SEIU

44 posts / 0 new
Last post
mikus
Offline
Joined: 18-07-06
Feb 15 2008 01:42
SEIU

Are any of you people in it? Thoughts? Apparently I'm in the union (1021) starting next week because I work in a union shop now.

I was walking around downtown Oakland today and randomly saw a bunch of them doing some protest with janitors but even based on their flier it wasn't exactly clear what was going down.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Feb 15 2008 03:02

I'm in SEIU.

mikus
Offline
Joined: 18-07-06
Feb 15 2008 03:54
thugarchist wrote:
I'm in SEIU.

Thoughts?

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Feb 15 2008 04:08
mikus wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
I'm in SEIU.

Thoughts?

Well, I don't know what you mean.

How does it compare to other mainstream unions in the US? Better than most.
Is it a vehicle for revolutionary activity? No.
How do I like purple? Hate it.

Is 1021 that new conglomeration public sector local?

mikus
Offline
Joined: 18-07-06
Feb 15 2008 04:40
thugarchist wrote:
mikus wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
I'm in SEIU.

Thoughts?

Well, I don't know what you mean.

Yeah, me neither. I guess just any info that'd be at all useful or of interest for a new member. I guess there'd be more of that if you were in the bay area.

Quote:
Is 1021 that new conglomeration public sector local?

Yup.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Feb 15 2008 04:53
mikus wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
mikus wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
I'm in SEIU.

Thoughts?

Well, I don't know what you mean.

Yeah, me neither. I guess just any info that'd be at all useful or of interest for a new member. I guess there'd be more of that if you were in the bay area.

Quote:
Is 1021 that new conglomeration public sector local?

Yup.

Well, I'd go to a union meeting and see whats going on. I met some folks from your local in Baltimore last summer but I honestly don't know much about the public sector in SEIU. I'd be interested to see what 1021 is up to.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Feb 15 2008 04:55

Not Baltimore. I think it was a conference in LA.

petey
Offline
Joined: 13-10-05
Feb 15 2008 14:30

i used to be in it, but that was a good while ago, when
this guy was at the top. as a worker i got no help when i was axed by a sicko boss, and on another occasion i was threatened by another member because he could "tell" when someone wasn't in the union, although i was.

but i'm sure it's different now.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Feb 15 2008 14:45
newyawka wrote:
i used to be in it, but that was a good while ago, when
this guy was at the top. as a worker i got no help when i was axed by a sicko boss, and on another occasion i was threatened by another member because he could "tell" when someone wasn't in the union, although i was.

but i'm sure it's different now.

Thats a pretty balanced article. Greenhouse usually goes for the jugular on corruption. There's gotta be more interesting sensationalist news from other papers at the time yeah?

petey
Offline
Joined: 13-10-05
Feb 15 2008 15:16

on television there was: panoramic views from his pad on 59th and 5th.

Mike Harman
Offline
Joined: 7-02-06
Feb 15 2008 15:41

They're endorsing Barak Obama apparently.

petey
Offline
Joined: 13-10-05
Feb 15 2008 18:50

breaking news:

Quote:
A major battle brewing is within the Service Employees International Union, one of the country’s largest unions with 1.9 million members. Last week, executive committee member Sal Rosselli resigned in a blistering letter accusing union President Andy Stern of expanding his powers at members’ expense.

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/15/seiu_members_face_off_in_dispute

gurley's picture
gurley
Offline
Joined: 4-01-07
Feb 15 2008 19:13
thugarchist wrote:
mikus wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
mikus wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
I'm in SEIU.

Thoughts?

Well, I don't know what you mean.

Yeah, me neither. I guess just any info that'd be at all useful or of interest for a new member. I guess there'd be more of that if you were in the bay area.

Quote:
Is 1021 that new conglomeration public sector local?

Yup.

Well, I'd go to a union meeting and see whats going on. I met some folks from your local in Baltimore last summer but I honestly don't know much about the public sector in SEIU. I'd be interested to see what 1021 is up to.

.....

gurley's picture
gurley
Offline
Joined: 4-01-07
Feb 15 2008 19:26
newyawka wrote:
breaking news:
Quote:
A major battle brewing is within the Service Employees International Union, one of the country’s largest unions with 1.9 million members. Last week, executive committee member Sal Rosselli resigned in a blistering letter accusing union President Andy Stern of expanding his powers at members’ expense.

