Cameras on demos

25 posts / 0 new
Last post
jef costello's picture
jef costello
Offline
Joined: 9-02-06
Feb 15 2006 00:18
Cameras on demos

I was having a look through the AF website and noticed that they advise you not to take cameras on demos an I was wondering why.

I know that the police tend to target those with cameras, but I seem to remember a thread, I think it was one about critical mass, in which someone said that having our own footage was invaluable as the police always fucked theirs up and we rarely incriminated ourselves.

I was just wondering why it was recommended.

edit: I meant "we" as anarchists, I'm not in AF.

ftony
Offline
Joined: 26-05-04
Feb 15 2006 09:56

yeah as far as i'm aware it's for legal reasons- if most people are carrying cameras then it's likely that at least one will be able to capture some of an incident. also, the more people with cameras, there is less chance of police picking on them (cf. safety in numbers and all that)

also, i usually take a camera to demos because it's a sort of inversion of the police surveillance. by creating our own little panopticon for them, they feel under surveillance too.

knightrose
Offline
Joined: 8-11-03
Feb 15 2006 17:38

As I recall, we put that advice up because the cops were using people's films to prosecute demonstrators.

jef costello's picture
jef costello
Offline
Joined: 9-02-06
Feb 15 2006 17:47
knightrose wrote:
As I recall, we put that advice up because the cops were using people's films to prosecute demonstrators.

I suppose it depends on the demo, with Critical Mass I'd imagine the demonstrators are probably less likely to be doing things they can be arrested for.

knightrose
Offline
Joined: 8-11-03
Feb 15 2006 19:08

If you notice, in Resistance we no longer put that peice of advice. As you say, it depends on the demo.

BB
Offline
Joined: 12-08-04
Feb 16 2006 15:00
ftony wrote:
also, i usually take a camera to demos because it's a sort of inversion of the police surveillance. by creating our own little panopticon for them, they feel under surveillance too.

That's really going to scare them, you see them getting done all the time for beating up on folks...

For a start, i'd say never take any camera on a demo, reality-wise nobody knows who everyone is, whether they're cops or journos.

Cameramen are legitimate targets!

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Feb 16 2006 15:03
BB wrote:
ftony wrote:
also, i usually take a camera to demos because it's a sort of inversion of the police surveillance. by creating our own little panopticon for them, they feel under surveillance too.

That's really going to scare them, you see them getting done all the time for beating up on folks...

For a start, i'd say never take any camera on a demo, reality-wise nobody knows who everyone is, whether they're cops or journos.

Cameramen are legitimate targets!

Arsehole!

BB
Offline
Joined: 12-08-04
Feb 16 2006 15:08
revol68 wrote:
BB wrote:
ftony wrote:
also, i usually take a camera to demos because it's a sort of inversion of the police surveillance. by creating our own little panopticon for them, they feel under surveillance too.

That's really going to scare them, you see them getting done all the time for beating up on folks...

For a start, i'd say never take any camera on a demo, reality-wise nobody knows who everyone is, whether they're cops or journos.

Cameramen are legitimate targets!

Arsehole!

Your point Dildo?

JDMF's picture
JDMF
Offline
Joined: 21-05-04
Feb 16 2006 15:10

its other way around mate:

IF YOU DONT WANT TO BE PHOTOGRAPHED, DONT GO TO A DEMO!

simple smile

I vote we bring back the good old working class tradition of dressing in our best gear for demonstrations, suit, tie, clean ironed clothes etc.

big al
Offline
Joined: 7-08-05
Feb 16 2006 15:22
JDMF wrote:

I vote we bring back the good old working class tradition of dressing in our best gear for demonstrations, suit, tie, clean ironed clothes etc.

I thoroughly agree JDMF, all these dirty dreadheads with their atrocious personal hygeine make us all look silly. Button down shirts and Trilbys from now on.

Rob Ray's picture
Rob Ray
Offline
Joined: 6-11-03
Feb 16 2006 15:24

Seconded (though a v cheap suit is probly more replaceable than sunday best wink ). I'd reckon cheap still cameras, in particular digital, would be best for 'incriminating' demos cos pics can be wiped at the touch of a button after and you can argue lack on context in court?

jef costello's picture
jef costello
Offline
Joined: 9-02-06
Feb 16 2006 18:02
BB wrote:

That's really going to scare them, you see them getting done all the time for beating up on folks...

For a start, i'd say never take any camera on a demo, reality-wise nobody knows who everyone is, whether they're cops or journos.

