Anarchist and feminst parties in the 2006 election in Sweden

12 posts / 0 new
Last post
Wendal
Offline
Joined: 4-11-04
Sep 21 2005 10:55
Anarchist and feminst parties in the 2006 election in Sweden

Under the last 8 months Sweden has seen the birth of more new parties than in the last ten years.

First of all a party called Vägval vänster(could be translated into a question: Where should the left goes from here ?).

It was a mixture of people from the leftist party that did not like that the leader of the party alienated people by calling himself a communist as well as people who wanted a more updated neoliberal leftism shaped after the needs of the capitalist market(no need for that we already have the social democrat party for that) as well as some group that either wanted to work with autonomous movements and anarchists and syndicalists as well as people that defined themself as such. The first meeting of the party was realy intresting beacuse i have newer heard so many politicans call themself syndicalists or libertierian soicalists before or talked good about such movements as well as autnomous socialism and humanitarianism.

Recently the party got divided and a new party was created with only liberterian socialists(and therefore most likely fewer authorian socialists and neoliberal socialists in it). i will go to the first meeting and report more in detail after that. Right now there are not specific agenda for that group and it will be formed during that meeting.

The creation of FI a feminist aliance that might become a party with a huge mixture of feminists from diferent political backgrounds(right left queer radical) worked as something of a shock-theraphy for the social democrats that was already in power. The wages for nurses was quickly raised and the women houses where promised huge amounts of money for the next two years.

After that a huge smearcampaign against feminists was started up in the stateist and private media. It had poltical effects as well with right wing politicians demanding that the woman shelters should be closed down or at least not finansialy suported by the state but after a while the effects of the documentary died away, exspecialy after the documentaries main and only witnes was acording to DN(a major swedish newspaper) interviewed in a insane asylum and later regret all the things that she siad and tried to stop the interview from being aired. Acording to the documentary she had also been kidnaped by a woman shelter and not had the permision to talk with the police but there is material from when the police in Stockholm interviewed her as the first thing that happened and they told them that it would not be safe to stay in sweden so first after that they escaped to norway. During the time that the documentary claimed that the person was hold hostage and kept from contact with the police she was in interviews with the police.

After a huge amount of anti-feminist articles in the press that was not aimed at specific people articles have now been published aimed specificaly at the FI.

In a smear-campaign the not so radical queer-feminist and member of FI Tiina Rosenberg has been attacked. A line of her from a performance where she says "kill all Neoliberals" has been quoted(which makes as much sense as quoting an actor reciting macbeth and call him or her a murder) and in most of the swedish media there has been a statement that she has called all women who lives with men traitors, something that she claims that she has newer said and there is no certainity where the rumor came from.

Tiina Rosenberg has had a background of being a tool for male homosexuals(which almost lead to the woman shelter in stockholm being closed down beacuse of her) so that she would be some female-separatist sounds pretty unlikely. She has also a background in mixed groups in the german communist movement. Of what i know of her the statement sounds totaly ludacrise.

It is intresting to see that it came just after FI was divided beacuse the right wing did not feel that the party was neutral and therefore left. It is no suprise that most members of a feminist party will be left tough(since most of the working class is females) and that it will affect a democratic non-hierarchal organisations decisions that the majority is left.

Finaly the swedish guru-hippie-musician Tomas Dileva(known for his beatifull skirts, long hair and jesus like beard and his song Everyone is jesus) has started a party called Det andliga partiet(the spiritual party) that seem to be somewhere between seriousnes and performance, as most of the things that he participates in.

Most likely the left will be divied enough in this election for the right wing to win. On the other hand the huge amount of people that dont vote usualy might be caught up in some of the new parties...

In any case it might be the begining of feminist and anarchist parties that might become stronger in time. It might if nothing less be an intresting experiment for how long the anarchist and feminist movement can go in state-ist organisations and what goals that are posible to achieve as a part of the state in a capitalist stateist democracy.

Would you vote for an anarchist party ?

Would you vote for a feminist party ?

Do you think that you will ever get such a posiblity in your country ?

cantdocartwheels's picture
cantdocartwheels
Offline
Joined: 15-03-04
Sep 21 2005 11:13
Wendal wrote:
Would you vote for an anarchist party ?

Bit of an odd question, epends what their plan was. I think i might vote for them, but i don't really see what the point of an anarchist party is? What would be the aim of such a party?

I know one person in the Swedish Left Party and i heard about that thing where he openly called himself a leninist and upset a lot of people. Not that it upset my friend coz he's a tankie.

Quote:
could you vote for a feminist party ?

probably not, but yet again what exactly do you mean by a feminist party?

Quote:
think that you will ever get such a posiblity in your country ?

no idea, i know anarchists used to enter elections in a 'stand down' style. Or at least guy aldred did, don't think it achieved much then though, and considering it was slap bang in the middle of WW1 it was a bit odd considering how strong the radical left was generally at the time.

