Starbucks Informational Pickets
Here is text of the leaflet we have produced for this.
SOLIDARITY WITH VICTIMISED STARBUCKS WORKERS
FIVE STARBUCKS WORKERS SACKED FOR FORMING A UNION
For almost 3 years workers in Starbucks have been organising in their franchises in the USA. Starbucks have responded by waging a war of intimidation against the unionising workers. Already 5 employees have lost their jobs – Joseph Agins, Charles Fostrom, Evan Winterscheidt, Daniel Gross (Founder of the Starbucks Union) and Isis Saenz. This is a warning shot towards anyone attempting to improve work conditions. However, Starbucks workers have fought back: winning 2 workers their jobs back and more than $2000 in lost earnings. In New York City, workers have gained a 25% wage increase in just over 2 years, with similar raises in other areas they have organised.
“PLEASE DRINK SOMEWHERE ELSE TODAY”
We are asking the public to drink their coffee somewhere else, to protest Starbucks unfair practises. We also offer our support and assistance to any Starbucks barista considering organising his or her workplace. Regular pickets will be held at various franchises throughout South London to highlight Starbucks’ attacks on its workers, and to show solidarity with the 5 sacked workers in the USA.
WHY ORGANISE AT WORK?
Almost none of us really want to go to work in the morning. We do anyway because the rent and bills need paying, and we want money for ourselves (and our families), and maybe even a little bit for a social life! Sometimes however, things at your job can really get to be too much. The pay’s too low, the workload’s too tiring and management is always on your back. For many people, the immediate solution would be to find another job – only to find it’s exactly the same.
But there is another option. Together, we can fight to make our working lives more bearable. Coffee baristas in the States did just that, working together to form the Starbucks Workers Union (SWU) together with the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW). Thus far they’ve organised 6 franchises in New York City alone, and Starbucks Union members exert influence in many other Starbucks outlets.
There are plenty of ways in which we can better our working lives. It could be as basic as covering for a workmate or as extreme as going on strike for better pay or hours. What’s important is that we stick together: working collectively for stuff that all of us want.
VICTORY IN THE USA, ORGANISING IN THE UK
The Starbucks Workers Union won a major victory over unfair labour practices, in a conflict between the world's largest coffee chain and the baristas who work there. Faced with the prospect of having its widespread union-busting campaign exposed in a public hearing, Starbucks agreed to remedy many of the violations committed against workers who have organised a union. Workers from Leicester in this country recently followed suit and created Baristas United, which is open to employees of any coffee shop.
ELSEWHERE…
The Starbucks Workers Union is calling for Starbucks to recognize Ethiopia’s development of premium coffee varieties. If the rights to names such as Sidamo, Harar and Yirgacheffe were recognized, coffee farmers in Ethiopia would get almost £50 million extra per year. see www.starbucksunion.org
SOLIDARITY
Only by sticking together can we improve our lives. The fired Starbucks workers sought to do that, and Starbucks are attempting to punish them for this. This cannot just be forgotten, and we must all stand together, and let Starbucks know they cannot get away with this. If you are interested in trying to organise, please speak to one of the people handing out these leaflets for information or a copy of our leaflet “Stuff your Boss doesn’t want you to know”.
This leaflet was produced by South London Solidarity Federation – you can contact us at southlondonsf@solfed.org.uk
For further information, take a look at:
www.solfed.org.uk ; www.starbucksunion.org ; www.iww.org.uk ; www.baristasunited.org.uk
not sure about sticky (tech wise), but wasn't the idea of an informational picket as opposed to a boycott call? i mean, fine if it wasn't but i thought that's what came of the discussion on the other thread ...
I don't think it was the conclusion on the other thread, just some people's conclusion. I don't see it as a big problem myself, if other folk want to approach this differently that's fine. I think it is important to show solidarity with the sacked workers. also what sort of a union doesn't support workers sacked for organising? And considering the strengh of the union at present, how else can pressure be applied to the company? I think that a lot of the resistance to the boycott idea is it being bound up with perceptions of lefty, liberal, lifesyltism and it not being direct action on the job. It is a tactic with a long labour history, although it is of limited use, but in this case it's appiorate IMO.
Saturday 10th March at 12noon. Greenwich next to the Cutty Sark.
