I was just reading this article about the development of cancer drugs (in the USA)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/02/health/research/02cancerdrug.html
Here, a zinger worth noticing is...
“As long as the marketplace does not distinguish between modestly effective drugs and dramatically effective drugs, there won’t be an incentive to shift resources to a greater emphasis on a larger benefit,”
E.I. since a person (or their relatives) will pay a lot to stay alive just a bit longer, the market place directs drug company resources towards drugs that help people do only that, with the medical system boiling down to a despicable protection racket (sure, one that "helps" people).
Further, if you extend this and other insane misallocations of resources across the entire medical system, it's not hard to see how "health care" now takes 18% of the US GDP and growing, while still utterly failing millions of people. And, of course, since whatever reform is being discussed will only involve more bureaucracy combined with more efforts to commodify human health, we can only expect these efforts to make things worse.



Can comment on articles and discussions
That's horrendous, and I wish I could say it was surprising. In Victorville, (southern) California, just a few months ago brand new homes were demolished because the bank which had acquired them could save more money with the homes gone than to continue development and sell them at a lower price.
(http://www.vvdailypress.com/news/demolished-12162-homes-new.html)
This despite there being over 7000 homeless people in San Bernardino County alone. The market is incapable of functioning on a human need basis, despite what its apologists claim, and these sort of stories bear that truth out. Whether it be housing or health care, the market delineates towards the bottom line every time. Human beings are simply not part of the equation.