Open letter to the UAF repost

43 posts / 0 new
Last post
no1
Offline
Joined: 3-12-07
Mar 29 2010 21:47
Django wrote:
The EDL have got a bizarre anti-'communist' tirade against workers on strike on their site:

I haven't read anything so moronic for a long long time:

Quote:
Labour, Unite and the UAF
After successful demonstrations in London and Bolton the English Defence League have compiled evidence that needs to be examined by ministers of parliament and the police force due to unsavoury links between political parties, ministers, and the criminal behaviour of trade unions and their communist supporters.[...]

It is no secret that the Labour party is affiliated to Unite, recently the Labour party have been exposed for taking monies from this militant Union. Since Gordon Brown became the Labour party’s leader and current prime minister he has taken a staggering 11 million pounds from Unites militant coffers,[...]

Unite have recently been exposed for forging links with Americas notorious “Teamsters Transport Union” who have been linked to organised crime and racketeering [....]

So we have Communists /Anarchists backed by powerful Unions who are affiliated to the UAF, who in turn instigate violence on the streets. Some other worrying evidence we found prior to the Bolton demonstration was found on the socialistworker website, the website owners were hoping to stir up trouble between Muslims and the English Defence League [...]

Here are just a few examples of just how deep this Communist infestation goes in British politics. Here is a video clip of our demo in Bolton. Notice at 50 seconds in, that a “Unite” union flag is being waved which indicates Unite members are present at the Bolton demo. That would be the same Unite who are affiliated to the teamsters union in the United States, the same union who have members walking the corridors of power in the houses of parliament, the same union who have members of the Labour government on their payroll. The same union who have ploughed 11 million pounds into the Labour government to help fund their election campaign.

This is what the English Defence League are up against!
[...]
Rest assured The English Defence League will continue to demonstrate for the good of our country as very little faith can be placed in the hands of our leading political parties to protect our nation from Communism and Islamism.

We will never surrender!

http://www.DELETETHISenglishdefenceleague.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=181:labour-partys-affiliation-to-union-criminality&catid=42:feature-stories

Boris Badenov
Offline
Joined: 25-08-08
Mar 29 2010 21:50
EDL website wrote:
Here are just a few examples of just how deep this Communist infestation goes in British politics. Here is a video clip of our demo in Bolton. Notice at 50 seconds in, that a “Unite” union flag is being waved which indicates Unite members are present at the Bolton demo.

IT'S A CONSPIRACY!

gypsy
Offline
Joined: 20-09-09
Mar 29 2010 22:07
Vlad336 wrote:
EDL website wrote:
Here are just a few examples of just how deep this Communist infestation goes in British politics. Here is a video clip of our demo in Bolton. Notice at 50 seconds in, that a “Unite” union flag is being waved which indicates Unite members are present at the Bolton demo.

IT'S A CONSPIRACY!

In that case also throw the RMT into the conspiracy. cool

communal_pie's picture
communal_pie
Offline
Joined: 18-10-08
Mar 31 2010 22:28

Well, there's little to respond to from you anarchoskin, so let's just agree to disagree for now.

http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/features/Businessman-bankrolls-street-army.php Alan Lake works as an IT consultant in the CofE, lives in Highgate and bankrolls the EDL, their first demo was in Whitechapel followed by a subsequent one in Wood Green, neither of which got any attention from the left-wing (and rightly so at the time; they were a handful of wankers that no one gave a shit about).

An old AFed article basically said it in very simple terms concisely: http://www.afed.org.uk/blog/society/125-smash-the-english-defence-league.html

As for the comments about mobilising against them, I think it's a valid thing to do, nowdays, when they can mobilise enough people to actually raise the possibility of ethnic minorities being attacked in the streets, of course the police apparently try to limit this like they did in Harrow by splitting all non-white and white counter-protestors away, and this naturally needs to be avoided at all costs.

anarchoskin79's picture
anarchoskin79
Offline
Joined: 25-03-10
Apr 2 2010 17:48

@communalpie; I'd like to know on what grounds you think the IWCA organise around identity politics, I find that a ridiculous assertion about a group which has been exposing the lib/left obsession with identity politics for almost 20 years, since back in '93 when nobody else saw the ramifications of multiculturalism.

Its like saying the BNP organise around anti-racism!

Right from the start I've been saying the EDL leadership are irrelevant compared to the motivation of ordinary people attending the demos, and I don't believe demonising them all as 'racists' is helpful, as even the AF article does somewhat disappointingly.

