325
Just curious, what do folks in the UK think about 325? It hasn't really received much press or circulation in the US.
I happen to think it's pretty good, and I think the latest issue is particularly interesting, especially the anti-CPE article.
Here's the link:
My thoughts on the most recent issue (from anti-politics):
I recently read the majority of 325 and found it to be pretty damn good. The anti-CPE article was good because it analyzed changing police tactics during the events, how individuals involved were transformed from pacifistes to casseurs, and also gave a little description of how decisions were made some of the time. It's great to see the persepctive of one who was intimately involved and with whom I probably agree on many important issues.
There are two writeups about conferences/meeting, one on technopolis and one on a spanish anti-prison gathering. The anti-prison article is interesting because it outlines some of the dialogue and some of people's suggestions for practical activity. I think the focus on both theory and practice is a winner.
The article about the black bloc in Stirling against the G8 meeting was also a good read because it's an adventure story, and I don't remember that protest getting much media coverage in the US either in the alternative or mainstream media.
Overall the magazine is quite eclectic, but it's topics all seem to jive well together.
I disagree with their perspective on drugs, which they seem to be more pro (though perhaps it's a question of certain drugs). Living in washington for the past several months has really opened my eyes to the destruction caused by meth, whereas I was primarily familiar with crack addiction and alcoholism. For example the article about squatting in brighton is signed by "some drug addicts" or something like that, and that is definitely not something I'm interested in promoting.
I'm not familiar with many othe UK magazines, or the scene over there in general, but 325 seems to be pointing in a more interesting direction, combining the party culuture, anti-repression, a sharp ecological critique and a love for destructive direct action. So maybe it's a move beyond the earth first! and animal rights milieu of Do or Die! and stepping further into social struggle. I put a post on libcom about the magazine and what people think about it; I'm curious to see what people will say.
Seems like it has a strong influence of the inverse euronationalism that animates much of the insurrectionist milieu.
Wasn't this the magazine project various people from the Wombles (and others) were working on? Strong anti-fascist/prison line I seem to recall.
Edit: Just realised that wasn't any kind of commment on the content.
Just quickly, would say that the wrting style is difficult, jargony etc. I'm bored after the first few sentences and I know roughly what it's on about. It's also almost entirely self-referential ('As European anti-capitalists we must'), which is fine if that and sympathetic well-educated types are the target market but not if it's an outreach tool for a projected mass consumption.
Also, quote from Debord is meaningless to anyone not already well-read on the subject (Debord who?). That's only my impression from the opening articl though.
A cursory glance at the rest of the content (so forgive any misrepresentation here) seems to suggest a strong focus on glorification of actions with little on why they were undertaken or what the long term goals are, which is fine if you are preaching to the converted, or to someone with no critical faculties, but raises more questions than answers otherwise.
Good design though, and couple of interesting bits from a personal perspective.
Hmmm well it just seems self-referential, oriented towards small group elitist action and generally filled with ranty rhetoric and violent imagery. Not much that I can see related to everyday life in any way. Don't think I'll bother checking it again
Let one thousand flowers bloom. 325 are concerned with transforming social reality, creating areas of horizontal control outside the gaze of the capitalist system. 325 distribute and incite perception, providing doorways into the net of hidden utopias that resist attempts to censor and destroy autonomous areas/individuals & groups. We advocate direct action to reject the violence of the capitalist system.
Fuck me, I have an erection.
Did no one pick up on the Mao quote? Sexy.
Is raw or any of his wombatants involved in this shite?
Let one thousand flowers bloom. 325 are concerned with transforming social reality, creating areas of horizontal control outside the gaze of the capitalist system. 325 distribute and incite perception, providing doorways into the net of hidden utopias that resist attempts to censor and destroy autonomous areas/individuals & groups. We advocate direct action to reject the violence of the capitalist system.
because everytime i've made a criticism of their niave belief that there is some sort of outside, some sort of area autonomous from capitalism, i have been told they don't believe that.
Even at the Dublin bookfair a certain Womrade claimed I was arguing against a strawman, depsite the fact the pamphlet he was distributing on "social centres" had numerous references to creating "autonomous spaces" outside of the restrictive confines of capitalism.
Just wondering like.
"Seems like it has a strong influence of the inverse euronationalism that animates much of the insurrectionist milieu."
What does that actually mean?
