Socialist parties, would you vote for them?
What do people here think about the attempt to reclaim the labour party by
the left, John McDonell et al http://www.john4leader.org.uk/and also the the campaign for a new workers party
http://www.cnwp.org.uk/
Would you vote for them as a step in the right direction or leave well alone?
Can you elaborate as I am tempted, I thought Chomsky advocated
voting social democrat even just to stop the republicans getting in.
I mean, vote if you like, i'm not dogmatic about it. But its very much a case of vote and carry on organising and struggling the next day. There are minor differences between parties, sometimes millions of peoples lives are affected by those differences. But we improve our lives through excersising our own power by organising as a class - only when our power in some way threatens the state are reforms granted to try and diffuse the grassroots power we've built.
Specifically, the record of 'left' parties in office (and out) is at least as bad as the 'right' - e.g. the german social democrats crushing the german workers and paving the way for fascism, or labour (in opposition) refusing to support non-payment against the poll tax:
The Labour Party leadership feared to cross the line of 'legitimate' protest because they hoped to be in government in the future, and they expected their laws or policies to be obeyed
State power by its very nature is an instrument of class rule, it cannot be captured and used for good as the history of reformist social democratic and 'revolutionary' leninist parties shows.
Vote if you like. I have done on occasion. But the problem is that if you get involved in electoral activity it is in danger of becoming the only activity; that's how it works.
But my view on whether the Labour Party can ever be trusted is summed up in two words: Ramsay. MacDonald.
the problem is that if you get involved in electoral activity it is in danger of becoming the only activity
thats the other point i was going to make - think how much effort, time and money it takes to get someone elected, and think of all the things that could have been done with it to directly improve our lives and our organisation.
We've written here about why we think political party politics and electoralism are unproductive, you might find some bits interesting:
http://www.libcom.org/thought/manifesto/introduction/index.php
Can you elaborate as I am tempted, I thought Chomsky advocated voting social democrat even just to stop the republicans getting in.
Well, he wasn't exactly enthusiastic about it. He said something along the lines of they are marginally better than the Republicans, and it might make a small difference. He also said something along the lines of general elections are mostly a pointless exercise in selecting which faction of the business party you want ruling over you, but that local elections might having some meaning.
Personally I don't vote because it only encourages them. Labour looked a little rattled after the last general election due to low voter turnout, and starting muttering about making voting (or at least registering to vote) compulsory, if only to tick a box marked "abstain". Voting has more to do with the government seeking legitimisation, than voters making any kind of (positive) difference in their lives. Plus I can't really see how a socialist party (not that I would vote for one) would be able to get the funding or media support to seriously challenge the corporate funded business party -- as seen on TV!
I realise that parties and parliment are no substitute for direct action but
some environments are going to be better than others to organise within. A socialist leaning party is going to be
preferential than a Tory party in power.
Even if they dont get into power, the relative support or not
indicates the strength of general opinion regards these ideals.
I read a explaination of public relations the other day that
was something along the lines of creating a conducive environment for their specific business.
An old Labour type party would be a more conducive environment
as a form of entryism along the lines of Militant but for in this case libertarian socialism.
The way I see it, no (genuinely) socialist party stands a chance of getting into power without money and (positive) publicity via the media. When capitalists control both of these, it makes voter support for socialist parties nigh on impossible. Now you could argue that people should build up support by organising at a grass roots level, and making use of the internet to bypass the media, etc. But if you are going to do that anyway, why not organise an anarchist alternative?
A socialist leaning party is going to be
preferential than a Tory party in power
I don't think that's neccessarily true, (like i say social democrats did such a good job of crushing the working class the nazi transition to power was fairly seemless), and thats without getting into the logistics of exactly how a socialist could finance a campaign without being compramised from the off. I heard someone describe the left and right as the left and right fists of capital - you don't support a left jab because its better than a right cross - you try to knock your opponent out.
I mean there are arguments for voting in certain circumstances, but i can never see when its productive to put any effort beyond this into choosing one capitalist party over another - i.e. if we're going to go door-to-door in our communities it'd better not be to convince our neighbours to put their faith in someone who's doomed to either corruption or impotence.
Edit: Nemo said it better
Never ever. Gets us nowhere.
http://www.myspace.com/thespectrehauntingeurope
<A HREF="http://www.myspace.com/stalinswar"><img src="http://www.stalinswar.org/test/banner.gif"></a>
Well if voting in this country became as polarised as in the US I might vote to protect Abortion rights, otherwise who cares. As has been said by others, why make hobson's choice? We do not answer their question as it is their question. I have no interest in their power, I could probably gain some legitimately, but I have no interest in it. I want to be free, controlling others does not make me free.
Hi
controlling others does not make me free.
For a lot of people, it does allow a reasonable emulation of being free though, depending on personal taste. I think that’s why some people still vote, I mean it’s no stranger than wearing a set of grillz.
I tell you, I live in a LibDem constituency / district council, and we’re right next door to a Tory one. My MP’s constituency office has full time welfare advisors helping constituents with tax credit repayments, housing and poverty problems. The funding for local CAB and voluntary agencies isn’t lavish, but it’s there. Over in the Tory constituency (corruption and incompetence ousted it’s LibDem councillors) they are totally screwed. You can see little bits the district shut down daily as capital gets transferred (broadly) from the working class into the pockets of the local bourgeoisie.
It makes a difference. The ideological profile of local and national government has an impact on everyday life, although not always the one you'd expect.
Love
LR
How do. I'm new here
The CNWP is yet another front for the Socialist Party. I might be biased because I quit the leadership fetishists six months ago, but it's dominated by SP members. Like ISR, Socialist Students and YRE, it's a thinly disguised front.
I have voted twice in my 21 years. Once for the SLP in a local election in Wakefield, and the other for the AGS in the Euro elections. Won't be voting again though.
Luke
In need of a job and a group to work with
Would I ever vote for a socialist party?As a former member of the SWP I can honestly say:NEVER!and neither would i bother voting for anyone else.Politcians are parasites!
How do. I'm new hereThe CNWP is yet another front for the Socialist Party. I might be biased because I quit the leadership fetishists six months ago, but it's dominated by SP members. Like ISR, Socialist Students and YRE, it's a thinly disguised front.
I have voted twice in my 21 years. Once for the SLP in a local election in Wakefield, and the other for the AGS in the Euro elections. Won't be voting again though.
Luke
In need of a job and a group to work with
Whats your opinion of the Socialist Party?
when i first joined them, i thought that they were more radical and democratic than their great rivals, the SWP. however, as soon as i became more involved with them, i realised that they were exactly the same as the Swaps.
they're undemocratic, authoritarian and a bit too middle-class. not on the same scale as the swaps or CPGB though.






old labour screwed the working class. Social democratic parties the world over do the same. My only interest in state power is seeing it dissolved