amnesia is the colonisation of consciousness

35 replies [Last post]
Horselover Fat's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 8-05-06

The lines of communication in our society are dying. We are not active agents pursuing our own dreams and goals, but have learnt over generations and generations to become passive receptacles of information sent to us through a medium over which we have no influence, which is subject to no democratic control and which is accountable to nothing and no one other than itself. The one tool we still have left to communicate with each other, we don’t know what to do with, so passive and weak are we becoming, so much have we internalised the fundamentalisms of the ideology which is colonising every part of our lives, every aspect of our identity. We have traded our own memories of our own lives and our common history for its moral absolutisms, for the artificially constructed memories upon which its credibility depends. In so doing, in trading our own authentic memories for the ideologically constructed memories of the dominant ideology of our society, we have begun to forget ourselves and who we are and in so doing allowed our sense of individuality to be subverted and colonised by the identity chosen for us by the high priests of the fundamentalism—the identity of the passive consumer, the identity of the obsequious, cringing serf. We have unlearned to think for ourselves and act as our own agents, and have learnt ontological helplessness and dependency on the fundamentalism. We have learnt to let it do our thinking for us, so degraded have we become. We have allowed this to happen, we have found the fundamentalism easy to swallow because it has shown us the easy road through life, the road free of personal and social responsibility and the road free of the ethical obligation as sentient beings capable of independent thought and feeling to resolve the tension between being and becoming on our own terms, to define who we are as individuals through the process of trial and error with all its attendant pain and suffering. In our desire to avoid having to admit mistakes to ourselves and each other we have built ourselves a prison in the shadow of an idol, but what we fail to see is that our attachment to the idol is degrading us more and more as time passes, and the longer we cling, and the more venal and corrupt we become, the more decadent we become, the less able we are to turn ourselves around, to check our decline and to pull ourselves out of the blind alleyway of evolution into which we have fallen. We become so blind as to not see the end approaching, the time when our decline becomes terminal and our investment (both literal and metaphorical) in the idol becomes so great that we are unable to admit any wrongdoing on our own part at all, and make our schizophrenic break with reality complete. At exactly the same moment as we become completely blind, we also become completely convinced of our own moral superiority. At the same moment we become incapable of functioning as ethical agents, we become convinced that we are the only thing standing between the world and Armageddon. At the same time as we lose touch with a sense of natural, spontaneous order, we inherit the narcissistic, paranoid and megalomanical delusion that we are the only thing standing between the world and total chaos. The closer we get to the penultimate experience of the decline of our civilisation, the tighter our grip on the idol becomes, and the less we tolerate dissent or criticism. The more we equate mere acknowledgement of elementary reality with a conspiracy to undermine and overthrow our way of life in the name of some demonised Other. As carnage, destruction and horror creeps ever closer to home, the more do we cling to that which is the source of all our problems, and thus do we ensure our fate. This is happening right now, all around us. Wake the fuck up. It’s not too late, but the lines of communication are dying, and the ones we have we’re forgetting how to use. We are forgetting ourselves. Amnesia is the colonisation of consciousness. Moral absolutism is the absolute negation of the infinite progress inherent to the idea of free will. We have the tools to free ourselves within our own minds. These ideas are the keys to unlock them. It’s not too late.

Steven.'s picture
User offline. Last seen 2 days 22 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 27-06-06

That is one big paragraph...

User offline. Last seen 2 years 44 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 19-06-06

Yeah, I would have read it but I had to go shopping & then I forgot who I was, where I was and what day of the week it is!

Nemo's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 years 34 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 12-07-06

I thought it was a sporgery at first. And the title brought to mind the postmodernism essay generator: http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo [Click refresh for a new essay.]

Lazy Riser's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 year 50 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 6-05-05

Hi

That is so cool...

Quote:
“Class is fundamentally impossible,” says Baudrillard; however, according to Hamburger, it is not so much class that is fundamentally impossible, but rather the fatal flaw, and thus the economy, of class.

Love

LR

rkn
rkn's picture
User offline. Last seen 28 weeks 14 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 17-07-06
John. wrote:
That is one big paragraph...

Its just a C&P from his blog.... maybe this way he'll learn no one can be arsed to read it.

Wtf is wrong with paragraphs anyway!?

Nemo's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 years 34 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 12-07-06
rkn wrote:
Wtf is wrong with paragraphs anyway!?

The return key is a bourgeois invention intended to increase production and demoralise office workers. Capitalism can only be overthrown by first recognising this fact and ripping the return key from your keyboard. HTH!

Joined: 15-03-04
Nemo wrote:
I thought it was a sporgery at first. And the title brought to mind the postmodernism essay generator: http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo [Click refresh for a new essay.]

that is the best thing i've ever seen

EdmontonWobbly's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 25-03-06

So did a satellite beam that post into your head or are ya just nuts?

