The need for local independent news

Submitted by Sleeper on May 9, 2016

The need for local independent news]

By this I mean area, city or region based everyday news that is brought to people without advertisements or anything else that makes it a task or difficult just to be aware what is happening around you.

I know Indymedia was created at a particular time and for a particular reason and for activists, however the model of local based independent news and opinion can be resurrected whenever we choose...

Any thoughts on this?

Steven.

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Steven. on May 9, 2016

I know that Haringey Solidarity Group produced a local newsletter for a couple of decades at least (don't know if it's still going?)

However, it was a lot of effort, and I don't know really how useful it ended up being for the organisation if. Any HSG people want to comment? (I was in it but only lived in Haringey quite briefly)

Serge Forward

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Serge Forward on May 9, 2016

I was involved in setting up the first incarnation of Hackney Solidarity group. The Hackney Heckler was distributed pretty effectively in parts of the borough and got a fairly decent response, if I remember correctly. But that was in the days long before the Internet. I don't know if such a project would work so well in these days of Facefuck and Twatter. But always worth a go doing something like this, as long as you've got comrades prepared to graft for it and write, print and distribute it.

fingers malone

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by fingers malone on May 9, 2016

There were loads of local anarchist papers back in the day, I remember Hackney Heckler but also Yorkshire Evening Pest and South London Stress. If you can get articles that are really relevant to people and give the lowdown on stuff happening locally they can be really good. I used to do some of the donkey work for South London Stress and stand outside Brixton tube station handing it out, people did want to read it.

jef costello

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by jef costello on May 10, 2016

I only helped with distribution of the HSG newsletter but I thought it was worthwhile although it was hard to qualify it. It was good to have copies on the stall and was a good starting point with people at demos etc. People like having the chance to read something good rather thn being badgered into paying for the socialist worker.

There were often quite a few left at the end of a print run and sometimes we'd distribute them door to door, other times there was a bigger run so we could put them through doors. I don't remember anyne coming to us based on reading the magazine when it had come through the door.

HSG also has a postal mailout that I thought was a bit pointless but a lot of people liked it and people had standing orders that covered the cost of it so it didn't lose us anything, aside from an evening once a month to prepare it although to be honest those evenings were quite nice, everyone sat around with a relatively simple task to do together.

Sleeper

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Sleeper on May 13, 2016

Ah right I can see where this discussion has gone. As soon as I mentioned local/regional people have assumed a local paper or newsletter. I'm really talking about a local internet based news service that offers an independent, non corporate, ad free alternative to the local commercial rags website.

So let's say for example the Manchester Evening News. Their website bristles with adverts, pop ups and is fucking horrible to use for the average mancunian or anyone looking for some local news. That's the norm now and it does nothing to encourage people to be aware of what is happening.

I remember 12 years ago or more it was possible to collate news items on particular topics from a wide spectrum of sources and present them independently. Can this still be done, and is it worth doing?

Jim

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Jim on May 13, 2016

I don't think adverts are much of an issue, most people use ad blockers now and one of the best local anarchist papers I can think of carried adverts (Walthamstow Anarchist Group's The Underdog). They did that because the adverts covered the cost of printing and many of the small businesses who took out adverts were happy for stacks of the paper to be left in them. These were places like kebab shops and pubs if I recall correctly. I think taking this approach allowed the group to cover two of the problems anarchist papers face, the cost of production and distribution.

jef costello

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by jef costello on May 13, 2016

I suppose for a site that doesn't need to make money from advertisers you don't need to respect a 24-hour news cycle and you can go a few days between articles and updates.
The problem is finding people who can and will write things and that they can then find things to write about.

I used to do news for libcom and basically I trawled every francophone site I could find for news every single day, I had google news alerts set up for all the key words and so on. It took up a lot of time and I don't know if the results were worth it. But that was an international site and I was doing mostly international news. For my local area, for example, I wouldn't know where to start.
HSG worked because there were quite a few people who were extremely dedicated and spent huge amounts of time organising. And even with that core the newsletter was quarterly. That's the kind of website that people look at a few times and lose interest in because there aren't updates. I think the Walthamstow paper had a similar core of people, I think two were retired, and without that kind of dedication I think it would be difficult to run it. FInding that number of people on a local level and avoiding burnout and natural turnover as people move would be difficult, although it has been done in a few places.

I'd contribute to a local site like that given the opportunity, but I don't have the time, knowledge or connections to set one up.

JK's link to The Cable is interesting, but it proposes paying contributors and it has a huge amount of start-up cash from grants etc which could not necessarily be replicated elswhere even if the funding model could.

Sleeper

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Sleeper on May 16, 2016

Thanks for that. It seems like you have just under a thousand paying contributors. It's a model for how things can be done.

Yesterday I picked up issue 26 of NERVE which is a wonderful free or donation mag in Liverpool. This is another model for how things can be done. - http://www.catalystmedia.org.uk/

What both are missing is how it can be done online. The only decent thing I can find is Spiked, and yes I do know who is behind it - http://www.spiked-online.com/

Joseph Kay

Bristol Cable

Fleur

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Fleur on May 16, 2016

The only decent thing I can find is Spiked

The fuck? You think that bigoted pile of shit is decent?

