Lakota Nation declares independence

61 posts / 0 new
Last post
zarathustra
Offline
Joined: 8-12-07
Jan 12 2008 18:57
october_lost wrote:
Apparently a webcast question and answer session is planned via youtube before January 10th black bloc it looks positive that they want to engage with the wider world.
Any questions or observations should be forwarded to them to their email address via their website

red n black star

There you go wangwei. You tell 'em they're cogs in the system of the capitalist mode of production and state ideological hegemony!

wdh3
Offline
Joined: 20-11-07
Jan 12 2008 20:08

OK, there may be very real limitations on the effect/usefulness of the Lakotah's action here. All the same, some perspective on the Lakotah people (from their website):

Morality-
Lakotah men have a life expectancy of less than 44 years, lowest of any country in the World (excluding AIDS) including Haiti.
Lakotah death rate is the highest in the United States.
The Lakotah infant mortality rate is 300% more than the U.S. Average.
Teenage suicide rate is 150% higher than the U.S national average for this group.

Drugs & Alcohol-
More than half the Reservation’s adults battle addiction and disease.
Alcoholism affects 8 in 10 families.

Incarceration-
Indian children incarceration rate 40% higher than whites.
In South Dakota, 21 percent of state prisoners were Native.
Indians have the second largest state prison incarceration rate in the nation.

Disease-
The Tuberculosis rate on Lakotah reservations is approx 800% higher than the U.S national average.
Cervical cancer is 500% higher than the U.S national average.
The rate of diabetes is 800% higher than the U.S national average.
Federal Commodity Food Program provides high sugar foods that kill Native people through diabetes and heart disease.

Poverty-
Median income is approximately $2,600 to $3,500 per year.
97% of our Lakotah people live below the poverty line.
Many families cannot afford heating oil, wood or propane and many residents use ovens to heat their homes.

Housing-
Elderly die each winter from hypothermia (freezing).
1/3 of the homes lack basic clean water and sewage while 40% lack electricity.
60% of Reservation families have no telephone.
60% of housing is infected with potentially fatal black molds.
There is an estimated average of 17 people living in each family home (may only have two to three rooms). Some homes, built for 6 to 8 people, have up to 30 people living in them.

Unemployment-
Unemployment rates on our reservations is 85% or higher.

Threatened Culture-
Only 14% of the Lakotah population can speak Lakotah language.
The language is not being shared inter-generationally, today, the average Lakotah speaker is 65 years old.
Our lakotah language is an Endangered Language, on the verge of extinction.

Deezer
Offline
Joined: 2-10-04
Jan 12 2008 20:43

Those stats seem extremely similar to stats on Irish Travellers. They are appalling but not an argument for 'independence'. Also your use of the word country is a bit strange, surely the Lakota are a group not a country?

JoeMaguire's picture
JoeMaguire
Offline
Joined: 26-09-03
Jan 12 2008 21:54

wdh3 is quoting directly from the website.
BB its not fair to assess whats happening with the tribal people in the US in the same framework as travellers.

Deezer
Offline
Joined: 2-10-04
Jan 12 2008 23:50

Right he's quoting directly from the website, did I imply he made it up? Not that I was assessing things in relation to Irish Travellers just pointing out that the stats seem similar, and why wouldn't they? I'm not saying its the same or anything. I still don't think there is an argument for 'independence' or that independence is even possible.

Out of interest do you know anything about the Travellers I'm referring to?

zarathustra
Offline
Joined: 8-12-07
Jan 13 2008 00:35

If by country you mean "nation-state" than I'm having nothing to do with it. Bakunin made a huge distinction between the "state" and the "fatherland." A national consciousness is quite different from elitist thinking. In fact, the working class has only ever been truly patriotic, since the ruling class sell their country down the first opportunity they have. Again, Bakunin commented on this in a 19th century French context - the French ruling class were sad to see the Germans go! Likewise, in Britain the ruling class are selling British workers down the river by importing loads of cheap labor to put a downward pressure (as the recent SPGB editorial put it) on wages! But I digress.

zarathustra
Offline
Joined: 8-12-07
Jan 13 2008 00:43
Bakunin wrote:
A fatherland represents the incontestable and sacred right of every man, of every human group, association, commune, region, and nation, to live, to feel, to think, to want, and to act in its own way - and this manner of living and feeling is always the incontestable result of a long historic development.
zarathustra
Offline
Joined: 8-12-07
Jan 13 2008 01:10

Bakunin at his most sensible, as far as I can see. No infantile Enlightenment monism. Its interesting that a group such as the International Communist Current (ICC) see a direct link between Christianity and International Communism:

Quote:
Indeed, if anything, the Jews had further to go than the Christians: in the view of the Left Hegelians, Christianity was the last religious envelope in which the struggle for human emancipation had expressed itself historically. Having rejected the universalist message of Christianity, the Jews had two steps to make while the Christians had only one.

