probably hadn't done it for a while
Greek insurrectionists blowing up shit again
Are those the two main criteria for deciding whether or not you support an action? If so, I wonder how you are able to quantify "shaken" and "strengthened." Personally I'm less optimistic about some world-historical impact of various acts of sabotage/refusal. For the ones who engage in them, they offer some small satisfaction that they are not accepting the status quo with resignation; for those who learn about them, they offer some small acknowledgement that their frustration is not isolated and that acts of sabotage and refusal can be undertaken without getting caught. Each further success (which I judge by the simple criteria of whether or not the perpetrators are caught and whether or not such actions can be reproduced/expanded without recourse to clandestine hierarchy) shows that the state and its watchdogs and enforcers are neither omnipotent nor omniscient. Revolution isn't just some sudden mass break with the prevailing order, but a cumulative process that begins with small acts fo refusal like the one described above.
Although an arson attack of this nature is not the most radical of actions that doesn't particularly change anything. Repeated arson attacks all the time is a way to get to the "untouchables"of this world. A blown out car still needs to be replaced still makes insurance premiums rise, pushing the levels up will lead to a collapse of the insurance system which is an achievable and satisfactory goal for anyone to reach that has an idea of social change.
Such a negative bunch of whiners on these forums.
Although an arson attack of this nature is not the most radical of actions that doesn't particularly change anything. Repeated arson attacks all the time is a way to get to the "untouchables"of this world. A blown out car still needs to be replaced still makes insurance premiums rise, pushing the levels up will lead to a collapse of the insurance system which is an achievable and satisfactory goal for anyone to reach that has an idea of social change.
Such a negative bunch of whiners on these forums.
Whenever my insurance goes up i know revolution is getting closer.
But to be serious, read some economics: most of the economic system is fictitious anyways, and the insurance industry is especially so. If it collapses, it won't be because of real things happening like damaged cars, it'll be because of a problem in circulation of fake money.
After all, they write the rules, they can just deny the claims.
A blown out car still needs to be replaced still makes insurance premiums rise, pushing the levels up will lead to a collapse of the insurance system which is an achievable and satisfactory goal for anyone to reach that has an idea of social change.
A street full of smashed windows (cars, houses, etc.) might push up premiums too - are you going to suggest this as a viable revolutionary strategy?
Although an arson attack of this nature is not the most radical of actions that doesn't particularly change anything. Repeated arson attacks all the time is a way to get to the "untouchables"of this world. A blown out car still needs to be replaced still makes insurance premiums rise, pushing the levels up will lead to a collapse of the insurance system which is an achievable and satisfactory goal for anyone to reach that has an idea of social change.
Such a negative bunch of whiners on these forums.
You div.





Link
Anyone know why they picked the Saudis?