conversation about Carousel
Mar 20 2008 19:24
Split from: http://libcom.org/forums/thought/anarchist-fascist-website-13032008?page=2
ncwob wrote:
a fascist plot to use the language of anarchism to recruit disenchanted young minds.
carousel wrote:
The disenchanted deserve what they get. It's the only way they'll learn.
ncwob wrote:
For the sake of my sanity, can we refrain from responding to Carousel? Please.
carousel wrote:
Shut up. That was a serious point. You want to have a discussion about "me"? Do it elsewhere.
Carousel, this is a serious conversation, one I'd like to send over to the anarchy dot net boards without your inane ramblings. If you choose to ignore the basic social forces that lead to disenchantment, or to address a "point" you've previously made, force the poor and disenfranchised into war, that's fine, but don't bog down a productive discussion with your ridiculous fucking semantics.
Mar 20 2008 19:49
#2
You are feeding the troll
Mar 20 2008 20:21
#3
Jesus. So what if I am feeding the troll? So are "you".
Mar 20 2008 20:56
#4
You're the troll that's being fed Carousel - that's juzokas' point me thinks.
Mar 20 2008 21:32
#5
i suggest we also use this thread to complain about revol 
EDIT sorry i mean carousel goes to far, but [s]he is a good anathema [?] to some on this board. probably.
Mar 20 2008 21:33
#6
One thing with Carousel is that he means exactly what he posts -- even if it is shot through with a fairly thick seam of irony sometimes. Contentious he might be -- at least within the crazy microworld of anarchism. But that's not the same as trolling.
And anyway, he bought me a pint once, so I won't have a word said against him. 
Mar 20 2008 22:12
#7
Carousel wrote:
"you"
ffs
Mar 20 2008 22:35
#8
the button wrote:
And anyway, he bought me a pint once, so I won't have a word said against him.
He bought the admins a pizza once, he'd have to do a hell of a lot to get banned.
Mar 20 2008 22:47
#9
Plus he looks a bit like Mick Jagger, and you can't argue with that, tbh.
Mar 20 2008 22:58
#10
the button wrote:
Plus he looks a bit like Mick Jagger, and you can't argue with that, tbh.
you could but it probably wouldn't be very satisfying.
Mar 20 2008 23:08
#11
revol68 wrote:
the button wrote:
Plus he looks a bit like Mick Jagger, and you can't argue with that, tbh.you could but it probably wouldn't be very satisfying.
You're just phoning it in now 
Mar 20 2008 23:09
#12
revol68 wrote:
the button wrote:
Plus he looks a bit like Mick Jagger, and you can't argue with that, tbh.you could but it probably wouldn't be very satisfying.
That's funny, because Mick Jagger was in the Rolling Stones, and their most famos song was 'Satisfaction'.
Mar 20 2008 23:28
#13
jef costello wrote:
revol68 wrote:
the button wrote:
Plus he looks a bit like Mick Jagger, and you can't argue with that, tbh.you could but it probably wouldn't be very satisfying.
You're just phoning it in now :(
If you want a laugh get your own firends Jef.
Mar 20 2008 23:29
#14
Jack wrote:
revol68 wrote:
the button wrote:
Plus he looks a bit like Mick Jagger, and you can't argue with that, tbh.you could but it probably wouldn't be very satisfying.
That's funny, because Mick Jagger was in the Rolling Stones, and their most famos song was 'Satisfaction'.
I could go for the toliet humour and post up your hairy arsehole, d'want that?
Mar 20 2008 23:32
#15
revol68 wrote:
jef costello wrote:
revol68 wrote:
the button wrote:
Plus he looks a bit like Mick Jagger, and you can't argue with that, tbh.you could but it probably wouldn't be very satisfying.
You're just phoning it in now :(
If you want a laugh get your own firends Jef.
hey hey lets not go crazy here - we're all friends
Mar 20 2008 23:33
#16
revol68 wrote:
Jack wrote:
revol68 wrote:
the button wrote:
Plus he looks a bit like Mick Jagger, and you can't argue with that, tbh.you could but it probably wouldn't be very satisfying.