160 Years on: Marx and the Jewish Question

This universalism can be better expressed as monism - or the centrifugal will to authority. This Judeo-Christian monism is in direct contradiction with the kind of tribal anti-centrifugal violence (a la Pierre Clastre) that opposed statist forces. Look at difference between a figure such as, say, King David and Nordic heroes such as Beowulf or King Arthur. This was what Nietzsche was getting at with his "blond brute" talk - individualism is a Nordic/Western development, as far as I can figure. The anarchist and syndicalist movement stand in the feet of the barbarians who sacked Rome - the center of Aristotelian-Judeo-Christian monism. Of course, monist "universalist" leftism stands to corrupt the freedom-loving working class forces (as in fact, has happened before). This leftism was identified by Georges Sorel as the modern equivalent of the Caesaro-Papism that emasculated the Nordic forces who threw down the Roman Empire.

I could go on, but I'll suffice to say that the impulse towards monist "universalism" runs counter to the spirit of freedom and progress. The syndicalist movement has been an internationalist movement. "Inter-", right. Not globalist, like the ruling class.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Jan 13 2008 16:44

Which Lakotas in the 21st century have a pre-proletarian conciousness? Thats the most hilarious assertion I've heard in a long time.

zarathustra
Offline
Joined: 8-12-07
Jan 13 2008 17:30

Well, the fact that they are articulating their struggle for freedom along tribal lines suggests such. Of course, which came first - chicken or egg? But quite honestly, while these individuals still possess a consciousness which is rooted in their tribal identity, and have done so for the past hundred plus years since they were defeated, that would suggest they're still a tribal people. I know what clan my ancestors belonged to back in the day, before the Roman invasion of England, but I don't identify with my clan no more. If my clan had survived to this day and I still identified myself in relation to it, I'd have tribal consciousnesses. Correcto?

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Jan 13 2008 17:33
zarathustra wrote:
Well, the fact that they are articulating their struggle for freedom along tribal lines suggests such. Of course, which came first - chicken or egg? But quite honestly, while these individuals still possess a consciousness which is rooted in their tribal identity, and have done so for the past hundred plus years since they were defeated, that would suggest they're still a tribal people. I know what clan my ancestors belonged to back in the day, before the Roman invasion of England, but I don't identify with my clan no more. If my clan had survived to this day and I still identified myself in relation to it, I'd have tribal consciousnesses. Correcto?

No. Not correcto. I'm jewish. Do I have a pre-roman conciousness? Or regardless of however I culturally identify do I live under capitalism? You're absurdo.

Deezer
Offline
Joined: 2-10-04
Jan 13 2008 18:06

Yeah zara that seems absurd to me and all. It'd be like arguing that because loyalists/unionists and republicans/nationalists prioritise what are essentially communal interests and politics over class interests that they are tribal as opposed to proletarian.

Felix Frost's picture
Felix Frost
Offline
Joined: 30-12-05
Jan 13 2008 21:38
zarathustra wrote:
There aren't too many subjugated nationalities in a country such as France. Unless you count Roma, or something.

I think there's a few Basque, Corsican and Brittany nationalists that would disagree with you on that.

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Jan 13 2008 21:43

zarathustra you are a fucking retard, a fucking embarrassment to anarchism, which is saying something.

Smash Rich Bastards
Offline
Joined: 24-03-06
Jan 13 2008 21:52

Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming? Who in their right mind would even wanna claim that territory for a nation? Eeesh.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Jan 13 2008 21:54
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming? Who in their right mind would even wanna claim that territory for a nation? Eeesh.

I like Montana. I go there all the time.

Smash Rich Bastards
Offline
Joined: 24-03-06
Jan 13 2008 22:10
thugarchist wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming? Who in their right mind would even wanna claim that territory for a nation? Eeesh.

I like Montana. I go there all the time.

That place looks like the moon. Freaks me out.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Jan 13 2008 22:12
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming? Who in their right mind would even wanna claim that territory for a nation? Eeesh.

I like Montana. I go there all the time.

That place looks like the moon. Freaks me out.

I walked out of my hotel in Bozeman one morning and there was this old guy playing the banjo on a steamer trunk. Montana rules. Plus awesome steaks.

Smash Rich Bastards
Offline
Joined: 24-03-06
Jan 13 2008 22:16
thugarchist wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming? Who in their right mind would even wanna claim that territory for a nation? Eeesh.

I like Montana. I go there all the time.

That place looks like the moon. Freaks me out.

I walked out of my hotel in Bozeman one morning and there was this old guy playing the banjo on a steamer trunk. Montana rules. Plus awesome steaks.

I almost threw down with a Billy Ray Cyrus looking dude at a bar in Butte once. Its always been a dream of mine to kick the shit out of a cowboy. Too bad his buddy talked him down.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Jan 13 2008 22:21
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming? Who in their right mind would even wanna claim that territory for a nation? Eeesh.

I like Montana. I go there all the time.

That place looks like the moon. Freaks me out.

I walked out of my hotel in Bozeman one morning and there was this old guy playing the banjo on a steamer trunk. Montana rules. Plus awesome steaks.

I almost threw down with a Billy Ray Cyrus looking dude at a bar in Butte once. Its always been a dream of mine to kick the shit out of a cowboy. Too bad his buddy talked him down.

