More to the point, it's a mistake to focus one's politics on the locale/municipality, because the level of municipal/city politics is too weak, too small, too isolated, it is subject to the pressures of national (and even international) politics. This is why the working-class must unify and focus its struggles towards one aim: the destruction of the capitalist state; it will have to destroy the state in one, swift blow, from the top-down. Not gradually from the bottom-up.
I agree with Craftwork's point here (from another thread). But how can this be done in a way that's libertarian? In a way that uses direct democracy? Or would this, to some degree, require a hierarchical, centralized, top-down power structure?
The only way to complete such a feat is to engage in violent revolution. That is, at least, given the current sociopolitical environment. It is also worth noting that the revolutionary spirit of the first world has dwindled. There is no potential for revolution. In the link I just prescribed, a YouTuber by the name of Jason Unruhe advocates a brand of communism he calls third worldism. To sum it up, capitalism must be brought down through the development of communism/socialism in the third world, where the ground for communism/socialism is fertile; their situation is dire enough to inspire action.
With capitalism having been rid of, third world countries will stolen back their agency from the likes of America, the United Kingdom, etc. As the capitalist countries are thus unable to exploit communist/socialist countries, they too will lose power; they will see reason for communism/socialism. My addition to this is simple, during the transition construct a system which effectively limits the state's ability to govern, paving a roadway to anarchism.
That's just my thoughts, though.