One-man rail strike disrupts thousands
One-man rail strike disrupts thousandsA three-hour wildcat strike by one man caused travel chaos for thousands of rail passengers yesterday.
Talks with union officials are to get under way today after several trains out of Cork were cancelled after a single line worker took unofficial strike action in a dispute over what Iarnrod Eireann said were deployment issues.
Quote:
after other line staff went out in support of the employee.Not really one.
Are you saying a headline writer exaggerated?
I think I am!
Quote:
after other line staff went out in support of the employee.Not really one.
but still very funny
So there is hope for left-communism afterall?
a single line worker took unofficial strike action
Actually his fellow workers walked out with him and formed an impromptu picket line.
So no to SRB's question, then.
So no to SRB's question, then.
But just think of what would have happened if that worker had a newsletter!
crap, double post
All it takes is one spark* to ignite the working class!
[* + newsletter]
Just imagine, if someone had been leading them with ideas then they could have formed a union caucus to argue for wildcat action!
Just imagine, if someone had been leading them with ideas then they could have formed a union caucus to argue for wildcat action!
Is this aimed at NEFAC's workplace position paper somehow?
Not that such caucus' would be a bad idea.
Independent rank-and-file tendencies within existing unions, coupled with workplace resistance groups, solidarity networks (flying squads, workers' centers, student-labor action groups, etc.), and, eventually, workplace assemblies and coordinating councils, provide a glimpse at the kind of self-managed workers movement needed to not only effectively challenge the employers, but also develop the unity and revolutionary class consciousness needed to overthrow the capitalist social order.
and then later on...
Sometimes this struggle formalizes itself into groups of workers that act outside and in opposition to not only the exploiting class, but also the union bureaucracy. Some names that these formations have taken in the past are workers' committees, flying squads, resistance groups, action committees, etc. Other times, this is expressed through unofficial spontaneous collective action, such sit-down-strikes, occupations, slows downs, sabotage, and wildcat strikes utilizing informal networks that exist between workers. What matters is not the name or even the specific organizational form they take, but rather the way that the unmediated class struggle of these workers' formations starts the transformation of the organization of production.
Also, on a related note, maybe someone from Ireland could comment on this wildcat as far as I know the trade unions there are heavily intergrated "social partners" with capital and strikes are all but illegal.
Here's an interesting quote from the WSM article 'Partnership', trade unionism and anarchism which, sheesh, is almost a decade old!
In Irish Rail the company is suing all eleven members of the executive committee of the Irish Locomotive Drivers Association, looking for hundreds of thousands of pounds in damages arising from the ILDA taking industrial action. Although the ILDA represents the majority of train drivers, and is a registered trade union it does not have a negotiation licence (these are granted by the government through the High Court). Having no licence means they have no legal immunity and can be sued for loss of earnings by their employer.
Just imagine, if someone had been leading them with ideas then they could have formed a union caucus to argue for wildcat action!
I thought that was what the left-communist newsletter was for.
Organizing collective action is soooooo pre-'68 man...
I just wanna go on the official record as saying this is still awesome.





Not really one.