Organizing IT Workers

41 posts / 0 new
Last post
syndicalist
Offline
Joined: 15-04-06
Jan 28 2007 14:51

Ok, last licks for me and Chuck you're welcome to take another shot at me. Then it's best that we move on.

We do not have to like each other to discuss things. It's the manner in which they're discussed. I often times agree with some of your trade union views. But they can get lost or sidetracked.

This is what I was refering to Chuck:

throwhen http://libcom.org/forums/bin/yank-bun-fight#comment-

Mon, 22/01/2007 - 04:15

"fuck nefac.
fuck leftists.
fuck tom, mitch and even that canadian fucker mick.

They haven't organized workers and wouldn't know how to if they had to."

It's perfectly reasonable for people to agree or disagree over specifics or in general. Perhaps your affinity with your union, the style of your union and so forth bonds you to that union. Ok, cool. Everyones experiance is different. Every union is different.Many unions have transformed themseleves into more trade union oriented organizations rather than fiefdoms of the past. Your union is geenerally one of them. But not all are.

To say that your experiance is the only experiance, that others experiances or observations are not, well, that's where we can part ways.

As I have no desire to make this about me, yet you've made some statements that show you have no idea about me, I'll say this. I'm a former factory and warehouse worker who was taken out of the shop to work for his local. I then returned to the shop and then hired onto a progressive union organizing and assiting industrial workers in organizing, grievances and contract negotiation. I finished my union stint in healthcare and president of the satff union. I am currently self-employed after my father suddenly died suddenly and I took over his one-man tombstone business.

I have always retained a rank-and-file perspective and have approached all my work from this angle. My industrial experiances in the workplace and in assisiting other workers came during a period of intesnse attacks on the working class. Plant closings, lock-outs, major drive for concessions on wages and terms and coditions of employment and general de-industrializtion of my area. My healthcare experiances were with workers who had no protection under the NLRB and, therefore, it was through our ability to maintain self-organization and stamina that we were able to prevail.

That's my story. So I guess I have some idea of what I'm talking about.

So let's just agree to disagree where there are disagreements. Let's share whatever knowledge and experiance we have with others. And for all, let's keep things civil and hold back on the cussing and name calling--everyone.

To Flint and others, sorry to have momentarily derailed your conversation.

throwhen
Offline
Joined: 19-12-06
Jan 28 2007 18:17
syndicalist wrote:
Ok, last licks for me and Chuck you're welcome to take another shot at me. Then it's best that we move on.

ok.

syndicalist wrote:
We do not have to like each other to discuss things. It's the manner in which they're discussed. I often times agree with some of your trade union views. But they can get lost or sidetracked.

This is what I was refering to Chuck:

throwhen http://libcom.org/forums/bin/yank-bun-fight#comment-

Mon, 22/01/2007 - 04:15

"fuck nefac.
fuck leftists.
fuck tom, mitch and even that canadian fucker mick.

They haven't organized workers and wouldn't know how to if they had to."

It's perfectly reasonable for people to agree or disagree over specifics or in general. Perhaps your affinity with your union, the style of your union and so forth bonds you to that union. Ok, cool. Everyones experiance is different. Every union is different.Many unions have transformed themseleves into more trade union oriented organizations rather than fiefdoms of the past. Your union is geenerally one of them. But not all are.

i'm proud of my union and the workers. i trust the leadership and have every reason too.

i'm also part of the leadership of my local; as a negotiator and leader of the gaming division.

syndicalist wrote:
To say that your experiance is the only experiance, that others experiances or observations are not, well, that's where we can part ways.

your experience is valid. i just think it's dated.

still very true in many parts of the country and in many unions, but that the labor movement is changing and that need to be reflected in your vision.

syndicalist wrote:
As I have no desire to make this about me, yet you've made some statements that show you have no idea about me, I'll say this. I'm a former factory and warehouse worker who was taken out of the shop to work for his local. I then returned to the shop and then hired onto a progressive union organizing and assiting industrial workers in organizing, grievances and contract negotiation. I finished my union stint in healthcare and president of the satff union. I am currently self-employed after my father suddenly died suddenly and I took over his one-man tombstone business.

congrats. i organized my own union as a painter before becoming an organizer. Doesn't make me right, but it also doesn't make me wrong.

syndicalist wrote:
I have always retained a rank-and-file perspective and have approached all my work from this angle. My industrial experiances in the workplace and in assisiting other workers came during a period of intesnse attacks on the working class. Plant closings, lock-outs, major drive for concessions on wages and terms and coditions of employment and general de-industrializtion of my area. My healthcare experiances were with workers who had no protection under the NLRB and, therefore, it was through our ability to maintain self-organization and stamina that we were able to prevail.

my organizing was with construction workers and casino workers. I started and for five years organized tribal casino workers with no rights under the NLRB or any other laws. It was only through discipline and a clear plan that we were able to beat the combined strength of the casino management and government.

syndicalist wrote:
That's my story. So I guess I have some idea of what I'm talking about.

me too...

syndicalist wrote:
So let's just agree to disagree where there are disagreements. Let's share whatever knowledge and experiance we have with others. And for all, let's keep things civil and hold back on the cussing and name calling--everyone.

you too...

syndicalist wrote:
To Flint and others, sorry to have momentarily derailed your conversation.

me too...

