The slight hinderances of class

Submitted by voline on 27 August, 2007 - 17:22.

Dear libcommers,

I introduced myself to this forum appropriately some months ago. I have also posted replies I think only in the thought forum. My posts are few in number and one refers to a web site which I might believe was visited by one of your users who rated those posts of mine which were there more highly than I myself. I have a long association with the left dating back to the days when British Soldiers described eating tin foil to get out of Northern Ireland at LPYS meetings. As a teenager I graduated to anarchism, attracted by its freedoms. It is only recently that I discovered that with those freedoms come heavy responsibilities. Freedom is a gamble with risks for the immature but pays out 110% if invested in.

Now I'll cut the crap. I went to an anarchist meeting and came away with an Eat The Rich sticker. Kropotkin was rich. Engles was rich. Voline was a freemason. What is you boys have with class struggle?

This is class explained in Britain. There are three clubs. The working class, the middle class and the ruling class. Each has its own rules. Member of each think their own club is better than the other two. They fight. They slander each other. They sleep with each other. They are like teenagers behind the bike shed fighting to be first in line.

We (anarchists) are not looking for superiority. We are striving for fraternity, liberty and equality. You don't get these by spitting on people.

I have been thinking of how to help other anarchists recently. I have come to realise that despite the fact that I am as a poor as a church mouse with a little more than enough cheese to subsist that I am in fact incredibly well connected to huge numbers of people of all classes (although my ride needs pimping). I am knocking at your door as first visit of a newly found man and I KNOW others will open their door to me if you refuse.

Yours expecting the usual laughter and silence,
Voline.
p.s. I don't like Microsoft shops

27 August, 2007 - 17:27

how well connceted :ninja:

27 August, 2007 - 17:37

yeah i know i hate all rich people. Every last one of them. roll eyes

27 August, 2007 - 17:44

I think the answer is don't hang around with stupid anarchists. Class struggle is nothing to do with a kind of Ealing comedy style sociological view of class.

Lots of rich people are knobs though.

28 August, 2007 - 23:40

it's not like all rich people are horrid folk (or all poor are wonderful class warriors oioi), but placing hopes for a great social transformation - along the lines of Anarchism/libertarian communism - on the rich, in general, isnt too likely. what i mean is, the main avenue of action is gonna have to be at the bottom, and any rich people who might get involved in the movement need to come to grips with that, i think. i'm not sure if you were thinking opposite of what i'm saying here or not, though.

29 August, 2007 - 00:01

'Eat the rich' is nothing to do with class struggle - the sticker ought to read - 'expropriate the rich'.

29 August, 2007 - 08:43

Voline, when we refer to the working class here it is usually meant as that group in society that has the revolutionary potential to overcome capitalism. It is not an identity or a category in which its members can be counted, it is an active process. Working class also refers to alienated wage-labour, and much much more.

Volin, how do you, as an anarchist, propose how (and why) social change can occur?

31 August, 2007 - 20:51
voline wrote:
Dear libcommers,

I introduced myself to this forum appropriately some months ago. I have also posted replies I think only in the thought forum. My posts are few in number and one refers to a web site which I might believe was visited by one of your users who rated those posts of mine which were there more highly than I myself. I have a long association with the left dating back to the days when British Soldiers described eating tin foil to get out of Northern Ireland at LPYS meetings. As a teenager I graduated to anarchism, attracted by its freedoms. It is only recently that I discovered that with those freedoms come heavy responsibilities. Freedom is a gamble with risks for the immature but pays out 110% if invested in.

Now I'll cut the crap. I went to an anarchist meeting and came away with an Eat The Rich sticker. Kropotkin was rich. Engles was rich. Voline was a freemason. What is you boys have with class struggle?

This is class explained in Britain. There are three clubs. The working class, the middle class and the ruling class. Each has its own rules. Member of each think their own club is better than the other two. They fight. They slander each other. They sleep with each other. They are like teenagers behind the bike shed fighting to be first in line.

We (anarchists) are not looking for superiority. We are striving for fraternity, liberty and equality. You don't get these by spitting on people.