As I'm mixed race and partly of pakistani origin, I feel I see things slightly differently from some on the left, though it shouldn't matter if I was completely white. I feel that many muslim youths in the UK now have a culture which at least tacitly consents to extremism, whilst mainstream muslim culture does little to oppose it, and continues to promote homophobic and misogenistic values. This has to be opposed from within and without the muslim community, and is our responsibility too.

Nevertheless, I can't see anyone on the UAF demos having the balls to display an 'Anarchists against Fascists and Islamic Extremists' placard. The lack of this makes it look like tacit consent for what the EDL claim to oppose.

If some on the EDL demo have the balls to have placards opposing the BNP, Blood and Honour and the NF in their midst, then we should be able to do the same with regards to our anti-religious beliefs, no?

I wouldn't hold my breath as the white liberal-left are still obsessed with either not causing offence to 'muslims' (as if they are just one homogenous group - quite a racist but prevalent assumption), or else in worse cases see Al Quaida etc as distant allies in the fight against Imperialism and Capitalism. Which is just bullshit.

anarchoskin79's picture
anarchoskin79
Offline
Joined: 25-03-10
Apr 2 2010 17:51

And I agree that the EDL anti-union stuff is hilariously paranoid nonsense. Nevertheless I don't like seeing communist flags on demos either; historically these people have not been on our side and we know it.

communal_pie's picture
communal_pie
Offline
Joined: 18-10-08
Apr 3 2010 00:26
anarchoskin79 wrote:
@communalpie; I'd like to know on what grounds you think the IWCA organise around identity politics, I find that a ridiculous assertion about a group which has been exposing the lib/left obsession with identity politics for almost 20 years, since back in '93 when nobody else saw the ramifications of multiculturalism.

I never said that their polemics against multiculturalism were wrong, on the contrary, I think it is very valid to point out the errors in multiculturalism, however, you do not really seem to propose a replacement to multiculturalism which is an error, if you point it out I would expect you to offer some form of a substitute.

While not being a Trotskyist in any form, I think "revolutionary integrationism" was an excellent idea espoused by Trotskyists and is something we can use, you should read up on it.

Quote:
Its like saying the BNP organise around anti-racism!

Except, I'd defend the IWCA in some respects unlike the BNP.

Quote:
Right from the start I've been saying the EDL leadership are irrelevant compared to the motivation of ordinary people attending the demos, and I don't believe demonising them all as 'racists' is helpful, as even the AF article does somewhat disappointingly.

When more than 20 of them say racist things and make nazi salutes without any condemnation from the rest of the EDL crowd and it clearly causes more jeering and chanting from them, at the counter-protesters, it seems as if there might just be a few racists there you know, but maybe I'm wrong, maybe it was some kind of a clever trick.

By the way, I don't think we can say every single person there is a racist, or even right-wing, don't think I ever said that either.

Quote:
As I'm mixed race and partly of pakistani origin, I feel I see things slightly differently from some on the left, though it shouldn't matter if I was completely white. I feel that many muslim youths in the UK now have a culture which at least tacitly consents to extremism, whilst mainstream muslim culture does little to oppose it, and continues to promote homophobic and misogenistic values. This has to be opposed from within and without the muslim community, and is our responsibility too.

Welcome to the club.

Quote:
Nevertheless, I can't see anyone on the UAF demos having the balls to display an 'Anarchists against Fascists and Islamic Extremists' placard. The lack of this makes it look like tacit consent for what the EDL claim to oppose.

How odd, have heard plenty of people in AF say things such as this as well as seen "no to the IDF, no to HAMAS" banners and such at their demos.

Quote:
If some on the EDL demo have the balls to have placards opposing the BNP, Blood and Honour and the NF in their midst, then we should be able to do the same with regards to our anti-religious beliefs, no?

Oh yes, so they know how to sloganeer, they even put Israeli, Jamaican and other flags up on one of their police-arranged buses out. This obviously means that they have balls as well, perhaps there really is no double meaning when they burn nazi flags with a flag above them saying black and white unite.

Quote:
I wouldn't hold my breath as the white liberal-left are still obsessed with either not causing offence to 'muslims' (as if they are just one homogenous group - quite a racist but prevalent assumption), or else in worse cases see Al Quaida etc as distant allies in the fight against Imperialism and Capitalism. Which is just bullshit.

Of course. I don't want to cause offence to muslims even though I have a consistent record of challenging one of my best friends on every aspect of islam, as well as many other people I know, not that it feels like a matter of total importance above everything else to me, as that would mean I'm kind of placing it as a higher priority than it is.

anarchoskin79's picture
anarchoskin79
Offline
Joined: 25-03-10
Apr 3 2010 02:25
Quote:
I never said that their polemics against multiculturalism were wrong, on the contrary, I think it is very valid to point out the errors in multiculturalism, however, you do not really seem to propose a replacement to multiculturalism which is an error, if you point it out I would expect you to offer some form of a substitute.

