EDL

330 posts / 0 new
Last post
Khawaga's picture
Khawaga
Offline
Joined: 7-08-06
Nov 27 2009 17:13
Arthur wrote:
We need to force the government to act,

Arthur. It's been pointed out to you time and over again that the government has indeed reacted (or even been pro-active), and that this is a large part of why Muslims have been demonized on the one hand and radicalized on the other. It is in this context that the EDL was formed. Like it or not, but you are the government's willing shock troops against immigrants in general.

Caiman del Barrio
Offline
Joined: 28-09-04
Nov 27 2009 17:45
Arthur wrote:
They deliberately use terror to control us, allowing Islamist to preach their hate to the extent that they bomb us, it isn't these politicians who are on the trains and buses that get blown up, it's us the bloody workers on their way to work.

.....

Even the radical Islamists are now begging us to debate with them and we've told them, no debate, we will kick your arses out, they know the writing is on the wall.

How does the first section in bold lead to the second? Like, what's the thought process? You seem to be accusing the govt of using Islamic fundamentalism as a divisory tactic but if so, then you (the EDL) are playing along with it.

raw
Offline
Joined: 8-10-03
Nov 28 2009 17:07

To be honest i think Arthur represents a small portion of the people in EDL and increasingly I think that the EDL poses one of the biggest threats to working class unity. Whether they're fascists or not I don't care, some are and some aren't but unless an alternative movement develops that is progressive then we will return to the days of the 1970/1980s.

Have a look at this old AFA video to give a sense of what our comrades were up against: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ds4CTEyN3rc&feature=channel

Andros
Offline
Joined: 22-11-09
Nov 29 2009 16:04

When the racists and fascists are incapable of gaining a hearing by other means they're reduced to soft selling their drivel. Socially backward Islam is a fine bogeyman used by everyone from the swiss right in their anti minaret campaign, to the american state in its' geo-strategic oil profit driven "War on Terror".

Andros
Offline
Joined: 22-11-09
Nov 29 2009 16:05

When the racists and fascists are incapable of gaining a hearing by other means they're reduced to soft selling their drivel. Socially backward Islam is a fine bogeyman used by everyone from the swiss right in their anti minaret campaign, to the american state in its' geo-strategic oil profit driven "War on Terror".

Arthur
Offline
Joined: 19-11-09
Nov 29 2009 19:47

Are nearly 60% of Swiss citizens racist or fascist then?

I find that really quite hard to believe, I think it is a mirror of how large numbers of people feel.

I fail to understand why in the face of overwhelming evidence, people think that the Islamist ideology is not of its self fascist.

Arthur.

Khawaga's picture
Khawaga
Offline
Joined: 7-08-06
Nov 29 2009 19:55

Arthur. What is Islamist ideology/politics? Is wanting to build mosques with minarets Islamo fascist? You again homogenize an entire religion, not appreciating theological differences and the political differences within that heterogenous category referred to as political Islam.

And, you need to get your numbers right. 60% percent refers to number of voters, not citizens. Switzerland have referendums all the time and in this case voter turnout was 55%. If you say about 1/3 of the population is not of voting age then you get to the real number.

In addition, it was the far right-wing party who basically are racist that called the referendum. Are these the kinds of folks you see yourself in league with? They're not that far from the BNP.

Tojiah's picture
Tojiah
Offline
Joined: 2-10-06
Nov 29 2009 19:56

There is overwhelming evidence of the prevalence of anti-Muslim/anti-immigrant paranoia, yes. That's not evidence for Islam being fascist or whatever.

knightrose
Offline
Joined: 8-11-03
Nov 29 2009 20:02

But there is a difference between the opinions of most Muslim folk, who use their religion as a way of explaining why everyone should be nice to each other, and the politics and ideology of radical Islam which are totalitarian and by any definition close to fascism.

