Checking an anti-Poll Tax article
Hey all,
I posted this as a thread before to verify different bits of it. Some posters like martinH made good contributions but these were lost in the hack.
This is part of an article written by a crimethic guy in the states, we were going to hack it further for an article for history. (Cutting stuff about the riot for example, which is over-emphasised.)
Is there any stuff that should be added/corrected? Cheers in advance for any info - the text will be in my next post on this thread.
Good idea to get something up on libcom!
One thing of note in the early days of the campaign were the 'twinning initiatives' between Scottish groups and some of the earlier local anti-poll tax groups in England and Wales - aided in part by the anarchist 3-D network (Don't register, Don't implement, Don't pay) which was an early national coordination before Militant formed the All Britain Anti-Poll Tax Federation (AKA the 'Fed'). This enabled local groups in England (not sure about Wales) to get going before Militant got its teeth into every town. For example they tried to set up a local group (that they would have dominated) in one area of Nottingham, but instead they were forced to join the existing one when dozens of people turned up to their 'launch meeting'. We'd been warned of this tactic by the Scots and we were ready - so the importance of the twinning cannot be underestimated.
Maybe worth noting that bailiffs coming and seizing stuff to sell are called 'warrants sales' in Scotland. There's a picture of a protest against warrant sales and lots of other pics and cartoons in the ACF pamphlet Beating the Poll Tax. The SWP's behaviour of first ignoring the campaign, then supporting it, then stopping supporting it again is amusingly covered in the same pamphlet.
http://afed.libcom.org.uk/ace/polltax.html
One other aspect of importance is the complete impotence of the calls for 'don't implement'. The Left and also some anarchists thought there might be some kind of action by Labour local councils against implementation (and subsequently collection) - this turned out to be a non-starter. The Left perhaps thought that non-implementation would hurt Thatcher politically, but it would have hurt local councils finanically, plus there was utter contempt of working class refusal to register/pay by Labour local councils. For examples, see quotes at the start of each chapter in 'Beating the Poll Tax'. Any ideas of non-implementation were overtaken by mass refusal to register/pay.
Earlier issues of Organise! magazine covered the developments of the campaign in some detail (including the Scottish campaign before it went national). Although most of this predates web publication, we now have an online version of an index to Organise! dated from 1989, which gives detail of articles covering the Poll Tax campaign over many issues:
http://afed.libcom.org.uk/org/org_index14to39.html
If you wanted copies of these articles to help with the history I would be happy to copy them for you. You are right not to over emphasise the 'riot' (and you have to be careful even to call it riot - as analysed in Organise #19)- if you go by Organise! issues, we've got five issues covering the campaign before coverage of the riot itself.
This campaign was by far the best thing I have ever been involved in as an anarchist.
If you wanted copies of these articles to help with the history I would be happy to copy them for you.
That would be great - do you guys intend to scan those old ones? cos if not all of them it'd be good to scan in say all the poll tax stuff for the library. Poll tax and miners strike are things we're really lacking at the moment. We've been putting some miners stuff but the poll tax has nothing so far. we could stick your AF pamphlet in though, that'd be a good start.
cheers for the rest of the info too.
About the non-enforcing, did martinH say there was maybe one small strike in South London? any refusals to enforce documented anywhere?
OK then. Scanning is possible and I would like to do it, but extracting text from old Organise! is tricky due to text size and quality, and the fact that columns were laid out by hand, which generally causes problem for OCR software. First step would be page images and take it from there. Feel free to reproduce the pamphlet.
There's also a article in 10 year anniversary issue that summarises ACF coverage of the campaign in Organise! mag:
http://afed.libcom.org.uk/org/issue42/orgonwrd.html
On subject of non-implementation, please note, I was not saying there was no action by workers at all. In the pamphlet we have a photo of dole workers striking against being told to act as poll tax snoopers, and a pic of Edinburgh postal workers on a demo. But these were isolated instances and v. small scale compared to the community revolt, so the significant of this needs to be clear, in the same way that the effect of the 'riot' should not be over-emphasised. Leftists would have been crawling all over us if it had really been a workplace struggle... the fact it didn't look like it was ever going to be one is why many left groups didn't support the struggle to begin with. Also worth noting that Class War Fed decided it was not enough of a working class struggle in the early days of the campaign, and only got involved later on.
