Hezbollah: "chaos more oppressive than tyrannical or illegitimate governments"

14 replies [Last post]
User offline. Last seen 1 year 39 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 16-08-05

This morning's Financial Times claims: Hezbollah is trying to "bring down the government"[1] in Lebanon.

Anyone who's read peer reviewed studies of Hezbollah might think otherwise.

For example, take professor Amal Saad-Ghorayeb's study Hizb'ullah: Politics & Religion (Pluto Press 2002). she quotes the Shia Islamist and Hezbollah's take on Sharia (Islamic law), saying that Hezbollah views "chaos" as more oppressive than a tyrannical or illegitimate regimes. Hezbollah's leaders reasons for their view is basically that "chaos" will lead to civil war and that's the worst possible outcome, and that all Party activity is to avoid provoking the kind of actions that may lead to civil war (pp. 22 - 24).

This applies to their views on Lebanon and beyond. for example, she cites Hezbollah leaders calling on the Islamists in Egypt not to take up arms against the oppressive Egyptian State, they call for dialogue between the two instead (p.24). The exception to this view is when the "umma" (Islamic communiy) is mortally threatened, as in the case with Israeli invasions of Lebanon and the wholesale Israeli carpet bombing of Lebanese civilians.[2]

Even in domestic matters, Hezbollah is said to have sought mediation, not violence. In his In The Path of Hizbullah (Syracuse 2004)[3] Nizar Hamzeh, another professor that used to teach at the American University in Beirut and now teaches at it's sister college in Kuwait, has written that in areas Hezbollah controled during the Lebanese civil war, where Sharia was imposed, Hezbollah Islamic mediation officials sought to persuade the local clans to abandon the tribal custom of "a tooth for a tooth" and accept a negotiated settlement instead. so in murder cases, Hezbollah mediators would plea with the victim's family not to seek the death(s) of the killer or the killer's family member(s). Hamzeh writes that they usually proposed a financial compensation instead. for poor famillies, Hezbollah even paid the amount out of Party funds.

In general, if anyone thinks that Hezbollah wants to "bring down" the government and impose an Islamic State on all Lebanese (and, in some crazy corners, on Israelis, Palestinians, Syrians, etc), they may wish to read an article on the Federation of American Scientists' website, translated from an August 10, 2006 article in the conservative Iranian publication Ya Lesarat Ol-Hoseyn. In it Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah's general secretary ("the Che Guevara of the Arabs"[4]) states:

Quote:
"Islam is the religion on which you can establish a government on the basis of its principles. I would not deny that Hizballah's wish is to establish an Islamic Republic system one day, because Hizballah believes that establishing an Islamic government is the only way to bring stability to a society and is the only way to settle social differences, even in a society that is composed of numerous minorities. Nevertheless, establishing an Islamic Republic is not possible with force and resistance. It requires a national referendum. A referendum that wins 51 percent of the vote is still not the solution. What it needs is a referendum for which 90 percent of the people vote. Hence, with this assumption, and in view of the status quo, establishing an Islamic Republic system in Lebanon is not possible at the present time." http://www.fas.org/irp/news/2006/08/nasrallah.html

Notes

1. "...leaders of the anti-Syrian parliamentary majority have suggested that the assassination of Mr Gemayel was an attempt to bring down the government."

"Mourners gather ahead of Gemayel funeral," The Financial Times, By Ferry Biedermann in Beirut, Last updated: November 22 2006 11:07
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/a41f2178-7a19-11db-8d70-0000779e2340.html

this morning's Financial Times article about yesterday's assassination of a Christian Phalange party politician, was full of silly accusations, which cited no evidence, but suggested that Hezbollah is trying to "bring down the government". It also mentions that Lebanese right wingers, supporters of the Christian Phalange party are now "galvanized," "outraged" and "angry."

Now, an average reader who hasn't had the time to read the scholarship (understably so)
on Hezbollah and it's aims, methods, statements, etc. might be easily misled to believe that, since they're Islamists, then naturally we don't need any evidence to make serious accusations against them in a major Western newspaper. It's a little disturbing, if unsurprising, to see a major Western newspaper fail to mention these known facts on Hezbollah in its reporting. The same mistake was made during the Cold War Re: anyone in the "third world" to the left of Washington. Now, they're lumping all Arabs/Muslims into one big mess they think is called "Al-something"

2. "Fatal Strikes:Israel..s Indiscriminate Attacks Against Civilians in Lebanon"
Human Rights Watch
http://www.hrw.org/reports/2006/lebanon0806/

3. http://www.syracuseuniversitypress.syr.edu/fall-2004-catalog/path-hizbullah.html

4. "Nasrallah: from humble roots to Arab hero," The Daily Star, 09.05.2006, Rym Ghazal, Daily Star staff
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=1&categ_id=2&article_id=75244

Tacks's picture
User offline. Last seen 29 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 8-11-05

interesting stuff

Tacks's picture
User offline. Last seen 29 weeks 3 days ago. Offline
Joined: 8-11-05

so who killed that inister and why?