Tojiah's picture
Tojiah
Offline
Joined: 2-10-06
Nov 29 2009 20:32

Yeah, and I'm sure that a majority of Swiss voters voting against bloody minarets is a result of their keen understanding of this difference, and that this will push Muslims away from the radicals. roll eyes

Yorkie Bar
Offline
Joined: 29-03-09
Nov 29 2009 21:12
Quote:
But there is a difference between the opinions of most Muslim folk, who use their religion as a way of explaining why everyone should be nice to each other, and the politics and ideology of radical Islam which are totalitarian and by any definition close to fascism.

Oh yeah, I forgot about that hard-and-fast distinction between the evil radical Muslims and the hard-working/ordinary Muslims.

Fucksake, Islam is just as much a tool of class oppression as any other major religion: same goes for Buddhism, Christianity, Quakerism, etc. No matter how hard-working or ordinary a given Muslim is, they still hold beliefs which are reactionary as fuck, and have nothing to do with "explaining why everyone should be nice to each other" or some dumb crap like that.

~J.

Arthur
Offline
Joined: 19-11-09
Nov 29 2009 21:24

If it was against immigration then why not Hindus, England has a large Hindu population and there's no campaign against there religion.

Are you really defending the Ismalists, what about there treatment of women, of gays, of people who have left Islam. Not to speak of honour killings and the like.

Is it possible that you are looking at us instead of Islam, because you see us as the enemy that you look no further.

Arthur.

Arthur
Offline
Joined: 19-11-09
Nov 29 2009 21:26

If it was against immigration then why not Hindus, England has a large Hindu population and there's no campaign against there religion.

Are you really defending the Ismalists, what about there treatment of women, of gays, of people who have left Islam. Not to speak of honour killings and the like.

Is it possible that you are looking at us instead of Islam, because you see us as the enemy that you look no further.

Arthur.

Arthur
Offline
Joined: 19-11-09
Nov 29 2009 21:27

If it was against immigration then why not Hindus, England has a large Hindu population and there's no campaign against there religion.

Are you really defending the Ismalists, what about there treatment of women, of gays, of people who have left Islam. Not to speak of honour killings and the like.

Is it possible that you are looking at us instead of Islam, because you see us as the enemy that you look no further.

Arthur.

Arthur
Offline
Joined: 19-11-09
Nov 29 2009 21:37

Can I point you to this.

http://www.onelawforall.org.uk/successful-rally-against-sharia-law-in-uk-21-nov-2009/

Arthur.

Tojiah's picture
Tojiah
Offline
Joined: 2-10-06
Nov 29 2009 21:45
Arthur wrote:
If it was against immigration then why not Hindus, England has a large Hindu population and there's no campaign against there religion.

I thought we were talking about the vote in Switzerland, where the situation is different. In any case, their vote is evidence for their paranoia, not for anything bad about "Muslim ideology", or whatever the hell that means.

Arthur wrote:
Are you really defending the Ismalists, what about there treatment of women, of gays, of people who have left Islam. Not to speak of honour killings and the like.

I think it's silly that they're opposed to building minarets, it's paranoid and senseless. They've forbidden a particular form of architecture. How will that help women, gays, former Muslims and the victims of honor killings? What will that do other than make every single Muslim, or Muslim-related individual, feel unwelcome?

Arthur wrote:
Is it possible that you are looking at us instead of Islam, because you see us as the enemy that you look no further.

It's possible that my English simply isn't that good, but I really can't make any sense of this sentence at all.

Arthur
Offline
Joined: 19-11-09
Nov 29 2009 23:20

I wish it was paranoia, all of Europe feels under threat, not just the Swiss.
Read the link I've just posted. it gives you the point of view of other opposed groups.

It's more of a warning that this Ideology/religion cannot continue in its present form and needs to adapt.

What I meant was that by continuing to concentrate on whether or not the people opposed to the Islamist are paranoid, racist, fascist, nazis etc etc. That you should instead look at Islamist and whether they are a threat.

Arthur.

Jason Cortez
Offline
Joined: 14-11-04
Nov 30 2009 00:23
Jason Cortez wrote:
arthur wrote:
I would tend to agree with a lot of what you say but there are things just around the corner which may change things or change peoples perception of things.
There are now a couple of muslim groups who more or less agree with us and are prepared to demonstrate, that's not to say that they will join us as they...