Also to Saii, I think some of your intial perceptions of the magazine are wrong including the idea that they lack any sort of perspective of long term strategy. And yes the magazine isn't an agitational directed at the general pulibc, but it seems fairly accessible if someone from outside of the milieu/scene was interested. Some of the writing style is jargony; that I would agree with.
I'd say check out the latest issue for your final determination.
Fair enough, they might be, but as that article is the first on your website to promote it, may I suggest you rewrite that if the rest of the content is different? Cos atm it is anything but accessible. As I say, I know what it's on about, and it's not saying anything especially difficult but still manages to make heavy weather of it.
Hi
325 Magazine hasn't been produced by any people who were involved in wombles though there are some connections.
I think the content is interesting though I find this sort of writing (Jean Wier/Bonnano/Insurrectionist) very limited. Its really saying that you have to be ready to go, to do the business, destroy the megamachine...etc and people just aren't. I find the conclusion limiting, though they do have very good articles and reports, the layout is pretty good as well.
Revol: When the terms "Autonomous Space" is used, there is always a context, as well as a noted "degree of Autonomy" i.e. to what extent is something autonomous from something else. Therefore the term used during the European Social Forum, meant that BEYOND ESF was "autonomous" from the official organising process. i.e. it was autonomous from it NOT FROM CAPITAL!
Relating to Social Centres, the term is sometimes used (but rarely). In context it is suggesting that there is a degree of autonomy (i.e. an ability for us as oursleves, how we constitute ourselves to have control over a space and sufficient influence to construct a space which meets our social needs). There are obviously some people that are very new to social centres who do think they are "living outside capitalism" and people debate with them, interesting they seem to be more the squatter types (though they work?!).
I remember some ICC people coming to Ex-GrandBanks and having the same assumptions with what was meant by the word "autonomous", though they were put straight.
Raw
I couldn't find the anti-CPE article.
I found this one:
http://www.325collective.com/autonomy_too_young_to_wait.html
"Seems like it has a strong influence of the inverse euronationalism that animates much of the insurrectionist milieu."What does that actually mean?
It means a lot of insurrectionists seem to explicitly or implicitly invert the euronationalism of the new right. A great example is "EuroMayday", i.e. taking a day that only ever had meaning as an international one and giving it a European flavor.
Quote:
"Seems like it has a strong influence of the inverse euronationalism that animates much of the insurrectionist milieu."What does that actually mean?
It means a lot of insurrectionists seem to explicitly or implicitly invert the euronationalism of the new right. A great example is "EuroMayday", i.e. taking a day that only ever had meaning as an international one and giving it a European flavor.
And the Middlesex Declaration of the European Precariat by 'eurogeneration insurgents'
It means a lot of insurrectionists seem to explicitly or implicitly invert the euronationalism of the new right. A great example is "EuroMayday", i.e. taking a day that only ever had meaning as an international one and giving it a European flavor.
Um to the best of my knowledge the people behind EuroMayday are the ex-Tute Bianche/Disobedienti racketeers, scumbags who have physically attacked Italian insurrectionists.
Pete
Hi Olivertwister,
No your missing the point on the "european" element. If the EU is now (or is becoming) a statist and economic power, that acts over a territory (as defined by the 25 member states) then surely it should become a target for class struggle. Policies around immigration and border regimes are discussed on a european level, so is economic policy, terrorism, international "intervention" in conflicts (proposal for a european army) and the rest of it. The Eu is fast becoming the superstate above that of the nation state and therefore becomes of particular interests to anarchists and "insurrectionists".
Though you are right in part that it is not only the anarchist that are against the EU, in the UK this space is mainly taking up by the anti-eu right. I remember quite good coverage of the anti-EU gothenberg riots in the Telegragph which seemed quite sympathetic to the rioters!
As with EuroMayday, there are a small minority of pro-EU negrists which make a point of promoting Europe as new political space which is more progressive (think gay marraiges, workers rights...etc) than the "small minded" self-interests of nation states. Though it must be stressed that these people are not "euronationalist". It still sounds dodgy but I think it comes from exploiting the changes of the structure of european capitalism and the national soveriegnty which has been undermined by the autonomy of migration and struggles.
EDIT Plus the Insurrectionists don't have much to do within the EuroMayday thing at all. Though alot of Manpower and Adecco offices get gas bombed.
raw
Quote:
"Seems like it has a strong influence of the inverse euronationalism that animates much of the insurrectionist milieu."What does that actually mean?
It means a lot of insurrectionists seem to explicitly or implicitly invert the euronationalism of the new right. A great example is "EuroMayday", i.e. taking a day that only ever had meaning as an international one and giving it a European flavor.
