Something i came across in the CNT's 'qué es la CNT' is the phrase "the CNT is a tool of the working class". i like the sentiment, and think we're trying to be something similar. we're not everything. movements will always be bigger than our organisation. other forms of organisation will be thrown up in struggles. but we can be a tool, or ideally a weapon for the class to make use of; training, direct action solidarity, ideally industrial bulletins etc.
And tools are suited to some things better than others. An organisation like the CNT, oriented to workplace and community organising may well be less suitable for making 'interventions' in mass movements, since it's not set up with much theoretical unity, nor the capacity to reach collective decisions quickly in response to fast changing events (i think monthly assemblies are sovereign), whereas political groups or informal circles may well be much better suited. We need various tools, but i think a revolutionary union (intiative) is a vital one.



Can comment on articles and discussions
Hey Devrim, the post office in the UK sounds a lot like the Post Office in Canada. We put on a direct action course through our CUPW local (it was a huge fight to get it in) but when we did we had a base of about 50 militants to plan actions with. Long story short we had a huge struggle around forced overtime over the winter and using these tactics we built a committee based movement that had workfloor assemblies to issue demands and plan actions. We had one mass meeting with 160 workers that planned actions across the city and we won. You can read about it on the recompositions blog. This was largely independent of the union leadership and was very effective.
Honestly I think the course, along with independent blogs, and text message lists were the main developments that allowed us to move beyond isolated wildcats and towards a movement that can win.