That's the one problem with open publishing, any idiot can publish any piece of crap as fact
A pro-Israel group's plan to rewrite history on Wikipedia
Well, in this case it is more insidious than that. They're planning on getting a bunch of admins and moderators that will not edit any Israel articles so that they can later come in and act as "neutral" moderators in disputed Israel related articles. In most articles I've found Wikipedia to be more or less correct, and studies on wikipedia shows that it is basically as reliable as most professional encyclopedias in several academic fields. The problem now is the increasing dictatorial powers that mods and admins have, and the deletion frenzy.
CAMERA (you may already know) has been around for a good 25 years and is somehow connected with FLAME:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facts_and_Logic_About_the_Middle_East
Quote:
thanks for that khawaga. not the first time a bunch of rightwingers have tried this.Yeah? Do have any info on other groups that have tried this?
i know some anonymous people ran a campaign like this to delete the page on the Ottawa panhandlers' union a while back, which they succeeded in doing. this was associated with a big anti-panhandlers union postering campaign in Ottawa itself
I don't think Wikipedia is a joke, and I say that as someone whose fought any number of edit wars on Wikipedia about controversial history articles. And how can it "become" a joke, unless people who know better refuse to help edit it. If you do that, well then no shit the articles are going to become "heavily biased and untrustworthy. Argh.
Update from Electronic Intifada
EI accused CAMERA of "orchestrating a secret, long-term campaign to infiltrate the popular online encyclopedia Wikipedia, to rewrite Palestinian history, pass off crude propaganda as fact, and take over Wikipedia administrative structures to ensure these changes go either undetected or unchallenged."That got Wikipedia's attention. A panel of three administrators sanctioned or indefinitely blocked and banned five members of Ini's group. "Wikipedia is based on open, transparent editing in an atmosphere of mutual respect between editors," these administrators opined. "This goal is fundamentally incompatible with the creation of a private group to surreptitiously coordinate editing on Wikipedia by ideologically like-minded individuals." A formal arbitration process is ongoing.
CAMERA at work:
Last week, I wrote an article that described how untreated sewage was being pumped from illegal Israeli settlements on to Palestinian land, contaminating their reservoirs. This isn't controversial. It has been documented by Friends of the Earth, and I have seen it with my own eyes.The response? There was little attempt to dispute the facts I offered. Instead, some of the most high profile "pro-Israel" writers and media monitoring groups – including Honest Reporting and Camera – said I an anti-Jewish bigot akin to Joseph Goebbels and Mahmoud Ahmadinejadh, while Melanie Phillips even linked the stabbing of two Jewish people in North London to articles like mine.
I wonder if this is the same group of people who I noticed butchered the Rachel Corrie page about a year ago. I tried to fix some ridiculously inaccurate things there only to find a group of people controlling it and being banned from fixing the page. I haven't been there since then and wondering if the same crap is still there.



From Electronic Intifada