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/15/seiu_members_face_off_in_dispute

This has been going on for a while:
http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-06-13/news/stern-reprimand/

OliverTwister's picture
OliverTwister
Offline
Joined: 10-10-05
Feb 15 2008 20:17

Speaking of which, whats the low-down on CUE? They dont have a wikipedia entry and their website looks like it hasnt been updated since 2005.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Feb 15 2008 20:23
gurley wrote:
newyawka wrote:
breaking news:
Quote:
A major battle brewing is within the Service Employees International Union, one of the country’s largest unions with 1.9 million members. Last week, executive committee member Sal Rosselli resigned in a blistering letter accusing union President Andy Stern of expanding his powers at members’ expense.

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/15/seiu_members_face_off_in_dispute

This has been going on for a while:
http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-06-13/news/stern-reprimand/

Eh, its fairly serious but really its just about convention coming up and Roselli wants to make a power play. Pretty ho hum and really just distracts from the actual mission of the union.

gurley's picture
gurley
Offline
Joined: 4-01-07
Feb 15 2008 20:33
OliverTwister wrote:
Speaking of which, whats the low-down on CUE? They dont have a wikipedia entry and their website looks like it hasnt been updated since 2005.

Oh my god! No wiki entry....that means that they must not exist.

It looks like this one was updated recently.
http://www.berkeleycue.org
http://www.cueunion.org

The CUE folks broke from AFSCME, not SEIU, if we are talking about the same thing.

gurley's picture
gurley
Offline
Joined: 4-01-07
Feb 15 2008 20:44
thugarchist wrote:
gurley wrote:
newyawka wrote:
breaking news:
Quote:
A major battle brewing is within the Service Employees International Union, one of the country’s largest unions with 1.9 million members. Last week, executive committee member Sal Rosselli resigned in a blistering letter accusing union President Andy Stern of expanding his powers at members’ expense.

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/15/seiu_members_face_off_in_dispute

This has been going on for a while:
http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-06-13/news/stern-reprimand/

Eh, its fairly serious but really its just about convention coming up and Roselli wants to make a power play. Pretty ho hum and really just distracts from the actual mission of the union.

I agree that its a power play. But he does bring up valid critiques. I agree with Stern's focus on organizing. But whats the point of organizing folks into undemocratic structures, making back room deals and cutting off any meaningful member involvement. 1021, after the merger, was forced to accept appointed e-board members and union officials. The members, in response, formed an elected "advisory council" that has no real power within the union. They are trying to bring back the democratic nature many of the former locals enjoyed but its an uphill battle.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Feb 16 2008 02:22
gurley wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
gurley wrote:
newyawka wrote:
breaking news:
Quote:
A major battle brewing is within the Service Employees International Union, one of the country’s largest unions with 1.9 million members. Last week, executive committee member Sal Rosselli resigned in a blistering letter accusing union President Andy Stern of expanding his powers at members’ expense.

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/15/seiu_members_face_off_in_dispute

This has been going on for a while:
http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-06-13/news/stern-reprimand/

Eh, its fairly serious but really its just about convention coming up and Roselli wants to make a power play. Pretty ho hum and really just distracts from the actual mission of the union.

I agree that its a power play. But he does bring up valid critiques. I agree with Stern's focus on organizing. But whats the point of organizing folks into undemocratic structures, making back room deals and cutting off any meaningful member involvement. 1021, after the merger, was forced to accept appointed e-board members and union officials. The members, in response, formed an elected "advisory council" that has no real power within the union. They are trying to bring back the democratic nature many of the former locals enjoyed but its an uphill battle.

I disagree that he brings up any valid point at all. The guys a tyrant and is kicking people off his eboard for not agreeing with him right now. Amado just resigne. Etc, etc. Its hard to listen to democracy critiques from the right wing of the union.

Hieronymous's picture
Hieronymous
Offline
Joined: 27-07-07
Feb 17 2008 05:09

Here's a good interview for finding out about Stern, SEIU and its international:

http://labornotes.org/node/1547

mikus
Offline
Joined: 18-07-06
Feb 18 2008 06:47
thugarchist wrote:
gurley wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
gurley wrote:
newyawka wrote:
breaking news:
Quote:
A major battle brewing is within the Service Employees International Union, one of the country’s largest unions with 1.9 million members. Last week, executive committee member Sal Rosselli resigned in a blistering letter accusing union President Andy Stern of expanding his powers at members’ expense.

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/15/seiu_members_face_off_in_dispute

This has been going on for a while:
http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-06-13/news/stern-reprimand/

Eh, its fairly serious but really its just about convention coming up and Roselli wants to make a power play. Pretty ho hum and really just distracts from the actual mission of the union.

