Edmonton 2010

Submitted by RevolutionReversal on 5 September, 2007 - 03:36.

Anyone from Edmonton knwo of any anti-G8 mobilizing being done, or going to spring up in response to Edmonton being named the host of the G8 meetings in 2010?

5 September, 2007 - 16:44

Hmm,just found out about it looked it up and can't say I'm all that jazzed. Edmonton has some really great grassroots organizing around the workplace, housing, homelessness, and the environment going on and it would be a bloody shame if practical day to day organizing was put on the back burner because of this.

We can build real long term organization, and working class power through unsexy low key activity, or we can build a one-off media spectacle that empowers only media savvy spokespeople. Building ten hour spokescouncil meetings, and encouraging every black clad kid with an axe to grind is not how we build a movement.

5 September, 2007 - 20:02

Heh this is the problem we have in DC. We have national mobes every 3-4 months here. Its a constant interference in any attempt to do proper local organizing. My advice, lay down a basic framework putting local organizations in control of the protests. Use the Media spectacle to highlight local issues and local struggle. you know its coming might as well integrate it as a tool for local organizing than as a silly spectacle.

5 September, 2007 - 23:45
EdmontonWobbly wrote:
Hmm,just found out about it looked it up and can't say I'm all that jazzed. Edmonton has some really great grassroots organizing around the workplace, housing, homelessness, and the environment going on and it would be a bloody shame if practical day to day organizing was put on the back burner because of this.

We can build real long term organization, and working class power through unsexy low key activity, or we can build a one-off media spectacle that empowers only media savvy spokespeople. Building ten hour spokescouncil meetings, and encouraging every black clad kid with an axe to grind is not how we build a movement.

Well to me you can do both and use the G8 as a sexy recruiting tool for the longer term mobilization, to me it all depends on how you frame it.

However, axes to grind sometimes end up being ways to inspire; and find people to get into the nitty gritty, i know I was myself influenced and drawn in by the sexy; you just have to learn to split time.

6 September, 2007 - 00:05
EdmontonWobbly wrote:
Hmm,just found out about it looked it up and can't say I'm all that jazzed. Edmonton has some really great grassroots organizing around the workplace, housing, homelessness, and the environment going on and it would be a bloody shame if practical day to day organizing was put on the back burner because of this.

Its probably worth looking at the Dublin 2004 EU summit protest then, this gave a massive boost to the local libertarian movement without either being a long term distraction or a short term burn out. The main focus of this was using the summit to engage with the population. Lots of articles linked from http://www.anarkismo.net/newswire.php?story_id=486

6 September, 2007 - 02:44

You could try something like this. It was hella fun, confused the media no end and made us the good guys to the local community
http://www.ainfos.ca/04/jun/ainfos00246.html

6 September, 2007 - 03:22
RevolutionReversal wrote:
EdmontonWobbly wrote:
Hmm,just found out about it looked it up and can't say I'm all that jazzed. Edmonton has some really great grassroots organizing around the workplace, housing, homelessness, and the environment going on and it would be a bloody shame if practical day to day organizing was put on the back burner because of this.

We can build real long term organization, and working class power through unsexy low key activity, or we can build a one-off media spectacle that empowers only media savvy spokespeople. Building ten hour spokescouncil meetings, and encouraging every black clad kid with an axe to grind is not how we build a movement.

Well to me you can do both and use the G8 as a sexy recruiting tool for the longer term mobilization, to me it all depends on how you frame it.

In my experience, kids recruited by "sexy" protests/clashes with cops don't stick around for very long.

6 September, 2007 - 03:33
Quote:
In my experience, kids recruited by "sexy" protests/clashes with cops don't stick around for very long.

Exactly.

It's all media hype, highlighting local issues is all fine and good but it isn't direct action. How does this protest build working class self activity and confidence?

6 September, 2007 - 04:46

Well we have different experiences then....

I'm not saying focus all energy on it; however, it is not without merit of focusing some energy on. Somone is going to do something around it, so would it not be better to have some input.

6 September, 2007 - 05:05

Can't we just let Starhawk and Jaggi have this shit? Whatever happened to Warcry? Seriously. I thought we had professionals to run these things for us.

6 September, 2007 - 05:15
thugarchist wrote:
Can't we just let Starhawk and Jaggi have this shit? Whatever happened to Warcry? Seriously. I thought we had professionals to run these things for us.

Some professionals to take care of it.

6 September, 2007 - 14:57
thugarchist wrote:
Can't we just let Starhawk and Jaggi have this shit? Whatever happened to Warcry? Seriously. I thought we had professionals to run these things for us.

ha ha i saw warcry last year...

