IRA , anarchists and N.Ireland

136 posts / 0 new
Last post
revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Oct 17 2006 13:53

I think Jack has got confused somewhat, escalation was the policy of the Provies that dovetailed with the suppression of the Civil Rights movement, not the policy of secret Provies in the Civil Rights movement.

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Oct 17 2006 14:16

Peoples Democracy weren't Provo's but they saw the Civil Rights movement as a stepping stone for a war of national liberation and socialism. The tragic thing is that those voices in the civil rights leadership who could have made the best links with the protestant working class around a class politic were enthralled to a Connellite analysis and were convinced partition was the fundamental lynchpin of injustice and sectarianism on the island and that the struggle against it came above all.

Pumpsie Green's picture
Pumpsie Green
Offline
Joined: 12-05-06
Oct 17 2006 14:19

Minor point (or maybe not), but the line about Sands being arrested for possession of guns is wrong, I think. If I remember rightly, I read he was involved in an incendiary attack at a furniture warehouse and was lifted for that (possession of explosive material maybe?) The same kind of craic that the Real crowd are now at in Newry and other places.

Bobby
Offline
Joined: 22-09-05
Oct 17 2006 14:26

I think this calls for a separate thread on the NICRA and Peoples Democracy. Does anyone have any avaliable info on them?

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Oct 17 2006 14:27

Jack it would hardly be a fucking diservice to Bobby Sands to suggest he might have been involved in an arson campaign, I mean the guy was pretty serious about his politics and no doubt prepared to kill and die for them, the notion he might have been more involved than hiding weapons is hardly crazy.

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Oct 17 2006 14:31

Being told that speculation isn't helpful by someone who just implicated the NICRA in a grand republican plot is a tad rich. tongue

AndrewF's picture
AndrewF
Offline
Joined: 28-02-05
Oct 17 2006 14:35
Jack wrote:
[Did PD have any mass base or 'power' within the wider movement? I'm sure that the people who became the provos had been in it with this intention in the start?

Not really - they were the student trouble makers who were considered by everyone else to be too provocative - those involved in it included anarchists as well as trots. The event which made them famous, the Belfast to Derry march only had around 100 on it and they quite quickly turned into a small rump that joined the USFI trots. Actually I think Organise are working in the Water Tax struggle with the last remenants in Belfast who now call themselves Socialist Democracy - http://www.socialistdemocracy.org/ - (I may be out of date on this). But even PD can't be explained as a republican plot - it was more a case of a mixed bag of (often republican influenced) revolutionaries who saw an opportunity to drive the situation to the left and soon lost what little control and relevance they had. With the emergence of the provos that rump became little more that useful idiots.

I actually can't find a good article on PD online which is weird and a gap that shold be filled - I though the Socialist Democracy website might have one but there is nothing in sight. The wikipedia article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Democracy is pretty shit as it is obviously written from someone in Socialist Democracy and with one exception (the 1986 conference) does not give a picture of how far the later PD had declined in numbers and influence.

AndrewF's picture
AndrewF
Offline
Joined: 28-02-05
Oct 17 2006 14:43
Bobby wrote:
I think this calls for a separate thread on the NICRA and Peoples Democracy. Does anyone have any avaliable info on them?

Actually more than that I think it calls for an anarchist history and analysis of PD to be written and stuck online. Your in Belfast and so have fairly easy access to the Linen Hall library, why not have a go - in a lot of ways it might be the most useful document anarchists could write about what happened. I'd read it for sure.

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Oct 18 2006 14:35

LOL That's fucking hilarious, awh bless the lil martyr's, "sure aren't they just like the lovely Jaysus on the cross".

magidd
Offline
Joined: 23-09-06
Oct 18 2006 14:43

Ret Marut
You could give much the same 'respect' to the republicans in Spain for their bravery, or the Stalinists for the ruthless efficiency with which they pursued their goals.

Comment
I agree about repablicans!

But apparently because the IRA was 'anti-imperialist' and did not have to explicitly crush an organised working class movement (though they undoubtedly would've if necessary) they are supposedly more deserving of praise.

Comment
I am not thinking this way. For me there is no "bad" or "good" nationalism. Thay both bad. Nationalism of small nation and nationalism of big mation is the same shit.
I am talking about absolutly different things. I am just say that alot of modern anarhists are just burgua filisters who prefer burgua life, coutes, some "peasefool protestrs", "good brends", "logo" ets. And comper with them Bobby Sends or some repablicans of 1916 or 1936 looke as revolutionaris- not in udeological level but on personal level.
You did not understand me. And it is very understandeble.

