How would this be dealt with in libertarian com society?

123 posts / 0 new
Last post
Ted Heath's Ghost
Offline
Joined: 7-10-05
Oct 13 2005 22:36
Lazy Riser wrote:

I’m suspicious of the assertion that those of us who only countenance fucking within a framework of social consensus are afraid of discussing sexual ethics. Is it OK if I bring up bestiality again? Presumably, those who wish to explore child sexuality would be as willing to advance our understanding of inter-species love as well.

Well, bestiality implies non-consent from the animal involved. Zoophilia, on the other hand...

I just plum don't see how society has any right to interfere in people's private sex lives, assuming people's private sex lives are mutually consentual. It's the same principle as society not having anything to do with what people eat for breakfast, assuming people aren't hacking other people to death and then spreading them on toast (or any other breakfast related potentiality that involves harming others).

Quote:

I question the profit in proffering arguments that risk an increase in the number of child/adult sexual liaisons, even for the sake of greater human sexual awareness.

There is no "profit" to it other than that two consenting parties get to do what they want. If that creeps other people out, then that's their problem.

Again, I very much doubt you'd find kids younger than the current starting age of sexual activity (about 11, and then in a minority) who actually would want to have sex - so if they were forced into it, people would have to act according to whatever the rules for rape were, applied obviously to the individual situation. (What's more, peadophillic attacks are quite a rarity - the chances of it happening now, let alone in a healthier society, are almost nill). But, you're just gonna have to accept that very, very early in puberty, and even often in pre-pubescence, kids have sex, often with people older than them. It's part of their life and will end up shaping who they are.

I remember a friend of mine's 16th birthday, she pointed out that she could buy cigarettes and have sex - she'd been doing both since she was about 11, and had even had a baby a year before. The idea that we can stop people having sex is stupid, and I can't understand why the idea that we should is being considered by anarchists.

Steven.'s picture
Steven.
Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
Oct 13 2005 23:00
Ted Heath's Ghost wrote:
The idea that we can stop people having sex is stupid, and I can't understand why the idea that we should is being considered by anarchists.

Cos older people using their authority and influence to fuck children fucks people up for life you fucking twat.

Quote:
(What's more, peadophillic attacks are quite a rarity - the chances of it happening now, let alone in a healthier society, are almost nill)

What are you talking about? There are at least 50,000-odd convicted paedos in the UK, mostly family members/close friends. Yeah the predatory paedos are mostly a media invention but so what - are you gonna defend incest as well?

Dolphins, on the other hand - they love the cock.

Ted Heath's Ghost
Offline
Joined: 7-10-05
Oct 13 2005 23:09
Quote:
Cos older people using their authority and influence to fuck children fucks people up for life you fucking twat.

If they fucking use their fucking authority and fucking influence to fucking force a fucking kid into fucking fucking then that's rape, isn't it, which i've already fucking mentioned is fucking wrong, fuck fuck fuck.

Quote:
Yeah the predatory paedos are mostly a media invention but so what -

that's what i was referring to, i guess i didnt make it clear.

Quote:
are you gonna defend incest as well?

well if it's mutually consentual...

Quote:
Dolphins, on the other hand - they love the cock.

y'know dolphins can pick up buckets with their cocks?

kalabine
Offline
Joined: 27-03-04
Oct 13 2005 23:11
John. wrote:

What are you talking about? There are at least 50,000-odd convicted paedos in the UK, mostly family members/close friends. Yeah the predatory paedos are mostly a media invention but so what - are you gonna defend incest as well?

ah, but you see they were misunderstood, or simply victims of an unjust legal system...

roll eyes

yeah right

JDMF's picture
JDMF
Offline
Joined: 21-05-04
Oct 14 2005 08:23

well if any of my 30+ year mate would have sex with a 11 year old and somehow try to claim on some woolly anarchist idea of consentual sex between two people, i would fucking dig their eye out - consentually of course.

look, the potential infringement of some theoretical freedom of having sex with anyone who has pubic hair is quite insignificant compared to opening the floodgates and making it publicly acceptable.

You fail to understand how sophisticated the grooming and predatory behaviour is - most often even the perpetrator doesn't see what they are doing with their behaviour.