I don't think it was the conclusion on the other thread, just some people's conclusion. I don't see it as a big problem myself, if other folk want to approach this differently that's fine. I think it is important to show solidarity with the sacked workers. also what sort of a union doesn't support workers sacked for organising? And considering the strengh of the union at present, how else can pressure be applied to the company? I think that a lot of the resistance to the boycott idea is it being bound up with perceptions of lefty, liberal, lifesyltism and it not being direct action on the job. It is a tactic with a long labour history, although it is of limited use, but in this case it's appiorate IMO.
yeah cool i wasn't sure, haven't been following this that closely. i mean i'm not sure what i think of a boycott, it would seem to preclude workplace organising (join us! get fired!), but if that's not on the cards anyway doesn't matter i guess. good luck with it anyway
It's better to be up front and honest about what risks organising at work entails and at least they would know there would be international support
of course, but you might tend to attract a rather nihlistic membership if the main reason to join is a quick way to get fired and feel hard-done-by
i'll not be around on saturday, but i'll let wobs know at our meeting tonight.
is the picket still on? i reckons a couple of wobs will be up for it.
Yeah the picket is still on. Hope to see a couple of Wobs tommorrow then
no hostilities but what exactly is SOL-FEDS role in this whole thing? I mean, are you just showing solidarity with fellow syndicalists, trying to get new members into a political org, do you see your self as a political org, union, union some time down the road, etc.????
Primarily, we are doing this in solidarity with sacked workers in NYC. While it's good that they're in the IWW, we'd like to think we'd do something similar for any group of workers sacked in similar circumstances. It also helps that Starbucks are visible and we can actually do something.
It's much easier to do this sort of thing when the company have outlets where you are. We woudl have done similar things last year for the Mercadona strikers, but Mercadona only have outlets in Iberia. It also has a disproportionate effect being international.
As to the boycott call clashing with organising efforts, this was discussed elsewhere as is mentioned above. For the time being we see no problems for the B.U. effort from us continuing to do this but we will continue to keep in touch with the Leicester (and London) comrades in the IWW.
At present, this is an initiative of South London SF, supported by other locals, not a national campaign. We see it as basic solidarity, and also tying in with our anti-casualisation work.
Most of us would see ourselves as a political group, but one that sees no separation between the economic and the political.
Regards,
Martin
Primarily, we are doing this in solidarity with sacked workers in NYC. While it's good that they're in the IWW, we'd like to think we'd do something similar for any group of workers sacked in similar circumstances. It also helps that Starbucks are visible and we can actually do something.It's much easier to do this sort of thing when the company have outlets where you are. We woudl have done similar things last year for the Mercadona strikers, but Mercadona only have outlets in Iberia. It also has a disproportionate effect being international.
As to the boycott call clashing with organising efforts, this was discussed elsewhere as is mentioned above. For the time being we see no problems for the B.U. effort from us continuing to do this but we will continue to keep in touch with the Leicester (and London) comrades in the IWW.
At present, this is an initiative of South London SF, supported by other locals, not a national campaign. We see it as basic solidarity, and also tying in with our anti-casualisation work.
Most of us would see ourselves as a political group, but one that sees no separation between the economic and the political.
Regards,
Martin
Cheers for the clarification!
Its a bit confusing reading shit on the international IWW website written by sol-fed when the IWA sec. wrote a paper about how the IWA should have a "no contact" stance with us. Could you give me yer opinion on all that?
glad to see fellow rev. unionists working together.
hope things went well on sat. i got a couple of 'i can't make it' text messages on the day, so i hope some wobs turned up.
Its a bit confusing reading shit on the international IWW website written by sol-fed when the IWA sec. wrote a paper about how the IWA should have a "no contact" stance with us. Could you give me yer opinion on all that?
Hi x357997,
Could you post a link to this material? I've had a look at the IWW website and I can't find it.
Respect,
Dave.
For most of the time there were only 2 of us there on Sat. A couple of comrades from Egham showed up, but couldn't stay long and a couple of other people showed just as we were running out of leaflets and packing up.
Some good comments from some passers by, including an old CP member, who made a criticism about not being part of the TUC, though I think was glad to see anyone even raising some class issues 
There were of course a few hostile people, including one who Jason had a long argument with who claimed to know the CEO of the company. And another who asked of her fried "Are they allowed to do that?" (i.e. give out a couple of leaflets..... )
Regards,
Martin
Could you post a link to this material? I've had a look at the IWW website and I can't find it.
I presume he's talking about this: -
http://www.iww.org/en/node/3280
which is the text of our leaflet.
Quote:
Its a bit confusing reading shit on the international IWW website written by sol-fed when the IWA sec. wrote a paper about how the IWA should have a "no contact" stance with us. Could you give me yer opinion on all that?Hi x357997,
Could you post a link to this material? I've had a look at the IWW website and I can't find it.
Respect,
Dave.
PM Oliver Twister




We will post details of dates of pickets here.
LibCom folks can this be made into a sticky?