Which groups are these then, names please.

Arthur wrote:
The core of EDL think along lines much the same as mine but there are difficulties in working with such a diverse bunch of people and you can't tell a racist or a nazi until they say or do something.

Yet your only tactic is street demos, which despite your claims to the contrary, are clearly provocative and which unsurprisingly attract people who you claim don't agreed with the core beliefs. In which since it is very difficult to control who will attend demos and you have clearly attracted both racists and fascists, why haven't you stewarded more tightly? I note you say

Arthur wrote:
When some thing does occur we act straight away.

but this isn't the perception of people who have been at these demos.

So Arthur are you going to answer these questions?

Jason Cortez
Offline
Joined: 14-11-04
Nov 30 2009 00:26

So in fact EDL have no point in existing, since other groups are doing, what you claim to be doing but strangely without attracting loads of Fascists and racists.

Khawaga's picture
Khawaga
Offline
Joined: 7-08-06
Nov 30 2009 00:35

Ok, now is the time I'll start saying that maybe Arthur should just fuck off. He's not replying to any questions anymore. He's not even trying and instead just keeps saying "b-b-but what about the Islamofascist... everyone hates them so you should as well".

Arthur, please start responding to questions. You're no longer engaging anyone in good faith.

Jason Cortez
Offline
Joined: 14-11-04
Nov 30 2009 00:40

You forgot to mention that they had this to say about the EDL

One Law for All wrote:
We will have nothing to do with the English Defence League, October 26, 2009

Tony writes on our website: This group should join forces with the English Defence League and help them in their fight against Islamic extremism and Shariah law in the UK.

Maryam Namazie responds: One Law for All will never ever join forces with the English Defence League. As I have said before, the far-right’s version of Britain is not very different from the Islamists’ one and we won’t stand for either.

I know the EDL tries to hide its true intentions – sort of like the BNP claiming not to be racist in order to join the mainstream. But even without a mission statement on its website and with a disclaimer on its forum, it isn’t hard to see that the EDL is a racist organisation.

First off, just their name makes me shudder. English Defence League reveals nationalism, exclusivity, segregation… I think it is very clear who they are – and are not – including in their version of ‘English.’

And it is also clear who they are from the hooligans and thugs who join their rallies. The EDL says it can’t be blamed for those it attracts but of course it can and it must. Send out right-wing messages of nationalism and ‘England for the English’ and you will get the racists and fascists doing Nazi salutes and demonising those perceived to be different.

And it is also clear who they are from their tactics, one of which is organising demonstrations in front of mosques and terrorising people passing by or entering. Look, if you are concerned about the political Islamic movement and mosques being funded by Islamic states to promotes Islamism, then by all means demonstrate but why not do it at the Qatar embassy (if you are concerned about the Burnley mosque for example) or for that matter Jack Straw’s office (who is thought to be responsible for the Emir of Qatar’s £1.5 million gift to the mosque). Yes I am opposed to faith schools but I wouldn’t stand with a group that brings out thugs in front of an Islamic school and threatens children going in who are sent their by their parents…

How you show your opposition is just as important as what you oppose – if not more.

Clearly, being opposed to Sharia is not nearly enough if it isn’t done within a framework of defending the rights of all and not just the ‘English.

Yorkie Bar
Offline
Joined: 29-03-09
Nov 30 2009 01:14
Arthur wrote:
If it was against immigration then why not Hindus, England has a large Hindu population and there's no campaign against there religion.

... which is rather like saying Hitler wasn't a racist because he allied himself to the Japanese, and they aren't white either.

~J.

red and black riot
Offline
Joined: 15-04-08
Nov 30 2009 17:48

Don't listen to this prick. EDL are a bunch of fascists, I know because they have accused me of being a terrorist for sticking up for my atheist beliefs on youtube. Also they didn't believe I was white and called me a 'third world piece of shit'. You EDL ARE A BUNCH OF DEGENERATE NATIONALISTS, FUCK OFF!!!

admin - this is a no flaming forum. Arthur is being polite here so please respond in kind

Boris Badenov
Offline
Joined: 25-08-08
Nov 30 2009 18:29
BigLittleJ wrote:
Quakerism

hand

Arthur
Offline
Joined: 19-11-09
Dec 1 2009 09:14

Hi Jack, if it was some one from EDL that said that to you then on behalf of EDL I apologise unreservedly.
Can I just say that EDL have only one website and all others that have sprung up are not EDL but people who are trying to jump on the bandwagon. If it doesn't come from our website then it is NOT EDL.