Like revol said, no one is arguing for control of sex plays among young teenagers, it is the adult - child issues which concern us. And by default that is abusive since the situation is not level.

Lazy Riser's picture
Lazy Riser
Offline
Joined: 6-05-05
Oct 14 2005 11:27

Hi

Quote:
What would you call extracting sturgeon's eggs?

“Roeing”. What would you call extracting chicken’s eggs? Milking? Only joking.

Ted Heath's Ghost wrote:
If that creeps other people out, then that's their problem.

Anti-working class position. If its wrong to sex up moo cows then it must be wrong to sexually engage children. I’m amazed John. hasn’t sent you packing.

Or do you think a moo cow could consent to sex with a human? A dolphin maybe?

Cheers

LR

Ted Heath's Ghost
Offline
Joined: 7-10-05
Oct 14 2005 11:33
Quote:
Anti-working class position.

Heaven forbid! I should be purged!

Quote:
I’m amazed John. hasn’t sent you packing.

Maybe it's because this is an anarchist forum?

Quote:
A dolphin maybe?

It's quite well known that dolphins very frequently attempt to initiate sex with humans. Make of that what you will.

JDMF's picture
JDMF
Offline
Joined: 21-05-04
Oct 14 2005 11:43
Ted Heath's Ghost wrote:
Quote:
I’m amazed John. hasn’t sent you packing.

Maybe it's because this is an anarchist forum?

what does anarchism has to do with it?

if you have any anarchist problem with this board it should surely be about unaccountability and lack of transparent processes to choose and recall the moderators, not about "anyone can say and do anything because its an anarchist board."

Ted Heath's Ghost
Offline
Joined: 7-10-05
Oct 14 2005 11:51
Quote:
if you have any anarchist problem with this board it should surely be about unaccountability and lack of transparent processes to choose and recall the moderators, not about "anyone can say and do anything because its an anarchist board."

No, I agree completely. I just don't see suppression of debate as a particularly libertarian instinct. As far as I'm aware, I haven't been offensive, inconsistent or trollish, so I don't see any fair grounds for me being exiled.

I just think that pre-pubescent sexuality is an interesting topic, as is discussion about the abilities of children to think rationally - that doesn't mean that I believe completely what I'm saying or that I haven't changed my views since starting this conversation. I'll drop it, if you want, but to be fair you did pretty much ask for this debate when you started the thread.

Ted Heath's Ghost
Offline
Joined: 7-10-05
Oct 14 2005 11:52

Anyway, I have to go toss off a dolphin at a school, now.

grin

the button's picture
the button
Offline
Joined: 7-07-04
Oct 14 2005 11:55
Ted Heath's Ghost wrote:
Anyway, I have to go toss off a dolphin at a school, now.

grin

You are Che Guevara, and I claim my £5.

Ted Heath's Ghost
Offline
Joined: 7-10-05
Oct 14 2005 11:58

w-w-wha?

the button's picture
the button
Offline
Joined: 7-07-04
Oct 14 2005 12:00
Ted Heath's Ghost wrote:
w-w-wha?

http://libcom.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5119

JDMF's picture
JDMF
Offline
Joined: 21-05-04
Oct 14 2005 13:16
Ted Heath's Ghost wrote:
I'll drop it, if you want, but to be fair you did pretty much ask for this debate when you started the thread.

actually i started this thread with the hope to get answers on how do we deal with sick scum in libertarian society smile

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Oct 14 2005 14:16

see JDMF is suffering from something a disorder that means he can't take a fucking shit without trying to understand it within an anarchist framework, hence even his diet has to be tied into the communism project.

JDMF's picture
JDMF
Offline
Joined: 21-05-04
Oct 14 2005 14:18
Tommy Ascaso wrote:
JDMF wrote:
if you have any anarchist problem with this board it should surely be about unaccountability and lack of transparent processes to choose and recall the moderators, not about "anyone can say and do anything because its an anarchist board."

So because a group of us decided to put together a website we should become accountable to everyone that visits it? confused

nah, not at all. It was just a handy comparison.