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Oct 18 2006 14:47

what you mean most anarchists aren't died in the wool outlaws, constantly in and out of jail? you mean anarchists are just proles too, trying to get by?

So tell us you big macho twat, what exactly have you been doing that's any different? Duelling over custody of the kids instead of using burga curts? Organising bands of insurrectionary supermarket workers and laying seige to Police stations?

magidd
Offline
Joined: 23-09-06
Oct 18 2006 14:53

Of course i am not talking about all anarhists, i have no doutes that some anarhists are good revolutionaris (in 10 times better than me).
And,Revo68, i am not talking with people like you. I am not so bad about myself.

Deezer
Offline
Joined: 2-10-04
Nov 1 2006 10:50

Um, the Wee Black Booke of Belfast Anarchism published by Organise! as a fundraiser for Just Books has some information on the civil rights movement and Peoples Democracy in it including anarchist involvement. Maybe we could start there with reading up on these events, should provide a nice introduction at least.

MalFunction
Offline
Joined: 31-10-03
Nov 1 2006 11:11

re Peoples Democracy.

you might be able to find copies of paul arthur's "the peoples Democracy 1968-73" published by Blackstaff press in 1974. (Abebooks has a couple that are very expensive secondhand)

In the 1969 elections they got 23,645 votes
NILP got 45,121,
Republican Labour got 13,155
Nationalists got 42,315

(before the days of SDLP and sinn fein as political parties standing in elections)

unionists (pro and anti o'neill got over 350,000 votes to give you a sense of proportion.)

PD from what i remember started off as a radical off-shoot of the main civil rights movement.

it was the rapid escalation in the troubles which eventually lead them to being cheer leaders for PIRA - by about 1972/3.

Bobby
Offline
Joined: 22-09-05
Nov 1 2006 12:37

Wilkipedia has some info on Peoples Democracy here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Democracy

AndrewF's picture
AndrewF
Offline
Joined: 28-02-05
Nov 1 2006 15:36

Following on from this thread it turns out a WSM member has a copy of Anarchy from around 1971 in which a lot of the articles are written by PD members. He is going to see about scanning them.

Bobby
Offline
Joined: 22-09-05
Nov 1 2006 16:11

nice one, i would like to have a look as it is an important part of our recent past that needs to be explored and hopefully these documents can encourage this.

revol68's picture
revol68
Offline
Joined: 23-02-04
Nov 1 2006 16:19

well Peoples Democracy where kinda all over the shop theoretically, it was only really their position that inequality could not be reached without the destruction of partition and a socialist united ireland that kept them together. Some members when onto the INLA, others joined Sinn Fein and the rest kind of moved into a critical support position for the IRA. Socialist Democracy came from the small rump that was left and they are linked to one of the hundred trot internationals for the reformation of the fourth international or some such shite.

patchanga
Offline
Joined: 15-10-06
Apr 9 2007 16:04

Ret Marut (from Page 3, a long time ago)
I've only just come back to the forum...sorry for leaving you unanswered for such a long time. I think words are still being put in my mouth. I don't see anything inconsistent with what I wrote. If you re-read what you quote, you'll see that I don't praise IRA members: I said I had respect for them. Similarly, it is not the IRA I find admirable, it is the realisation that individuals can work together to bring about political change.Nevertheless, whilst I am not an anarcho-nationalist, I do accept that I am probably guilty of operating in accordance with the hierarchy of sympathy. This is undoubtedly because my earliest political affiliations were Irish republican and, like Catholicism, it takes a lot to get over that.

In brief, I take your point and consider it well made. Consequently, I stand corrected.

georgestapleton's picture
georgestapleton
Offline
Joined: 4-08-05
Apr 10 2007 01:14
revol68 wrote:
Socialist Democracy came from the small rump that was left and they are linked to one of the hundred trot internationals for the reformation of the fourth international or some such shite.

I'll have you know that Socialist Democracy is the irish section of THE fourth international. All the other trot international were kinda splits from it.

Red Marriott's picture
Red Marriott
Offline
Joined: 7-05-06
Apr 11 2007 13:53
patchanga wrote:
In brief, I take your point and consider it well made.

Thanks. Your mode of exchange is exemplary. cool