Regards Arthur.

Arthur
Offline
Joined: 19-11-09
Dec 1 2009 10:19
Jason Cortez wrote:
You forgot to mention that they had this to say about the EDL
One Law for All wrote:
We will have nothing to do with the English Defence League, October 26, 2009

Tony writes on our website: This group should join forces with the English Defence League and help them in their fight against Islamic extremism and Shariah law in the UK.

Maryam Namazie responds: One Law for All will never ever join forces with the English Defence League. As I have said before, the far-right’s version of Britain is not very different from the Islamists’ one and we won’t stand for either.

I know the EDL tries to hide its true intentions – sort of like the BNP claiming not to be racist in order to join the mainstream. But even without a mission statement on its website and with a disclaimer on its forum, it isn’t hard to see that the EDL is a racist organisation.

First off, just their name makes me shudder. English Defence League reveals nationalism, exclusivity, segregation… I think it is very clear who they are – and are not – including in their version of ‘English.’

And it is also clear who they are from the hooligans and thugs who join their rallies. The EDL says it can’t be blamed for those it attracts but of course it can and it must. Send out right-wing messages of nationalism and ‘England for the English’ and you will get the racists and fascists doing Nazi salutes and demonising those perceived to be different.

And it is also clear who they are from their tactics, one of which is organising demonstrations in front of mosques and terrorising people passing by or entering. Look, if you are concerned about the political Islamic movement and mosques being funded by Islamic states to promotes Islamism, then by all means demonstrate but why not do it at the Qatar embassy (if you are concerned about the Burnley mosque for example) or for that matter Jack Straw’s office (who is thought to be responsible for the Emir of Qatar’s £1.5 million gift to the mosque). Yes I am opposed to faith schools but I wouldn’t stand with a group that brings out thugs in front of an Islamic school and threatens children going in who are sent their by their parents…

How you show your opposition is just as important as what you oppose – if not more.

Clearly, being opposed to Sharia is not nearly enough if it isn’t done within a framework of defending the rights of all and not just the ‘English.

Yes I'm fully aware of what they say, let's take the word English, to me it means all who are born here regardless of skin colour, regardless of religion.
But the word English has been stolen from us, by the far right and and more sinister, the Labour government. This is akin to stealing our country and we want our country back.

Why can't we say I'm English without immediately being tagged as racist/fascist etc. England is our home, the Scots can say I'm Scottish and proud of it but we can't and I'm offended by this.

There are many people going round the net, using the rise of the EDL to spout their ugly racist, nazi views.
Where we can we go onto different forums and try to correct this but we are not in control of the net.
You should remember the far right hate us and do every thing they can to bring us down.
As do the left of course.

Does not anyone find it strange we are attacked by both right and left.

I fully under stand why the BMSD and CEMB wont join us, we have a bad image and that image, given to us by a very biased government and a complicit media is going to be hard to shake off, but it will be done.

We may well be demonstrating outside embassies in the new year and we have talked about a demo against Jack Straw, all options are open. Demos in town centres are losing their shock factor.

We will continue talking to different moderate groups such as the BMSD because we believe that dialogue is no bad thing. The fact that we are talking to such groups surely must send out a message that we see that a dialogue between moderate muslims is needed and will be needed even more in the future.
After all, at the end of the day, we all have to find a way of living together in harmony.

On Hindus, I know many Hindus and they are as English as me, with more or less the same values.

As to the Swiss, I was pointing out that it reflects the feeling across Europe, here's a poll.