You're never going to be able to foment a modern peasant uprising in the US with that kind of attitude.

fnbrill's picture
fnbrill
Offline
Joined: 13-01-07
Jan 13 2008 22:21

I kind of agree with Zara.

The problem is that the Lakota have never really been incorporated into capitalism. There are families on the Pine Ridge, etc. who have never had full time wage labor, ever. Not just a couple of generations, I mean never. So the situation isn't the same as the Basques, Corsicans, etc. So they don't have Ulsterior motives.

Ironically, the closest class the recognized tribes would be identified with would be the classic European aristocracy as most tribal members on reservations survive on monies recieved for hereditary land rights ie. rents. via. the Federal Gov't. The problem is, as I've stated before on this thread, that the Federal Go't has been defrauding the tribes for decades/centuries. Now the tribes have some money to pay for lawyers and the feds are sweating - and not in lodges.

I have an ex who is a traditional Lakota. I asked her opinions regarding Means' proclaimation. She laughed and said her folks at Pine Ridge are amoused and consider it a interesting provocation/grandstanding by Means.

fnbrill's picture
fnbrill
Offline
Joined: 13-01-07
Jan 13 2008 22:25

Montana is too eastern for my liking.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Jan 13 2008 22:26
fnbrill wrote:
I kind of agree with Zara. The problem is that the Lakota have never really been incorporated into capitalism. There are families on the Pine Ridge, etc. who have never had full time wage labor, ever. Not just a couple of generations, I mean never. So the situation isn't the same as the Basques, Corsicans, etc. So they don't have Ulsterior motives.

Ironically, the closest class the recognized tribes would be identified with would be the classic European aristocracy as most tribal members on reservations survive on monies recieved for hereditary land rights ie. rents. via. the Federal Gov't. The problem is, as I've stated before on this thread, that the Federal Go't has been defrauding the tribes for decades/centuries. Now the tribes have some money to pay for lawyers and the feds are sweating.

Dude. Do you actually agree that "they" have a "pre-proletarian conciousness" or do you just agree that the Lakota political play is a positive thing? C'mon. Pre-proletarian conciuosness? That shit's nutty as hell.

Smash Rich Bastards
Offline
Joined: 24-03-06
Jan 13 2008 22:28
thugarchist wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Smash Rich Bastards wrote:
Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana and Wyoming? Who in their right mind would even wanna claim that territory for a nation? Eeesh.

I like Montana. I go there all the time.

That place looks like the moon. Freaks me out.

I walked out of my hotel in Bozeman one morning and there was this old guy playing the banjo on a steamer trunk. Montana rules. Plus awesome steaks.

I almost threw down with a Billy Ray Cyrus looking dude at a bar in Butte once. Its always been a dream of mine to kick the shit out of a cowboy. Too bad his buddy talked him down.

You're never going to be able to foment a modern peasant uprising in the US with that kind of attitude.

Don't worry. Pretty sure he was just dressing the part for a night out. I would probably think twice about getting into it with some real-deal tough-ass cow herder.

fnbrill's picture
fnbrill
Offline
Joined: 13-01-07
Jan 13 2008 22:32

Duke,

What I'm saying is they don't fall into the typical marxian catagory of "proletarian". That's why I *kind of* agree. Are they pre-prole? No. They are one of those strange social anomalies which are different. They live inside and beside capitalism at the same time.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Jan 13 2008 22:39
fnbrill wrote:
Duke,

What I'm saying is they don't fall into the typical marxian catagory of "proletarian". That's why I *kind of* agree. Are they pre-prole? No. They are one of those strange social anomalies which are different. They live inside and beside capitalism at the same time.

Fine. I can live with that. Except for the conciousness thing. I mean they do read newspapers and shit. They got pickup trucks. There's tv and radio. They don't live on Dinotopia Island. I spent a decent amount of time on reservations when I was younger. I could always buy smokes, beer and a snickers. Thats all I'm sayin.

fnbrill's picture
fnbrill
Offline
Joined: 13-01-07
Jan 13 2008 22:40
thugarchist wrote:
fnbrill wrote:
Duke,

What I'm saying is they don't fall into the typical marxian catagory of "proletarian". That's why I *kind of* agree. Are they pre-prole? No. They are one of those strange social anomalies which are different. They live inside and beside capitalism at the same time.

Fine. I can live with that. Except for the conciousness thing. I mean they do read newspapers and shit. They got pickup trucks. There's tv and radio. They don't live on Dinotopia Island. I spent a decent amount of time on reservations when I was younger. I could always buy smokes, beer and a snickers. Thats all I'm sayin.

We agree. Better an indian bar than a logger bar.

jef costello's picture
jef costello
Offline
Joined: 9-02-06
Jan 13 2008 22:40
zarathustra wrote:
I know what clan my ancestors belonged to back in the day, before the Roman invasion of England, but I don't identify with my clan no more.

grin

MalFunction
Offline
Joined: 31-10-03
Jan 14 2008 11:30

Was reading an article from LiP magazine last night:

Winona LaDuke "Islands in a continent: an indiginous view of north america"

http://www.lipmagazine.org/articles/featladuke_68_p1.htm

which may be of interest.