Khawaga's picture
User is online Online
Joined: 7-08-06
Quote:
so who killed that inister and why?

Syria man, didn't you get the Bush/UN memo?

User offline. Last seen 1 year 38 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 31-10-06
atlemk wrote:
Quote:
so who killed that inister and why?

Syria man, didn't you get the Bush/UN memo?

I'm not sure about him being a 'Syria man'. Judging from his age, he seems to be the grandson of late Pierre Gemayel who, after a visit to the Berlin Olympics, founded the Phalanges Libanaises back home which had definite affinities to Nazi ideology. PL claimed the xtian Lebanese descended right from the Phoenicians, contrary to all the rest of the population (especially the Muslims). One of his sons was the commander of the PL militia during the war in Lebanon and responsible for a massacre in a Palestinian refugee settlement.Iirc, Bashir Gemayel ran for President and got blown up, too, so that his brother Amin had to 'step in' as a candidate.

Beneath the surface, Lebanese society functions on a clan system, with each clan having a 'Zaim' (headman) who has to provide for his clan members. On the other hand, the individual clan members will profit from this system (jobs, houses etc) as long as he pleases the Zaim. I suppose this opens up several possibilities.

Khawaga's picture
User is online Online
Joined: 7-08-06

well, I didn't mean him being syrian. I was just saying "syria did it", coz that is what bush, hariri and chirac would like us to believe. I was trying to be somwhat funny, but I obviously failed... wink

User offline. Last seen 1 year 39 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 16-08-05
Tacks wrote:
so who killed that inister and why?

if i knew, i'd be much more effective in this world.

so far noone who's made accusations has presented any evidence, to the best of my knowledge. just saying "it was Syria!" doesn't mean it was. then when, other unscrupulous reporters pick up that accusation, with zero evidence, and try to insinuate that Hizbullah, since they have some anti-imperialist connection to Syria, must have been involved... it certainly serves the interests of Washington, but is complete horse dung without any evidence.

not even Tony "The Poodle" Blair has come out and said "i've personally seen the evidence that it was Syria" or anything like that.

Khawaga's picture
User is online Online
Joined: 7-08-06

There has been theories about Syria, Hezbollah, even the Hariri gang. The last one I heard (I think it was on the Angry Arab blog) was that it was an intra-communal thing, some internal christian power thing. Still, no evidence one way or the other.

What concerns me much more in Lebanon is the racist violence that Syrian workers face from fascist or semi-fascist groups of Lebanese. Every week some Syrian person is killed, beaten up, his car set on fire or something else.

User offline. Last seen 25 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 25-12-05
freedum wrote:
In general, if anyone thinks that Hezbollah wants to "bring down" the government and impose an Islamic State on all Lebanese (and, in some crazy corners, on Israelis, Palestinians, Syrians, etc), they may wish to read an article...

Hey look, Hezbollah wants to bring down the government.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/794802.html

User offline. Last seen 1 year 39 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 16-08-05
Quote:
Hey look, Hezbollah wants to bring down the government.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/794802.html

hey look! Seniora, the source of the Haaretz article, is an American puppet who couldn't even use his pretty mouth to get Bush to stop the Israeli massacre of Lebanese this summer.

my point was that when most people in Europe or the US write about how Hezbollah wants to "bring down" the government are usually panicking about crap like "the Caliphate is coming back!" and it's simply not true at this point. there's certainly a lot of this sort of unsupported speculation in Western media.

the Haaretz article quoted above doesn't seem contradict my point. the article states that "Nasrallah... called for peaceful protests to force it [the current administration] to resign." calling for a gov't [adminitstration] to "resign" doesn't imply any sort of revolutionary activities or the overthrow of the current system of government.