Sleeper

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Sleeper on May 16, 2016

Show me something better doing the same thing then. A regular online based media source. I think NERVE is brilliant (read it Fleur) and it is local based news and culture that manages to dip under the radar sometimes. What it isn't is an online based news source ..

Fleur

The only decent thing I can find is Spiked

The fuck? You think that bigoted pile of shit is decent?

Steven.

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Steven. on May 16, 2016

Sleeper

What both are missing is how it can be done online. The only decent thing I can find is Spiked, and yes I do know who is behind it - http://www.spiked-online.com/

lol, well if you like that den of bigoted and idiotic bullshit then it's no wonder you don't like libcom (although kind of bizarre you spend so much time here)

jef costello

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by jef costello on May 17, 2016

Well, spiked does have lots of articles and no adverts that I can see.

But the articles I read were either openly bigoted or dog whistle politics.

It isn't a local news source either.

Battlescarred

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Battlescarred on May 17, 2016

Spiked is an unmitigated pile of shite.

Serge Forward

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Serge Forward on May 17, 2016

Never read it, never likely to... but going off the Wikipedia page, I notice there's ex-AWG involvement :o

Sleeper

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Sleeper on May 17, 2016

It's what left of the RCP who were active in the 1980's and in to the early 1990's. Particularly active in Irish politics and anti-fascism. They were behind Living Marxism magazine which was different at the time, as Spiked was when it started. Have you had a look at Nerve? It's a local arts and community based mag that manages to get out a couple of times a year if they're lucky.

I'm still wandering if it's even possible to put out an independent news source on a daily basis. Technology wise is it possible?

jef costello

Well, spiked does have lots of articles and no adverts that I can see.

But the articles I read were either openly bigoted or dog whistle politics.

It isn't a local news source either.

Sleeper

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Sleeper on May 17, 2016

I don't like arseholes who have nothing positive to offer. All they do is scoff and use other peoples contributions to make a name for themselves.

Steven.

Sleeper

What both are missing is how it can be done online. The only decent thing I can find is Spiked, and yes I do know who is behind it - http://www.spiked-online.com/

lol, well if you like that den of bigoted and idiotic bullshit then it's no wonder you don't like libcom (although kind of bizarre you spend so much time here)

Auld-bod

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Auld-bod on May 17, 2016

Sleeper #18

At times it is better to say nothing, than to reveal you have nothing to say.

jef costello

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by jef costello on May 17, 2016

Sleeper

I'm still wandering if it's even possible to put out an independent news source on a daily basis. Technology wise is it possible?

Yes and it has been for a long time. You can set it up as a blog and use a free service like wordpress. You can set it up to have admins and contributors etc. It's a good idea to get your own site address rather than use one that they provide is what I was told. If you know more complicated stuff you can set up a front page like libcom has as well. A front page like spiked's isn't too complicate deither I don't think.
If you asked nicely the libcom admins would probably give you some advice, they helped set up a discussion forum a few years ago that had loads of people who were banned from here, so they're not too petty.

Your problem would be getting the content. Updating local news on a daily basis when you have no revenues means you need a decent-sized organisation to pay for hosting etc (not too much) and willing to find, write and edit content (not at all easy)
It also requires a fair bit of co-ordination so you don't end up with people researching and writing articles on the same subject.

Fleur

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Fleur on May 17, 2016

Jeff is correct. There are plenty of wordpress themes you can can download for free, which take the form of a newspaper. Lots of people do it. It's really quite easy to set up a pretty professional looking site. Driving the traffic in your direction is another thing.

I used to write for a local online newspaper. It was a pain in the ass, nobody got their stuff together on time and you really need someone to be willing to boot people up the ass to get their copy in on time for the deadline.

Battlescarred

7 years 11 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Battlescarred on May 21, 2016

Sleeper

Thanks for that. It seems like you have just under a thousand paying contributors. It's a model for how things can be done.

Yesterday I picked up issue 26 of NERVE which is a wonderful free or donation mag in Liverpool. This is another model for how things can be done. - http://www.catalystmedia.org.uk/

What both are missing is how it can be done online. The only decent thing I can find is Spiked, and yes I do know who is behind it - http://www.spiked-online.com/

Joseph Kay

Bristol Cable

What, you mean vile stuff like "The tyranny of the Trans Movement"?
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/the-tyranny-of-the-trans-movement/18367#.V0AuQpEguM9

Reddebrek

7 years 10 months ago

In reply to by libcom.org

Submitted by Reddebrek on May 28, 2016

Sleeper

It's what left of the RCP who were active in the 1980's and in to the early 1990's. Particularly active in Irish politics and anti-fascism. They were behind Living Marxism magazine which was different at the time, as Spiked was when it started. Have you had a look at Nerve? It's a local arts and community based mag that manages to get out a couple of times a year if they're lucky.

Living Marxism also denied genocide in Rwanda and denied allegations that Serb paramilitaries were carrying out ethnic cleansing of muslims in Bosnia. It also supported Fox hunting as being really fun, I actually found that article on line and re-reading it, it doesn't seem to be satirical
http://web.archive.org/web/20000304100503/www.informinc.co.uk/LM/LM108/LM108_Foxes.html