Cameramen are legitimate targets!

That seems odd. The police takes photos anyway, so why not let people on demos take their own, even if they are cops they can't make it much worse and if they're not they could help out.

Steven.'s picture
Steven.
Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
Feb 16 2006 20:40

Yeah, and half (more than half?) the point of a demonstration is to get media coverage anyway confused

knightrose
Offline
Joined: 8-11-03
Feb 16 2006 22:17

As I said, the issue was about people taking pictures and then having them confiscated by the cops to use in prosecutions. I'd say, ionly take cameras when you know it's going to be a fluffy demo.

JDMF's picture
JDMF
Offline
Joined: 21-05-04
Feb 16 2006 22:29

the added benefit of dressing up in style is that you would look good in the police photos.

Rob Ray's picture
Rob Ray
Offline
Joined: 6-11-03
Feb 16 2006 22:59

Also less likely to be searched for wearing unseasonable clothing, and easier to melt into the crowd, ninja style.

888's picture
888
Offline
Joined: 30-09-03
Feb 17 2006 00:00
Jef Costello wrote:
I was having a look through the AF website and noticed that they advise you not to take cameras on demos an I was wondering why.

I know that the police tend to target those with cameras, but I seem to remember a thread, I think it was one about critical mass, in which someone said that having our own footage was invaluable as the police always fucked theirs up and we rarely incriminated ourselves.

I was just wondering why it was recommended.

edit: I meant "we" as anarchists, I'm not in AF.

I think the AF line is a bit old fashioned. There are (possibly literally) a hundred times more cameras on demos (and in the world at large) than there were on demos in the early nineties. I actually have two cameras on me right now.

Ghost_of_the_re...
Offline
Joined: 16-06-04
Feb 17 2006 01:41

With all the FITs that turn up at the big demos the pigs will probably never need to steal other people's film to prosecute people. Cameras are a useful detterent to the cops sometimes, which is good; but anyone taking pictures of people doing illegal stuff is just throwing from the back black bloc

BB
Offline
Joined: 12-08-04
Feb 17 2006 11:15
JDMF wrote:
the added benefit of dressing up in style is that you would look good in the police photos.

tongue

black bloc

Sorry to say, it's no debate for me, No Cameras.

How can you predict the reaction of the old bill, stay fluffy or defend yourself? Maybe i'm just stuck in the past, "shop a rioter" ring any bells. The old bill haven't got files on everyone, hence don't know who everyone is. The media does it's bit.

LiveFastDiarrea
Offline
Joined: 19-09-03
Feb 17 2006 11:18

I can't take my camara down the pub without breaking it so I dont feel inclined to take it out on demos.

nastyned
Offline
Joined: 30-09-03
Feb 17 2006 13:42

People have been put away because of cameras on demos. And why would you want to take a camera to a demo anyway?

We stopped having the 'no cameras' line in resistance because so many people have them on their phones now but the basic fact there's no need to take pictures, and people taking pictures put other peoples liberty at risk remains unchanged.

JDMF's picture
JDMF
Offline
Joined: 21-05-04
Feb 17 2006 14:08
nastyned wrote:
People have been put away because of cameras on demos.

then they shouldn't go to a demo. Demonstration is a public display of some political opinion. Do not go there if you dont want to be there and be counted.

Quote:

And why would you want to take a camera to a demo anyway?

memories, publicity, material for future stuff, articles etc, perhaps if it is a support picket for some striking workers elsewhere you could send them photos of your event, if it is a good day out, you have some photos to remember it from and so on.

Quote:
the basic fact there's no need to take pictures,

disagree strongly, see above. One could argue that for those who do not want to be photographed, should not go to demos.

Quote:

and people taking pictures put other peoples liberty at risk remains unchanged.

I think we have a fundamental difference here of what we mean by demo. By a demo i mean events where i personally have been in the past few years, like support pickets, solidarity marches etc where the risk of things "kicking off" is very low. I dont even want to go to demos where that risk is apparent anyway, 9 times out of 10 they are counterproductive and serve little purpose.

nastyned
Offline
Joined: 30-09-03
Feb 17 2006 16:24

Since when have we been able to decide which demo kicks off and which doesn't? I think you're taking a very naive here.

Steven.'s picture
Steven.
Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
Feb 17 2006 16:34
nastyned wrote:
Since when have we been able to decide which demo kicks off and which doesn't? I think you're taking a very naive here.

This is true. But as long as you don't take any pics of people doing anything bad you'll be fine. No? That would be sound advice.