Joined: 23-01-04
Quote:
high priests of the fundamentalism

ever read a little known book called society of the spectacl wink

Quote:
. As carnage, destruction and horror creeps ever closer to home, the more do we cling to that which is the source of all our problems

who is this "we"? Are you reffering to people who like to hide their confusion in verbiage? Or are you reffering to the ignorant, blind and debased proletariat?!

User offline. Last seen 15 hours 17 min ago. Offline
Joined: 9-02-06
Nemo wrote:
I thought it was a sporgery at first. And the title brought to mind the postmodernism essay generator: http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo [Click refresh for a new essay.]

I love that. I met Alan Sokal at work, he didn't seem that amusing in person unfortunately. The best part of his hoax was the defence of it by the publishers.

Why do people insist on eating dictionaries, they never seem to be able to keep them down?

Horselover Fat's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 8-05-06
EdmontonWobbly wrote:
So did a satellite beam that post into your head or are ya just nuts?

ahahaha! errrr

Horselover Fat's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 8-05-06
jef costello wrote:
Why do people insist on eating dictionaries, they never seem to be able to keep them down?

It beats having the kind of vocabulary you get by reading nothing by Murdoch tabloids, I guess. If you want your ideas spoonfed to you, you know where to go.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 days 12 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Horselover Fat wrote:
jef costello wrote:
Why do people insist on eating dictionaries, they never seem to be able to keep them down?

It beats having the kind of vocabulary you get by reading nothing by Murdoch tabloids, I guess. If you want your ideas spoonfed to you, you know where to go.

I dunno the Murdoch papers i've seen all have a decent grasp of paragraphs.

And the idea that the society of the spectacle (an over egged concept if ever there was one) can be traversed through ideas in your head is to completely misunderstand the functioning of the spectacle.

but alas your just another poseur clown who recurgiatates shite they haven't properly grasped.

Horselover Fat's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 8-05-06
revol68 wrote:
but alas your just another poseur clown who recurgiatates shite they haven't properly grasped.

thanks. it's a lot easier to flame someone on an anarchist forum than confront anyone with real power eh. you must feel pretty clever.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 days 12 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04

and it's alot easier to post pretentious ole bollocks that is absloutely meaningless if you coat it in obtuse language.

it's amazing seeing someone spout on about the society of the spectacle and how we need to "think" our way out of it, "unlock" it with our minds. It's like you've taken all of Debord and Baudrillard's vocabulary but never quite moved away from idealism.

And since your such an intelligent little cookie, perhaps you might want to explain to us all how we can "unthink" commmodity fetishism?

Horselover Fat's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 8-05-06

jesus...you obviously have a bug up your arse about something. don't know why exactly you feel the need to dump this bullshit attitude over me to make yourself feel better, but you get that i guess. that's your opinion, mate, but opinions and arguments are two different things.

i guess in general my feeling is that since we tend to be conditioned by the market to regard commodity production as 'normal', we also tend to internalise the values of the market, and in internalising authority structures such as those that exist within corporations we breed a cop in our heads that tends to reproduce itself in our thoughts and actions without our being aware of it. if we want to resist commodity fetishism and the economic system that makes it possible, we have to free our perceptual frameworks first, so that we can free ourselves in fact, and make our means consistent with our ends rather than building new prisons to replace the old ones.

how was that, princess?

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 days 12 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04

niave, simplistic pish serving only as a fine illustration of what happens when pretentious wee middle class ball bags don't grasp the fundamental Marxism at the centre of the society of the spectacle. The commodity form does not require belief, it merely requires you act like you believe in it, you can deconstruct it in your head all you want, it doesn't stop you needing a job, or you getting thrown in prison for stealing.

The bug that crawled up my ass is the corpse in your mouth.

Horselover Fat's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 8-05-06
revol68 wrote:
niave, simplistic pish serving only as a fine illustration of what happens when pretentious wee middle class ball bags don't grasp the fundamental Marxism at the centre of the society of the spectacle. The commodity form does not require belief, it merely requires you act like you believe in it, you can deconstruct it in your head all you want, it doesn't stop you needing a job, or you getting thrown in prison for stealing.

The bug that crawled up my ass is the corpse in your mouth.

i guess it's that sort of attitude that makes marxism the dynamic and influential social force it is today eh? tongue

the button's picture
User offline. Last seen 45 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 7-07-04
revol68 wrote:
and it's alot easier to post pretentious ole bollocks that is absloutely meaningless if you coat it in obtuse language.

grin

User offline. Last seen 2 days 13 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 9-07-06
revol68 wrote:
niave, simplistic pish serving only as a fine illustration of what happens when pretentious wee middle class ball bags don't grasp the fundamental Marxism at the centre of the society of the spectacle. The commodity form does not require belief, it merely requires you act like you believe in it, you can deconstruct it in your head all you want, it doesn't stop you needing a job, or you getting thrown in prison for stealing.

The bug that crawled up my ass is the corpse in your mouth.