JDMF's picture
JDMF
Offline
Joined: 21-05-04
Jan 28 2007 20:57

can i suggest opening a new thread with the same topic, but this time if this throwhen character could refrain from posting on it please?

throwhen
Offline
Joined: 19-12-06
Jan 28 2007 22:55
JDMF wrote:
can i suggest opening a new thread with the same topic, but this time if this throwhen character could refrain from posting on it please?

seriously. I posted a legitimate question. If you don't think there is a point...DON"T respond.

Flint
Offline
Joined: 17-12-05
Jan 29 2007 17:05
tojiah wrote:
gatorojinegro wrote:
like Flint, i work for a contracting agency, but in my case it's a "captive" agency that works, I think, only for one software tool maker. it's just a scam to improve their labor "flexibility".

t.

It's very common in the Israeli public sector to erode workers` benefits by employing through a contractor - they then can't become members of the workplace union, thus forfeiting all benefits.

This is the exact situation. This is a big business too. ACS is a big player with some 58,000 contracted employees... most of them in IT.

Flint
Offline
Joined: 17-12-05
Jan 29 2007 17:14
throwhen wrote:
1. You must organize work sites..not workers
2. Traveling unions don't work
3. There is no special way to organize IT workers

Does the same apply to all industries and trades? I'm thinking about jobs that are seasonal, have moving worksites, etc...

For example, construction workers or sailors.

As Tom already pointed out, programmers can be temporarily employed for awhile, and then that contracts ends, and then they are in a lull period, until there is another push for their skills... sometimes contracted to the same previous company, sometimes in others. Programmers really have a pretty elastic cycle of development, and rarely does a shop seem to keep around a bunch of programmers in house (there are some exceptions). Lots of companies keep a core stable of programmers, and then temp hire more during a crunch in development (as well as quality assurance, etc...) and then lay them off as soon as the software goes gold. The video game industry is notorious for this.

I'd think that there are pecularities to how you organize in all jobs and industries. If there was one cookie cutter solution, HERE-UNITE would have organized the entire globe by now.

But hey, if you take something complicated and make a simplification of it and say it enough times, I'm sure everyone will agree with you.

throwhen
Offline
Joined: 19-12-06
Jan 29 2007 19:17
Flint wrote:
throwhen wrote:
1. You must organize work sites..not workers
2. Traveling unions don't work
3. There is no special way to organize IT workers

Does the same apply to all industries and trades? I'm thinking about jobs that are seasonal, have moving worksites, etc...

For example, construction workers or sailors.

As Tom already pointed out, programmers can be temporarily employed for awhile, and then that contracts ends, and then they are in a lull period, until there is another push for their skills... sometimes contracted to the same previous company, sometimes in others. Programmers really have a pretty elastic cycle of development, and rarely does a shop seem to keep around a bunch of programmers in house (there are some exceptions). Lots of companies keep a core stable of programmers, and then temp hire more during a crunch in development (as well as quality assurance, etc...) and then lay them off as soon as the software goes gold. The video game industry is notorious for this.

I'd think that there are pecularities to how you organize in all jobs and industries. If there was one cookie cutter solution, HERE-UNITE would have organized the entire globe by now.

But hey, if you take something complicated and make a simplification of it and say it enough times, I'm sure everyone will agree with you.

again. I am not talking about a final structure of a new union. I am talking about the initial organizing process.

You are starting from scratch.

eventually traveling union jobs and hiring halls could be great for tech workers. I don't know. I'm not one and don't know anything about the work.

but you need density to make it practical.

banquet workers function like that. However, if the union didn't have enough shops organized then this wouldn't make any sense.

afraser
Offline
Joined: 16-07-05
Jan 29 2007 22:01

For those interested in the UK position,
this good Amicus/MSF forum thread
raised this issue with what sounded like a positive way forward - except nothing apparently happened.

Two unions are attempting to oraganise Indian IT workers, also with apparently no success so far: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/HK21Df01.html

It has been exceptionally hard to organise IT workers formally (although plenty of good informal bargaining, but that has its limititations when employed on its own) - but signs are that that could change as industry moves to be more established and cost conscious. Wages have tended to fall in real terms since 1999.

gatorojinegro's picture
gatorojinegro
Offline
Joined: 21-01-07
Jan 30 2007 17:31

wages have not been falling here in the bay area. the industry has recovered and is now in a major boom. the job market is tight again. that isn't going to lead to falling wages.

t.

syndicalist
Offline
Joined: 15-04-06
Apr 4 2012 15:21

Bump ..... given the amount of time that has passed since this first went up, I'm curious about updated experiances, etc.