I agree that its a power play. But he does bring up valid critiques. I agree with Stern's focus on organizing. But whats the point of organizing folks into undemocratic structures, making back room deals and cutting off any meaningful member involvement. 1021, after the merger, was forced to accept appointed e-board members and union officials. The members, in response, formed an elected "advisory council" that has no real power within the union. They are trying to bring back the democratic nature many of the former locals enjoyed but its an uphill battle.

I disagree that he brings up any valid point at all. The guys a tyrant and is kicking people off his eboard for not agreeing with him right now. Amado just resigne. Etc, etc. Its hard to listen to democracy critiques from the right wing of the union.

Why do you consider Roselli to be on the right wing of the union? I know nothing about him other than the little links people have posted but his criticisms seem pretty sound. My only experience with the union so far is with the orientation provided to new hirees but the whole speech was very much about how the workers and bosses are partners, and so forth. If Roselli wants to lessen this tone I think that's a good thing. (Not that I think this would suddenly transform the union into some radical organ of class struggle.)

What am I missing?

Also, what exactly is the "mission" of the union?

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Feb 19 2008 01:12
mikus wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
gurley wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
gurley wrote:
newyawka wrote:
breaking news:
Quote:
A major battle brewing is within the Service Employees International Union, one of the country’s largest unions with 1.9 million members. Last week, executive committee member Sal Rosselli resigned in a blistering letter accusing union President Andy Stern of expanding his powers at members’ expense.

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/15/seiu_members_face_off_in_dispute

This has been going on for a while:
http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-06-13/news/stern-reprimand/

Eh, its fairly serious but really its just about convention coming up and Roselli wants to make a power play. Pretty ho hum and really just distracts from the actual mission of the union.

I agree that its a power play. But he does bring up valid critiques. I agree with Stern's focus on organizing. But whats the point of organizing folks into undemocratic structures, making back room deals and cutting off any meaningful member involvement. 1021, after the merger, was forced to accept appointed e-board members and union officials. The members, in response, formed an elected "advisory council" that has no real power within the union. They are trying to bring back the democratic nature many of the former locals enjoyed but its an uphill battle.

I disagree that he brings up any valid point at all. The guys a tyrant and is kicking people off his eboard for not agreeing with him right now. Amado just resigne. Etc, etc. Its hard to listen to democracy critiques from the right wing of the union.

Why do you consider Roselli to be on the right wing of the union? I know nothing about him other than the little links people have posted but his criticisms seem pretty sound. My only experience with the union so far is with the orientation provided to new hirees but the whole speech was very much about how the workers and bosses are partners, and so forth. If Roselli wants to lessen this tone I think that's a good thing. (Not that I think this would suddenly transform the union into some radical organ of class struggle.)

What am I missing?

Also, what exactly is the "mission" of the union?

The problem I have with the left in general on the subject of unions is that they read an article or listen to a speech and then simply believe the content of it or disbelieve the content of it based on their prior prejudices. I call Roselli the right wing of the union because, despite his rhetoric, he has reactionary practices that disenfranchise workers who disagree with him and he's deliberately fucking things up for workers in other parts of the country to gain market share and power for himself.

The mission of any union should be to grow and improve the lives of its members. Simplistic answer to be sure but that should at least be the lowest common denominator.

mikus
Offline
Joined: 18-07-06
Feb 19 2008 02:50
thugarchist wrote:
mikus wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
gurley wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
gurley wrote:
newyawka wrote:
breaking news:
Quote:
A major battle brewing is within the Service Employees International Union, one of the country’s largest unions with 1.9 million members. Last week, executive committee member Sal Rosselli resigned in a blistering letter accusing union President Andy Stern of expanding his powers at members’ expense.

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/15/seiu_members_face_off_in_dispute

This has been going on for a while:
http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-06-13/news/stern-reprimand/

Eh, its fairly serious but really its just about convention coming up and Roselli wants to make a power play. Pretty ho hum and really just distracts from the actual mission of the union.

I agree that its a power play. But he does bring up valid critiques. I agree with Stern's focus on organizing. But whats the point of organizing folks into undemocratic structures, making back room deals and cutting off any meaningful member involvement. 1021, after the merger, was forced to accept appointed e-board members and union officials. The members, in response, formed an elected "advisory council" that has no real power within the union. They are trying to bring back the democratic nature many of the former locals enjoyed but its an uphill battle.

I disagree that he brings up any valid point at all. The guys a tyrant and is kicking people off his eboard for not agreeing with him right now. Amado just resigne. Etc, etc. Its hard to listen to democracy critiques from the right wing of the union.