I'm not being lazy by copying part of the website, I think its a good condensed summary of a number of issues:

IWCA Programme:
Race & class

For many years racism was opposed because people recognised that it divided the working class. Increasingly, however, there are calls for the state funding of religious schools, for segregated schooling and for segregated housing. All of which is promoted in the name of anti-racism.

However, experience shows that the funding of social projects purely on the grounds of race can only foster an us and them scenario, with the result that instead of being united by anti-racism, the working class can just as easily be divided by it. Multiculturalism, which insists everyone be treated differently, also undermines the concept of fairness at the core of anti-racism. For example, in America recent research has found that the application of the multicultural strategy has increased segregation in many cities and created a black middle class, often directly at the expense of the black working class.

The IWCA is against any strategies that artificially divide the working class against itself. In order to rectify past mistakes there will need to be recognition that:

* Orthodox models of equal opportunities racialise social questions in such a way as to set communities against each other.
* Equal opportunities models which assume there is a uniform access to power by all white people and a uniform denial of access to power by all black people must be rejected.
* Systematic cuts in youth and community provision and a subsequent rise in racial tension are often linked by a straightforward relationship of cause and effect.
* Anti-racist strategies that are not broadly accepted as reasonable and rational by working class communities are counter-productive and can deflect attempts to tackle the most extreme forms of bigotry.
* Multicultural strategies which promote or result in segregation, particularly in housing and schooling, must be scrapped.
* Organised and systematic racial violence needs to be dealt with from a political as well as criminal perspective.

Quote:
While not being a Trotskyist in any form, I think "revolutionary integrationism" was an excellent idea espoused by Trotskyists and is something we can use, you should read up on it.

I checked out the wikipedia for quickness so correct me if I've misunderstood.

My main concerns with RI is that it pretty much postpones the solving of racial or cultural integration until 'after the socialist revolution;' the usual panacea for difficult problems. If the 'transition' solution is not to wait for a revolution but to work for class unity across racial lines, well then, that's not any different from the IWCA goal and methodology.

The other thing is that the USA a century ago is certainly not the UK today. There is an established middle class in most UK immigrant communities and this class is often represented politically at the highest levels, and there is no legacy of slavery to contend with. My point is that currently the left is reaching out to 'the muslim community' as a whole.

I also feel that the RI theorists would probably have been surprised at the emergence of a black middle class and the possibility of a black president without a socialist revolution. Maybe that's why the Republicans think Obama's a socialist...

Quote:
Quote:
Nevertheless, I can't see anyone on the UAF demos having the balls to display an 'Anarchists against Fascists and Islamic Extremists' placard. The lack of this makes it look like tacit consent for what the EDL claim to oppose.

How odd, have heard plenty of people in AF say things such as this as well as seen "no to the IDF, no to HAMAS" banners and such at their demos.

Well thats good then. Sorry, I just get really fucking wound up by SWP front groups.

Quote:
Oh yes, so they know how to sloganeer, they even put Israeli, Jamaican and other flags up on one of their police-arranged buses out. This obviously means that they have balls as well, perhaps there really is no double meaning when they burn nazi flags with a flag above them saying black and white unite.

I presume you were being sarcastic and meant burning 'anti-nazi' flags like in Swansea. Those guys clearly were not hard to pin as fascists.

Quote:
I don't want to cause offence to muslims even though I have a consistent record of challenging one of my best friends on every aspect of islam, as well as many other people I know, not that it feels like a matter of total importance above everything else to me, as that would mean I'm kind of placing it as a higher priority than it is.

Personally, I can't think of much else with a higher priority than addressing racial and cultural divisions in society. And beyond the UAF/EDL pantomime. Right now it seems like divisions are growing, and if current trends are allowed to continue it doesn't look hopeful for the future. The more multiculturalism sets its teeth in, the harder it will be to organise along class lines.

communal_pie's picture
communal_pie
Offline
Joined: 18-10-08
Apr 9 2010 00:46
anarchoskin79 wrote:
'm not being lazy by copying part of the website, I think its a good condensed summary of a number of issues:

IWCA Programme:
Race & class

For many years racism was opposed because people recognised that it divided the working class. Increasingly, however, there are calls for the state funding of religious schools, for segregated schooling and for segregated housing. All of which is promoted in the name of anti-racism.