The context of the struggle is really important - especially the war between 'old' and 'new' Labour, Militant having only recently having been thrown out of the Labour Party. Kinnock's modernising agenda went hand in hand with TUC keeping check on any working class action they could not control but they could only do that in the workplace, not the community. Whilst Thatcher was hell-bent on crushing local councils controlled by Labour - those councils just went ahead to pass that bill on to residents. Anarchists saw through that from the start, for the most part and realised a community campaign could win with or without wide-scale action of public sector workers. I'd say Militant saw it too and this went along nicely with their wanting revenge on Kinnock's Labour Party, even if they would have otherwise taken the usual lefty line. The rest of the left just carried on sucking up to the unions and Labour as they always had done, at least until it became clear to everyone that this was a countrywide class revolt that could not be ignored.
For the semi-formed anarchist group I'm in in Seattle right now, I'm doing a short presentation on the poll tax tomorrow
particularly focusing on:
- community direct action, what forms it took
- how it avoided (for the most part) becoming "social work" by an activist minority acting on behalf of others, and avoided (to some extent) control by political parties
- why (and how) it spread so successfully in this case.
Thanks for the info above, if you can provide further enlightenment on these questions that would be great...
I found this article http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/ws94/ws42_poll.html
to be fairly informative too. I know I've read other stuff in the past but can't find it.
PS - I can't access the history pages on libcom for some reason.
you get a particular error message?
There was one DSS office that had a strike over Poll Tax - it was the one where a lot of lefties worked (might have been Crystal palace) and was in part organised by the AWG. Dev might remember more and I'm sure i've got something on it somewhere. (Just give me time to find it ha ha).
Also, I found some 5.25 inch disks which I think contain some material from the time. Anyone got a reader for them?
Regards,
Martin
Cheers martin, i bet someone here has access to a 5.25 reader...
i think thats a pretty terrible article tbh
Has anyone got further info/links to articles on 1) how takeover by Militant was combated (was this successful enough or did they gain too much control of the movement), 2) how it spread so successfully.
John - the problem is that if you go to the history page you are presneted with a list of regions with two articles for each region. If you click on a region the page merely reloads.
Oh yeah sorry the region listings died. To see them add /tags into the URL. For example http://libcom.org/history/tags/uk, not http://libcom.org/history/uk
we'll try to fix asap.
Has anyone got further info/links to articles on 1) how takeover by Militant was combated (was this successful enough or did they gain too much control of the movement), 2) how it spread so successfully.
Apart from what I wrote before that got lost in the hack - not much. There was a lot of stuff in DA in 1989/90/91 on this subject, as well as things like "An Open Letter to the Anti-Poll Tax Movement" which was written by London DAM members (none of which is online AFAIK).
Basically, Militant spread by the same tactics they'd used in the Labour Party, (boring everyone else away) plus using their superior numbers to set up bogus groups that could then pack federation meetings.
We resisted them by being organised, forming alliances with others interested in fighting on the principles of non-payment, non registration and non implementation. (This was the 3D network - for Don't Register DOn't Pay Don't Implement/Collect - the main political currents involved were the Labour left and anarchists - back then there was such a thing as a Labour left).
The National Federation of APTUs had 12 regions, of which MIlitant controlled 9. Where they controlled the Region, or local federation, people just worked around them. This was going on before the riot and prepared people in the local groups for working around them in a much bigger way once the leaders (SHeridan and Nally) offered to "name names" after the riot. Clearly, any defence campaign that was linked to the National Fed was going to be compromised and the Trafalgar Square Defendants Campaign was set up and controlled by the people directly affected.
WHen I get a chance I will write more on this. I don't think a lot of the article at the top, either. I'll come back to it
regards,
Martin




