red anarchism

59 replies [Last post]
User offline. Last seen 3 years 9 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 26-09-03

ok, i have noticed that basically there is a huge division between red and green anarchism. I guess we all like to argue about it because it makes us feel like we might actually be doing something.

but i just wanted to ask - what has red anarchism achieved in the last 10 years?

surely green anarchism has fought against roads, fought for our land and actually beat the state in many circumstances.

what do red anarchists do>?

rkn
rkn's picture
User offline. Last seen 11 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 17-07-06

*sizzle*

grin

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 28-10-03

Err what is 'red' anarchism. I've never met anyone who calls themself a 'red' anarchist'.

In terms of Ireland rather than Britain one very detailed list of what one groups of anarchists have been doing (with lots of photos) can be found at http://struggle.ws/wsm/news.html

It also shows the that weird division you use above is pretty irrelevant

User offline. Last seen 9 hours 51 min ago. Offline
Joined: 8-11-03

I guess I could be called a red anarchist, but strangely found myself quite busy round here a few years ago fighting the M66.

Sorry, beanis. A false division - or at least it ought to be.

User offline. Last seen 7 hours 39 min ago. Offline
Joined: 30-09-03

Hmmm, i think there is a real division: between collectivist, materialist, class struggle anarchists and individualist, idealist, utopian 'anarchists'.

I guess you fall into the later category Peanis. tongue

red n black star circle A

User offline. Last seen 7 hours 50 min ago. Offline
Joined: 26-09-03

Beanis, your rejection of class politics is your choice, but some 'reds' do follow green issues so I reject the green/red divide people keep throwing up. However Im startled by some of the things I read in Green Anarchy.

The point however is those who try to engineer change through class struggle are more bound to the tides of political change linked to wide social political factors that are currently more than the sum of our own forces. We are and will continue to be in the low ebb unless we can muster our forces,

red n black star star green black

Hopefully see you at the SHAC demo on Sat 17th April

User offline. Last seen 3 years 9 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 26-09-03
nastyned wrote:
Hmmm, i think there is a real division: between collectivist, materialist, class struggle anarchists and individualist, idealist, utopian 'anarchists'.

I guess you fall into the later category Peanis. tongue

red n black star circle A

right, im going to turn in to a communist. red salute! :red:

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 21-02-04

"red anarchists", or to use the real term "anarcho-syndicalists" do actually do things, shockingly enough. It just happens that the activities of green anarchists are often more visible. Look at any website for an anarcho-syndicalist union and there are loads of little struggles, for better pay or breaks or shorter hours, stopping lay-offs etc. I got these examples from the CNT Spain website (you can tell theyre genuine by the poor translation;

Demonstrate against the ascent of pay of los/as políticos/as. Popular initiative against the Mangoneo

CNT of Sherry (Cadiz) (03-02-04)

The CNT demands an agreement for the administrators of urban property

www.eldiariomontanes.es (01-02-04)

Resolution of theKrug-Naval conflict. Against the great power of the patronos

CNT of Vigo (12-03-04)

Were all doing our part.

User offline. Last seen 7 hours 39 min ago. Offline
Joined: 30-09-03
beanis wrote:
right, im going to turn in to a communist. red salute! :red:

In that case why don't you fuck off to North Korea then? wink grin

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 24-10-03
nastyned wrote:
beanis wrote:
right, im going to turn in to a communist. red salute! :red:

In that case why don't you fuck off to North Korea then? wink grin

Because he would get, very very hungry, very, very quickly!

wheresmyshoes's picture
User offline. Last seen 29 weeks 5 days ago. Offline
Joined: 19-09-03
Augusto_Sandino wrote:
"red anarchists", or to use the real term "anarcho-syndicalists"

'real term' i'm a red anarchist and i'm not a syndalicalist,i'm an anarcho-communist confused

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 21-02-04

Well, yeah ok then, i can accept that, my bad. I just interpreted the attack as being against anarcho-syndicalists becuase a Green Anarchist could also be a communist. Besides, the original point that anarcho-syndicalists are achieveing little things all the time still stands.

User offline. Last seen 4 days 11 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 20-02-04
beanis wrote:
ok, i have noticed that basically there is a huge division between red and green anarchism. I guess we all like to argue about it because it makes us feel like we might actually be doing something.

but i just wanted to ask - what has red anarchism achieved in the last 10 years?

surely green anarchism has fought against roads, fought for our land and actually beat the state in many circumstances.

what do red anarchists do>?

Well whoever heard of revolutions started by people digging holes under motorway routes? Class struggle, on the other hand, is responsible for at least 5 or 6 full scale revolutions against capitalism, albeit ones defeated by anti-working class forces (and I include Russia in that category), as well as numerous smaller uprisings and pressure towards social reform. What you call green anarchism hasn't really done much apart from look bad on the news.

