Founding Congress of the new international anarcho-syndicalist and revolutionary syndicalist.

It all matters. Though this discussion has been hashed out elsewhere
I'm not a fan of your premise or of much of anything else going on with the intra and inter organizational stuff.

Was the only way, sadly. IWA is not ready to accept more than one section in each country as was doing at the begining. Several sections can't understand that 10 people can't be a section, can be a start but not a section with the same power than thousand ( this rule of one section one vote was logical when we sections were real unions of 100 thousands members, there are sections that in Spain they could not be not even a local union). The discussions and meetings we are having the last 3 years could not be imagined within IWA. I hope the things change in the future, but now a days I think that the fact that between 80/90% of the IWA militants decided to create something new can't be seen as a simple banality of their members. Have in mind that left IWA the militants with the biggest experience in working class organising.

Sorry, I don't accept your opinion.^^^^^^

Your answer is the best example of why it was necessary a new international. Good luck with your acronym.

Well, I don't. If there is a will, there is a way.

Some more feedback here:
https://freedomnews.org.uk/founding-of-a-new-international/
Maybe we will get some feedback and comment from the IWW in the UK later. There is presently a degree of cooperation between the IWW and the SolFed (IWA) in the UK (both accepting duel union membership with other unions) but not sure how that might pan out in the future on the back of this. In the UK there are already a number of different but equally small alternative base type unions apart from the above, operating mostly in the more precarious sectors of employment. Not sure how the approach of the main components of this new anarcho/revolutionary syndicalist international might differ from that of either the IWW or the SolFed ?.

They'll probably issue a 10 point program claiming that supporting Scottish independence is the road to anarchist revolution http://libcom.org/library/10-point-program-catalan-cnt

Fwiw, this^^^^ presents it's own challenges in the US as well.
More so on a lesser and individualized level. Though organizationally, to the extent it may exist as well (tho more as it related to international stuff).

Got a good chuckle

New international ready

Confederación Internacional del Trabajo.

Interesting stuff, I wish the participants all the best.

Intriguing to see that the CNT-F are taking part. I thought they were very much in the bad books of the Spanish CNT for taking part in works councils. Is that no longer the case?

Is that the new official name??

.

Is what told me a comrade that is there.

So it'll be Confederación Nactional del Trabajo-Confederación Internacional del Trabajo (CNT-CIT)

Not too self-serving of a name.

No, CNT has agreement to use locally only Confederación Nactional del Trabajo CNT.

So maybe only internationally you could see it.
There is only one CNT in Spain no reason to put any thing more.

I love the name. Really.

ICL/International Confederation of Labor

In relation to the post above in Spanish, this is really an interesting international which has sections whose organizations haven't voted to join yet. But details, details...

Mrs split:

Which section didn't vote? Because they came with agreements, or is like in other situations that you decide about other organizations if they take agreements or not base on your own criteria?

In CNT we saw several times how you were deciding which agreements of CNT were valid and which no base on your own criteria.

Also is interesting the delegates of WAS and ARS that express interest about the new international.

Looks like the IWW NARA delegates went against their mandate and committed the IWW NARA to founding the CIT and being secretariat in 4 years.

In all the congresses and in al the organizations there is a period to retificate the agreements or not. Totally normal. I go further, this is free federation, in any moment can a union decide to change and leave.

Melenas, Klas has given one answer to your question/accusation. I don't find it a minor point - I find it a basic problem when people don't understand this concept.

Hope the folks in NA who do understand this will work to ensure that people don't act this way. (Or you can end up with fallout like the CNT-R.)

Akai, as general secretary of IWA, it is pathetic to see you trolling in every post of CNT or the new international. Just mind your own business and your own organization. You will be remembered as one of the main persons that destroyed IWA loosing 95% of the members. You took active part in an internal conflict of an organization that wasn’t yours when you should stay neutral as IWA Secretary, adding fire instead of looking for consensus.
Just leave us alone.

This is a public discuss and the purpose of such forums is exactly to discuss, not to serve as a promotional tool for one option. Furthermore, your posts avoid the merit of what was said and try to harrass people, especially using untrue statements, while your friend tries to attach sexist married titles. This way of acting is why you had internal problems, not me. I really wonder how stupid people have to be to give credence to your theories instead if the most likely scenario.

I hooe comrades of IWW will do a better job of sorting things out than you did in Spain.