Why do you consider Roselli to be on the right wing of the union? I know nothing about him other than the little links people have posted but his criticisms seem pretty sound. My only experience with the union so far is with the orientation provided to new hirees but the whole speech was very much about how the workers and bosses are partners, and so forth. If Roselli wants to lessen this tone I think that's a good thing. (Not that I think this would suddenly transform the union into some radical organ of class struggle.)

What am I missing?

Also, what exactly is the "mission" of the union?

The problem I have with the left in general on the subject of unions is that they read an article or listen to a speech and then simply believe the content of it or disbelieve the content of it based on their prior prejudices. I call Roselli the right wing of the union because, despite his rhetoric, he has reactionary practices that disenfranchise workers who disagree with him and he's deliberately fucking things up for workers in other parts of the country to gain market share and power for himself.

I don't "simply believe the content of it or disbelieve the content" of Roselli's claims "based on [my] prior prejudices." I think Roselli's claims sound nice. Whether or not they are simply a part of a power move, I have no idea, since I have no idea about the internal structure of the union nor the factional disputes within it. Hence my asking about it. I'd like to see evidence to substantiate your criticism of Roselli. (This is not a challenge, as if I doubted there were any, but I'd like to see it so I can make up my mind on this.)

thugarchist wrote:
The mission of any union should be to grow and improve the lives of its members. Simplistic answer to be sure but that should at least be the lowest common denominator.

If that's the mission of a union (I don't disagree with you), then it seems that the internal structure of the union and whether or not it focuses on partnership is very relevant to the mission of the union.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Feb 19 2008 03:20
mikus wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
mikus wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
gurley wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
gurley wrote:
newyawka wrote:
breaking news:
Quote:
A major battle brewing is within the Service Employees International Union, one of the country’s largest unions with 1.9 million members. Last week, executive committee member Sal Rosselli resigned in a blistering letter accusing union President Andy Stern of expanding his powers at members’ expense.

http://www.democracynow.org/2008/2/15/seiu_members_face_off_in_dispute

This has been going on for a while:
http://www.sfweekly.com/2007-06-13/news/stern-reprimand/

Eh, its fairly serious but really its just about convention coming up and Roselli wants to make a power play. Pretty ho hum and really just distracts from the actual mission of the union.

I agree that its a power play. But he does bring up valid critiques. I agree with Stern's focus on organizing. But whats the point of organizing folks into undemocratic structures, making back room deals and cutting off any meaningful member involvement. 1021, after the merger, was forced to accept appointed e-board members and union officials. The members, in response, formed an elected "advisory council" that has no real power within the union. They are trying to bring back the democratic nature many of the former locals enjoyed but its an uphill battle.

I disagree that he brings up any valid point at all. The guys a tyrant and is kicking people off his eboard for not agreeing with him right now. Amado just resigne. Etc, etc. Its hard to listen to democracy critiques from the right wing of the union.

Why do you consider Roselli to be on the right wing of the union? I know nothing about him other than the little links people have posted but his criticisms seem pretty sound. My only experience with the union so far is with the orientation provided to new hirees but the whole speech was very much about how the workers and bosses are partners, and so forth. If Roselli wants to lessen this tone I think that's a good thing. (Not that I think this would suddenly transform the union into some radical organ of class struggle.)

What am I missing?

Also, what exactly is the "mission" of the union?

The problem I have with the left in general on the subject of unions is that they read an article or listen to a speech and then simply believe the content of it or disbelieve the content of it based on their prior prejudices. I call Roselli the right wing of the union because, despite his rhetoric, he has reactionary practices that disenfranchise workers who disagree with him and he's deliberately fucking things up for workers in other parts of the country to gain market share and power for himself.

I don't "simply believe the content of it or disbelieve the content" of Roselli's claims "based on [my] prior prejudices." I think Roselli's claims sound nice. Whether or not they are simply a part of a power move, I have no idea, since I have no idea about the internal structure of the union nor the factional disputes within it. Hence my asking about it. I'd like to see evidence to substantiate your criticism of Roselli. (This is not a challenge, as if I doubted there were any, but I'd like to see it so I can make up my mind on this.)

thugarchist wrote:
The mission of any union should be to grow and improve the lives of its members. Simplistic answer to be sure but that should at least be the lowest common denominator.

If that's the mission of a union (I don't disagree with you), then it seems that the internal structure of the union and whether or not it focuses on partnership is very relevant to the mission of the union.