JDMF's picture
JDMF
Offline
Joined: 21-05-04
Oct 14 2005 14:19
revol68 wrote:
see JDMF is suffering from something a disorder that means he can't take a fucking shit without trying to understand it within an anarchist framework, hence even his diet has to be tied into the communism project.

thanks mate, thats a really good observation. How about waiting for someone to make a reply first before trying to find good ways to make personal attacks?

You really are an asshole.

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Oct 14 2005 14:25

ah, stop your whining.

It's just this continual need people have to think of ever little fucking thing and personal decision within some sort of anarchist framework.

Anarchism is not a fucking lifestyle guide!

Lazlo_Woodbine
Offline
Joined: 26-09-03
Oct 14 2005 14:26
revol68 wrote:
Anarchism is not a fucking lifestyle guide!

Stop trying to defend the bourgeois division between the personal and the political spheres angry

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Oct 14 2005 14:27

no you see sometimes the personal is just fucking personal.

stop trying to recreate authoritarian master narratvies, modernist fuck!

kalabine
Offline
Joined: 27-03-04
Oct 14 2005 14:28
revol68 wrote:
ah, stop your whining.

It's just this continual need people have to think of ever little fucking thing and personal decision within some sort of anarchist framework.

Anarchism is not a fucking lifestyle guide!

i agree, but he blatantly wasnt doing that on his thread tongue

JDMF's picture
JDMF
Offline
Joined: 21-05-04
Oct 14 2005 14:29
revol68 wrote:
ah, stop your whining.

It's just this continual need people have to think of ever little fucking thing and personal decision within some sort of anarchist framework.

Anarchism is not a fucking lifestyle guide!

well, i have no trouble with the content of what you say, but you still are a proper arse mate.

Now i am not famous for being impatient or getting angry, but you kid piss me off. And this is not because the way you attack me, but the way you are such an arse towards practically anyone, and i have never liked bully boys.

But, this being a cyberspace i cant tell you to fuck off because i can't back it up with anything, so please continue to be like you are mate.

gentle revolutionary
Offline
Joined: 31-10-04
Oct 14 2005 14:51
JDMF wrote:
actually i started this thread with the hope to get answers on how do we deal with sick scum in libertarian society :)

http://www.restorativejustice.org

http://www.extern.org/restorative

http://home.wanadoo.nl/ipce/library_two/scpgt/scapegoat_text.htm

(...)

"The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons."

-- Fyodor Dostoevsky

"Even though we will rejoice over each real improvement that is made to penal law and the penal system - our aim is wider: we ask for radical transformation, not partial changes; we see another principle appear on the horizon: that of a new era, of a brotherly humanity, which will break the principle of punishment."

-- Clara Wichman, Dutch anarcho-pacifist

kalabine
Offline
Joined: 27-03-04
Oct 14 2005 15:07

there's no such thing as an anarcho-pacifist, pacifism is fundamentally opposed to building a libertarian society

Ted Heath's Ghost
Offline
Joined: 7-10-05
Oct 14 2005 15:17

why?

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Oct 14 2005 15:19

ahh i get it, your an anonco pacifist, you wanna be left in peace to fuck the kids.

Ted Heath's Ghost
Offline
Joined: 7-10-05
Oct 14 2005 15:36

Yep, that's precisely why. It's amazing that from the tiny word, "why?", you managed to work out all of that about me! You truly are a genius of god-like abilities.

alibadani
Offline
Joined: 12-09-05
Oct 17 2005 08:41

I think pedophilia is a psychological illness. But I don't think one can divorce psychology from sociology. The mental illnesses people suffer from are linked to the conditions of their existence.

Two good examples: There is almost no anorexia among Africans. Anorexia rates in the U.S are extremely low among Blacks and Latinos. African-American and Latino-American cultures value curvy women, so being very thin isn't a common aspiration. Another example would be someone with an extreme fear of germs (I think it's called verminophobia). Before mankind discovered the existence of germs nobody suffered form that ailment.

Pedophilia is about control and power. It is obviously a reflection of a society in which millions of people are powerless and are controlled in their daily lives. In a real communist society I don't think there would be any pedophiles.

Nick Durie
Offline
Joined: 12-09-04
Oct 17 2005 08:44

Well after a hundred years or so of commmunism that'd maybe be the case yes, but not immediately tho.