I have been thinking of how to help other anarchists recently. I have come to realise that despite the fact that I am as a poor as a church mouse with a little more than enough cheese to subsist that I am in fact incredibly well connected to huge numbers of people of all classes (although my ride needs pimping). I am knocking at your door as first visit of a newly found man and I KNOW others will open their door to me if you refuse.

Yours expecting the usual laughter and silence,
Voline.
p.s. I don't like Microsoft shops

Did he say PIMP

31 August, 2007 - 22:55

oh your that 3rd person dickhead.

do one.

1 September, 2007 - 02:04

What i don't like about class, dude, is like the teacher gets to do all the talking and the students in the class they just, like, sit there, you know? And it's like all hierarchical.

1 September, 2007 - 05:17
guydebordisdead wrote:
'Eat the rich' is nothing to do with class struggle - the sticker ought to read - 'expropriate the rich'.

Eating the rich saves on groceries.

1 September, 2007 - 11:13

yeah if you're groceries were human flesh... confused

2 September, 2007 - 09:06
Khawaga wrote:
Voline, when we refer to the working class here it is usually meant as that group in society that has the revolutionary potential to overcome capitalism. It is not an identity or a category in which its members can be counted, it is an active process. Working class also refers to alienated wage-labour, and much much more.

Volin, how do you, as an anarchist, propose how (and why) social change can occur?

I MUST STATE THIS

I am not Volin, I am Voline. Kindly read.

Voline.

2 September, 2007 - 09:10
Tacks wrote:
oh your that 3rd person dickhead.

do one.

Dear Tacks,

I have realised the error of my ways. I have adopted a different form of communication: verse rather than prose in which being humble not using the word "I" is acceptable.

Voline not volin

2 September, 2007 - 09:15

Tacks posted insinuations about human flesh.

Dear Tacks,

thank you for everything. I have learnt now that I can survive on my bare bones devoid of human flesh. I will restate my ideas elsewhere now that you have helped me.

Voline not volin.

3 September, 2007 - 11:10

oh my.

3 September, 2007 - 15:35
Quote:
I MUST STATE THIS

I am not Volin, I am Voline. Kindly read.

Voline.

So I spelt it correctly in the beginning, and then I didn't in the end. Kindly read.

3 September, 2007 - 16:06

Shit volin seems pretty angry here. sad

3 September, 2007 - 17:07

yeah, that volin guy get's pretty pissed if we don't spell his name correctly V-O-L-I-N. VOLIN.

There. Now he must be happy.

4 September, 2007 - 18:22

You are no more volin or voline than I am guydebord or dead.

4 September, 2007 - 18:33

Prolly can't even play a violin.

4 September, 2007 - 23:03

Voline was vermin anyway, not really worth getting indignant about his legacy...

4 September, 2007 - 23:09
Jack wrote:
Voline was vermin anyway

Too right. Himself, Malatesta and Goldman are so over-rated.

4 September, 2007 - 23:09

double post.

4 September, 2007 - 23:09
Jack wrote:
Voline was vermin anyway, not really worth getting indignant about his legacy...

What the fuck? You're just being a fucking idiot saying shit like that.

What made him vermin?

4 September, 2007 - 23:38
revol68 wrote:
What the fuck? You're just being a fucking idiot saying shit like that.

What made him vermin?

His shit politics.

But you like Bakunin and Malatesta, so your opinion on famous anarchists is automatically wrong.

4 September, 2007 - 23:39
guydebordisdead wrote:
Too right. Himself, Malatesta and Goldman are so over-rated.

To be fair tho, does anyone who isn't a nob think any of them apart from Malatesta isn't a twat?

Not that Malatesta isn't a cunt.

4 September, 2007 - 23:44
Jack wrote:
does anyone who isn't a nob think any of them apart from Malatesta isn't a twat?

Jack, this sentence is a bit much.

4 September, 2007 - 23:47

Which serious anarchist that you know thinks voline or Goldman has any value whatsoever then?

4 September, 2007 - 23:48

ps people who forgive goldmans supremely shit politics because she's a woman automatically fall into the "nob" category.

4 September, 2007 - 23:58

No, I literally meant your sentence was a bit much. It contained a string of negatives which rendered it impossible to understand.