Sure. The interesting thing about Roselli's critique of partnership is that the partnerships he's criticizing are ones he helped invent. The critiques he makes of alliance agreements are items from those agreements he originally crafted. Now because he doesn't control the employer relationships he's all of a sudden anti-partnership? Its crazy.

petey
Offline
Joined: 13-10-05
Feb 19 2008 17:00

could yiz stop quoting every other post when answering?
thanks, i've been wanting to say that for a while.

mikus
Offline
Joined: 18-07-06
Feb 20 2008 01:40
newyawka wrote:
could yiz stop quoting every other post when answering?
thanks, i've been wanting to say that for a while.

No.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Feb 20 2008 03:55
mikus wrote:
newyawka wrote:
could yiz stop quoting every other post when answering?
thanks, i've been wanting to say that for a while.

No.

Agreed.

gurley's picture
gurley
Offline
Joined: 4-01-07
Feb 20 2008 04:20
thugarchist wrote:
mikus wrote:
newyawka wrote:
could yiz stop quoting every other post when answering?
thanks, i've been wanting to say that for a while.

No.

Agreed.

Yep...

Actually. The sense I get is that Rosselli was all hunky dory with the mergers, trusteeships, purges etc... until it hit too close to home. When the international came in, took over bargaining, essentially ignored the local and the negotiating committee and cut a deal behind everyone's back Rosselli got pissed. But only because they went behind his back "this time".

He raises good points though. But these are things that reformers have been pushing for for years. Rosselli is not the best champion for their cause as it comes across as a power play and the pot calling the kettle black. But there are good solid unionists in the reform movement who deserve to have their voices heard. Don't ignore their legitimate grievances just because Mr. Rosselli is riding the reform bandwagon for his own purposes.

thugarchist's picture
thugarchist
Offline
Joined: 26-11-06
Feb 20 2008 06:26
gurley wrote:
thugarchist wrote:
mikus wrote:
newyawka wrote:
could yiz stop quoting every other post when answering?
thanks, i've been wanting to say that for a while.

No.

Agreed.

Yep...

Actually. The sense I get is that Rosselli was all hunky dory with the mergers, trusteeships, purges etc... until it hit too close to home. When the international came in, took over bargaining, essentially ignored the local and the negotiating committee and cut a deal behind everyone's back Rosselli got pissed. But only because they went behind his back "this time".

He raises good points though. But these are things that reformers have been pushing for for years. Rosselli is not the best champion for their cause as it comes across as a power play and the pot calling the kettle black. But there are good solid unionists in the reform movement who deserve to have their voices heard. Don't ignore their legitimate grievances just because Mr. Rosselli is riding the reform bandwagon for his own purposes.

Except thats not what happened. In 2004 Roselli ans everyone else voted for a restructuring of seiu. Roselli liked it when it meant his local was growing from it and he was getting tons of resources. Then in 2006 the exec board, including Roselli voted for a cali political restructure. That didn't add to his power. When everyone voted for a united strategy in catholic controlled healthcare, he loved it assuming he'd run the show. When he didn't get that he launched his latest "woe is me and democracy" nonsense. There was no back door negotiations here. He refuses to communicate with the union unless he gets his way. Thats all there is to his nonsense.

Now that isn't to say that unions are some bastion of democracy, including SEIU. Just that Roselli is very good at playing this game and he's deliberately calling all kinds of decisions he voted for "behind his back."

Ever hear the story about how he became president? He was a staffer and got fired. So he went and worked as a CNA in a nursing home for just long enough to constitutionally run for office. then he ran an extremely well-funded campaign. The guys just better at dirty union politics and the media than the rest of the union.

petey
Offline
Joined: 13-10-05
Feb 20 2008 15:19
thugarchist wrote:
mikus wrote:
newyawka wrote:
could yiz stop quoting every other post when answering?
thanks, i've been wanting to say that for a while.

No.

Agreed.

fuck alla youse

petey
Offline
Joined: 13-10-05
Feb 23 2008 03:43

i told youse, i see angry

1199-SEIU in NYS:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/23/nyregion/23union.html?_r=1&ref=nyregion&oref=slogin

Quote:
In recent years, the union, which was once a favorite of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., has struck an unlikely but fruitful alliance with the Senate majority leader, Joseph L. Bruno, pouring millions of dollars into the Senate Republican war chest to help the party retain its control.

In turn, Mr. Bruno has defended 1199 against cuts sought by Gov. Eliot Spitzer, a Democrat.

But recent campaign finance filings raise an intriguing question: Is the politically astute union now quietly hedging its bets?

In recent weeks, 1199 has been shoveling money into the Working Families Party, a labor-backed organization that has been mobilizing support for the Democratic candidate in a crucial State Senate special election in upstate New York on Tuesday. At the same time, the union has not contributed to the central campaign account maintained by Mr. Bruno’s Senate Republican operation in about six months.