You've been aggressive from the beginning you fucking cocksucker so let's be clear.
The problem is this: Libcom has defined itself, no doubt rightly, via the act of expelling certain traits and affinities which it identified with certain individuals – if it had not done this there would only be the continued mess of enrager.com. However, all definition includes contradiction and these contradictions must be later addressed. Red is speaking from a position of that which was designated as beyond the pale. However, it now seems that those traits and affinities which Libcom projected onto those it (effectively) expelled in its formation actually also logically belong to Libcom users, and must be included if Libcom is not to end up making pro-capitalist statements in favour of the rule of Law.
Every organisation reaches a moment where it is futile to continue to externalise that which properly belongs within its own frame, and it becomes necessary to consider how what has been disavowed might be reconciled. The return of the repressed is sometimes a violent matter, and yet what has been repressed will only be accepted back if it appears in a different guise, or at a higher level of sophistication if you like. Even so, the ‘work of the other’ is vital to the continuation of all internal group power relations – the content of its work is to become part of the included, and for this to occur, the other must raise its appeal and become irresistible. To put this clearly, I want to raise my arguments to a level where they have to be included, and so I am trying to speak in new terms for that which was once dismissed in the formation of Libcom as hippy. liberal, utopian, mad. My motivation is that certain strands in the arguments being made against these excluded designations (which I accept at the time were necessary) are now becoming indefensibly leftist.
In all social forms, it is always a question of the route that must be taken by that which was once excluded for it to be reconciled with the included – for this to happen a shift in the rules of belonging must also occur. When this reordering has been completed and the account of how the parts are fitted together has been written, it will inevitably become apparent that either some other element is found to be logically excluded by the internal relations or that some element must be actively excluded because it now does not conform to the new boundaries that have been set.
Through knowledge of this process by which what was once beyond the pale becomes included, and once re-included in a new guise causes the transformation of the internal relations, ie precipitating previous included forms to be cast out, we arrive at a position where Law as such is no longer required but is replaced by a more conscious understanding of what form necessity has taken (ie in the endless cycle of expulsions and inclusions that make up human society).
Can comment on articles and discussions
Ha ha. How's your increased expression of VMAT2 genes coming along comrades? I bet neither of you are alcoholics.