I can't say that I've seen much of this in Britain. Is euronationalism something that gets a lot of coverage in the US?
Um to the best of my knowledge the people behind EuroMayday are the ex-Tute Bianche/Disobedienti racketeers, scumbags who have physically attacked Italian insurrectionists.Pete
Actually Pete, the EuroMayday wasn't started by the Disobedienti but milan based collective called ChainWorkers in 2002. The EuroMayday Parade in Milan (now spread to other parts of Italy and 23 cities - in some places outside europe) is now the biggest far left, non-political party demonstration in Italy consisting of 100,000 people. The big base unions COBAS, CUB, RdB all mobilise and are part of this network, as well as social centres, collectives working on precarity, student collectives, groups of workers...etc.
The Disobedient are disliked in Italy and after the violence (caused by stalinists within the disobedienti) in 2005 where some disobedient attacked some comrades from Acrobax in Rome, they were pushed off the demonstration and heavily isolated. Lets just say that the Disobedienti are a small, antagonisatical part of the EuroMayday (& struggle against precarity) in Italy though they like to think themselves as influential within it.
Raw
Actually Pete, the EuroMayday wasn't started by the Disobedienti but milan based collective called ChainWorkers in 2002.
OK, I think they are somewhat dodgy too, haven't some of them stood for election with the Greens?
Pete
I think you make some valid points Raw, and those are things i'd thought about. Zabalaza's propaganda has a strong focus on radicalism in (mostly Southern) Africa, and I think that's basically correct. But I think there is a tendency in the insurrectionist milieu and its surroundings to see neo-liberalism as a) something new, and b) something specifically (or especially) European. The term "European Precariat" is a great example of this.
Jef my understanding of "Euronationalism" is that it is promoted by many of the left and right parties, the right ones with their idea of "Europeans" and "outsiders" the leftists with their idea of "anti-imperialism" (i.e. us imperialism). The great majority of what passes for radical politics in America is inverted US nationalism, so it isn't hard to see similar patterns in Europe, especially in particularly European movements such as insurrectionism.
raw wrote:
Actually Pete, the EuroMayday wasn't started by the Disobedienti but milan based collective called ChainWorkers in 2002.OK, I think they are somewhat dodgy too, haven't some of them stood for election with the Greens?
Pete
Yes it was Alex Foti now of the neurogreen network who ran for a council seat in Milan - and lost. He was kicked out of chainworkers or he may have left because of it.
I think you make some valid points Raw, and those are things i'd thought about. Zabalaza's propaganda has a strong focus on radicalism in (mostly Southern) Africa, and I think that's basically correct. But I think there is a tendency in the insurrectionist milieu and its surroundings to see neo-liberalism as a) something new, and b) something specifically (or especially) European. The term "European Precariat" is a great example of this.
I have to clarify that the whole "european precariat" hasn't anything to do with insurrectionism in europe. They are different movements that are very antagonistical towards each other. I really think that this new "obsession" with Europe (as the EU superstate) is an organic response to power being centralised within the EU framework and less and less away from "european" nation states. It is a reaction to something which European Capital has created rather than an ambition for the movement (unless your tony negri!).
Raw
jesus, raw in talking sense shocker!
Even agreeing with the points about the growth of the power of the EU, it still seems like a step backwards to make an international event – Mayday – just a European one. Similar to if it have been renamed "BritMayday" or something. But it's only a minor thing, and this is off-topic anyway. It would be nice to split this thread into a discussion about Europe stuff, I'll have a look later to see if it would be possible/practical, or we could see if someone starts a more detailed discussion of it…
I will start a thread on Europe or contribute if someone does. I've been involved in the two previous "europe-wide day of action for freedom of movement and migrant rights" and EuroMayday Network and there have been some criticism from the West Essex Zapatistas on the issue of European identity (most of which is bollox).
Raw
[Mode="Lazy Riser"]
Hi
"Let a thousand flowers bloom" narrowly beats "Power Corrupts" as the most counter-revolutionary phrase to be uttered by "European Anti-capitalists".
Love
Oliver
[/Mode="Lazy Riser"]
I like that Mao quote.
Doesn't it strike you as the utterance of a bourgeois scumbag trying to maneuver rebellious workers and youth into supporting his faction of the bourgeois state?
revol's recuperated it
Give me one context in which it could possibly have a different meaning than the one Mao gave it.







Never heard of it, you got a link?