Wendal
Offline
Joined: 4-11-04
Sep 21 2005 11:28

A picture of some representatives of FI.

Quote:
cantdocartwheels wrote:
Wendal wrote:
Would you vote for an anarchist party ?

Bit of an odd question, epends what their plan was. I think i might vote for them, but i don't really see what the point of an anarchist party is? What would be the aim of such a party?

Well i guess that is up to us to decide at the first meeting of the party. I have contact them about their agenda and they have decided nothing and have choose to create the form for the party out of what is decieded in its first open meeting.

If i could decide on my own then i would wish that the abolishing of state and capitalism together with all parties(the anarchist party itself included) would be central for the party.

I know one person in the Swedish Left Party and i heard about that thing where he openly called himself a leninist and upset a lot of people. Not that it upset my friend coz he's a tankie.

Quote:
could you vote for a feminist party ?

probably not, but yet again what exactly do you mean by a feminist party?

A party strifing for equality between males and females an equality that might be provocative for some men that are so used to their benefits that they are taking them for granted and would feel opressed if equality was reached.

Quote:
think that you will ever get such a posiblity in your country ?

no idea, i know anarchists used to enter elections in a 'stand down' style. Or at least guy aldred did, don't think it achieved much then though, and considering it was slap bang in the middle of WW1 it was a bit odd considering how strong the radical left was generally at the time.

Ya. I Guess the bomb-throwing image was to strong as well.

Jello Biafra did some atemp as well as some of you might remember.

It is intresting tough and since FI has been able to more for women than what the social democrats been able to do in ten year just by threatening to create a party then an anarchist party might have a similiar effect.

This could be viewed also as a deviding between revolutionary and reformatory anarchism a bit like communism compared to social democracy back in the days when social democracys goal was to reach communism through election and thus be sure that the people want such a revolution, that it would be a mass movement and that it would not be as bloody as sovjet.

It could also end up as with the spanish revolution, the anarchists wins the election someday, the right makes a coup de'tat and it becomes crushed by the sponthaneous rising of the people.

I think i have started to become lost in re/de-volutionary pipedreams now tough.

To see a swede do something sponthaneous would be beyond my imagination, exspecialy sober(out of the three riots that we have had in gothenburg for example the last one was the first when most people was not intoxicated).

BB
Offline
Joined: 12-08-04
Sep 21 2005 12:00
Wendal wrote:

It could also end up as with the spanish revolution, the anarchists wins the election someday, the right makes a coup de'tat and it becomes crushed by the sponthaneous rising of the people.

The anarchists did not win any election, the 3 or 4 members of the cnt/fai were asked by the local republican government to join said government, under the spurious reason of anti-fascist unity and a lot more to boot, but also to add more credibility, to the government. And in my eyes leaving their anarchist credentials at the door!

Also the coup came first, after the republicans were voted into power.

Although in the run-up to this election the cnt made no anti-voting campaign as they had previously, due to the said fact that the republicans had promised to release all the cnt/anarcho prisoners (political).

Wendal
Offline
Joined: 4-11-04
Sep 22 2005 12:46

Ah ok.

Anarchoneilist
Offline
Joined: 10-12-04
Sep 22 2005 13:48

I've heard of the Feminist party.

Apparently they want to ban marriage

and introduce a 6hr max working day.

Sounds alright in my book!

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Sep 22 2005 14:52

banning marriage well that doesn't smack of complete and utter bollox.

meanoldman
Offline
Joined: 15-01-04
Sep 22 2005 16:59
Quote:
Apparently they want to ban marriage

Much as I loathe marriage the idea of state to punish people who get married in some church sounds more bonkers than feminist.

What would be cool would be if they implement Mujere's Libre's proposal for a wedding factory:

Proposal for the Creation of Wedding Factory

Location

The wedding factory will be located far from every urban nucleus. It is not good that tragedies take place in the public eye, because they will demoralise the people. Besides, the difficulties of access to the factory will force the stupid ones to think [about what they're doing].

Material For Construction

Should be of such kind that dampens noise. What goes on inside is not anyone's business, and it's always better not to hear the statements of those who come to complain about how theirs have gone wrong.

Subdivisions

A waiting room, divided into two-person cubicles by partial partitions. Isolation is essential in case of epidemic. One room for ceremonies and an exit ramp. Speed is important so that people shouldn't have time to change their minds...

Material

Of two kinds: (a) necessary and (b) voluntary

(a) A cold shower; a committee convinced of the importance of its mission; a seal that says "Enter, if you dare"; a stamp pad of red or red and black for the seal.

(b) A stake.

Library

One copy of the Laws of Common Sense

Related Institutions

A shop for rivets, collars, rings, and chains. An allegorical tricolour of Freedom.