Quote:
The call for peaceful street action came in a statement broadcast Thursday on the television stations of Hezbollah and other opposition groups.... The opposition "calls on all the Lebanese of all sects and parties... to gather peacefully and stage an open-ended sit-in to protest the absence of real political participation and to demand a national unity government, whose priority is to decide a new election law," the statement said.
User offline. Last seen 1 year 39 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 16-08-05

Here's what Nasrallah said on December 7, 2006:

Quote:
'We will not be dragged into any strife even if you kill a thousand of us. We will not raise weapons in the face of anyone ... Our weapons are only for our Israeli enemy,' he added, speaking from an undisclosed location.

Hezbollah vows to press ahead with anti-govt drive, REUTERS, By Nadim Ladki

In the past Hizbullah has shown itself capable of rather imressive restraint from violence, even when its' members were killed by the Lebanese army. for example, in 2002 Amal Saad-Ghorayeb wrote in Hizbullah: Politics & Religion:

Quote:
First... the Shari'a which conceives of public disorder as an even greater 'evil' than oppressive rule, because of its own ineluctable culmination in civil
war.... Second is the ease with which external enemies... can penetrate a lawless society, especially in a civil war. It was for these reasons that Hizbu'llah exercised extreme restraint in the face of the [Lebanese] government's killing of several Hizbu'llah protesters who took part in a demonstration against the Oslo Accord, on 13 September 1993, otherwise known as the 'September Massacre'

See also Learning from Its Mistakes, London Review of Books, Vol. 28 No. 16 dated 17 August 2006, by Charles Glass:

Quote:
The deputy secretary-general and co-founder of Hizbullah, Sheikh Naim Qassem, wrote a fascinating if partisan account of the creation and rise of Hizbullah. His version of the events in 2000 is, however, borne out by eyewitnesses from other Lebanese sects – including some who stood to lose their lives – and the UN. ‘It is no secret that some young combatants, as well as some of the region’s citizens, had a desire for vengeance – especially those who were aware of what collaborators and their families had inflicted on the mujahedin and their next of kin across the occupied villages,’ Qassem wrote in Hizbullah: The Story from Within. ‘Resistance leadership issued a strict warning forbidding any such action and vowing to discipline those who took it whatever the justifications.’ Hizbullah captured Israeli weapons, which it is now using against Israel, and turned over SLA militiamen to the government without murdering any of them. Barbarous?... ...what impressed most Lebanese as much as Hizbullah's victory over Israel was its refusal to murder collaborators -- a triumph over the tribalism that has plagued and divided Lebanese society since its founding. Christians I knew in the Lebanese army admitted that their own side would have committed atrocities.
User offline. Last seen 1 year 39 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 16-08-05

it'd be interesting to see if Western media, yet again, pick up Israeli propaganda about Hezbollah. MEMRI* just released a press release claiming that "Hizbullah Threatens Violent Escalation" of the protests in Beirut.

Quote:
"Despite Arab Diplomatic Efforts, Hizbullah Threatens Violent Escalation – To Begin this Coming Monday (January 8, 2007)"
http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP141407

Professor As'ad, from Anrgy Arab News Service (http://angryarab.blogspot.com/) said about this MEMRi report:

Quote:
I thought that maybe there is some new information that I don't know about although I read all Lebanese newspapers last night, and receive all Lebanese TV stations. It turned out that MEMRI just made up that headline and that it was a typical MEMRI fabrication. They attributed the the report to an article by Ibrahim Al-Amin (identified as editor) although he is not the editor of the paper; Joseph Samahah is the editor-in-chief and Al-Amin is chairperson of the board of the company that owns Al-Akhbar. I read the article in question by Al-Amin last night, and said no such things. Al-Amin is not Hizbullah: he is a former Communist fighter who participated in key battles during the Lebanese civil war on the side of the Lebanese Communist Party. The article in question spoke about tas`id (escalation) but in the rhetoric of the opposition in Lebanon, it has been made repeatedly clear that all the steps of escalation will adhere to non-violent struggle and protests.

==========
* for more on MEMRI see
http://www.guardian.co.uk/elsewhere/journalist/story/0,7792,773258,00.html

Quote:
Selective Memri

Brian Whitaker investigates whether the 'independent' media institute that translates the Arabic newspapers is quite what it seems

Monday August 12, 2002
Guardian Unlimited

User offline. Last seen 44 min 20 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 13-10-05

good to see MEMRI outed. they're a bunch of bought-and-paid-for neocon mouthpieces. disbelieve everything they say.

User offline. Last seen 21 weeks 5 days ago. Offline
Joined: 23-09-06
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 10-04-06

Powerful music video. Arab pop is really good at portraying feelings of rising tension and fear. So used to Palestinian music I assumed the Hezbollah fighters were Israeli forces initially.