However, experience shows that the funding of social projects purely on the grounds of race can only foster an us and them scenario, with the result that instead of being united by anti-racism, the working class can just as easily be divided by it. Multiculturalism, which insists everyone be treated differently, also undermines the concept of fairness at the core of anti-racism. For example, in America recent research has found that the application of the multicultural strategy has increased segregation in many cities and created a black middle class, often directly at the expense of the black working class.

The IWCA is against any strategies that artificially divide the working class against itself. In order to rectify past mistakes there will need to be recognition that:

* Orthodox models of equal opportunities racialise social questions in such a way as to set communities against each other.
* Equal opportunities models which assume there is a uniform access to power by all white people and a uniform denial of access to power by all black people must be rejected.
* Systematic cuts in youth and community provision and a subsequent rise in racial tension are often linked by a straightforward relationship of cause and effect.
* Anti-racist strategies that are not broadly accepted as reasonable and rational by working class communities are counter-productive and can deflect attempts to tackle the most extreme forms of bigotry.
* Multicultural strategies which promote or result in segregation, particularly in housing and schooling, must be scrapped.
* Organised and systematic racial violence needs to be dealt with from a political as well as criminal perspective.

This doesn't really offer much of an alternative except for "it has to be opposed", although you say in a second that the IWCA would probably endorse RI. So we're in agreement pretty much.

Quote:
I checked out the wikipedia for quickness so correct me if I've misunderstood.

My main concerns with RI is that it pretty much postpones the solving of racial or cultural integration until 'after the socialist revolution;' the usual panacea for difficult problems. If the 'transition' solution is not to wait for a revolution but to work for class unity across racial lines, well then, that's not any different from the IWCA goal and methodology.

We're in agreement pretty much. I just think it is noteworthy to include the goal of completely uniting workers as being only possible post-revolution.

Quote:
The other thing is that the USA a century ago is certainly not the UK today. There is an established middle class in most UK immigrant communities and this class is often represented politically at the highest levels, and there is no legacy of slavery to contend with. My point is that currently the left is reaching out to 'the muslim community' as a whole.

It depends what parts of the left you mean, the reformist and revisionist left, yes, of course they are reaching out to the Muslim bourgeois but then again, what else would you expect?

Quote:
I also feel that the RI theorists would probably have been surprised at the emergence of a black middle class and the possibility of a black president without a socialist revolution. Maybe that's why the Republicans think Obama's a socialist...

Not really, CLR James wrote many polemics against this separation by ethnicity a very long time ago, himself having rebelled against the idea of being rightfully better off than others (being brought up in the Trinidadian intelligentsia) and taking up the positions of socialism against this. I think he endorsed revolutionary integrationism.

Quote:
Well thats good then. Sorry, I just get really fucking wound up by SWP front groups.

Yes, we do need to outnumber them.

Quote:
Personally, I can't think of much else with a higher priority than addressing racial and cultural divisions in society. And beyond the UAF/EDL pantomime. Right now it seems like divisions are growing, and if current trends are allowed to continue it doesn't look hopeful for the future. The more multiculturalism sets its teeth in, the harder it will be to organise along class lines.

Multiculturalism has already set in, I can't think of anything more multicultural than the race separated schools in tower hamlets and south hackney, or in manchester, or in so many other places. Yes it needs to be opposed, yes the workers need to be united along class-lines, but you will not really appeal to the working-class by taking either extreme of talking about speculative support for a group like the EDL, nor for talking about speculative support of a group attached to something like the UAF (not that you have done this).

Nifty Casual
Offline
Joined: 13-04-10
Apr 13 2010 18:08
Django wrote:
Joseph Kay wrote:
I'm told in Manchester anarchists have trouble finding venues because of (largely idle) fascist threats. i think it's prudent to prevent them getting to even that level of nuisance since we can.

I think thats a bit of an exagerration. We got a threat once years ago, which led to nothing. We've never had any trouble doing distros or street stalls. We have more trouble finding venues because people run a mile when they hear the word 'anarchist'.

It's good that you've had no problems with holding stalls and distributions but this neglects the fact that in Manchester recently UAF/Socialist Students stalls in the town have been disrupted by people under the EDL banner, as well as a recent UAF meeting having to be disbanded- these actions have also occured in other cities, with videos uploaded upon youtube.
If anyone knows their British antifascist history, then they would know that it was due to these more aggressive moves by the National Front and Loyalists, both types of whom have somewhat into the EDL (though not always welcomed nor appreciated by the EDL leadership but nonetheless have both been attending the recent flurry of demostrations over the UK), that lead to the creation of the Squads. So, learning from the experiences of radical political history, and the grow of fascism/far right groups in general, it would be reckless to assert that this is a non issue and let it grow when it can potenially be diverted.