cheers guys - what was the strike about? is it legal for public sector workers to strike in turkey?
Public sector struggles in Turkey
cheers guys - what was the strike about?
Good question, John. This is a very prominent issue in Turkey, and people know about it. Maybe we should have put in some background in the translation though. It is about pay.
is it legal for public sector workers to strike in turkey?
Yes, technically it is. This wasn't a strike. It was a 'one day quitting work event'.
Devrim
Good that you have translated stuff from your publication. A brief summary of the contents would be useful. Excellent analysis of how 'left wing' unionism corresponds to a need of capital to contain the struggle when it begins to radicalise.
A reservation about the last line. What does it mean to say that unions 'define' the price of labour? It could imply that unions are there to defend wage levels but no good for revolutionary struggle, whereas the whole thrust of the article is to show how unions, including the radical ones, obstruct even the defensive struggle of the working class.
A reservation about the last line. What does it mean to say that unions 'define' the price of labour? It could imply that unions are there to defend wage levels but no good for revolutionary struggle, whereas the whole thrust of the article is to show how unions, including the radical ones, obstruct even the defensive struggle of the working class.
Nothing about the unions defending the wage levels were actually implied in that sentence. The unions do participate in the process of defining the price of labor (after all, they "negotiate" with the bosses) but this quite obviously doesn't mean they are going to defend wage levels; they participate in the process of defining the price of labor as a part of the bourgeoisie and against the working class. As you say the whole thrust of the article is to show how unions, including the radical ones, obstruct even the defensive struggle of the working class. What that sentence meant was the opposite: if workers count on the union on how it does in the negotiations (or in fact on anything else) during their struggle; they will lose. Even in defensive struggles, only independent working class aiming the whole system of wage labor is the way to go. I thought the sentence would connect well with the rest of the text but perhaps it wasn't really well expressed - it could have been more clear.
No disagreement there, Leo. There are numerous theories which define the unions as in some way standing between the proletariat and capital, as 'mediators', or having a dual nature, etc. I know that's not your position, but it's important to demarcate ourselves clearly from these theories.
Thanks for the information and analysis eks. I remember writing about an 'almost inssurectionary' struggle of workers in Izmir in the mid-80s, a struggle which was violently supressed by the Turkish state. But since then, I've rather lost the plot of where the struggle was in that particular country (many particular countries in fact).
It's also enlightening to read about the specificities of the struggle, the history of particular unions, for example, and of the obstacles that are common to workers around the world, whatever the cultural and historical background of the country in which they find themselves.
Agree that a brief summary in English of the contents of each issue would be good.
And please remind me: what does EKS stand for (the initials, I mean, or the word) and what does 'Gece Notları' translate as?
Agree that a brief summary in English of the contents of each issue would be good.
They do actually exist already. I will post them on here next to the texts.
EKS translates into English as Internationalist Communist Left. If you look to your left you will see the Turkish under my name.
'Gece Notları' translates as something like 'night notes', or 'notes of the night'. Actually just writing that I have realised that it doesn't sound very good in English. The Turkish sounds better though.
Devrim


Translation From 'Gece Notları':
The one day quitting work event which KESK (Public Worker Unions Confederation) has been talking about since the outrageous “mass negotiations” which took place during the summer, finally took place on 14th of December in many places of Turkey with a quite high participation in many places of Turkey despite the fact that the event was made definite very late and announced unwillingly by the union.
Participation in demonstrations which happened in many places Turkey was high despite the unwilling attitude of the union. Despite the fact that they have been talking about it since the summer, the union bureaucrats announced started announcing the one day quitting work event on 5th of December, only nine days before the date of the action itself. In Ankara, during the demonstration which over 1500 workers attended, there were some quarrels with the police but there weren’t any clashes. In Istanbul, over 3000 teachers, postmen and health and transportation workers were on the streets. 3500 public workers who attended the demonstration in Izmir said “Long live class solidarity”. 4000 workers attended the demonstrations in Izmit, in Mersin the number was 3000, in Adana 750, in Zonguldak, Kırklareli and Malatya 700, in Antakya and Aliaga 500, in Trabzon 300. It is thought that 40,000 workers attended the demonstrations countrywide and 250,000 public workers stopped working for one day in hospitals, schools and government offices.
On KESK
On 14th of December, Thursday, a so-called “one day quitting work event” directed by KESK occurred. The union bureaucrats who lead KESK have been talking about this action since the outrageous “mass negotiations” which took place during the summer. The fact that the event was going to happen on 14th of December was made certain on 5th of December and it was announced very unwillingly. Demonstrations ended with empty rhetoric on “laicism” without being radicalized. At this point, it is necessary to provide some information about KESK’s role in the struggles and militancy of workers who work in the public sector. Member syndicates of KESK started being formed after 1990, following the period of long class struggle known as 1989 Spring Events. If we shortly summarize the events, 1989, with the participation of 30,153 people during Spring Events, became the year in which the highest number of public workers went on strike. The Spring Events, started by public workers, quickly spread to unionized and non-unionized workers in the private sector who demanded better living conditions. Over 1.5 million workers participated in the events which started in April. The rising class struggle opened the way for united struggle through independent factory committees formed by workers breaking the artificial barriers between workers in different sectors which are created by the bourgeoisie. Those independent worker committees especially really disturbed the union bureaucrats. Bureaucrats from Türk-İş (the main right wing union), under the pressure of workers factory committees, had to sign some agreements which they themselves did not benefit; as the working class was radicalized enough to the point of raiding union offices to get what they want done. The events ended up with certain temporary compromises, however in the end those gains were taken back in a short time and the result was a loss. Those events showed the bourgeoisie clearly the existing unions, especially public workers unions, were about to become bankrupt: There was a need for a union that could organize more radical workers as a part of capital and unions which radical looking unions which jumped on those events were to make up the left-wing public workers union of the bourgeoisie. Those new formations were to play their role in preventing the radicalization of the working class in 1992-1993 following the revoking of the temporary concessions given following the 89 Spring Events. Yet the second major service KESK provided to the bourgeoisie took place in 1995 during the occupation of Kızılay, the center of Ankara where the administrative centers of the Turkish government are. Unions working under the name KÇSKK (Public Workers Unions Confederalisation Committee) presumed that “organizing” the public workers who were still being more and more radical was their “duty”. Yet, the plans they made had little to do with reality; while the unions had planned a quiet sit down protest on 17-18th of June in 1995, the militant working class had suddenly occupied Kızılay with over 150,000 public workers. When the union bureaucrats tried to stop the occupation, public workers answered them with whistles and stones, initially the union bureaucrats had to “allow” the workers to continue the occupation and also quit working. Yet again, the plan made by bureaucrats did not match the reality and 600,000 public workers did not work on 20th of June. Nevertheless, unions had still accomplished their mission and prevented the spread of the events to workers in other sectors. The events finally ended with the unions being awarded for the high services they provided to the bourgeoisie; KESK was recognized in December 1995. The history of KESK does not only show us why they did not even have serious preparation for their last event in 14th of December, but also tells the working class something very important about the role unions take in the existing capitalist order: the only thing that the unions do is to divide workers into different sectional groups, and pull their class interests as a whole behind social democratic bourgeois slogans. Class struggle is a political proletarian struggle made in order to put an end to wage-labor instead of defining the price labor is going to be sold at.
From Gece Notları 2:
http://libcom.org/files/Gece_Notları_Ocak.pdf