Jack's picture
User offline. Last seen 4 hours 6 min ago. Offline
Joined: 22-09-03
redyred wrote:
What you call green anarchism hasn't really done much apart from look bad on the news.

Oh come on, be fair, Green Anarchism has played a really, really successful role in alienating anarchism from 99% of society.

Joined: 19-09-03

I think the difference is that at least Green Anarchists have looked "bad in the news" recently!

Where as the rest of us, don't even manage that, much less and recent Working Class uprisings...

And I am refering to the UK and the US, not Europe, where people seem to have their shit together a bit more.

User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 20-09-03
Quote:
Well whoever heard of revolutions started by people digging holes under motorway routes?

um, well maybe not revolutions, but preventing new roads from being build directly attacks the flow of capital and capitalism's attempts at expansion. and just cos only the mud monkeys got on the news doesn't mean that they didn't have support in the working class communities near some of the planned routes, with the locals doing plenty of monkeywrenching etc.

and i think that it is a fair question to ask what anarchists who aren't completely focused on 'green' issues do, even if only to suddenly discover that there's some effective activity going on somewhere in this country (pointing to what the cnt or whoever is doing outside of the uk doesn't count in this, seeing as the activities of the greens that is being focused on is in this country...). personally i think the main reason that people know about the environmental type protesters is that they are effective in what they set out to do, and most people don't care if you have a good position on argentina or if you think trade unions are good or bad or whatever, they will only be interested in something if it is visibly achieving something in the here and now.

the anti-roads protests effectively destroyed the road building programme in britain. what projects, activities, campaigns etc. focused on more traditional arenas of class struggle started by or with a visible anarchist presence have actually been successful in the last ten years, locally or nationally? there must be some, but right now i can't think of any off the top of my head. if we stopped whining about the green focused types not going after what we consider the real targets and actually tried to do something effective instead, then we might actually be some way towards being a worthwhile movement... if your going to whine about someone at least whine about fucking marxists and other lefty parasites rather than people who have very similar politics to us just with a different focus.

fuck i hate sectarianism... fight the real enemy: trots! wink

Ed
Ed's picture
User offline. Last seen 2 days 18 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 1-10-03

Er, well Beanis, red Anarchists have done fuckloads. We just do it on a more local scale, at our workplaces, in our communities, in our schools/colleges. You know, trying to create a grassroots anarchist movement. What have Green Anarchists been doing except for calling for gassing commuters on the tube and producing quasi-Fascist publications?

Personally, I've got a massive respect for the anti-roads lot and had I been six or seven years older, I prolly would've joined them. I care deeply for the environment, I just think that maybe engaging with the people around me is a better way of spreading anarchist ideas. But you know, if you want to reject the revolutionary potential of the working class a.k.a the VAST majority of the world, then fine. And if you don't even believe there is a working class then I'm not even gonna engage in discussion with you.

CLASS PRIDE red n black star red n black star red n black star red n black star red n black star WORLD WIDE

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 21-02-04

But as much as i'm all for anarcho-syndicalism, you do have to admit theyre pretty naff in Britain. The continent and South America are the blueprint.

User offline. Last seen 2 years 33 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 27-06-06
Augusto_Sandino wrote:
But as much as i'm all for anarcho-syndicalism, you do have to admit theyre pretty naff in Britain. The continent and South America are the blueprint.

The very different history and the fear of many British anarchists to get involved in workplace or with working class organisation may explain that. red n black star

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 7-10-03
Augusto_Sandino wrote:
But as much as i'm all for anarcho-syndicalism, you do have to admit theyre pretty naff in Britain. The continent and South America are the blueprint.

You don't know what you're talking about. Britain has a long and proud direct action unionist tradition. I've spoken to spaniards who talk glowingly about British class warfare.

Everything important is always somewhere over there and anything mucky and complicated is unimportant because it doesn't conform to some soap dodger's fantasy. Zapatistas, Guantanamo Bay, Palastine, Argentina all those places are relying on *us* to overthrow our ruling class *here*.

I support the building of even bigger wider faster roads so the dog-on-a-string brigade will fuck off to Hampshire or somewhere & annoy someone else.

User offline. Last seen 3 years 9 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 26-09-03
brizzul wrote:
I support the building of even bigger wider faster roads so the dog-on-a-string brigade will fuck off to Hampshire or somewhere & annoy someone else.

bloody hell, i cant believe you can say that. but im not that supprised actually.

User offline. Last seen 2 years 22 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 20-09-03

what GenerationTerrorist says, innit?