- France : 86% would vote for banning the minarets
- Europe (euronews) : 70% would vote for banning them
- Belgium : 63.2 % for banning
- Germany : 76.30 % - 87% for banning
- Spain : 94% for banning
- Italia : 84 % for banning
- Netherland : 63% for banning

So you have to consider why are people feeling like this.

Arthur

Tojiah's picture
Tojiah
Offline
Joined: 2-10-06
Dec 1 2009 10:33

Well, I thought that you had made it very clear earlier in the thread how the government in the UK is making people feel this way. I imagine similar processes are at work throughout the continent. None of this reflects in any meaningful way on the "dangers" of radical Islamofascism.

Anyway, you should probably rename your website the "Real EDL", just so people don't confuse you with all those fake EDL people, who just happen to be the bulk of the people that come to EDL demos, though I'm sure that that's entirely circumstantial.

ernie
Offline
Joined: 19-04-06
Dec 1 2009 15:25

Arthur

This is the nub of the difference between your nationalist position and the internationalism defended by the vast majority of those who post on here

Quote:
means all who are born here regardless of skin colour, regardless of religion.
But the word English has been stolen from us, by the far right and and more sinister, the Labour government. This is akin to stealing our country and we want our country back.

Why can't we say I'm English without immediately being tagged as racist/fascist etc. England is our home, the Scots can say I'm Scottish and proud of it but we can't and I'm offended by this.

You protest that nationalism does not mean you are a racist, very true it does not. But that does not make any the less pernicious. Why do we say this, because it puts nation and nationality before class. The millions who were slaughtered in WW1 believed they were fighting for democracy, queen and country, or democracy Kaiser and country. In WW2 millions of workers were murdered in the name of defending democracy and fighting Nazism, (the queen and country guff didn't wash so well after the horror of WW1) when in reality they were killing their class brothers in the interests of the ruling class. A ruling class in the case of Britain that ruled a vast empire which it maintained with brutal terror and by stirring up racial, ethnic and national differences. In the case of the US, not much needs to be said about the situation of segregation that existed. Internationalism is so important and fundamental to us because once you make any concession to nationalism you can only defend the ruling class.

As with others i agree that you clearly do not believe you are a racist, and have a real dislike of the government etc. And it is clear that this sense of being faced with a society in increasing chaos is felt strongly in the working class. But to see the cause of this in radical islam is to fall hook line and sinker for the campaign of those you detest: Brown etc. They want the EDLs out on the streets protesting about 'radical islam' the stealing of 'Englishness', any thing but blame capitalism. For all your protests about not wanting to, you end up being the cannon fodder of the ruling class.

The setting up of one ethnic group, nationality, region as the cause of all our woes etc is the class divide and rule tactic of the ruling class down the century. This is why we oppose it so firmly.

Your focus on radical Islam, Shia law etc etc misses two important points;
- why does radical islam appeal to young people? Part of it is that it offers a community, a united community under Islam. It offers a community faced with the unemployment, poverty, alienation and growing Islamophobia that many youth, especially Asian face every day. This desire for a community, togetherness and security, is what appears to also behind your need to defend queen and country, as some form of stable rock in the society falling apart.
- Radical Islam is not some alien product to 'English society' its growth in the last 30 years can be directly traced to the needs of imperialism. Don't forget that in the 1980's the US and British imperialism funded and helped organise the formation of international networks of these groups in order to recruit cannon fodder for Afghanistan. In the 1990s and up until the early part of this century amongst international intelligence agencies London was known as Londonistan because of the British secrete services support for the Fundamentalist in Algeria etc. Now this same class that used these fundamentalist want you to blame them for your problems; thus helping them divided up the working class and hence maintaining their boot on the neck of all workers, be they white, black brown or yellow, Christian, Muslim, etc etc

Tarwater's picture
Tarwater
Offline
Joined: 29-12-08
Dec 1 2009 15:12

I don't think it's going out on a limb for a lot of people to conflate nationalism with racism, especially within a framework of an anti-immigration group that attracts fascists and such.

ernie
Offline
Joined: 19-04-06
Dec 1 2009 15:29

Arthur you may find this article interesting
Antisemtism, Islamophobia: products of a rottig society