That's funny, because Mick Jagger was in the Rolling Stones, and their most famos song was 'Satisfaction'.
I could go for the toliet humour and post up your hairy arsehole, d'want that?
I don't think calling it hairy is very fair, it's at best averagely haired.
Mar 20 2008 23:35
#17
Jack wrote:
revol68 wrote:
Jack wrote:
revol68 wrote:
the button wrote:
Plus he looks a bit like Mick Jagger, and you can't argue with that, tbh.you could but it probably wouldn't be very satisfying.
That's funny, because Mick Jagger was in the Rolling Stones, and their most famos song was 'Satisfaction'.
I could go for the toliet humour and post up your hairy arsehole, d'want that?
I don't think calling it hairy is very fair, it's at best averagely haired.
more like matted.
Mar 21 2008 00:06
#18
revol68 wrote:
jef costello wrote:
revol68 wrote:
the button wrote:
Plus he looks a bit like Mick Jagger, and you can't argue with that, tbh.you could but it probably wouldn't be very satisfying.
You're just phoning it in now :(
If you want a laugh get your own firends Jef.
Ooh that got me on the ropes, tell everyone you don't like my hair and finish me off once and for all.
Mar 21 2008 00:09
#19
I like carousel. Tedious bastard but I think I met him in real life once and he was pretty sound.
Can't remember if he ever bought me a pint.
Mar 21 2008 00:19
#20
jef costello wrote:
revol68 wrote:
jef costello wrote:
revol68 wrote:
the button wrote:
Plus he looks a bit like Mick Jagger, and you can't argue with that, tbh.you could but it probably wouldn't be very satisfying.
You're just phoning it in now :(
If you want a laugh get your own firends Jef.
Ooh that got me on the ropes, tell everyone you don't like my hair and finish me off once and for all.
i really couldn't give a fuck about you or your hair.
Mar 21 2008 00:20
#21
i don't like jefs hair - but for other reasons :ninja:
Mar 21 2008 00:27
#22
I want to know if carousel could do 25 consecutive posts, each of which was a positive assertion
Mar 21 2008 00:32
#23
revol68 wrote:
i really couldn't give a fuck about you or your hair.
it really does seem that way.
Mar 21 2008 00:36
#24
jef costello wrote:
revol68 wrote:
i really couldn't give a fuck about you or your hair.it really does seem that way.
I don't know why you keep brinigng up your hair to be honest, it's getting as tideous as the pictures of that gimp Kutcher.
Mar 21 2008 00:42
#25
revol68 wrote:
I don't know why you keep brinigng up your hair to be honest, it's getting as tideous as the pictures of that gimp Kutcher.
I don't, you used to because it was one of the few things you had that you could have a go at me about on the board.
Work in the morning so I'll say goodnight now.
Mar 21 2008 00:46
#26
jef costello wrote:
revol68 wrote:
I don't know why you keep brinigng up your hair to be honest, it's getting as tideous as the pictures of that gimp Kutcher.I don't, you used to because it was one of the few things you had that you could have a go at me about on the board.
Work in the morning so I'll say goodnight now.
I think I made one joke two years ago, i'm pretty certain my emo hair got mocked much more frequently without me deluding myself that anyone really gave a shit.
anyway rest assured i couldn't give a fuck.
Mar 21 2008 01:56
#27
Carousel wrote:
Jesus. So what if I am feeding the troll? So are "you".
DUMB-ass. haha
Mar 21 2008 13:22
#28
can someone explain lazy riser to me then? 'cos he sure needs explaining, and from reading his posts i certainly know not to bother asking him...
Mar 21 2008 13:28
#29
i would but like so many it would just be medical jargon 
Mar 21 2008 13:49
#30
All of LR/Carousel's posts make sense to me. One of the few posters here I enjoy reading... especially when he tangos with the ICC.
You bring the sense of absurdity with you. How did you infer I'm ignoring anything?