If we look back over the past 10-15 years in the uk what other prodominantly anarchist movement has had that level of success? The anti-roads movement took on the state and capital and to a large extent won- 500 out of 600 of the road building plans in the mid 90's cancelled. In economic terms that's £12.5 billion pounds of public expendature. It mobilsed 1000's of people and cpature the public imagination in the way that no other recent movment i'm aware of has?

Also shows how rediculous this red/green division is. Don't think i've ever met anyone at anti-roads camps that didn't see capitalism as one of the core issues. Or see this as a forms of protest amongst wider movement for social change that would encompass work place organisation. It's also had examplery acts of community building. I've spent nights in the SW australian rainforests with local construction workers who'd brought along there tools and machinary, spending all night dig up logging roads getting pissed on moonshine. A bunch of working class people getting together to defend there common interest against capitalism. Was down at blackwood in wales the other week- where a bunch of locals have spent the past month camping there to defend the local wood land. Also had ex-miners down there giving advice on how to shore up tunnles. All this is a really good oppotunity to share skills on community self manangement and get people to think reflexively about anarchy.

But instead of actually looking at what was successful about the anti roads movement or any other examples of coomunity building or direct action, intstead lets reify ourselves into two opposing camps and never talk to each. The crap that's been going on enrager lately is pathetic- why is acceptable for anarchist to call for the murder(if even in a joking manner) of other anarchist cos they don't agree with the specifics of there politics? Why are we spending all are time building up boggie men- evil anarcho-primivitists who'd eat working class babies whilst wiping there arse on a copy of conquest of the bread. Or some 'anarcho-trot' that would ensalve us all to selling papers and analysising the grundrisse for all eternity. I'm mean for fucks sake whos' actually meet a primivitist? I'm mean a really one? Someone who commited to the return to hunter-gather existence to the extent there not involved in positive radical projects as opposed to someone who reckons elements of the primitivist critique are worth taking seriously or adopts it as a kind of joking identity?

Anyway instead of some crap platitude about red and green joining together and dancing merily to the revolution, instead i'll post a piture of a prarie dog with amchine gun

Now all fight it out whether he's red or green

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 21-02-04

Yeah, im not denying Britain has a glowing record of unionism, as late as the miner's strike, but i dont think alot of of it was anarchist influenced.

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 21-02-04

And both the anti-greens and anti-reds here are being utterly crushed by the "united front" people. We dont want to end up fighting amongst ourselves when ourselves could probably be counted on two hands, so im with the united front.

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 16-09-03
beanis wrote:
brizzul wrote:
I support the building of even bigger wider faster roads so the dog-on-a-string brigade will fuck off to Hampshire or somewhere & annoy someone else.

bloody hell, i cant believe you can say that. but im not that supprised actually.

Er, well you do realise that s/he's joking then yes?

Man you greens should get a sense of humour! grin

User offline. Last seen 39 years 48 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 16-09-03
captainmission wrote:
what GenerationTerrorist says, innit?

Best post today - definitely.

And that picture has to be on an enrager sticker when we get round to making them black bloc

Also in reply to beanis's question, apart from the fact that as people have pointed out the red/green divide is a false one, and it's kind of a silly question as people with particular politics don't work alone on any campaigns, AFA pretty comprehensively smashed the BNP and NF off the streets over the past 20-odd years. AFA outside London and Manchester was mostly run by class struggle anarchists.

Joined: 15-10-03

Has everyone entering into this debate read the history of the UK rad-green movement in Do or Die #10? I think its worth a read for anyone who isn't /hasnt been involved in eco-direct action over the past x amount of years, or people who want to know more about it.

User offline. Last seen 9 weeks 5 days ago. Offline
Joined: 7-10-03
captainmission wrote:
Also shows how rediculous this red/green division is.

Excellent post smile

Joined: 15-10-03

Just realised that article i mentioned is online here;

http://www.eco-action.org/dod/no10/empire.htm

User offline. Last seen 9 hours 51 min ago. Offline
Joined: 8-11-03

Class struggle doesn't only take place in workplaces or on estates. It happens wherever the interests of capital are confronted. Roadbuilding was, and is, a crucial part of capital's programme for globalisation and expansion. We temporarily stopped it in the 90s. Wait for the rerun!

Joined: 15-03-04
knightrose wrote:
Class struggle doesn't only take place in workplaces or on estates. It happens wherever the interests of capital are confronted. Roadbuilding was, and is, a crucial part of capital's programme for globalisation and expansion. We temporarily stopped it in the 90s. Wait for the rerun!

agreed, when they go to pull down housing or target recreation areas, its always the poor who suffer, its not like they build roads through prime real estate or something

and anyway environmentalism isn't just linked to class struggle it IS class struggle. Environementalism is against the misuse of technology by the ruling class, who are the first to suffer from the misuse of this technology? the proletariat of course.