Functioning Of The Factory

It is quick. Individuals wait, by pairs, in the two-person cubicles.

Later they will pass into the ceremonial room. They can do nothing, absolutely nothing, without the proper stamp. [An official] stamps a small piece of paper, their cheeks, and their underwear.

Then, with a very hollow voice, the Committee reads them the Laws of Common Sense, which can be reduced to three:

1. When there were priests, the priest deceived you; when there were judges, the judge deceived you; now we are deceiving you ourselves, since you came here.

2. He who cannot go on without a guarantee of property and fidelity deserves the most vile oppressions upon his heart (danger of asphyxiation).

3. The act of passing through the factory gives evidence of idiocy, and predisposes to two or three afflictions per day. We know what we are doing!

The ceremony is free. Those who go have already suffered enough misfortune. Afterwards, ring and chains are put on them, they are made to kiss the tricolour picture of libertarian communism, and they are thrown down the ramp.

In order to avoid disturbances to the normal functioning of the factory, it is a good idea to place the following poster at the exit:

NO COMPLAINTS ACCEPTED

Source: "Proyecto para la creacion de una fabrica de bodas en serie (Churros autenticos)" Mujeres Libres, no. 7.

cmdrdeathguts
Offline
Joined: 25-08-05
Sep 28 2005 00:42

don't really see the point of an electoral 'anarchist party' - i'm not sure that the electoral system can deliver much more than welfare state social democracy. which is fine, but we already have parties for that.

well.

had.

888's picture
888
Offline
Joined: 30-09-03
Sep 28 2005 05:20
Wendal wrote:

Would you vote for an anarchist party ?

Would you vote for a feminist party ?

Do you think that you will ever get such a posiblity in your country ?

Never, no, and I hope not. It would be embarrassing.

Anarchoneilist
Offline
Joined: 10-12-04
Sep 28 2005 15:22
meanoldman wrote:
Quote:
Apparently they want to ban marriage

Much as I loathe marriage the idea of state to punish people who get married in some church sounds more bonkers than feminist.

Well, I suppose your church could recognise your marriage but

the state doesn't. The point is (I think) that the state shouldn't

promote monogamous heterosexual relations.

What would be cool would be if they implement Mujere's Libre's proposal for a wedding factory:

Proposal for the Creation of Wedding Factory

Location

The wedding factory will be located far from every urban nucleus. It is not good that tragedies take place in the public eye, because they will demoralise the people. Besides, the difficulties of access to the factory will force the stupid ones to think [about what they're doing].

Material For Construction

Should be of such kind that dampens noise. What goes on inside is not anyone's business, and it's always better not to hear the statements of those who come to complain about how theirs have gone wrong.

Subdivisions

A waiting room, divided into two-person cubicles by partial partitions. Isolation is essential in case of epidemic. One room for ceremonies and an exit ramp. Speed is important so that people shouldn't have time to change their minds...

Material

Of two kinds: (a) necessary and (b) voluntary

(a) A cold shower; a committee convinced of the importance of its mission; a seal that says "Enter, if you dare"; a stamp pad of red or red and black for the seal.

(b) A stake.

Library

One copy of the Laws of Common Sense

Related Institutions

A shop for rivets, collars, rings, and chains. An allegorical tricolour of Freedom.

Functioning Of The Factory

It is quick. Individuals wait, by pairs, in the two-person cubicles.

Later they will pass into the ceremonial room. They can do nothing, absolutely nothing, without the proper stamp. [An official] stamps a small piece of paper, their cheeks, and their underwear.

Then, with a very hollow voice, the Committee reads them the Laws of Common Sense, which can be reduced to three:

1. When there were priests, the priest deceived you; when there were judges, the judge deceived you; now we are deceiving you ourselves, since you came here.

2. He who cannot go on without a guarantee of property and fidelity deserves the most vile oppressions upon his heart (danger of asphyxiation).

3. The act of passing through the factory gives evidence of idiocy, and predisposes to two or three afflictions per day. We know what we are doing!

The ceremony is free. Those who go have already suffered enough misfortune. Afterwards, ring and chains are put on them, they are made to kiss the tricolour picture of libertarian communism, and they are thrown down the ramp.

In order to avoid disturbances to the normal functioning of the factory, it is a good idea to place the following poster at the exit:

NO COMPLAINTS ACCEPTED

Source: "Proyecto para la creacion de una fabrica de bodas en serie (Churros autenticos)" Mujeres Libres, no. 7.

BB
Offline
Joined: 12-08-04
Sep 29 2005 11:16
meanoldman wrote:
Proposal for the Creation of Wedding Factory

Source: "Proyecto para la creacion de una fabrica de bodas en serie (Churros autenticos)" Mujeres Libres, no. 7.

Nice. 8)