this kinda fantasism than the occasional off the cuff dismissal. In all honesty, I think most of the mods - despite all your overbearing and somewhat patronising commitment to "politeness" - would have at least wanted to respond in the same way.
Whatever though, I'm back. I dunno why, sicne I was told I'd only be able to return once I'd given you this absurd apology. So much for transparency eh mods? ;)
Nov 8 2009 17:21
#10
petey wrote:
Caiman del Barrio wrote:
Btw you got a link for this shit? I'm surfing ABC for the first time in ages...god they're pious, self-important fucks.if you're registered you can put his name in the search box, that's how i found it all.
Quote:
InformationSorry but you are not permitted to use the search system.
Nov 8 2009 17:25
#11
Oh right I've been banend again and my post on the Venezuela thread has been deleted (!!).
Seriously, this beggars belief.
Nov 8 2009 17:25
#12
Fuck searching, I have made a film of it for you pricks
Nov 8 2009 17:45
#13
Caiman del Barrio wrote:
Oh right I've been banend again and my post on the Venezuela thread has been deleted (!!).
yeah see i saw that, but you were listed as 'temp banned' when you posted it. now it's gone? that was fast.
Nov 8 2009 17:46
#14
parole violation.
Nov 8 2009 17:49
#15
No PM or explanation either.
Once again, so much for transparency and consistent decision-making.
Nov 8 2009 17:55
#16
weeler wrote:
Fuck searching, I have made a film of it for you pricks
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
Nov 8 2009 18:09
#17
Dundee Utd. wrote:
we have nobody to blame for the failure of our class to make gains this past thirty years but ...failure of leadership, and risible ad hoc jokery ...Our leaders in the workers movement...
The 'workers movement' won't rest until the last self-important and bollock mental internet anarchist is hanged with the guts of the last ABC moderator.
Nov 8 2009 19:25
#18
'bollock mental'
vlad wins the thread
Nov 8 2009 19:27
#19
Choccy wrote:
The worst thing is he actually apologised
didn't realise you were american
Nov 8 2009 19:50
#20
Caiman del Barrio wrote:
petey wrote:
Caiman del Barrio wrote:
Btw you got a link for this shit? I'm surfing ABC for the first time in ages...god they're pious, self-important fucks.if you're registered you can put his name in the search box, that's how i found it all.
Quote:
InformationSorry but you are not permitted to use the search system.
its on this thread
http://anarchistblackcat.org/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=173&p=2917&hilit=oisleep#p2917
Nov 8 2009 19:54
#21
oisleep wrote:
Choccy wrote:
The worst thing is he actually apologiseddidn't realise you were american
Nov 8 2009 20:17
#22
Wait so a racial slur (which they're accusing him of) only warrants a finger-wagging, but "discussing moderating policy" is an official warning?
Jesus, ABC mods really are a bunch of middle manager cunts aren't they?
Nov 8 2009 22:44
#23
weeler wrote:
Fuck searching, I have made a film of it for you pricks
I don't post much on the intrawebs anymore but I felt compelled to note how fucking spot on brilliant this is.
Nov 8 2009 23:28
#24
i think the dundee united one is the best
Nov 8 2009 23:47
#25
i think the dundee united one is the best
Nov 9 2009 00:29
#26
Nov 9 2009 00:40
#27
weeler wrote:
Which is funnier? I think wsm links are funny, but oisleep getting b& over on ABC for using "racial slurs" made my sunday.
WSM = srs business
racial slurs = friendly banter
Nov 9 2009 01:22
#28
Organise! = "most working class anarchist group i've ever met" (good thing)*
Organise! = "most working class anarchist group i've ever met" (bad thing)*
*quote attributed to wayne, the best poster libcom ever lost.
ftwsm!
Nov 9 2009 05:34
#29
Nov 10 2009 14:28
#30
Fuck I wish oisleep wasn't such a drip on libcommunity, just reading some of his posts on economics and that, and they're pretty spot on when he's not making I HATE ANARCHY jabs.
Also, yes, I was specifically reading back through his posts there.