6 September, 2007 - 16:14

Yeah Rev I think we have very different experiences, I think because of that we also have very different conceptions of where the strength of the working class lies and how best to leverage it.

Quote:
Can't we just let Starhawk and Jaggi have this shit? Whatever happened to Warcry? Seriously. I thought we had professionals to run these things for us.

Actually when I was discussing this with another comrade on our way home back to Edmonton in the car yesterday that is pretty much verbatim what I said. We have our own analogues in Edmonton of course but there is no shortage of NGO staff and union staffers to organise stuff like this here.

6 September, 2007 - 18:02
EdmontonWobbly wrote:
Yeah Rev I think we have very different experiences, I think because of that we also have very different conceptions of where the strength of the working class lies and how best to leverage it.

I'm not sure there is a best way, i kinda think we have to make links between all struggles and show the interdependency.

Though at the end of the day making sustainable unions, communities and collectives is more important than a protest at a summit; however, that said they can be good times for people to relieve frustration and come together.

I think you are right but so are other methods, we need to combine everyones organizing efforts; learn to tolerate the starhawks and the jaggis for what they are....mouthpieces.

6 September, 2007 - 18:35

well they're certainly orifices

7 September, 2007 - 23:58

This sucks for Edmonton, it'll be just like SPP here a month ago. Man I still want to bash my head in thinking of that. Another thing to consider though is that 2010 will also have big "mobilisation" around Vancouver Olympics. Some folk came to Ottawa to talk about that. I was actually pretty impressed with them, they seemed like community organisers rather than the wanky activists I associate with this sort of thing.

So I guess the moral is, don't plan a revolution for the summer of 2010 because all the activoids will be tied up.

Actually maybe better off planning it for then....

Catch 22 wrote:
My advice, lay down a basic framework putting local organizations in control of the protests. Use the Media spectacle to highlight local issues and local struggle. you know its coming might as well integrate it as a tool for local organizing than as a silly spectacle.

Believe that was tried for Scotland G8 and failed miserably. Would love to hear stories otherwise but that was my impression. Some hippies went and made some gardens which they didn't attend to after the protest and largely had a big riot in a field.

RevolutionReversal wrote:
Well to me you can do both and use the G8 as a sexy recruiting tool for the longer term mobilization, to me it all depends on how you frame it.

I think we've already been over this on chat. But nevertheless. People who are recruited via stupid pointless mobilizations are at high risk of becoming "disillusioned" and dropping out when they really how fruitless all their work is. This kind of recruiting is a good way of ensuring the continued dominance of machoist activists in our movements.

8 September, 2007 - 01:46
Quote:
they seemed like community organisers rather than the wanky activists

what's the differance? Community organisers are activists par excellance, I mean what the fuck does community even fucking mean?

8 September, 2007 - 09:51
j.rogue wrote:
In my experience, kids recruited by "sexy" protests/clashes with cops don't stick around for very long.

I have!! embarrassed

David in Atlanta wrote:
You could try something like this. It was hella fun, confused the media no end and made us the good guys to the local community
http://www.ainfos.ca/04/jun/ainfos00246.html

What's the point?

8 September, 2007 - 15:08
Quote:
Community organisers are activists par excellance, I mean what the fuck does community even fucking mean?

I'm gonna have to disagree with you there. I would say the difference is people who are willing to settle down and work on one project for an extended period of time and see it through to the end. Instead of running from one issue to the other chasing headlines like some kid on crystal meth with ADD.

I would say that praise for community organisers should be tempered with a qualifier, not all community organisers are good, just as not all community projects are good. It depends on what they are organising. I mean I would call the folks that run the community radio station community organisers, this station has a few news shows that IWW members work for on and off and provides a lot of news on what is going on in town from a radical perspective.

Vancouver has a really interesting workers centre movement based around phillipine nannys that does amazing work, they have some good anti poverty activism, kinda like OCAP (they also have a lot of primmy wingnuts from what I hear).

8 September, 2007 - 19:08
guydebordisdead wrote:
j.rogue wrote:
In my experience, kids recruited by "sexy" protests/clashes with cops don't stick around for very long.

I have!! embarrassed

Well, I would still say most don't stick around, and I wonder how much energy it is worth trying to organize a demographic with retention of one out of every thousand.

Regarding community organizers, and perhaps my defintion is different, but I grew up around a lot of people who organized in their community. Their idea of activism was very different from the stereotype of the white middle class college student that "means well" or whatever.