I think this response is unnecessarily aggressive, patronising, dogmatic and disparaging

Joseph Kay's picture
User offline. Last seen 19 min 3 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 14-03-06
the button wrote:
revol68 wrote:
and it's alot easier to post pretentious ole bollocks that is absloutely meaningless if you coat it in obtuse language.

grin

indeed.

Horselover, revol has a point though, see my comment on your other thread about your apparent image fetishism.

Lazy Riser's picture
User offline. Last seen 1 year 50 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 6-05-05

Hi

Quote:
grasp the fundamental Marxism at the centre of the society of the spectacle

The trick is to grasp it, then let it go.

Love

LR

Horselover Fat's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 8-05-06
Lazy Riser wrote:
Hi
Quote:
grasp the fundamental Marxism at the centre of the society of the spectacle

The trick is to grasp it, then let it go.

LOL.

Joseph K. wrote:
the button wrote:
revol68 wrote:
and it's alot easier to post pretentious ole bollocks that is absloutely meaningless if you coat it in obtuse language.

grin

indeed.

Horselover, revol has a point though, see my comment on your other thread about your apparent image fetishism.

Haha. I did get that one, thanks.

User offline. Last seen 3 weeks 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 3-08-05

i would say that attempting to free your mind from capitalist logic etc is an ok thing to do providing you realise that although you may feel better as a result it hasn´´t actually changed anything in the real world. This is materialism will always be more important than and effective than idealist theories.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 days 12 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
jaycee wrote:
i would say that attempting to free your mind from capitalist logic etc is an ok thing to do providing you realise that although you may feel better as a result it hasn´´t actually changed anything in the real world. This is materialism will always be more important than and effective than idealist theories.

But by remaining in the realm of circulation,of the spectacle, you are more of a hostage to the commodity than people who see the advert, think "what a crock of shite" and move on.

User offline. Last seen 15 hours 17 min ago. Offline
Joined: 9-02-06
revol68 wrote:
jaycee wrote:
i would say that attempting to free your mind from capitalist logic etc is an ok thing to do providing you realise that although you may feel better as a result it hasn´´t actually changed anything in the real world. This is materialism will always be more important than and effective than idealist theories.

But by remaining in the realm of circulation,of the spectacle, you are more of a hostage to the commodity than people who see the advert, think "what a crock of shite" and move on.

How so? Surely if you can think beyond capitalist logic you'd be more likely to dismiss advertising.

Joseph Kay's picture
User offline. Last seen 19 min 3 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 14-03-06

i think revol's saying that by dignifying pr with a response we are more enthralled to the spectacle than those who intuitively reject it's images per se.

i think this is true if the critique remains solely of images, but there is a potential for the critique of the images of the spectacle to become a critique of passivity and passifying power relations in their totality (the spectacle itself), which is what the situationists did imho.

User offline. Last seen 15 hours 17 min ago. Offline
Joined: 9-02-06
Joseph K. wrote:
i think revol's saying that by dignifying pr with a response we are more enthralled to the spectacle than those who intuitively reject it's images per se.

i think this is true if the critique remains solely of images, but there is a potential for the critique of the images of the spectacle to become a critique of passivity and passifying power relations in their totality (the spectacle itself), which is what the situationists did imho.

I'm not sure if I'd value intuition that highly myself. To behonest if you applied that logic to capital, rather than the spectacle, I think you'd end up in Lazy Riser's position.

revol68's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 days 12 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
jef costello wrote:
Joseph K. wrote:
i think revol's saying that by dignifying pr with a response we are more enthralled to the spectacle than those who intuitively reject it's images per se.

i think this is true if the critique remains solely of images, but there is a potential for the critique of the images of the spectacle to become a critique of passivity and passifying power relations in their totality (the spectacle itself), which is what the situationists did imho.

I'm not sure if I'd value intuition that highly myself. To behonest if you applied that logic to capital, rather than the spectacle, I think you'd end up in Lazy Riser's position.

it's not some unthinking intution, it's the intution that says, "aye,right mate 3extra blades, fucking whoopy fucking doo" or "aye cos I can afford to buy that piece of shit". It's not unthinking.

I'd alos like jef to explain what "capitalist logic" is and how he and his buddies see "behind it".

User offline. Last seen 15 hours 17 min ago. Offline
Joined: 9-02-06
revol68 wrote:
it's not some unthinking intution, it's the intution that says, "aye,right mate 3extra blades, fucking whoopy fucking doo" or "aye cos I can afford to buy that piece of shit". It's not unthinking.

Surely intuition by definition does not involve thinking. Surely someone who doesn't see the point in an extra blade on a razor has seen through the advert.

Quote:
I'd alos like jef to explain what "capitalist logic" is and how he and his buddies see "behind it".

I don't think I used that term, so perhaps I'd not be the best person to ask. You've also failed to answer my question but I'll let it go, you need one in the win column.