8 September, 2007 - 20:08

The G8 came to Calgary in 2002. A lot of us put a tremendous amount of time and effort into organizing actions. Some groups came out of it, through networking and such, and I made a lot of good drinking buddies, but the best thing that came out of it was disgruntled militants who joined and organized grassroots community stuff. Most of the activisties dropped out or wandered into NGOs to die.

Stuff like this could bring in the activistoids who seem to have crawled under a rock since the Anti-globalization movement choked on its own vomit and mercifully went belly-up. But I hope not. I've had enough consensus for my life, and I don't want to see all of the good organizing done around local issues to get smashed up by a huge upswing in puppet making and muppet street theatre.

8 September, 2007 - 22:40
R.R. Berkman wrote:
The G8 came to Calgary in 2002. A lot of us put a tremendous amount of time and effort into organizing actions. Some groups came out of it, through networking and such, and I made a lot of good drinking buddies, but the best thing that came out of it was disgruntled militants who joined and organized grassroots community stuff. Most of the activisties dropped out or wandered into NGOs to die.

Stuff like this could bring in the activistoids who seem to have crawled under a rock since the Anti-globalization movement choked on its own vomit and mercifully went belly-up. But I hope not. I've had enough consensus for my life, and I don't want to see all of the good organizing done around local issues to get smashed up by a huge upswing in puppet making and muppet street theatre.

puppets can be integrated into any action....show a little bit less cynicism.

8 September, 2007 - 22:43

Oh no, now this is going to be a thread about the merits of puppets.

8 September, 2007 - 22:45

I think it actually is wondering how do we make action fun but not middle class professionalized on drugs retarded protest and actually fulfill movement goals.

8 September, 2007 - 23:51
Quote:
The G8 came to Calgary in 2002. A lot of us put a tremendous amount of time and effort into organizing actions.

Hah! Suckers. I spent a tremendous amount of time trying to convince arts students they are workers...oh wait....never mind.

Puppets don't make anything more fun, they make it seem sillier, they also take up a lot of time that could be used to do substantive outreach into communities. If you think silly is fun I can grant you that, personally I don't do activism for fun. I have hobbies for that. I also agree they can be integrated into any action, next week I'll bring a sock puppet into work when I try and incite a slow down, "Mr Hand what do you think of the boss?".

9 September, 2007 - 21:46

Who says you can't combine anti-globalisation techniques with workplace agitation?

11 September, 2007 - 15:47
thugarchist wrote:
Can't we just let Starhawk and Jaggi have this shit? Whatever happened to Warcry? Seriously. I thought we had professionals to run these things for us.

Is it getting a little ironic in here, or is it just Duke?

11 September, 2007 - 16:54
guydebordisdead wrote:
j.rogue wrote:
In my experience, kids recruited by "sexy" protests/clashes with cops don't stick around for very long.

I have!! embarrassed

David in Atlanta wrote:
You could try something like this. It was hella fun, confused the media no end and made us the good guys to the local community
http://www.ainfos.ca/04/jun/ainfos00246.html

What's the point?

Class solidarity, most of the core workers for the project were actual building trades workers, mostly artisan but a few union folks as well, and the neighborhood is low wage working class. Crossing racial divides, still very important in the deep south. Focusing the protest on local issues, in this case housing. I really can't think of much wrong with the project at least in theory. It was the one good thing to come from SEANET, which folded it's uberbig tent a year or two later having more or less decided that deciding things was authoritarian. We didn't do as much as we might have explainiing our ideas to the community or making the contacts permanent but given the serious limitations of informal network organizational formation, it was a good try.

11 September, 2007 - 16:59
j.rogue wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Can't we just let Starhawk and Jaggi have this shit? Whatever happened to Warcry? Seriously. I thought we had professionals to run these things for us.

Some professionals to take care of it.

they've certainly put a lot of thought into how to shut down an urban center. useful to know in the long run.

11 September, 2007 - 17:01
David in Atlanta wrote:
It was the one good thing to come from SEANET, which folded it's uberbig tent a year or two later having more or less decided that deciding things was authoritarian.

Oh lord, I can see this. I haven't worked with anarchists much since moving back to the south, but I can see this happening based on the anarchists I do know. I have been meaning to ask after SEANET; can you pm me if you don't mind talking to me about it?

11 September, 2007 - 17:02
David in Atlanta wrote:
j.rogue wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
Can't we just let Starhawk and Jaggi have this shit? Whatever happened to Warcry? Seriously. I thought we had professionals to run these things for us.

Some professionals to take care of it.

they've certainly put a lot of thought into how to shut down an urban center. useful to know in the long run.

You don't have to like EVERYONE! I have a lot of shit to say about that particular group of folks, long story.